Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

1942 June 01

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> 1942 June 01 Page: <<   < prev  23 24 [25] 26 27   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
1942 June 01 - 7/5/2018 4:27:54 AM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline
1942 June 01

INVADED
Batavia, Changsha, Padang, Nookanbah are also invested.

CHANGED OWNERSHIP
Kaimana is occupied by the Japanese



Overall
• No carrier sightings.

• Lots of upgrades today.
quote:


BB Colorado beginning refit in shipyard at Pearl Harbor
BB Tennessee beginning refit in shipyard at Bremerton
BB Idaho beginning refit in shipyard at Pearl Harbor
BB New Mexico beginning refit in shipyard at Pearl Harbor
BB Mississippi beginning refit in shipyard at Pearl Harbor
DD Meredith beginning refit in shipyard at Pearl Harbor
DD Gwin beginning refit in shipyard at Pearl Harbor
DD Grayson beginning refit in shipyard at Pearl Harbor
DD Monssen beginning refit in shipyard at Pearl Harbor
DD Sims taken out of commission to begin refit at Pearl Harbor
DD Hughes taken out of commission to begin refit at Pearl Harbor
DD Anderson taken out of commission to begin refit at Pearl Harbor
DD Hammann taken out of commission to begin refit at Pearl Harbor
DD Mustin taken out of commission to begin refit at Pearl Harbor
DD Russell taken out of commission to begin refit at Pearl Harbor
DD O'Brien taken out of commission to begin refit at Pearl Harbor
DD Walke taken out of commission to begin refit at Pearl Harbor
DD Morris taken out of commission to begin refit at Pearl Harbor
AK Bellatrix beginning refit in shipyard at Pearl Harbor
AK Fomalhaut beginning refit in shipyard at Pearl Harbor
AK Betelgeuse beginning refit in shipyard at Pearl Harbor
AK Alchiba beginning refit in shipyard at Pearl Harbor
AK Algorab beginning refit in shipyard at Pearl Harbor
AK Almaack beginning refit in shipyard at Pearl Harbor
AK Arcturus beginning refit in shipyard at Pearl Harbor
AK Procyon beginning refit in shipyard at Pearl Harbor
AK Castor beginning refit in shipyard at Pearl Harbor
107th RAF Base Force - some devices have been upgraded at Kohima
2/1st Pioneer Battalion's TOE was upgraded to Aus Pioneer Battalion at Charters Towers
2/11th A/Car Regiment's TOE was upgraded to Armoured Car Regiment at Cloncurry
2/2nd Pioneer Battalion's TOE was upgraded to Aus Pioneer Battalion at Chittagong
1st Australian Brigade's TOE was upgraded to CMF 42 Inf Brigade at Newcastle
9th Australian Brigade's TOE was upgraded to CMF 42 Inf Brigade at Sydney
28th Australian Brigade's TOE was upgraded to CMF 42 Inf Brigade at Port Kembla
8th Australian Brigade's TOE was upgraded to CMF 42 Inf Brigade at Newcastle
5th Australian Brigade's TOE was upgraded to CMF 42 Inf Brigade at Sydney
21st Fld RAA Regiment's TOE was upgraded to RAA Field Arty Regiment at Sydney
4th Australian Brigade's TOE was upgraded to CMF 42 Inf Brigade at Melbourne
10th Australian Brigade's TOE was upgraded to CMF 42 Inf Brigade at Sale
15th Australian Brigade's TOE was upgraded to CMF 42 Inf Brigade at Portsea
6th Australian Brigade's TOE was upgraded to CMF 42 Inf Brigade at Geelong
2nd Australian Brigade's TOE was upgraded to CMF 42 Inf Brigade at Portland
3rd Australian Brigade's TOE was upgraded to CMF 42 Inf Brigade at Adelaide
7th Australian Brigade's TOE was upgraded to CMF 42 Inf Brigade at Brisbane
11th Australian Brigade's TOE was upgraded to CMF 42 Inf Brigade at Townsville
29th Australian Brigade's TOE was upgraded to CMF 42 Inf Brigade at Brisbane
22nd Fld RAA Regiment's TOE was upgraded to RAA Field Arty Regiment at Melbourne
12th Australian Brigade's TOE was upgraded to CMF 42 Inf Brigade at Hobart
21/22 Field Arty Regiment's TOE was upgraded to RAA Field Arty Regiment at Sydney
1st RNZA Fld Regiment's TOE was upgraded to RNZA Field Arty Regiment at Auckland
2nd RNZA Fld Regiment's TOE was upgraded to RNZA Field Arty Regiment at Wellington



West Coast USA, Alaska, Hawaii
• Enemy sub activity near Pearl Harbor.

• CVE Long Island now has a DD escort at Balboa and will head for Pearl Harbor.

• Empty troop convoy proceeding peacefully.


Pacific
• Enemy sub activity near Suva.


New Zealand, Australia, New Caledonia, New Hebrides, Solomons, Papua New Guinea, New Britain
• Enemy sub activity near Brisbane, Sydney, Charters Towers. Although land locked Charters Towers is apparently under recon from submarine based aircraft, presumably looking at the 4EB there. Two squadrons of P-40E are on CAP already. CAP % being increased slightly.

