RE: June 6th, 1943

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

RE: June 6th, 1943

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: June 6th, 1943

Page: << < prev 52 53 [54] 55 56 next > >>

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: June 6th, 1943 - 8/20/2019 9:52:22 PM

Canoerebel

Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline

If that's the case - if it's the June 8 turn - then it looks like the sync bug struck.

(in reply to BBfanboy)

Post #: 1591

RE: June 6th, 1943 - 8/20/2019 11:41:50 PM

Anachro

Posts: 2506
Joined: 11/23/2015
From: The Coastal Elite
Status: offline

Got the turn. It's amazing...the combat report is identical in everything except the air battle...a Tonan Maru TK takes a torp like in the sync bug, the Tatsuta-maru CVE tanks a torpedo like in the sync bug...but for some reason the air battle is different. Anyways, Buna falls. We go again tomorrow. I get some hits in on CVs with no hits on mine, but nothing too devastating for John. We will try a flank speed surface action perhaps with our BCs and BBs (though I'd bet John moves northeast). Sync bugs are always frustrating.

Replenishment carriers will provide plane reinforcements to my carriers in one or two turns. Fuel is also coming. I can put LBA DBs previously at Tagula/Milne on carriers and remove some devastated squadrons. There is still cause for optimism. But it does feel like all the lucky breaks go against me in this match.

< Message edited by Anachro -- 8/21/2019 12:00:03 AM >

(in reply to Canoerebel)

Post #: 1592

RE: June 6th, 1943 - 8/21/2019 2:27:22 AM

CaptBeefheart

Posts: 2301
Joined: 7/4/2003
From: Seoul, Korea
Status: offline

Well, shucks. Sorry to see the lack of devastation. Good luck with the follow up. Fresh VMFs, VMBs and VMTBs on your decks might carry the day.

Cheers,
CB

_____________________________

Beer, because barley makes lousy bread.

(in reply to Anachro)

Post #: 1593

RE: June 6th, 1943 - 8/29/2019 2:38:41 PM

Anachro

Posts: 2506
Joined: 11/23/2015
From: The Coastal Elite
Status: offline

Hey guys, back from my trip and its been quite a roller coaster. At the end of the day, we lost of a few CVEs in some battles (most frustratingly were my replenishment CVEs which did not move nearly as far as their range bands implied the previous day, ending up in range of enemy carriers). I'll post an update soon. The good news: we hold Manus, Lae will fall, and we have a foothold to build upon around Cape Gloucester, Hansa Bay, and soon enough Madang. Manus will not doubt come under pressure.

Let's keep John occupied and focused on this area of operations. No CVs have been lost and the full fleet of CVs (American and British, new Essex's and old Lexingtons) and CVLs are combining.

(in reply to CaptBeefheart)

Post #: 1594

RE: June 6th, 1943 - 9/2/2019 1:42:08 AM

Timotheus

Posts: 481
Joined: 12/13/2013
Status: offline

Can I ask for a favor?
Can you keep the pictures not too wide

OR

have pictures on separate post, and the commentary on a separate post?

This is because on my browser, if a picture is too wide, I can either make the window smaller - and the text size omg-I-cannot-read-it or I have to scroll forever to the right to read a sentence, then scroll left for the next one.....

_____________________________

NEWBIE GUIDE Distant Worlds Universe
http://tinyurl.com/k3frrle

War in the Pacific Poradnik po Polsku
http://tinyurl.com/nxd4cesh

INSTALL WITPAE on modern PC
https://tinyurl.com/l5kr6rl

(in reply to Anachro)

Post #: 1595

June 29th, 1943 - 9/16/2019 2:48:59 PM

Anachro

Posts: 2506
Joined: 11/23/2015
From: The Coastal Elite
Status: offline

Sorry for lack of activity, I've been pretty busy with real life work. Started a new job.

June 29th, 1943

Expending huge amounts of fuel and men, John has taken back Lae. He has 2-3 heavily degraded divisions there now and, furthermore, suffered losses from a CV strike that wiped out his transports with casualties to either men he was loading or offloading. In the north, I still hold Manus and Hansa Bay, but I of course expect these to also come under attack. Forts at both are at level 2 and building. I'm happy to let John continue to thrust here and throw his weight around. As I said, he is expending a lot of fuel doing this as every battleship in the Japanese fleet seems to be in the area. No doubt, Manus will come under heavy bombardment itself. I made a mistake at Lae in attacking when I thought the initial landing forces were weak and lost a 100 AV as a result. I won't do the same again.

