RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> After Action Report >> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Page: << < prev 31 32 [33] 34 35 next > >>

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/2/2016 10:50:27 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 9. Jan/Feb 1941. Allied #3. RN. North Sea, Combat.

1. In the North Sea the CA Fiji in the 3-box will try to initiate combat.

2. The French sub unit is NOT committed.

3. Search rolls are 2 (allies) and 4 (axis). The RN ships in the 3 & 4 box find the three KM ships in the 4-box. The KM ships are surprised.

4. The allies use their 2 surprise points to increase damage against the three KM ships.

5. What are your instructions for applying the 1 destroyed, 2 damaged and 2 aborted to the three KM ships?

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 9/2/2016 10:52:07 PM >

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 961

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/2/2016 11:31:54 PM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

quote:

5. What are your instructions for applying the 1 destroyed, 2 damaged and 2 aborted to the three KM ships?

X on Admiral Hipper
D on Gneissenau
D on Scharnhorst
A's won't matter, Germans aborting the sea zone. Any non damaged ships abort to Brest.

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 962

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/3/2016 12:08:11 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 9. Jan/Feb 1941. Allied #3. RN. North Sea, Naval Battle.

Both sides lose a heavy cruiser. The two German pocket battleships avoid damage but are forced to abort. Disappointing from the allies perspective as the two German pocket battleships were fleeing the sea area anyway.

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 9/3/2016 2:25:04 AM >

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 963

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/3/2016 12:24:23 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 9. Jan/Feb 1941. Allied #3. CW Naval Reorg.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 964

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/3/2016 12:27:36 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 9. Jan/Feb 1941. Axis #5. Weather.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 965

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/3/2016 1:59:06 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

JF41 i5:
All axis powers took land actions.
Ground strikes on Sian were successful.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 966

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/3/2016 4:02:45 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

JF41 i5: Move and Attack.
Occupied one Chinese city during movement (US cared) and one during advance (no reporters). Used all of the JP airforce for Gsupport.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 967

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/3/2016 4:14:50 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

JF41 i5: China and East Africa situation

Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 968

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/3/2016 4:15:20 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

JF41 i5:
Europe situation.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 969

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/3/2016 9:06:38 AM

Courtenay

Posts: 4003
Joined: 11/12/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: rkr1958

Turn 9. Jan/Feb 1941. Allied #3. RN. North Sea, Naval Battle.

Both sides lose a heavy cruiser. The two German pocket battleships avoid damage but are forced to abort. Disappointing from the allies perspective as the two German pocket battleships were fleeing the sea area anyway.

Scharnhorst and Gniesenau were battlecruisers, not pocket battleships. The pocket battleships were Deutschland, Admiral Graf Spee, and Admiral Scheer.

Scharnhorst and Gneisenau were hard ships to pin down. You just managed to recreate the Channel dash, but in reverse.

< Message edited by Courtenay -- 9/3/2016 11:52:24 PM >

_____________________________

I thought I knew how to play this game....

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 970

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/3/2016 6:40:38 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Courtenay

quote:

ORIGINAL: rkr1958

Turn 9. Jan/Feb 1941. Allied #3. RN. North Sea, Naval Battle.

Both sides lose a heavy cruiser. The two German pocket battleships avoid damage but are forced to abort. Disappointing from the allies perspective as the two German pocket battleships were fleeing the sea area anyway.

Scharnhorst and Gniesenau were battlecruisers, not pocket battleships. The pocket battleships were Deutschland, Admiral Graf Spee, and Admiral Scheer.

Scharnhorst and Gneisenau were hard ships to pin down. You just managed to recreate the channel dash, but in reverse.

Thanks!

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to Courtenay)

Post #: 971

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/3/2016 7:12:25 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 9. Jan/Feb 1941. Allied #8. Actions.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 972

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/3/2016 7:16:44 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 9. Jan/Feb 1941. Allied #8. French & RN Naval Move. East Med.

1. The French use the one naval move of their combine to put three French ships into the 4 box of the East Med.

2. The RN uses 1 of their two naval moves of a combine to move a loaded transport at sea in the 2-box of Cape St. Vincent through the West Med and to port in Cyprus. Because of the storms raging in the West Med, axis air power was "grounded" and since the axis had no SCS at sea there the loaded transport could traverse without the risk of axis interception.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 973

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/3/2016 7:18:38 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 9. Jan/Feb 1941. Allied #8. RN. Bay of Biscay.

1. The RN uses the second, and last, naval move of their combine to move a transport loaded with a fighter into the Bay of Biscay.

2. Do the axis wish to intercept? If so, which unit they like to use?

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 974

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/3/2016 7:53:26 PM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

No.

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 975

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/4/2016 12:33:41 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 9. Jan/Feb 1941. Allied #8. RN. Contested Sea Areas.

There are two contested sea areas and the RN chooses NOT to try to initiate combat in either.

Since the transport loaded with the fighter that Pat didn't try to intercept in the Bay of Biscay moved onto Cape St. Vincent, the axis can't try to initiate in the Bay of Biscay. Since no movement into or within the Fareores gap was made, neither can they try there either. Bottom line, no naval combat this impulse.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 976

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/4/2016 12:34:13 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 9. Jan/Feb 1941. Allied #8. China.

Post movement, no air or land combat.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 977

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/4/2016 12:34:36 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 9. Jan/Feb 1941. Allied #8. Libya.

Post movement, no air or land combat.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 978

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/4/2016 12:35:09 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 9. Jan/Feb 1941. Allied #8. End of Turn.

The turn continues.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 979

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/4/2016 12:35:39 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 9. Jan/Feb 1941. Axis #11. Weather.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 980

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/4/2016 1:49:28 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

JF41 i11:
GE and JP take land actions while IT takes a combined.
Italy moves 4-CAs to the 4-box of the Italian coast.
Italy initiates combat in the Bay of Biscay.
Rnd 1 went the axis ways, though two subs were aborted (allies lost 2CP and had 3CP aborted). The axis did not commit the remaining sub to combat in round 2, so it ended after one round.
Where would you like the 3 CP to abort. The GE sub went to Bordeaux and the Italian to Bayonne.
Going to eat dinner, if there is no answer when I get back, I'll abort to Plymouth.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 981

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/4/2016 2:57:56 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

JF41 i11:
Italian Coast searches both find on 1/2. No net surprise points. We each have 2D A to allocate.
How do you wish to allocate your damage? Will you stay for a second round?

Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 982

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/4/2016 3:50:59 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

1. The 3 CP aborted go to Plymouth.

2. D on CA Dorsetshire, D on CA Canberra and A on CV Glorious.

3. If the CV Glorious is aborted then the RN stays. If not, then it aborts.

4. Aborts to Malta.

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 983

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 9/4/2016 8:37:39 PM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

JF41 i11:
Italian Coast results below. The Glorious made it's damage control, so the British abort the zone per instructions.