BBfanboy
Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010 From: Winnipeg, MB Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Lokasenna quote:
ORIGINAL: Canoerebel It's fun reading your guesses and analysis. Some good thinking there. It's also fun monitoring Erik's thinking, as best I can cobble together from SigInt, garrison levels, movement dots, and the other little things that help paint a picture. He's thinking. He's making logical deductions. He has a problem, I believe. His problem is that it's 1945 and he doesn't have much of a fleet anymore because he just used it. I'll put my nonexistent chips on Genzan. I don't think you'd do Sendai or Iwaki, even though it's open terrain, simply because the risk is too great given that Erik still has strong air forces. Korea, on the other hand, is harder for him to interdict both by sea (there are no good ports on the north side of Japan, really, so presumably his navy is on the south side which will take an additional day or two of transit) and by air (fewer interlocking high-level airfields). Rashin, the base right next to Russia, doesn't really get you much. Neither does Kanko. Genzan, on the other hand, opens up splitting the Korean peninsula in a matter of days if it's weakly-held. At minimum, you may end up triggering the Soviets early or keeping that possibility in his mind - especially if you can land paratroops to help block the rails from China and prevent AV from moving into the garrison area, such as at Jehol or points west. My cyber-chips are on Akita and Hachinohe, to sever the end of Honshu from the rest and isolate all the troops at Aomori, Ominato and on Hokkaido.
_____________________________
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
|