However, I think John has made a mistake in that the 20,000 men at Lae are trapped there and can continue to be trapped through the threat of my CVs and nearby LBA. It'll be tough for him, especially now that all my fleet-capable CVs and CVLs are now combined and will meetup at Rockhampton. I will have: 4 Yorktown-class, 1 Lexington-class, 2 Charlotte-class, 2 Independence-class, 3 upgraded Illustrious-class, 1 Indomitable-class, and 2 Essex-class carriers (CVs Enterprise and Hornet are on their way back from repairs at Sydney, Enterprise has 8 days of emergency repairs before full health, CV Lexington is on her way to Capetown for repairs before supporting efforts in the Indian theater). This will bring the total to 7 American CVs, 4 British CVs, and 4 CVLs for a total of ~950 a/c. In turn, 3 or so Japanese carriers have taken torpedoes (though frustratingly none suffered more than 1 hit and a 4th took 2 duds) and this bodes well. I must be cognizant, however, that John also has immense LBA in the area. We have troops prepping for Madang and Aitape, etc. The goal is to overwhelm and cutoff the 20,000 men at Lae and push north, staying in range of LBA.

However, I don't want to stick around with my carriers for too long. Let's keep John distracted in this theater as long as possible. The real news is the thousands of AV (including thousands of Chinese AV) prepping for Burma and most of my transports, slow battleships, etc. are heading that way. John interestingly has a mini-KB roving around near Diego Garcia (just how many carriers does Japan get in this fantasy mod?). I'm not gonna try and take it on, but I have some DDs roving around looking for opportunities (he already tried to strike DDs once with no hits). Anyways, we do our first city strike against the oil fields of Magwe today where John inexplicably seems to have no air cover. As a result, we do good damage in our first day of work and an oil field that was previously estimated at 301 oil production today shows 136(215). We will continue to bomb it into smithereens.

< Message edited by Anachro -- 9/16/2019 2:50:39 PM >

(in reply to Timotheus)

Post #: 1596

RE: June 29th, 1943 - 9/16/2019 3:18:28 PM

BBfanboy

Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline

The problem with concentrating all your CV types in one spot is that eventually they have to go back to port for ammo, fuel, repairs and upgrades. During their absence he can reinforce or withdraw troops and bring in supply. If you can decimate that CV/CVE TF up at Kavieng you would be able to halve your CV force and have one half at sea at a time. I know he has strong LBA up that way, but maybe you could lure him with a false Amphib force heading toward Lae?

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Anachro)

Post #: 1597

RE: June 29th, 1943 - 9/18/2019 5:52:07 PM

Anachro

Posts: 2506
Joined: 11/23/2015
From: The Coastal Elite
Status: offline

Yes, we aim to not allow that to happen. His CVs, divided already I think, move back towards Truk. He is using battleships and LBA to put pressure on Cape Gloucester, which has some minor base units, and Manus. Manus should hold, we'll see about Cape Hansa. Gloucester should fall. We'll move in with reinforcements in a bit as we line them up. I have most definitely thought about enticing John with an exposed transport force. We'll see. The problem with this scenario is that John has extreme recon/nav search capabilities due to the immense amounts of long-range heavy bombers he has with like 30+ range. He can can cover far more deep space with eyeballs than the Japanese could in real life. Or so it seems to me. Hard to hide task forces in the rear.

July 1st, 1943

In China, John has broken through defensive lines and we retreat back towards the mountains. An attack by one unit to see what's there finds 2000 AV in Chungking, giving us info to pull some troops out to solidiy defenses elsewhere. More interestingly, it seems John has left only a token force in the rear: only 300 Japanese AV sits at Tsuyung and can probably be overwhelmed if reinforcements are brought in.

quote:

Ground combat at Tsuyung (68,46)

Allied Bombardment attack

Attacking force 35032 troops, 33 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 1111

Defending force 8034 troops, 38 guns, 285 vehicles, Assault Value = 359

Assaulting units:
36th Chinese Corps
10th Chinese Corps
76th Chinese Corps

Defending units:
15th Tank Regiment
8th Ind.Mixed Brigade
3rd Tank Regiment
12th Tank Regiment
5th Armored Car Co

In the South Pacific/Australia, various mundane efforts are underway to repair, refuel, and re-situate boats for operations.

