RE: August 18th, 1943

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

RE: August 18th, 1943

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: August 18th, 1943

Page: << < prev 53 54 [55] 56 57 next > >>

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: August 18th, 1943 - 11/28/2019 7:39:34 PM

BBfanboy

Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline

Even estimating ops losses I cannot see those two combat reports coming up to the 93 aircraft lost by the IJN. Huge FOW overestimate IMO. Still, even if the losses are only half that it is nice to dull KB's fangs, especially over your base. Well done!

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Anachro)

Post #: 1621

RE: August 18th, 1943 - 11/29/2019 1:02:25 AM

Anachro

Posts: 2506
Joined: 11/23/2015
From: The Coastal Elite
Status: offline

Good point, looking at recon from previous turns to most recent, he probably lost between 40-60 a/c. Still using A6M5s, but I expect he'll upgrade soon to the Jacks/Georges. Then we'll really learn if that was a balanced decision or not.

(in reply to BBfanboy)

Post #: 1622

RE: August 18th, 1943 - 11/29/2019 6:47:11 PM

Anachro

Posts: 2506
Joined: 11/23/2015
From: The Coastal Elite
Status: offline

Next turn: not much to note. A sub launches 4 torpedoes at a Japanese CVL, but as with my luck with subs in this game so far, all miss! Meanwhile, John seems to land more troops (though seems to mostly be supply or equipment at Manus)! This will be fun! John also bombards Tagula Island.

quote:

Night Naval bombardment of Tagula Island at 104,137

Allied aircraft
no flights

Allied aircraft losses
OS2U-3 Kingfisher: 9 damaged
OS2U-3 Kingfisher: 1 destroyed on ground
Catalina I: 2 damaged
PB4Y-1 Liberator: 11 damaged

Japanese Ships
CA Miyako
CA Seiki
CA Haguro
CA Takao
DD Shimakaze
DD Yoizuki
DD Fuyuzuki
DD Shimozuki
DD Niizuki
DD Akizuki

Allied ground losses:
502 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Non Combat: 4 destroyed, 52 disabled
Engineers: 2 destroyed, 22 disabled
Guns lost 12 (3 destroyed, 9 disabled)
Vehicles lost 20 (6 destroyed, 14 disabled)

Airbase hits 32
Airbase supply hits 10
Runway hits 37

quote:

Sub attack near Arawe at 101,127

Japanese Ships
CVL Ryukaku
BC Chichibu
CLAA Kako
CS Sukai
CS Poroshiri
DD Haruzuki
DD Hanazuki
DD Mitchisuki
DD Hazuki
DD Ozuki
DD Natsuzuki

Allied Ships
SS Blackfish, hits 1

SS Blackfish launches 4 torpedoes at CVL Ryukaku

quote:

Pre-Invasion action off Manus (101,119) - Coastal Guns Fire Back!
Defensive Guns engage approaching landing force

107 Coastal gun shots fired in defense.

Japanese Ships
BB Mutsu
BB Nagato
DD Isonami
xAK Daisho Maru, Shell hits 10, heavy fires, heavy damage

Allied ground losses:
55 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 5 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 6 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Vehicles lost 3 (1 destroyed, 2 disabled)

BB Mutsu firing at Americal Infantry Division
BB Nagato firing at Americal Infantry Division
Port Moresby Coastal Gun Battalion firing at DD Isonami
DD Isonami firing at Port Moresby Coastal Gun Battalion
155mm M1 Howitzer battery firing at xAK Daisho Maru
40mm M1 Bofors battery firing at xAK Daisho Maru
3.7" Mk VI AA battery firing at xAK Daisho Maru
105mm M3 Howitzer battery firing at xAK Daisho Maru

quote:

Amphibious Assault at Manus (101,119)

TF 169 troops unloading over beach at Manus, 101,119

(in reply to Anachro)

Post #: 1623

RE: August 18th, 1943 - 11/29/2019 6:50:46 PM

Anachro

Posts: 2506
Joined: 11/23/2015
From: The Coastal Elite
Status: offline

I will say, a big boost to Japan in this game from my opinion, seems to be the immense additional nav search options Japan has in this game. In stock normal scenarios, Japan already has long-range nav search, but with the introduction of even longer-range HB's, he can see very deep and it's hard to find places where John might have gaps in his nav search umbrella. On top of that, Japan gets a number of these new CS ships (Poroshiri-class, I think) to pad out his Air TFs with more search planes. Notice two more of that CS class (I already sank two a week ago!) in that CV TF my sub ran into.