• LBA has taken over bombing the troops marching away from Katherine. They will be ambushed tomorrow.

• Fuel and Supply unloading at Melbourne.


Philippines


DEI, Dutch new Guinea, Borneo, Malaya
• Our unit moving to cut the LOC of the enemy within Padang might be too late!
quote:


Ground combat at Padang (44,85)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 5710 troops, 44 guns, 26 vehicles, Assault Value = 195

Defending force 1478 troops, 5 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 35

Japanese adjusted assault: 155

Allied adjusted defense: 52

Japanese assault odds: 2 to 1 (fort level 1)

Japanese Assault reduces fortifications to 0

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), leaders(-), fatigue(-), morale(-)
experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
10 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Allied ground losses:
134 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 3 disabled
Non Combat: 4 destroyed, 6 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Assaulting units:
2nd Raiding Regiment
5th/A Division

Defending units:
Emmahaven Defenses
Padang Cdo


• Our sub spotted (and attacked but missed) an AO heading toward Balikpapan.


China
• What amounted to a modest skirmish in the air, but the first in a long time over China.
quote:


Morning Air attack on Kweiyang , at 74,49

Weather in hex: Overcast

Raid spotted at 21 NM, estimated altitude 31,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 6 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 8

Allied aircraft
H81-A3 x 16

Japanese aircraft losses
A6M2 Zero: 2 destroyed

Allied aircraft losses
H81-A3: 3 destroyed

Aircraft Attacking:
2 x A6M2 Zero sweeping at 29000 feet

CAP engaged:
AVG/1st Sqn with H81-A3 (0 airborne, 11 on standby, 0 scrambling)
5 plane(s) not yet engaged, 0 being recalled, 0 out of immediate contact.
Group patrol altitude is 20000
Time for all group planes to reach interception is 29 minutes


• They are making progress, so we are shuffling ground units again.
quote:


Ground combat at 84,42 (near Sian)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 42656 troops, 466 guns, 929 vehicles, Assault Value = 1332

Defending force 42812 troops, 188 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 732

Japanese adjusted assault: 989

Allied adjusted defense: 1243

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 2

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), supply(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
274 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 42 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 20 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Vehicles lost 82 (5 destroyed, 77 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
2784 casualties reported
Squads: 58 destroyed, 225 disabled
Non Combat: 2 destroyed, 54 disabled
Engineers: 5 destroyed, 7 disabled
Guns lost 18 (5 destroyed, 13 disabled)

Assaulting units:
15th Tank Regiment
5th Tank Regiment
12th Tank Regiment
37th Division
9th Tank Regiment
3rd Tank Regiment
23rd Tank Regiment
36th Division
34th Division
11th Tank Regiment
5th Ind.Hvy.Art Battalion
2nd Hvy.Artillery Regiment
15th Ind.Medium Field Artillery Regiment
3rd Hvy.Artillery Regiment
2nd Medium Field Artillery Regiment
1st Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
6th Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
8th Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
11th Ind.Art.Mortar Battalion
4th Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
7th Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
10th Medium Field Artillery Regiment

Defending units:
38th Chinese Corps
115th Red Chinese Division
61st Chinese Corps
33rd Chinese Corps
9th Chinese Corps
16th Chinese Corps
88th Chinese Corps
4th Chinese Cavalry Corps



India, Burma, Thailand, Indochina
• Enemy sub activity near Karachi.

• The convoy made it into Karachi without incident in spite of being sighted. All aircraft and most troops unloaded during the night.


Japan, Korea, Manchuria, Russia


Complete combat report attached.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 721
RE: 1942 June 01 - 7/5/2018 4:28:19 AM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline
1942 June 01

TK British Confidence sank in a homeward bound convoy after unloading in New Zealand after pumps failed ot control flooding but I have no idea what the damage was caused by. The insurance company simply lists the cause of the loss as "Accident".




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 722
RE: 1942 June 01 - 7/5/2018 5:34:08 AM   
RangerJoe


Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline
Maybe either of these two things happened:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFOUqRBWH-I

or

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jph9VGypmuU

< Message edited by RangerJoe -- 7/5/2018 5:47:49 AM >


_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
― Julia Child


(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 723
RE: 1942 June 01 - 7/5/2018 6:08:36 AM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline


_____________________________


(in reply to RangerJoe)
Post #: 724
RE: 1942 June 01 - 7/5/2018 1:21:22 PM   
Bif1961


Posts: 2014
Joined: 6/26/2008
From: Phenix City, Alabama
Status: offline
Nice to see your AAR is just a few days ahead of my PBEM but I am the Japanese. Good to have yours as a benchmark to see how mmine is going in relation to your game.

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 725
RE: 1942 June 01 - 7/5/2018 1:51:24 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bif1961

Nice to see your AAR is just a few days ahead of my PBEM but I am the Japanese. Good to have yours as a benchmark to see how mmine is going in relation to your game.

Welcome aboard! This should prove helpful to some degree from an Intel standpoint, but by this time there is great divergence in most games.