In Burma, for some reason John decided Magwe isn't worth air cover for a week now. The oil production there is now down below 100 and sits at like 93(230) or something like that based on recon. Not sure why John is happy to let his oil be pounded. We will bring it down to 0 I guess and then work on the refineries.

quote:

Morning Air attack on Magwe , at 57,47

Weather in hex: Heavy rain

Raid detected at 40 NM, estimated altitude 15,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 14 minutes

Allied aircraft
Liberator II x 12
Liberator GR.III x 3
Wellington B.X x 12
B-17E Fortress x 12
B-17F Fortress x 13
B-24D Liberator x 20
B-24D1 Liberator x 46

Allied aircraft losses
Wellington B.X: 1 damaged
B-17F Fortress: 1 damaged
B-24D Liberator: 1 damaged
B-24D1 Liberator: 8 damaged

Oil hits 32

< Message edited by Anachro -- 9/18/2019 5:53:47 PM >

(in reply to BBfanboy)

Post #: 1598

RE: June 29th, 1943 - 9/18/2019 6:16:51 PM

Cheesesteak

Posts: 301
Joined: 11/8/2010
From: Richmond, VA
Status: offline

I'm reading both sides, just wanted to say thanks for providing the updates! I've been spotty at best on my own AAR. Real life can be a serious distraction.

Do you consider the recent op a success? I've never taken a pvp game to the point of Allied counteroffensives, so curious to hear how the pacing and losses feel.

_____________________________

"Knowledge is Good" - Emil Faber

(in reply to Anachro)

Post #: 1599

RE: June 29th, 1943 - 9/18/2019 7:14:43 PM

Andav

Posts: 474
Joined: 5/8/2007
Status: offline

quote:

In Burma, for some reason John decided Magwe isn't worth air cover for a week now. The oil production there is now down below 100 and sits at like 93(230) or something like that based on recon. Not sure why John is happy to let his oil be pounded. We will bring it down to 0 I guess and then work on the refineries.

Speaking as a Japanese player, John is probably happy you are not using 120 4E bombers on his troops, his airfields or his ports. The oil from Magwe is by far the lowest priority to pull from anywhere in the Empire. It is furthest away from the Home Islands and closest to Allied Nastiness. Bombing this does not prevent him from building forts at other bases or building airfield around the theater and does not destroy his supplies or cause him to use supplies to rebuild airfields or ports. It does not damage his troops or really cause him any concern. Bombing refineries after the oil is gone cause him even less concern. It also does not cost him strategic points since it is outside of the HI. While I feel like I am betraying my brethren, you really should look for a different target. If he does pull some oil or fuel it will not really matter. For the Japanese, it is hard to keep Burma supplied. Bomb something that will cause him to use supplies to defend or rebuild.

Wa

(in reply to Cheesesteak)

Post #: 1600

RE: June 29th, 1943 - 9/18/2019 7:39:37 PM

Anachro

Posts: 2506
Joined: 11/23/2015
From: The Coastal Elite
Status: offline

@andav I agree with your advice on not going after the refineries and changing targets to other things, but I have to disagree on your assessment of oil for this mod. In John's scenario, the value of oil is at a premium due to the expanded Japanese industry and navy. Taking his ability to extract it from any significant source is valuable and worthwhile, as he needs it. So I'm happy to bomb his oil production at Magwe to 0 before moving on to more worthwhile targets. Without air cover it's going to go down to near 0 in a few days anyways. I bet John has significantly built up his industry as well.

@cheesesteak I'm happy with my initial gains and Port Moresby, etc. And think those will hold. Moreover it remains to be seen if Manus will fall. I think the operation or campaign in this area is still very much up in the air. Obviously, I lost more CVEs than I would like, but haven't lost any CVs, CVLs, BBs, BCs, or cruisers. If I can hold on to Manus and destroy troops at Lae while making John commit most of his forces here and burn fuel, I'll be very happy.

< Message edited by Anachro -- 9/18/2019 7:42:56 PM >

(in reply to Andav)

Post #: 1601

RE: June 29th, 1943 - 9/18/2019 7:51:53 PM

Canoerebel

Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline

John probably isn't defending Magwe because it's comparatively late. He might have in 1942.