(in reply to Anachro)

Post #: 1624

RE: August 16th, 1943 - 11/29/2019 8:18:25 PM

Chickenboy

Posts: 24520
Joined: 6/29/2002
From: San Antonio, TX
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Anachro

Also, my yearly made-from-scratch Thanksgiving blueberry pie. I think I posted one last year too.

A real beaut!

_____________________________

(in reply to Anachro)

Post #: 1625

RE: August 16th, 1943 - 11/29/2019 10:09:37 PM

witpqs

Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline

Alas, the one you posted last year never arrived.

Did you put enough stamps on it?

_____________________________

Intel Monkey: https://sites.google.com/view/staffmonkeys/home

(in reply to Chickenboy)

Post #: 1626

August 20th, 1943 - 12/1/2019 11:03:26 PM

Anachro

Posts: 2506
Joined: 11/23/2015
From: The Coastal Elite
Status: offline

I will post the last few turns (I think around 5 or so have happened since my last update. This has resulted in a one-sided carrier battle where my pilots and planes severely under perform and despite very strong escort my bombers get chewed up a bit. Nonetheless, we have definitely sunk one Japanese CV and might sink more in the ensuing turns. This all came about through a very risky maneuver on John's part that, so far, has come back to bite him. Accompanying this turn, John sent me a note that he is discontinuing his AAR.

A bit sad; I will be continuing this one, but I understand,given my emails to him that I might be slow at times due to RL busyness, that he will be doing a second PBEM and AAR. I can attest that the absolute maximum one can do is 2 PBEMs and trying to do multiple AARs really is not possible. I hope to still tell his story through my AAR. Perhaps he can do periodic updates on his strategic situation from his end.

August 20th, 1943

August 20th is an innocuous day which sees John operating forces in two areas. From previous turns, it's apparent John has a force of some sort up by Horn Island, in addition to his roving main KB force around Manus that seems to be covering a force that, at this moment, I assumed would be landing additional troops at Manus. John, much like the Japanese in real life, has Japanese TF's weaving around all over. While this is going on, I have my carriers and other ships refueling and slightly repairing at Townsville in preparation for a movement on Law that I hope will simultaneously spook John's ships around Manus.

< Message edited by Anachro -- 12/1/2019 11:27:10 PM >

(in reply to witpqs)

Post #: 1627

August 21st, 1943 - 12/1/2019 11:37:20 PM

Anachro

Posts: 2506
Joined: 11/23/2015
From: The Coastal Elite
Status: offline

August 21st, 1943

The CV force seen a few days ago at Merauke is shown to be at Horn Island this turn (was unconfirmed last turn). Meanwhile, John continues to rove around covering his extraction from Manus. He also does a nice bombardment of Portland Roads and gets my HBs on the ground. Meanwhile, my transports are filling up with combat and support troops for the Lae invasion and are ready to sail this turn. My carriers were in port to recuperated for a turn and fuel up.

(in reply to Anachro)

Post #: 1628

August 22nd, 1943 - A sudden carrier chase - 12/1/2019 11:48:20 PM

Anachro

Posts: 2506
Joined: 11/23/2015
From: The Coastal Elite
Status: offline

August 22nd, 1943 - A sudden carrier chase

Next turn, in order to spook John's forces at Horn and at Manus I move my carriers and surface ships at Townsville, a good portion of the Allied fleet, northeast towards Milne Bay. That way, I could leave John in a dilemna as to whether or not I'd move towards Horn or go north towards Manus, putting him in a bind and hopefully making him withdraw to a safer distance. These ships would then pull back to cover my transports as they headed for Lae. John, perhaps not expecting me to move out so strongly this turn (I had given no indications of it at all), seemed to have ran his carriers at flank speed from Horn down south of Milne Bay and across, perhaps with the intention of linking up with his other carriers at Manus. As he stated in his emails, he took a big risk this turn and it worked out for him. He was 8 hexes away from my own carriers which I had set to a strike distance of 7.