_____________________________


(in reply to Bif1961)
Post #: 726
RE: 1942 June 01 - 7/5/2018 2:38:44 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: witpqs

1942 June 01

TK British Confidence sank in a homeward bound convoy after unloading in New Zealand after pumps failed ot control flooding but I have no idea what the damage was caused by. The insurance company simply lists the cause of the loss as "Accident".




I had a tanker ignite in open ocean, far from any Japanese base and without any report of float plane or torpedoes from a sub. Blame it on the guy who couldn't wait to get astern before he lit up his cigarette.

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 727
1942 June 02 - 7/6/2018 3:07:28 AM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline
1942 June 02

INVADED
Amphibious TF 63 offshore of Dobo
Batavia, Changsha, Padang are also invested.

CHANGED OWNERSHIP
Nookanbah is occupied by the Japanese



Overall
• No carrier sightings.

• Today bought out the last unit for the summer invasions requiring changed HQ. These last two regiments cost fewer PP than I had thought because their assigned HQ was subordinate to Pacific Ocean Areas HQ to which I transferred them. This is good news because it means I got the second (last) one done much earlier than I expected. I might be able to get the summer invasions underway up to two weeks earlier than I had thought I could manage.

Wasp should make Pearl Harbor in about two weeks. The large troop convoy with the last load of troops from the West Coast (plus non-invasion troops) will start loading day after tomorrow at San Francisco. The convoy will also add a number of AP's and AK's which have arrived in the meantime. Those AK's will not get their June '42 upgrades (AA and radar) before operations commence. 8x BB will be available, plus two more from San Francisco which will not quite make the accelerated schedule but will follow. A number of AKE's and AE's will follow the convoy to Pearl but I will have to discover how far forward I will be able to rearm battleship guns. The oilers which prepositioned to the South Pacific (Pago Pago) will begin heading to Pearl Harbor tonight.

Not all combat units will be 100% prepared in two weeks so I will take inventory to determine which targets will be first and which later.


West Coast USA, Alaska, Hawaii
• Enemy sub activity near Pearl Harbor.

• Empty troop convoy will enter San Francisco tomorrow.


Pacific
• Enemy sub activity near Suva.

• This means war!
quote:


TF 42 encounters mine field at Suva (132,160)

Allied Ships
KV Cyclamen, Mine hits 1, on fire, heavy damage

quote:


KV Cyclamen sinks....



New Zealand, Australia, New Caledonia, New Hebrides, Solomons, Papua New Guinea, New Britain
• Enemy sub activity near Brisbane

• Fuel unloading at Melbourne.


Philippines


DEI, Dutch new Guinea, Borneo, Malaya
• They held!
quote:


Ground combat at Padang (44,85)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 5703 troops, 44 guns, 26 vehicles, Assault Value = 194

Defending force 1342 troops, 5 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 31

Japanese adjusted assault: 46

Allied adjusted defense: 76

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 2 (fort level 0)

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), experience(-)
Attacker: supply(-)

Japanese ground losses:
22 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 5 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Allied ground losses:
232 casualties reported
Squads: 4 destroyed, 5 disabled
Non Combat: 5 destroyed, 4 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Assaulting units:
2nd Raiding Regiment
5th/A Division

Defending units:
Emmahaven Defenses
Padang Cdo



China
• A tough day as the sweepers find the range. The squadron is pulling back; 10 damaged planes remain on the ground undergoing repairs.
quote:


Morning Air attack on Kweiyang , at 74,49

Weather in hex: Light cloud

Raid spotted at 12 NM, estimated altitude 33,070 feet.
Estimated time to target is 3 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 26

Allied aircraft
H81-A3 x 18

Japanese aircraft losses
A6M2 Zero: 1 destroyed

Allied aircraft losses
H81-A3: 3 destroyed

Aircraft Attacking:
11 x A6M2 Zero sweeping at 29070 feet

CAP engaged:
AVG/1st Sqn with H81-A3 (0 airborne, 8 on standby, 7 scrambling)
3 plane(s) not yet engaged, 0 being recalled, 0 out of immediate contact.
Group patrol altitude is 20000
Time for all group planes to reach interception is 17 minutes

quote:


Morning Air attack on Kweiyang , at 74,49

Weather in hex: Light cloud

Raid spotted at 40 NM, estimated altitude 30,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 11 minutes

Japanese aircraft
Ki-45 KAIa Nick x 8

Allied aircraft
H81-A3 x 5

No Japanese losses

Allied aircraft losses
H81-A3: 1 destroyed

CAP engaged:
AVG/1st Sqn with H81-A3 (0 airborne, 0 on standby, 0 scrambling)
5 plane(s) not yet engaged, 0 being recalled, 0 out of immediate contact.
Group patrol altitude is 20000 , scrambling fighters between 22980 and 29000.
Time for all group planes to reach interception is 48 minutes



India, Burma, Thailand, Indochina
• Enemy sub activity near Karachi, Colombo.

• Karachi port has built to size 7.


Japan, Korea, Manchuria, Russia


Complete combat report attached.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 728
RE: 1942 June 02 - 7/6/2018 4:16:37 AM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline
OK, here is the status of preparation for the summer targets (as of now + 2 weeks).

Kwajalein - Ready.

Roi-Namur - Ready.