(in reply to Anachro)

Post #: 1602

RE: June 29th, 1943 - 9/18/2019 8:30:34 PM

BBfanboy

Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline

quote:

Anachro: haven't lost any CVs, CVLs, BBs, BCs, or cruisers.

Uh, oh! The War Gods hate when players make this kind of statement. You are now cursed!

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Anachro)

Post #: 1603

RE: June 29th, 1943 - 9/22/2019 1:51:03 PM

Bearcat2

Posts: 577
Joined: 2/14/2004
Status: offline

Thank you for the AAR!

_____________________________

"After eight years as President I have only two regrets: that I have not shot Henry Clay or hanged John C. Calhoun."--1837

(in reply to BBfanboy)

Post #: 1604

July 10th, 1943 - 9/24/2019 5:36:57 AM

Anachro

Posts: 2506
Joined: 11/23/2015
From: The Coastal Elite
Status: offline

July 10th, 1943

I began the operation a while back: to relieve Hansa Bay and reinforce Manus. Unfortunately, Hansa fell a few days before I could land reinforcements. Moreover, one of my carrier TFs went on naval strike mode when I had been setting the rest to stick to cap and ASW and its bombers got chewed up, so while my carrier's cap is strong, the bomber wings are a little weak though can still pack a bunch. Most of the action, as a result, has been on the surface where I have done decently in naval battles and have devastated John's LBA through bombardment. In a series of engagements, I have definitely sunk a Japanese BC and DD and most likely sunk a CA for the cost (as of now) of two DDs. In the previous turn, bombardments against Madang and Rabaul destroy ~150-200 Japanese A/C on the ground, mauling John's LBA. This turn, two separate task forces hit Rabaul and destroyed another ~100 A/C. I had noticed in the previous weeks that John was heavily overstacking Rabaul and this takes his LBA largely out of the equation for any close-by engagement.

The question is what to do now that some of John's carriers (what am I kidding, it's probably most of them that haven't been damaged by subs, of which there are 3-4) have appeared northeast of Manus. They were in range of my carriers at 8 hexes away, but much like the USN at the Mariana's, up till now the primary duty of my carriers have been CAP defense and ASW (with nav strike seet to a max range of 3 for any nearby enemy ships; sadly, John's BC task force was four hexes away this turn). I could attempt to strike these carriers, but my bomber wings are at about 70%. However, my fighter wings are near full-strength at ~426 fighters. What should I do? Part me screams stick close and maintain CAP, the Jeb Stuart/John III in me says run after him; I'd imagine his LBA was concentrated at Rabaul and is weak at Truk, but I do not know for sure. The prudent thing is to not go charging off into the unknown.

That said, one of my transport convoys carrying a division got scared into turning back towards home, an APA even took a torp despite escorts. As of now, all Manus is getting as reinforcements are: supply, the NG Vol Rifles BN, and the 14th Armored regiment. Shame, but I think we can do this type of operation again in the future. John's frontline LBA has been shown to be vulnerable to bombardment.

I'll sleep on the turn for now.

< Message edited by Anachro -- 9/24/2019 5:38:39 AM >

(in reply to Bearcat2)

Post #: 1605

July 15th, 1943 - 9/29/2019 2:37:09 PM

Anachro

Posts: 2506
Joined: 11/23/2015
From: The Coastal Elite
Status: offline

July 15th, 1943

Don't have much time to post, but I'll give the situation. There was a carrier battle and once again John stymied my ability to significantly inflict harm despite having superior carrier firepower (though I'm taking it as a tactical victory as a number of his carriers experience some form of damage that should put them out of the way temporarily). I lost 400 planes to ~200 for him. The main reason for this is that the coordination of my air wings was horrible and went in piecemeal, but honestly at this point I'm thinking of doing something unusual for a future battle and putting my bombers on ASW and my fighters on a day 1 80-100% CAP to kill off his bomber threat first before trying to do something the next day. The more worrisome thing is that these battles have taken place WITHOUT the Jack yet on Japanese carriers - how will I fare in a battle once he DOES have those? At least my pilot losses aren't too bad and, vice-versa, his elite KB pilots should be somewhat decimated.

Nonetheless, the operation in total did see a Japanese BC sunk for the cost of a couple destroyers and Manus did receive some reinforcements and much-needed supply. However, the divisional reinforcement coming was turned back by Japanese torpedo boats and I judged it not appropriate given the situation to turn it around. It'll recuperate and then we will try another reinforcement probably sometime soon once my carrier air wings are ready.

