Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> After Action Report >> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR Page: <<   < prev  30 31 [32] 33 34   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/30/2016 5:24:17 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 8. Nov/Dec 1940. End of Turn. Conquests. France Conquered by Germany.

No choice where France was concerned. The fall of France resulted in 2 chits being added to the US Germany/Italy entry pool.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 931
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/30/2016 5:25:31 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 8. Nov/Dec 1940. End of Turn. Conquests. France's New Home Country.

Those in the French government who could get out did and set up France's government in exile in Senegal.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 8/30/2016 5:26:13 AM >

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 932
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/30/2016 5:26:36 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 8. Nov/Dec 1940. End of Turn. Conquests. Captured French Ships.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 933
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/30/2016 5:27:12 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 8. Nov/Dec 1940. End of Turn. Conquests. French Ship Wanting to Fight On.

And with this post I'm off to bed. Past my bedtime again.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 8/30/2016 5:28:49 AM >

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 934
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/30/2016 2:20:08 PM   
brian brian

 

Posts: 3191
Joined: 11/16/2005
Status: offline 		Darn, Mao is cheated out of a Battleship again.

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 935
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/30/2016 10:19:16 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: brian brian

Darn, Mao is cheated out of a Battleship again.



_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to brian brian)
Post #: 936
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/30/2016 11:16:56 PM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		JF41: Axis year start scrap and JF reinforcements shown in images below.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 937
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/31/2016 1:01:35 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 9. Jan/Feb 1941. Trade.

There's two non-mandatory trade agreements, both highlighted in blue. One is axis and one is allied. The remaining trade agreements are mandatory.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 938
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/31/2016 1:04:21 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 9. Jan/Feb 1941. Initiate, First Roll.

The allies win the first roll for initiative, 9 to 8.

Do you wish to re-roll?

And if you do and win would you wish to move first or second?

By the way, I'm not understanding something. Why would the axis win ties? You moved first last turn. Is this a bug? The allies won the initiate last turn but let the axis move first.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 8/31/2016 1:37:44 AM >

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 939
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/31/2016 4:03:11 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		I will not demand a re-roll.

I believe I win ties because you won the initiative last turn. You had me move first, but you still had won the initiative.

< Message edited by ashkpa -- 8/31/2016 4:04:12 AM >

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 940
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/31/2016 4:22:37 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		From 6.1 in the RAC, first paragraph, last sentence: "If tied, the side that had the initiative from the previous turn loses."

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 941
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/31/2016 12:26:38 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ashkpa

From 6.1 in the RAC, first paragraph, last sentence: "If tied, the side that had the initiative from the previous turn loses."

OK. Thanks!

quote:

ORIGINAL: ashkpa

I will not demand a re-roll.

I believe I win ties because you won the initiative last turn. You had me move first, but you still had won the initiative.
And since it worked out so well last turn I decide to let you move first this turn.

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 942
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/31/2016 12:27:24 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 9. Jan/Feb 1941. Axis #1. Weather.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 943
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/31/2016 4:24:42 PM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		Germany aligns Hungary, resulting in a chit going into the Ge/It entry pool.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 944
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 8/31/2016 5:01:44 PM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		JF41 i1:
Axis actions: JP, IT combined; GE naval.
Germany and Italy have flown 1 fighter each into the 2-box of the W. Med.
Germany and Italy have moved their subs into the 4 and 3 box of the BoB respectively.
The Germans have moved several CP and the Amph and Tran out to the Baltic.
The Germans are currently moving 3 ships (the Bismarck, Deutschland, and Graf Spree) into the N. Sea. Will you intercept?
The Germans have 3 other ships (Gnie., Scharnhorst, Adm. Hipper) ready to leave Kiel (will you intercept them if they move?)




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by ashkpa -- 8/31/2016 5:03:20 PM >

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 945
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/1/2016 12:32:04 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		The Germans are currently moving 3 ships (the Bismarck, Deutschland, and Graf Spree) into the N. Sea. Will you intercept? No.

The Germans have 3 other ships (Gnie., Scharnhorst, Adm. Hipper) ready to leave Kiel (will you intercept them if they move?) No.


_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 946
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/1/2016 4:17:35 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		JF41 i1:
Per instructions, no interceptions. The first 3 ships moved on to the Faeroes Gap 1-box. The next 3 moved to the N. Sea and stopped in the 4-box.
Possible combats shown below.
I do not initiate combat in the Faeroes Gap.
I do initiate in the N. Sea (disorganize the Schwarnhorst). Rolls of 6/8 meant no contact.
BoB in next post.
You may want to think about what will react to the W. Med and into which box.