Maloelap - Ready.

Wotje - Close to ready.

Mili - About half the forces close to ready, about half will require a few more weeks. Mili is renown for having a tough fortress but 4x infantry regiments might be more than is needed. We could make a primary invasion with 2x regiments, then, if needed, let them hold while the other 2 finish preparing.

Tarawa - Will need a few more weeks.

_____________________________


(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 729
RE: 1942 June 02 - 7/6/2018 7:06:07 AM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline
I would do Ailinglaplap instead of Maloelap or Wotje. Those two are small Atolls with naval forts which cannot be built much. Ailinglaplap can hold more troops, can be built bigger and is in a great position, IMO.

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 730
RE: 1942 June 02 - 7/6/2018 7:16:02 AM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

I would do Ailinglaplap instead of Maloelap or Wotje. Those two are small Atolls with naval forts which cannot be built much. Ailinglaplap can hold more troops, can be built bigger and is in a great position, IMO.

Nobody is preparing for Ailinglaplap.

_____________________________


(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 731
RE: 1942 June 02 - 7/6/2018 2:48:29 PM   
Bif1961


Posts: 2014
Joined: 6/26/2008
From: Phenix City, Alabama
Status: offline
Invading the Marshalls a year and a half early that is an ambitious schedule. His carriers must be busy in DEI or better yet the Indian Ocean.

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 732
RE: 1942 June 02 - 7/6/2018 4:43:45 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bif1961

Invading the Marshalls a year and a half early that is an ambitious schedule. His carriers must be busy in DEI or better yet the Indian Ocean.

That's my plan, uh, hope.

I want a firm Allied presence in the Marshalls to reduce pressure elsewhere, primarily China as that is the only place he is pressing right now. I don't consider the invasion of NW Australia as the Empire pressing because so far it is limited to areas the Allies have very little ability to resist anyway.

The amphibious bonus is gone so he will have to prepare units to invade. I want to get all the developed bases before he can start that process. I suppose that's why I did not consider Ailinglaplap as a target. Assault shipping is the obvious weakness and of course I don't have enough to conduct all 6 landings at one time. Tarawa can wait until last due to its position and lack of airfield. Mili should be able to wait until after the other 4 airfields have been invaded as it has no port and only a size 1 airfield.

I still have to closely inventory assault shipping and see how many of those 4 primary targets I can get into one sailing.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to Bif1961)
Post #: 733
RE: 1942 June 02 - 7/6/2018 6:24:41 PM   
DOCUP


Posts: 3073
Joined: 7/7/2010
Status: offline
Slow up, I'm trying to catch up. I'm only on page 13. Lol Great AAR so far

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 734
RE: 1942 June 02 - 7/6/2018 8:56:33 PM   
RangerJoe


Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline
Capturing them while he is preoccupied elsewhere is a good idea. Then he will be threatened in CentPac a lot sooner than usual plus it gives your LOS from the West Coast to the ANZAC areas some protection.

Might you consider laying some sub minefields in target areas to possibly slow down reinforcements, just in case?

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
― Julia Child


(in reply to DOCUP)
Post #: 735
RE: 1942 June 02 - 7/6/2018 9:09:29 PM   
HansBolter


Posts: 7704
Joined: 7/6/2006
From: United States
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: witpqs


quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

I would do Ailinglaplap instead of Maloelap or Wotje. Those two are small Atolls with naval forts which cannot be built much. Ailinglaplap can hold more troops, can be built bigger and is in a great position, IMO.

Nobody is preparing for Ailinglaplap.



I agree that it is one of the best potential bases in the group and should be developed.
Given there is no one there to fight it can be picked up on the cheap by engineers without prep once you are established elsewhere in the group.

_____________________________

Hans


(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 736
1942 June 03 - 7/6/2018 9:12:25 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline
1942 June 03

INVADED
Amphibious TF 114 offshore of Timoeka
Batavia, Changsha, Padang are also invested.

CHANGED OWNERSHIP
Dobo is occupied by the Japanese



Overall
• No carrier sightings.

• Double dose of heavy volume radio transmissions at Truk. Could that be KB1?


West Coast USA, Alaska, Hawaii
• Enemy sub activity near Pearl Harbor.

• Large troop convoy at San Francisco has taken on additional ships as planned and loaded as many combat units as possible. The last of the assigned invaders are included. A convoy with non-assault shipping will follow with more support units and some aircraft.


Pacific
• In the mid-Gilberts: I wonder if this is the convoy our sub spotted earlier near Kusaie?
quote:


Radio transmissions detected at 137,131.

Naval search has not sighted anything there so it could be just a sub transiting.


New Zealand, Australia, New Caledonia, New Hebrides, Solomons, Papua New Guinea, New Britain
• Enemy sub activity near Brisbane, Adelaide.

• Fuel unloading at Melbourne; Fuel and Supply unloading at Sydney.