The loss reports in ships to both sides for the month. Take the Japanese carriers lost with a grain of salt: the most likely one lost is the CVE Tatsuta-maru which took a number of mine hits and two torpedo hits, but, somehow, based on intelligence and reports from the days after those attacks, I doubt that she has sunk. This list does not include transports lost, of which there are a number. The list also doesn't include the Japanese CA Myoko, which, based on planes destroyed on the ground, sank on July 10th.

In India, we landed at Diego Garcia and though I judged the forces landed sufficient to take the base based on initial combat from the first 1-2 days, the base has not fallen and will most likely be reinforced. Hopefully, the forces on the ground there hold out until reinforcements arrive. John has forces in the area, but they cannot stick around Diego permanently.

(in reply to Anachro)

Post #: 1606

RE: July 15th, 1943 - 11/25/2019 6:49:53 PM

Anachro

Posts: 2506
Joined: 11/23/2015
From: The Coastal Elite
Status: offline

CR asked me to give an update so I shall do so. I'll do one more detailed later on when I have access to my PC so I can post pictures and definitive numbers (right now I only have access to my Surface tablet). It is late 1943 and the situation is thus:

Strategic Level
Major area of tension is primarily the area in and around New Guinea at the moment, with static lines in both the Indian Ocean and the Central and Northern Pacific.

Theaters
Indian Theater:Operationally, Allies forces are gathering in the Indian Ocean with some damaged ships slated for that area heading to or currently repairing at Capetown. There is a large list of ground forces preparing or already fully prepared for targets with the major holdup being getting naval and transport assets in place.

At the tactical level, my invasion of DG was spooked because I didn't have full recon and was super scared about unseen Japanese carriers appearing from the south or east. As such, I didn't get the full forces earmarked for the operation offloaded, John counterattacked, and I lost some AV. That said, DG is a far ways away from Japanese territory, with a known line of communication. Knowing that John has surface and transport forces in the areas, I have been harrying this LoC with small CL/DD task forces and even a 1 CVL TF fleet that has appeared opportunistically. Thanks to this, John has lost a few destroyers , 1-3 very nice 28 VP tankers, a number of xAKs and xAPs, as well as 5 8VP tankers of some sort. He has divisions on DG, but their extraction has proved a bit more troublesome and his mini-KB carrier TF has either left the theater or his repairing/upgrading at Singers.

Australia/Guinea: In the Guinea/Australian theater, John has had successful counter landings (taking back basically everything north of Lae (and including Lae), but his most recent attempt to retake Manus Island might have been a bit too aggressive with too little of his own men. Three divisions landed, but their margin in AV superiority was too small when I had a partial division, artillery, and forts and his first attack saw him lose more men than me. Given John's previous counterlandings (as well as him forecasting his intentions with focused bombardments of Manus) I had been preparing for a push on Manus with earmarked counterlanding forces of my own and a large portion of the Allied fleet. Thus, in the previous week or two in the game, I have landed an additional division, armored battalions, bombarded the island, and John now has inferior AV on the island and while in my first deliberate attack I had a bad 1 to 4 roll, I had 700 casualties and he had 1900.

Moreover, John messed up in extracting his landing TF and my CVs sank a number of DDs (7-8), xAPs, and even 2 of his scout cruisers (the new CS class John added to the game as part of this mod). The only real messup on my part was misclicking "set for TF" as opposed to "set for all TBs in hex" so a number of my TBs got slaughtered as they attacked unescorted when I wanted them on ASW duty (this was when I had my fighters focused purely on CAP while I unloaded my counterlanding forces).

Last turn, I sent my forces back (they are currently 8 or so hexes north of Milne Bay) and just in time as a Japanese CV unit or two has appeared northeast of Kavieng (and it shows ~400-500 fighters). My TFs are currently all heading to Milne Bay to take advantage of CAP. Once the immediate danger has passed, we will refuel and re-arm. We will then make a new concerted effort on Lae and Fischaven to take those airfields and slowly put pressure on John's ability to have uninterrupted access to the surrounding waters of Manus. I can't emphasize that John has three divisions in danger of destruction on Manus, at this point I can see his only option to be to try and extract them. He can also double-down, do lots of naval bombardments, and land more forces; the likelihood of this is not small. Forts at Manus just got up to 3.