< Message edited by Anachro -- 12/1/2019 11:50:20 PM >

(in reply to Anachro)

Post #: 1629

August 23rd, 1943 - The chase continues - 12/2/2019 12:00:17 AM

Anachro

Posts: 2506
Joined: 11/23/2015
From: The Coastal Elite
Status: offline

August 23rd, 1943 - The chase continues

Hoping to catch John's carriers (I suspected that a flank speed run the previous turn would make them a bit slower and fall within range this turn), I move my carriers due northeast and set fighters and dive bombers to use drop tanks with a range of 10 hexes. Knowing John has several bases in the area, I set my fighters primarily to escort duty, relying on ~180 fighters at Milne Bay to help provide LRCAP. Unfortunately, nothing seems in range this turn and all my carriers manage to do is send a half-hearted strike at a couple destroyers at Fischaven where they put two bombs into DD Hibiki. This is frustrating because there appears to be a SCTF 8 hexes away near Buin.

John's comments on the past 2 turns, including this one:

quote:

That last turn was a near thing. Did a high speed jump from Horn east and ended up only 8 hexes from your CVs. Thank goodness neither of us reacted. It would have been VERY bad!

I decide to send my carriers again to the northeast as I try to at least hit the SCTF near Buin (and part of me wonders if its just bad recon on John's carriers from the previous turn). However, cognizant that John has another carrier force with strong fighter escort in the north, I set an evenly divided CAP and escort for the following day.

< Message edited by Anachro -- 12/2/2019 12:01:00 AM >

(in reply to Anachro)

Post #: 1630

August 24th, 1943 - A Carrier Battle, kind of... - 12/2/2019 12:22:49 AM

Anachro

Posts: 2506
Joined: 11/23/2015
From: The Coastal Elite
Status: offline

August 24th, 1943 - A Carrier Battle, kind of...

My hunch from last turn turns out to be a home run. That SCTF was indeed a carrier strike force! And rather than being the mini-KB with ~70 fighters or so shown in previous turns, it's CAP is actually very strong (~140 fighters) and the task force is composed of 4 fleet carriers and 1 light carrier (CV Hiryu, Soryu, Akagi, Amagi, and CVL Soryu). Unfortunately for our strike package, the Japanese fighter pilots are indeed aces able to swat aside our hellcats and really dig into our bombers. This has an ensuing effect on our bombers who perform very poorly in their strikes despite their numbers. Nonetheless, enough get through and get a few bomb hits in that turn out to be significant. CV Hiryu suffers an ammo storage explosion, CV Soryu suffers a fuel storage explosion, CV Akagi, Hiryu, and most likely CV Amagi are shown with heavy smoke. In a second strike, CV Soryu is hit 2 more times, and last seen heavily burning and smoking

While the strikes are a bit lackluster from our perspective. We are pleased with the implications for the ensuing turn. We can assume one carrier has sunk based on a/c destroyed on the ground, we can further assume an additional 1-2 carriers are heavily or decently damaged (most likely Hiryu or Soryu sank with the other one in trouble). This means that KB2 will either need to be split or will be slowed down in the next turn, with John's carriers in serious trouble from further attack. Moreover, recon shows little a/c strength left on the carriers in KB2. However, KB1 with significant a/c strength is to the north, 19 hexes from KB2 and 17 hexes away from Death Star. There is opportunity in the ensuing turns tempered by risks from John's still-dangerous CV TF's. Moreover, it's a crapshoot as to where John's KB2 will try to flee towards.

So this is really a turn in which I ask the panel of readers. What do you think I should do with Death Star? Feel free to ask additional questions. The Lae invasion force is at Milne Bay with a strong covering CVE force (~120 fighters) and SCTF's. It can probably continue on towards Lae with additional LRCAP from Port Moresby. My Death Star carriers still have the large majority of their fighter strength, it was really only their bombers that were cut into. That said, they still have decent strike power.

(in reply to Anachro)

Post #: 1631

RE: August 23rd, 1943 - The chase continues - 12/2/2019 12:24:29 AM

witpqs

Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline

IIRC, Allied carriers max striking range is 7 hexes against ships, IJN carriers max striking range is 8 hexes against ships. They can strike out to full aircraft ranges against land targets. Paraphrasing heavily, there is a rule where awesome squadron leaders and great pilots can pass die roll checks to strike farther, but it's unusual even for that august crowd.

_____________________________

Intel Monkey: https://sites.google.com/view/staffmonkeys/home

(in reply to Anachro)

Post #: 1632

RE: August 23rd, 1943 - The chase continues - 12/2/2019 12:25:33 AM

Chickenboy

Posts: 24520
Joined: 6/29/2002
From: San Antonio, TX
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: witpqs
but it's unusual even for that august crowd.