• A small but welcome ambush.
quote:


Afternoon Air attack on Darwin RAAF Base Force, at 76,130 , near Daly Waters

Weather in hex: Heavy rain

Raid spotted at 21 NM, estimated altitude 11,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 7 minutes

Japanese aircraft
G4M1 Betty x 18

Allied aircraft
P-39D Airacobra x 3

Japanese aircraft losses
G4M1 Betty: 2 destroyed, 8 damaged
G4M1 Betty: 1 destroyed by flak

No Allied losses

Allied ground losses:
33 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled

Aircraft Attacking:
14 x G4M1 Betty bombing from 7000 feet
Ground Attack: 2 x 250 kg GP Bomb, 4 x 60 kg GP Bomb

CAP engaged:
35th FG/40th FS with P-39D Airacobra (3 airborne, 0 on standby, 0 scrambling)
(3 plane(s) diverted to support CAP in hex.)
3 plane(s) intercepting now.
Group patrol altitude is 10000 , scrambling fighters between 0 and 10000.
Raid is overhead



Philippines


DEI, Dutch new Guinea, Borneo, Malaya


China
• They are trying to break through. Prior to this assault Imperial death gliders attacked a column of troops moving up from Sian and stopped it from arriving here today.
quote:


Morning Air attack on 57th Chinese Corps, at 83,41 (Sian)

Weather in hex: Light cloud

Raid spotted at 25 NM, estimated altitude 5,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 7 minutes

Japanese aircraft
Ki-21-IIa Sally x 18

Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-21-IIa Sally: 11 damaged

Allied ground losses:
127 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 2 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 8 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Aircraft Attacking:
18 x Ki-21-IIa Sally bombing from 2000 feet
Ground Attack: 4 x 250 kg GP Bomb

Also attacking Red Chinese Army ...
Also attacking 57th Chinese Corps ...
Also attacking Red Chinese Army ...
Also attacking 57th Chinese Corps ...


quote:


Ground combat at 84,42 (near Sian)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 41657 troops, 466 guns, 787 vehicles, Assault Value = 1273

Defending force 40634 troops, 176 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 552

Japanese adjusted assault: 562

Allied adjusted defense: 985

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 2

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), leaders(+), experience(-), supply(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
687 casualties reported
Squads: 3 destroyed, 70 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 16 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Vehicles lost 42 (1 destroyed, 41 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
2143 casualties reported
Squads: 39 destroyed, 171 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 20 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 12 disabled
Guns lost 23 (2 destroyed, 21 disabled)

Assaulting units:
36th Division
15th Tank Regiment
3rd Tank Regiment
37th Division
13th Tank Regiment
9th Tank Regiment
23rd Tank Regiment
34th Division
11th Tank Regiment
3rd Hvy.Artillery Regiment
2nd Hvy.Artillery Regiment
6th Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
15th Ind.Medium Field Artillery Regiment
4th Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
2nd Medium Field Artillery Regiment
8th Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
7th Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
5th Ind.Hvy.Art Battalion
11th Ind.Art.Mortar Battalion
1st Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
10th Medium Field Artillery Regiment

Defending units:
33rd Chinese Corps
38th Chinese Corps
61st Chinese Corps
9th Chinese Corps
88th Chinese Corps
16th Chinese Corps
4th Chinese Cavalry Corps
115th Red Chinese Division



India, Burma, Thailand, Indochina
• Enemy sub activity near Trivandrum


Japan, Korea, Manchuria, Russia


Complete combat report attached.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to HansBolter)
Post #: 737
RE: 1942 June 03 - 7/6/2018 9:12:56 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: HansBolter


quote:

ORIGINAL: witpqs


quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

I would do Ailinglaplap instead of Maloelap or Wotje. Those two are small Atolls with naval forts which cannot be built much. Ailinglaplap can hold more troops, can be built bigger and is in a great position, IMO.

Nobody is preparing for Ailinglaplap.



I agree that it is one of the best potential bases in the group and should be developed.
Given there is no one there to fight it can be picked up on the cheap by engineers without prep once you are established elsewhere in the group.

Good point.

_____________________________


(in reply to HansBolter)
Post #: 738
RE: 1942 June 02 - 7/6/2018 9:14:20 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

Capturing them while he is preoccupied elsewhere is a good idea. Then he will be threatened in CentPac a lot sooner than usual plus it gives your LOS from the West Coast to the ANZAC areas some protection.

Might you consider laying some sub minefields in target areas to possibly slow down reinforcements, just in case?

Possibly, but I would have to discover/navigate them too (you only get to know what hex they are in unless it is your base).

_____________________________


(in reply to RangerJoe)
Post #: 739
RE: 1942 June 02 - 7/6/2018 9:14:38 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DOCUP

Slow up, I'm trying to catch up. I'm only on page 13. Lol Great AAR so far

Thanks!

_____________________________


(in reply to DOCUP)
Post #: 740
RE: 1942 June 02 - 7/6/2018 11:58:50 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline
Turkey trots to water.

_____________________________

Post #: 741
1942 June 04 - 7/7/2018 10:02:27 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline
1942 June 04

INVADED
Amphibious TF 50 offshore of Memboro
Batavia, Changsha, Padang are also invested.

CHANGED OWNERSHIP
Timoeka is occupied by the Japanese



Overall
• No carrier sightings.