Misc: Elsewhere, we have plans for the North Pacific.

< Message edited by Anachro -- 11/25/2019 6:53:44 PM >

(in reply to Anachro)

Post #: 1607

RE: July 15th, 1943 - 11/25/2019 7:01:00 PM

Canoerebel

Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline

Hey, I asked for that update about two months ago!

But I'm glad you're back and posting.

(in reply to Anachro)

Post #: 1608

RE: July 15th, 1943 - 11/25/2019 8:25:28 PM

jwolf

Posts: 2493
Joined: 12/3/2013
Status: offline

Thanks for the update; I had feared that no news meant bad news. Glad to see that is (mostly) not true. It sounds like the two of you have great match in progress with a lot of tough fighting. I hope that attritional fighting will favor the Allies, as it did historically, but with this mod I don't know.

(in reply to Canoerebel)

Post #: 1609

August 15th, 1943 - 11/26/2019 4:08:11 PM

Anachro

Posts: 2506
Joined: 11/23/2015
From: The Coastal Elite
Status: offline

August 15th, 1943

The current situation around Manus. We had a bad attack last turn and so I will now opt to simply sit and let him attack while I dig in. If he lands more forces, hopefully I can put greater pressure by taking other bases around Manus and make his situation precarious. For now, my forces will move back to Townsville to rest and recuperate while I prepare for an amphibious operation against Lae, further reinforcement of Manus, and perhaps an invasion of Horn Island if I feel secure elsewhere. All my submarine transports will continually supply Manus (which has a precarious 4.5k supply at the moment), as more submarines are coming to patrol the area and further mine the base.

Here are some of the engagements from the past month, as well as current intelligence estimates on losses. I took out enemy carrier losses because I do not believe any Japanese carriers have sunk. I sank two of the CS ships shown, not much, but I'll take it.

Also, some engagements between DG and Malaya along John's LoC.

quote:

Night Time Surface Combat, near Diego Garcia at 23,71, Range 13,000 Yards

Japanese Ships
DD Kamikaze, Shell hits 2, on fire
DD Oite, Shell hits 2, on fire
E Oki, Shell hits 2, on fire
E Kanju, Shell hits 3, on fire
PB Teibo Maru #2, Shell hits 10, heavy fires, heavy damage
TK Kaizyo Maru, Shell hits 1
TK Kuroshio Maru, Shell hits 2
AV Kunikawa Maru
xAK Kirikawa Maru
xAK Mansei Maru
xAK Reiyo Maru
xAK Taihei Maru, Shell hits 1
xAK Yamafuku Maru
xAK Saiho Maru, Shell hits 1, on fire
xAK Akitsushima Maru, Shell hits 2

Allied Ships
CL Perth
CL Denver
DD Gwin
DD Monssen
DD Morris
DD Warramunga
DD Rotherham

quote:

Night Time Surface Combat, near Diego Garcia at 24,71, Range 11,000 Yards

Japanese Ships
DD Kamikaze, on fire
DD Oite, on fire
TK Kaizyo Maru, Shell hits 4
TK Kuroshio Maru, Shell hits 3, on fire
AV Kunikawa Maru, Shell hits 5, on fire, heavy damage
xAK Mansei Maru, Shell hits 4, heavy fires
xAK Reiyo Maru, Shell hits 1, Torpedo hits 1, heavy fires, heavy damage
xAK Taihei Maru, Shell hits 7, heavy fires, heavy damage
xAK Yamafuku Maru, Shell hits 2
xAK Akitsushima Maru, on fire

Allied Ships
CL Perth
CL Denver
DD Gwin
DD Monssen
DD Morris
DD Warramunga
DD Rotherham

quote:

Night Time Surface Combat, near Sabang at 25,71, Range 11,000 Yards

Japanese Ships
DD Kamikaze, heavy fires
DD Oite, Shell hits 7, and is sunk
TK Kaizyo Maru, Shell hits 3
xAK Yamafuku Maru, Shell hits 1

Allied Ships
CL Perth
CL Denver
DD Gwin, Shell hits 1, on fire
DD Monssen
DD Morris
DD Warramunga
DD Rotherham

quote:

Sub attack near Diego Garcia at 19,64

Japanese Ships
TK Kuroshio Maru, Torpedo hits 2, on fire, heavy damage

Allied Ships
SS KXVII

< Message edited by Anachro -- 11/26/2019 5:35:00 PM >

(in reply to jwolf)

Post #: 1610

RE: August 15th, 1943 - 11/26/2019 11:19:40 PM

ny59giants

Posts: 9869
Joined: 1/10/2005
Status: offline

I would use PBYs and transport planes to get supplies to Manus. You get and have more than enough C-47s to use up.