Attachment (1)

< Message edited by ashkpa -- 9/1/2016 4:18:44 AM >

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 947
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/1/2016 4:21:45 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		JF41 i1: Bay of Biscay
Round 1 searches 1/8 (disorganized the 3pt German sub to initiate the combat). [I'm feeling somewhat bad about my good luck with subs over the last 2 turns. But not enough to stop the attacks. ]
Subs engage the 0-box only with 11 surprise points.
Move the damage up to 3X 2A.
Will the CW stay for rnd 2?




Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 948
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/1/2016 5:12:48 AM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		The CW stays in the Bay of Biscay.

West Med - no reaction.

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 9/1/2016 5:15:58 AM >

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 949
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/1/2016 5:21:04 AM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		2nd round rolls of 6/2 meant the allies found. I avoided combat for you. Where do you want the 2 aborted CP to go?

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 950
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/1/2016 12:33:07 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Portsmouth.

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 951
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/1/2016 11:10:42 PM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		JF41 i1:
W. Med, the GE fighter initiates. rolls 6/5 -> no contact.

I'm assuming the CW will not initiate in the Faeroes Gap and continue with this assumption.

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 952
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/1/2016 11:43:28 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ashkpa

JF41 i1:
W. Med, the GE fighter initiates. rolls 6/5 -> no contact.

I'm assuming the CW will not initiate in the Faeroes Gap and continue with this assumption.

Wow, you read my mind. No wonder you're kicking my butt!

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 953
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/2/2016 5:54:17 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 9. Jan/Feb 1941. Allied #3. Actions.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 954
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/2/2016 6:01:53 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 9. Jan/Feb 1941. Allied #3. Questions.

I have some questions on whether or not you wish to try to intercept and initiate combat in two different areas. But first, I like to give an overview of the situation in the Faeroes Gap and North Sea, which could influence your decisions.

In the Faeroes gap, the allies made no naval moves that would give the axis the opportunity to try to initiate combat. I will not try so there will be no naval combat in that sea area this impulse.

In the North Sea, the RN moved in a task force that will try to engage the KM. So, there will be an attempted naval combat, initiate by the allies, in the North Sea this impulse.

Now the questions, which are in the next two posts.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 9/2/2016 6:15:30 PM >

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 955
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/2/2016 6:05:56 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 9. Jan/Feb 1941. Allied #3. Bay of Biscay. Two Questions.

1. Do you wish to attempt an intercept against the 4-4 transport loaded with the Whilwind fighter unit? If so, which unit would you like to use to try.

2. Do you wish to attempt to initiate combat in the Bay of Biscay. If so, and if you answered no to question 1, which unit would you like to use to try.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 956
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/2/2016 6:08:19 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 9. Jan/Feb 1941. Allied #3. Western Med.

During the naval air phase the CW flew two Beau-fighter units to the 3-box in the Western Med. The allies will not attempt to initiate a naval combat. Do you wish to? If so, which unit would you like to use for the attempt? And do you wish to add any additional air units to fray? If so, which ones?




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 9/2/2016 6:16:40 PM >

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 957
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/2/2016 6:56:53 PM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline
quote:

Turn 9. Jan/Feb 1941. Allied #3. Bay of Biscay. Two Questions.

1. Do you wish to attempt an intercept against the 4-4 transport loaded with the Whilwind fighter unit? If so, which unit would you like to use to try.

2. Do you wish to attempt to initiate combat in the Bay of Biscay. If so, and if you answered no to question 1, which unit would you like to use to try.

No to both questions.

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 958
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/2/2016 7:01:15 PM   
ashkpa


Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline
quote:

Turn 9. Jan/Feb 1941. Allied #3. Western Med.

During the naval air phase the CW flew two Beau-fighter units to the 3-box in the Western Med. The allies will not attempt to initiate a naval combat. Do you wish to? If so, which unit would you like to use for the attempt? And do you wish to add any additional air units to fray? If so, which ones?


I will pass at this time.

(in reply to rkr1958)
Post #: 959
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/2/2016 10:45:32 PM   
rkr1958


Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline 		Turn 9. Jan/Feb 1941. Allied #3. RN. Contested Sea Areas, No Combat.

1. The CW transport loaded with the Whirlwind fighter unit, which axis subs make no attempt to intercept, passes through the Bay of Biscay and Cape St. Vincent to stop in Gibraltar.

2. Faeroes Gap, no combat (allies), no opportunity to initiate (axis).

3. Bay of Biscay, no combat (allies & axis).

4. Western Med, no combat (allies & axis).




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)
Post #: 960
Page:   <<   < prev  30 31 [32] 33 34   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> After Action Report >> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR Page: <<   < prev  30 31 [32] 33 34   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.969