• Looking at available assault shipping, I am sure we can invade Roi-Namur, Wotje, and Maloelap in one sailing and maybe Kwajalein too. I have an entire division (USA 27th) assigned to Maloelap and that might be overkill so I can get away with concentrating them into fewer ships and suffering the slower unloading. Mili and Tarawa will have to be a separate sailing. Carnage allowing.


West Coast USA, Alaska, Hawaii
• Enemy sub activity near San Diego.

• The large troop convoy finished loading and is setting out for Pearl Harbor.

• Another convoy with 6 air groups is loading at SF for PH, another is loading the support units remaining at SF for Lahaina (to avoid stacking issues at Pearl Harbor).


Pacific
• The only enemy sub activity seen the last few days is near the Ellice Islands.


New Zealand, Australia, New Caledonia, New Hebrides, Solomons, Papua New Guinea, New Britain
• Enemy sub activity near Brisbane.

• Fuel unloading at Melbourne; Fuel and Supply unloading at Sydney.

• Cloncurry airfield is now size 3; in case I omitted this: Alice Springs airfield is size 2.

• No air strikes on withdrawing units in NW Australia today. ☺


Philippines


DEI, Dutch new Guinea, Borneo, Malaya
• The Imperial forces at Padang spotted our other unit coming to severe their LOC. Believing it must consist of more than the token force it is, one of those units has withdrawn from Padang to secure the LOC. Victory!

• Our sub attacked another AO near Dongglala.

• I figured Imperial combat units fresh from the capture of Soerabaja would be marching into Batavia by now. There are a few units seen at Buitenzorg so perhaps they are there at the railway station.


China
• They shall return with many times this strength...
quote:


Ground combat at 83,33 (near Ningsia)

Japanese Shock attack

Attacking force 6252 troops, 37 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 159

Defending force 887 troops, 1 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 2

Japanese adjusted assault: 268

Allied adjusted defense: 1

Japanese assault odds: 268 to 1

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), leaders(+), disruption(-), morale(-)
experience(-), supply(-)
Attacker: shock(+)

Allied ground losses:
1144 casualties reported
Squads: 15 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 58 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 1 (1 destroyed, 0 disabled)
Units destroyed 1

Assaulting units:
4th Ind.Mixed Brigade

Defending units:
82nd Chinese Corps


• We are rotating some units outside of Sian and also SW Chihkiang/SE Kweiyang. The units near Sian are recipients of many air strikes and ground bombardments daily (when not also assaulted); the spot described north of Kweilin have recently begun getting far more air strikes and are now getting daily ground bombardments.


India, Burma, Thailand, Indochina
• Enemy sub activity near Karachi.


Japan, Korea, Manchuria, Russia


Complete combat report attached.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 742
RE: 1942 June 04 - 7/8/2018 12:35:05 AM   
Bif1961


Posts: 2014
Joined: 6/26/2008
From: Phenix City, Alabama
Status: offline
My Allied opponent tried to invade the Northern Marshalls from Midway but my long range Search from Wake and the Marshalls spotted him a few days out. I positioned several subs along he projected path and I just a good hit on the Lexington that slowed her and stopped her air ops. He decided to continue with his operation with her limping back to PH via French Frigate Shoal direction. My carriers were East of Noumea bombing it when my search planes spotted him. I guess he figured I was far enough away that I would not be able to interfere with at least his air attacks on Roi Namur and the rest of the Northern Marshalls. I have a Naval Aviation HQ at Roi Namur so I stacked it with fighters to await his airstrikes as my carriers streaked to the Marshalls and I had tankers luckily spreadout in two groups along his bath from Noumea to the Marshalls. My 100+ fighters between Roi-Namur and Kawjaline were able to cause loses to his fighters and especially his dive bombers as they conducted 3 days of attacks. He was now down 90 AC on Lexington because she couldn't conduct air ops from damage and 90+ more from air loses over the Marshalls. As he withdrew my fastest KB element was able to intercept his carriers as they were staring to withdraw. In the carrier battle that ensued I was able to sink the Saratoga and heavily damage the Enterprise. I was also able to catch up to the limping Lexington and sink it as well. His invasion force which looked like fast transports had turned around earlier so from lack of fuel I was unable to chase them all the way to Midway-French Frigate Shoals or Johnson Island.

I got lucky that the Lexington sucked a torpedo but you may be spotted 2-3 days out as he was so he can take counter action and make things hot for you when you do arrive. If you don't know where all his carriers are then your lack of search might lead you into an ambush. Once you start landing you are stuck for a few days. If you know all his carriers are stationed in DEI or Indian Ocean then you are practicing the time honored baseball motto "hit'em where they ain't."