Pull off Avengers and add more fighters on your large CVs. Train up all those Avengers you have and those coming in on CVLs and CVEs in NavT, NavB, and either ASW or Gnd. The third skill going up will raise the Exp levels that you will need when you are stronger and can use DS to crush KB.

< Message edited by ny59giants_MatrixForum -- 11/26/2019 11:24:02 PM >

(in reply to Anachro)

Post #: 1611

RE: August 15th, 1943 - 11/27/2019 2:09:08 PM

Anachro

Posts: 2506
Joined: 11/23/2015
From: The Coastal Elite
Status: offline

I have a LOT of C-47's in India conducting transport missions (the areas closer to the Burmese border are always short on supply); I need more in Aussieland! Will try and work on that. However, the SST's won't hurt. I've converted all I can (I think I have around 6 at the moment), and between them they can get close to 1k supply per run.

As for my carriers, thanks to the horrendous air casualties through mistakes, etc., I've already been doing things like transferring off decimated British squadrons for American substitutes, etc. One thing I've found in the game so far is that Commonwealth (or more likely just British) naval A/C production is not in any way commensurate with the potential attrition of the war, especially considering the fact that John turned off withdrawals so I have all the British carriers available. That, coupled with the upgrades to British carriers to increase their a/c capacity, means I have a lot of under-strength British air wings with no or very little replacements. This has probably been my biggest observation.

I suspect I will be converting some Marine airwings to permanent carrier service on British ships, at least until I get more aircraft. Guess I can train up more British naval aviators in the mean time.

< Message edited by Anachro -- 11/27/2019 2:28:45 PM >

(in reply to ny59giants)

Post #: 1612

August 16th, 1943 - 11/27/2019 6:17:34 PM

Anachro

Posts: 2506
Joined: 11/23/2015
From: The Coastal Elite
Status: offline

August 16th, 1943

It seems the big guns (and transports) are coming to Manus and it remains to be seen for what purpose. I'm guessing John will try nuke bombardments coupled with more landings to try and take the island, but I have level 3 forts and ~550 AV so I should be able to hold for a bit. More prudently, John might try to extract his forces. We'll see what happens. Rather than chase and burn fuel, I will continue my planned retirement to Townsville to re-fuel and prepare for an invasion of Lae that can simultaneously be used for reinforcing Manus. The only question mark is John's carrier force. Based on days of recon, it appears to be a CV TF coupled with tankers, but could easily be two CV TFs. I'm not sure what John was planning: either he's trying to lure me away to follow them so he has more of a free-hand around Manus, or perhaps he is trying to draw me into a CAP trap around Guadalcanal. I'm not too sure. I'd expect he'd either wheel west or back northwest this turn, but I then again I also though he'd do that this past turn as well.

Happy to let him burn fuel on all of this. Those heavy BBs and CVs won't be cheap in fuel consumption.

Other places feel very ripe for invasion; the biggest hurdle is the need for carrier concentration to help these invasion targets. It's hard to conduct a safe operation in this game/mod without full carrier coordination.

< Message edited by Anachro -- 11/27/2019 6:19:31 PM >

(in reply to Anachro)

Post #: 1613

RE: August 16th, 1943 - 11/28/2019 8:04:50 AM

CaptBeefheart

Posts: 2301
Joined: 7/4/2003
From: Seoul, Korea
Status: offline

I hear you on the lack of Brit aircraft production. If I remember correctly, there's a big gap in TB production between Albacores and Avengers. You run into one or two vicious CAP traps and you'll have no FAA torpedo bombers for a year. Is it the same in the RTS mod? Also, do you have Juan's aircraft purchase system in that mod? Any boosts to production?

I agree that USMC squadrons are needed to fill out the RN carriers.

Cheers,
CB

_____________________________

Beer, because barley makes lousy bread.

