RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> After Action Report >> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

Page: << < prev 38 39 [40] 41 42 next > >>

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/9/2016 4:04:41 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 11. May/June 1941. Axis #3. Weather.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1171

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/10/2016 5:46:37 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

MJ41 i3:
Italy and Japan take combines and Germany a land action.
No European naval moves, the JP move two Carriers to the S. China Sea.
The Italians do not initiate combat in the CSV, but do in the W. Med.
Following the lead of your last moves in previous impulse, I did not fly any more CW planes to the W. Med.
Search rolls were 7/2. Again following your lead, I had you select a low box and then avoid combat.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1172

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/10/2016 5:53:09 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

MJ41 i3: Ground Strikes
Forgot to image the rolls of the second, but you can see in this image from the return to base phase that the CW MIL in Madrid was disorganized.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 1173

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/10/2016 6:31:12 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

MJ41 i3: Land Attack
Germans are attacking Saragossa. The CW can fly aircraft to support the defenders. Current odds are shown. No Axis ground support is being flown. I don't believe any axis fighters could intercept.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 1174

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/10/2016 11:10:17 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

No to CW providing defensive ground support.

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 1175

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/11/2016 6:24:11 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

Attack roll went well with an 11 (missed the fractional), taking Saragossa without casualty.

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1176

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/12/2016 12:51:11 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 11. May/June 1941. Allied #4. Actions.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 1177

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/12/2016 12:51:59 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 11. May/June 1941. Allied #4. Post Naval. No Combat.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1178

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/12/2016 12:52:24 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 11. May/June 1941. Allied #4. RAF. Ground Strike.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1179

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/12/2016 12:53:15 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 11. May/June 1941. Allied #4. Spain.

Post movement. No land combat. Ineffective ground strike (previous post).

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1180

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/12/2016 12:54:19 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 11. May/June 1941. Allied #4. North Africa.

Post movement. No land or air combat.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1181

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/12/2016 12:54:46 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 11. May/June 1941. Allied #4. Egypt. Libya.

Post movement. No land or air combat.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1182

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/12/2016 12:55:18 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 11. May/June 1941. Allied #4. Eastern Europe.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1183

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/12/2016 1:02:45 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Turn 11. May/June 1941. Axis #5. Weather.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1184

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/12/2016 7:02:34 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

MJ41 i5: Naval Initiation
Germany takes a land. Japan and Italy take combined actions.
Italy flies a NAV to the 4-box of the E. Med.

Italy does not initiate combat in CSV.
They do in the E. Med. The Hampden in Malta could have reacted, but I saw no reason for you to react a bomber to that sea zone.
In the E. Med the search rolls were 7/3. The Italians just missed, so there was combat.
In the W. Med, the Italians initiate with another plane. The CW can react with the Hurricane in Gibraltar or the Hampden in Malta. Will you?

Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1185

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/12/2016 12:24:52 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

Hurricane to the 0-box. Hampden to the 3-box if not extended range, otherwise to the 2-box.

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 1186

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/12/2016 4:23:45 PM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

MJ41 i5:
W. Med search rolls were 7/2. So the Allies find. With you flying the bomber out (to the 2-box at regular range), I was not sure if you would want to avoid anymore. So, below is the situation and your choice.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1187

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/12/2016 11:05:24 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

avoid ... with all the bad luck I've had in the West Med I don't want to press it now.

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 1188

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/13/2016 12:53:39 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

MJ41 i5:
One ground strike and it was very successful.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1189

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/13/2016 4:48:19 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

MJ41 i5:
Two Land attacks. Madrid (43:5 -> +15.2) and Barcelona (current odds shown below - before HQ support, ground support and offensive shore bombardment. At this point you can apply shore bombardment. You will probably have the option of flying the Sunderland as well. What is your direction on shore bombardment and air support.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 1190

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/13/2016 5:03:01 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

1. Barcelona, max shore bombardment. Also, provide max defensive ground support (if any) if not possible for axis fighters to intercept. Choose assault.

2. Madrid. No additional support. Choose assault.

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 1191

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/13/2016 5:15:50 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

Where would you like the Sunderland to return to base?

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1192

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/13/2016 6:02:05 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

MJ41 i5:
I went ahead and returned the Sunderland back to the UK (Southampton). You can move it if you want it elsewhere.
The results of the combats shown below. I probably should not have used the Italian ships shore bombardment. The increased attack strength did not compensate for the allied friction modifier. It worked out ok with the 19 rolled.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 1193

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/13/2016 6:12:36 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

MA41 i5 end: Situation in Spain

Attachment (1)

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 1194

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/13/2016 12:20:59 PM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ashkpa

Where would you like the Sunderland to return to base?

Would the Sunderland have been able to return to Gibraltar? If so, I might move it there.

< Message edited by rkr1958 -- 10/13/2016 12:38:18 PM >

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 1195

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/14/2016 12:14:43 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

quote:

Would the Sunderland have been able to return to Gibraltar? If so, I might move it there.

Yes it would have, as well as Malta I believe.

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1196

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/14/2016 12:27:21 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ashkpa

quote:

Would the Sunderland have been able to return to Gibraltar? If so, I might move it there.

Yes it would have, as well as Malta I believe.

1. I'm going to "return" him to Plymouth (from Portsmouth).

2. Also, I believe the Italian NAV in the East Med tried and failed to initiate a naval combat and needs to be disorganized, which I plan to do.

Please let me know if I'm mistaken on either or both of these points, otherwise I plan to "execute" to them.

_____________________________

Ronnie

(in reply to ashkpa)

Post #: 1197

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/14/2016 12:41:32 AM

ashkpa

Posts: 1507
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

quote:

1. I'm going to "return" him to Plymouth (from Portsmouth).

2. Also, I believe the Italian NAV in the East Med tried and failed to initiate a naval combat and needs to be disorganized, which I plan to do.

Please let me know if I'm mistaken on either or both of these points, otherwise I plan to "execute" to them.

1) No issue.
2) I believe all three Italian planes are now disorganized. I initiated with them in all three of my impulses. No German planes should be disorganized (the one that initiated during your first impulse was later shot down). The Italian ships should also all be disorganized.

(in reply to rkr1958)

Post #: 1198

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR - 10/14/2016 1:21:49 AM

rkr1958

Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ashkpa

quote:

1. I'm going to "return" him to Plymouth (from Portsmouth).

2. Also, I believe the Italian NAV in the East Med tried and failed to initiate a naval combat and needs to be disorganized, which I plan to do.

Please let me know if I'm mistaken on either or both of these points, otherwise I plan to "execute" to them.

1) No issue.
2) I believe all three Italian planes are now disorganized. I initiated with them in all three of my impulses. No German planes should be disorganized (the one that initiated during your first impulse was later shot down). The Italian ships should also all be disorganized.