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 743
RE: 1942 June 04 - 7/8/2018 2:56:40 AM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bif1961

My Allied opponent tried to invade the Northern Marshalls from Midway but my long range Search from Wake and the Marshalls spotted him a few days out. I positioned several subs along he projected path and I just a good hit on the Lexington that slowed her and stopped her air ops. He decided to continue with his operation with her limping back to PH via French Frigate Shoal direction. My carriers were East of Noumea bombing it when my search planes spotted him. I guess he figured I was far enough away that I would not be able to interfere with at least his air attacks on Roi Namur and the rest of the Northern Marshalls. I have a Naval Aviation HQ at Roi Namur so I stacked it with fighters to await his airstrikes as my carriers streaked to the Marshalls and I had tankers luckily spreadout in two groups along his bath from Noumea to the Marshalls. My 100+ fighters between Roi-Namur and Kawjaline were able to cause loses to his fighters and especially his dive bombers as they conducted 3 days of attacks. He was now down 90 AC on Lexington because she couldn't conduct air ops from damage and 90+ more from air loses over the Marshalls. As he withdrew my fastest KB element was able to intercept his carriers as they were staring to withdraw. In the carrier battle that ensued I was able to sink the Saratoga and heavily damage the Enterprise. I was also able to catch up to the limping Lexington and sink it as well. His invasion force which looked like fast transports had turned around earlier so from lack of fuel I was unable to chase them all the way to Midway-French Frigate Shoals or Johnson Island.

I got lucky that the Lexington sucked a torpedo but you may be spotted 2-3 days out as he was so he can take counter action and make things hot for you when you do arrive. If you don't know where all his carriers are then your lack of search might lead you into an ambush. Once you start landing you are stuck for a few days. If you know all his carriers are stationed in DEI or Indian Ocean then you are practicing the time honored baseball motto "hit'em where they ain't."

I know! It's a risk and I certainly want to have some Intel on where his carriers are during our approach. There will be NO air strikes on land targets in this operation. The carriers are there to protect the fleet from aircraft (and to that end will launch naval strikes), LBA will be handled by battleship bombardment. It won't be perfect but coupled with immediate landings at all offensive capable airfields it should work out.

The IJN carriers... they are the big problem. Second problem is the IJN surface fleet. I figure I need a minimum of 2 days at each target. I am willing to leave troops on shore especially if they have captured the target, which I do anticipate (always possible some reinforcement will occur before we get there, but ce le guerre). Maloelap and Wotje will get landings first due to their position, and either the following day or at most 2nd day following Roi-Namur and Kwajalein will be invaded.

An Imperial invasion of Perth, with heavy carrier support, would be perfect!

Cool story, BTW, good for you!

_____________________________


(in reply to Bif1961)
Post #: 744
RE: 1942 June 04 - 7/8/2018 12:04:17 PM   
zuluhour


Posts: 5244
Joined: 1/20/2011
From: Maryland
Status: offline
I like the plan. I cannot elaborate but may email, just in case (legitimately ) Francois is reading this as well. Just how much sea
can an optimized KB travel in 24 hours at mission speed? How far at flank and for how long sans AOs?

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 745
RE: 1942 June 04 - 7/8/2018 12:54:45 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: zuluhour

I like the plan. I cannot elaborate but may email, just in case (legitimately ) Francois is reading this as well. Just how much sea
can an optimized KB travel in 24 hours at mission speed? How far at flank and for how long sans AOs?

Truk is 23 hexes from Roi-Namur, 24 from Kwajalein. Add another 5 or 6 hexes for my closest targets. I figure if KB1 is at Truk they can be in striking range of the first invasion targets on the second day, and in range of R-N/K on the first day.

I figure Truk is the worst case scenario. The question strategically is: will we be invading soon enough that the Empire still has non-ambush assignments for the heavy carriers?

I wonder what is the upgrade schedule for the early IJN heavy carriers? Is is possible that right now they are in transit to Japan or other large port to get upgrades accumulated over the last 6 months?

_____________________________


(in reply to zuluhour)
Post #: 746
RE: 1942 June 04 - 7/8/2018 1:02:16 PM   
zuluhour


Posts: 5244
Joined: 1/20/2011
From: Maryland
Status: offline
For scenario 1
Kaga, Hiryu, Soryu, and Akagi 7/42
Shokaku and Zuikaku 6/42
1st upgrades

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 747
RE: 1942 June 04 - 7/8/2018 1:19:45 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: zuluhour

For scenario 1
Kaga, Hiryu, Soryu, and Akagi 7/42
Shokaku and Zuikaku 6/42
1st upgrades

Interesting, thanks. For some reason I had it in my head the first upgrades were earlier. So these upgrades correspond with Lexington and Saratoga 6/42 (but 42 days long) and the Yorktowns' 7/42.

I am already delaying those upgrades to get this operation done sooner than later. Will the IJN heavy carriers' upgrade schedule allow me to "sneak in"?

< Message edited by witpqs -- 7/8/2018 1:20:09 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to zuluhour)
Post #: 748
RE: 1942 June 04 - 7/8/2018 6:38:54 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: witpqs

quote:

ORIGINAL: zuluhour

For scenario 1
Kaga, Hiryu, Soryu, and Akagi 7/42
Shokaku and Zuikaku 6/42
1st upgrades

Interesting, thanks. For some reason I had it in my head the first upgrades were earlier. So these upgrades correspond with Lexington and Saratoga 6/42 (but 42 days long) and the Yorktowns' 7/42.

I am already delaying those upgrades to get this operation done sooner than later. Will the IJN heavy carriers' upgrade schedule allow me to "sneak in"?


That 42 day upgrade takes off the 8" gun turrets and replaces them with 5" plus beaucoup medium AA, no? Don't Akagi and Kaga also have 8" guns to be removed and replaced - ergo their time in the shop should be similar.