(in reply to Anachro)

Post #: 1614

RE: August 16th, 1943 - 11/28/2019 1:12:02 PM

Anachro

Posts: 2506
Joined: 11/23/2015
From: The Coastal Elite
Status: offline

It's the same in the RTS mod, yes, from what I can tell. If it has been boosted, not much or enough. The aircraft purchase system is in place, but again, seems to have very little options for purchasing additional British naval a/c.

There is another problem that has come up that I know I have seen before on these forums. I had a marine division and an army division both divided into their A/B/C parts. They all had the same chain of command, but for some reason after dividing them I could not re-combine them into their full division. They have no hanging parts anywhere else, they are all in the same hex. However, the option to re-combine them was/is grayed out. Randomly, the Marine option to recombine became available one turn and I recombined it. The Army division still does not allow me to recombine A/B/C. I'll post a picture when I get the next turn from John.

< Message edited by Anachro -- 11/28/2019 1:13:06 PM >

(in reply to CaptBeefheart)

Post #: 1615

RE: August 16th, 1943 - 11/28/2019 1:41:49 PM

witpqs

Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline

That's almost certainly going to be a device mismatch, where one or two units upgraded some device which the other one or two did not.

_____________________________

Intel Monkey: https://sites.google.com/view/staffmonkeys/home

(in reply to Anachro)

Post #: 1616

RE: August 16th, 1943 - 11/28/2019 3:54:48 PM

Anachro

Posts: 2506
Joined: 11/23/2015
From: The Coastal Elite
Status: offline

Figured it was a TOE thing. The next turn sees mini-KB (with LOTS of fighters, so John must have increased his fighter ratio on his CVs) move due west and is now either sitting at a hex besides Shortlands. Nothing much to say, we keep our CVs from disbanding in port at Townsville in case John tries an aggressive maneuver to catch our ships napping there. We also set a CAP trap for Milne Bay just in-case. Nothing against Manus this turn except fighter sweeps. We expect the enemy BBs to hit next turn or the one after, but I have reduced navsearch percentage to preserve recon planes until I really need them. On the flip side, an Allied cruiser TF bombards Horn Island for good results, inflicting ~350 casualties on units there (of which one is one of John's new CD units introduced in this mod). The island might be susceptible to a strong bombardment prior and during invasion.

New pictures will come next turn.

< Message edited by Anachro -- 11/28/2019 4:02:19 PM >

(in reply to witpqs)

Post #: 1617

RE: August 16th, 1943 - 11/28/2019 4:04:26 PM

Anachro

Posts: 2506
Joined: 11/23/2015
From: The Coastal Elite
Status: offline

Also, my yearly made-from-scratch Thanksgiving blueberry pie. I think I posted one last year too.

(in reply to Anachro)

Post #: 1618

RE: August 16th, 1943 - 11/28/2019 4:08:01 PM

Anachro

Posts: 2506
Joined: 11/23/2015
From: The Coastal Elite
Status: offline

I literally just sent the turn to John and he responds immediately by email:

quote:

This COULD be an exciting turn�

I hope he tries for an aggressive strike on Townsville or something. More likely, it's an unexpected strike somewhere else OR he tries to mass bombard Manus and reduce forts/take it. Who knows? Guess we'll find out.

(in reply to Anachro)

Post #: 1619

August 18th, 1943 - 11/28/2019 6:12:46 PM

Anachro

Posts: 2506
Joined: 11/23/2015
From: The Coastal Elite
Status: offline

August 18th, 1943

I'm not really sure what John meant by an "exciting" turn. Perhaps he was hoping to hit some of my shipping? Other than that, can't think of much. Instead, he walks right into a CAP trap at Milne Bay where I had a large number of CAP and LRCAP covering the base and 1DD/1xAK; while the damage done isn't too catastrophic, John loses 93 naval planes and aviators to a loss of 23 land-based fighters for myself. Interestingly, perhaps because of my bombardment last turn, a mini-KB appears northwest of Horn Island. This could either be a new mini KB or perhaps the mini-KB that was previously operating near Diego Garcia. I don't know. Portland Roads nearby shows 9/10 DL so perhaps John will try an airfield strike there, or a naval strike as I have two crippled subs in port.

My carriers are fine sitting at Townsville, though part of me wishes I attacked John's carriers. I'd expect him to move back north with his carriers this turn, but I have a number of undetected subs around the area. The expected bombardments at Manus haven't appeared yet. Instead, supply slowly rises currently through air transport and forts are building. My AV has recovered to ~600 currently at the base.