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 749
1942 June 05 - 7/9/2018 1:17:13 AM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline
1942 June 05

INVADED
Amphibious TF 50 unloading at Memboro
Batavia, Changsha, Padang are also invested.

CHANGED OWNERSHIP
Kai-eilanden is occupied by the Japanese
Japanese forces CAPTURE Tienshui !!!



Overall
• No carrier sightings.


West Coast USA, Alaska, Hawaii
• Enemy sub activity near Pearl Harbor, San Francisco.

• The large troop convoy bound for Pearl Harbor has been spotted (DL 1/0) 7 hexes out from San Francisco. The convoys leaving San Francisco tonight/tomorrow have been routed accordingly.


Pacific
• Enemy sub activity near Suva.


New Zealand, Australia, New Caledonia, New Hebrides, Solomons, Papua New Guinea, New Britain
• Enemy sub activity near Brisbane, Melbourne, Aoba Island.

• Fuel unloading at Melbourne; Fuel and Supply unloading at Sydney.

• NW Austyralia is quiet except for movements already in progress.


Philippines


DEI, Dutch new Guinea, Borneo, Malaya
• Now they are rolling in.
quote:


Ground combat at Batavia (49,98)

Japanese Bombardment attack

Attacking force 807 troops, 76 guns, 41 vehicles, Assault Value = 313

Defending force 16517 troops, 131 guns, 6 vehicles, Assault Value = 208

Allied ground losses:
38 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 2 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Assaulting units:
6th Tank Regiment
41st Infantry Regiment
55th Engineer Regiment
14th Tank Regiment
7th Tank Regiment
56th Field Artillery Regiment
3rd Medium Field Artillery Regiment
18th Medium Field Artillery Regiment

Defending units:
XI KNIL Battalion
I Marechausse Cdo
XIV KNIL Battalion
1st Cav Sqdn
I Landstorm Cdo
X KNIL Battalion
XII KNIL Battalion
IV Landstorm Cdo
ML-KNIL
ABDA
Batavia KM Base Force
2e-VLG-III Sup Afd
1e-VLG-III Sup Afd
Batavia Defenses
3e-VLG-III Sup Afd
HQ I KNIL Division
KNI Leger
KNI Zeemacht
A-I-Ld AA Battalion
2e-VLG-V Sup Afd


• Far in the southeastern Banda Sea; where are they going?
quote:


ASW attack near Molu at 79,114

Japanese Ships
DD Nowaki
CA Kinugasa
CL Kitakami
CS Chitose
DD Yudachi
DD Suzukaze

Allied Ships
SS Perch

SS Perch launches 4 torpedoes at DD Nowaki
Perch diving deep ....
DD Suzukaze attacking submerged sub ....
DD Suzukaze fails to find sub, continues to search...
DD Suzukaze fails to find sub, continues to search...
DD Suzukaze fails to find sub, continues to search...
DD Suzukaze fails to find sub, continues to search...
Escort abandons search for sub



China
• So we shall try to hold in the next hex, woods-rough, but we might not have enough there in time. If so we do have strong positions across the river.
quote:


Ground combat at Tienshui (81,38)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 26460 troops, 198 guns, 42 vehicles, Assault Value = 716

Defending force 9132 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 270

Japanese engineers reduce fortifications to 0

Japanese adjusted assault: 399

Allied adjusted defense: 97

Japanese assault odds: 4 to 1 (fort level 0)

Japanese forces CAPTURE Tienshui !!!

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), preparation(-), experience(-), supply(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
457 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 40 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 4 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Allied ground losses:
2647 casualties reported
Squads: 68 destroyed, 61 disabled
Non Combat: 92 destroyed, 18 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Units retreated 3

Defeated Allied Units Retreating!

Assaulting units:
9th Ind.Mixed Brigade
7th Ind.Mixed Brigade
26th Division

Defending units:
21st Chinese Corps
69th Chinese Corps
1st War Area


• Low on experience because these troops have not been bombarded constantly, they are dug in deep and dealt out punishment. Only one unit was low on supply so far as I can tell.
quote:


Ground combat at 78,51 (near Chihkiang)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 60680 troops, 464 guns, 36 vehicles, Assault Value = 1883

Defending force 40946 troops, 194 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 1200

Japanese adjusted assault: 1270

Allied adjusted defense: 1636

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 2

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), experience(-), supply(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
5373 casualties reported
Squads: 23 destroyed, 479 disabled
Non Combat: 4 destroyed, 23 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 41 disabled
Guns lost 31 (4 destroyed, 27 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
1005 casualties reported
Squads: 5 destroyed, 112 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 7 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 3 disabled

Assaulting units:
35th Division
27th Division
6th Division
51st Infantry Brigade
9th Division

Defending units:
46th Chinese Corps
25th Chinese Corps
8th Chinese Corps
65th Chinese Corps



India, Burma, Thailand, Indochina
• Enemy sub activity near Karachi.


Japan, Korea, Manchuria, Russia


Complete combat report attached.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 750
Page:   <<   < prev  23 24 [25] 26 27   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> 1942 June 01 Page: <<   < prev  23 24 [25] 26 27   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.719