OK. So it's unlikely to work now. But what about in September?

_____________________________

(in reply to witpqs)

Post #: 1633

RE: August 23rd, 1943 - The chase continues - 12/2/2019 12:25:36 AM

Anachro

Posts: 2506
Joined: 11/23/2015
From: The Coastal Elite
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: witpqs

IIRC, Allied carriers max striking range is 7 hexes against ships, IJN carriers max striking range is 8 hexes against ships. They can strike out to full aircraft ranges against land targets. Paraphrasing heavily, there is a rule where awesome squadron leaders and great pilots can pass die roll checks to strike farther, but it's unusual even for that august crowd.

I did not know this, now I do. I was wondering why my carriers wouldn't strike at targets close enough with droptanks on.

(in reply to witpqs)

Post #: 1634

RE: August 23rd, 1943 - The chase continues - 12/2/2019 12:26:56 AM

Chickenboy

Posts: 24520
Joined: 6/29/2002
From: San Antonio, TX
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Anachro

quote:

ORIGINAL: witpqs

IIRC, Allied carriers max striking range is 7 hexes against ships, IJN carriers max striking range is 8 hexes against ships. They can strike out to full aircraft ranges against land targets. Paraphrasing heavily, there is a rule where awesome squadron leaders and great pilots can pass die roll checks to strike farther, but it's unusual even for that august crowd.

I did not know this, now I do. I was wondering why my carriers wouldn't strike at targets close enough with droptanks on.

Forgive me if this is a mundane point, but you are aware that drop tanks on naval strike aircraft may interfere with loading of certain ordnance, right?

_____________________________

(in reply to Anachro)

Post #: 1635

RE: August 23rd, 1943 - The chase continues - 12/2/2019 12:28:29 AM

Anachro

Posts: 2506
Joined: 11/23/2015
From: The Coastal Elite
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

quote:

ORIGINAL: Anachro

quote:

ORIGINAL: witpqs

IIRC, Allied carriers max striking range is 7 hexes against ships, IJN carriers max striking range is 8 hexes against ships. They can strike out to full aircraft ranges against land targets. Paraphrasing heavily, there is a rule where awesome squadron leaders and great pilots can pass die roll checks to strike farther, but it's unusual even for that august crowd.

I did not know this, now I do. I was wondering why my carriers wouldn't strike at targets close enough with droptanks on.

Forgive me if this is a mundane point, but you are aware that drop tanks on naval strike aircraft may interfere with loading of certain ordnance, right?

Haha...please Chickenboy...of course I knew that! Hahah, of course I thought this through....

(in reply to Chickenboy)

Post #: 1636

RE: August 23rd, 1943 - The chase continues - 12/2/2019 4:52:34 AM

BBfanboy

Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline

If I were the IJ player, Ponape would be the only refuge nearby that I would feel is far enough from your LBA to have carriers lick their wounds. He would need to use KB1 to cover the cripples and bring in lots of fighters to Ponape. His Netties can operate from Truk.

The only other gambit he has is all those SCTFs that have been bombarding. If he has rearmed them at Truk and runs them flank speed he could soak up your sorties to save his crippled carriers. His CAs are fast enough to try and get into your DS at night.

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Anachro)

Post #: 1637

RE: August 23rd, 1943 - The chase continues - 12/2/2019 5:43:08 AM

CaptBeefheart

Posts: 2301
Joined: 7/4/2003
From: Seoul, Korea
Status: offline

Do you have a replenishment TF with CVE replacement squadrons within range? It's like American Express: Don't leave home without it. Barring that, do you have any VMF or VMSB squadrons you could put on your decks to fill them out? That would help your situation a lot.

Also, why did he move the mini-KB you hit to the east? Was it because he didn't think the KB to the north was strong enough to take on the DS? That would suggest he'll continue east with the mini-KB. If you do head east, I would not move the Lae invasion fleet any closer for the time being.

Tough one to read. Another thing to keep in mind is you could detach a surface TF to patrol in one direction while the DS went another.

Good luck!

Cheers,
CB

_____________________________

Beer, because barley makes lousy bread.

(in reply to BBfanboy)

Post #: 1638

SitRep - 12/2/2019 9:40:47 AM

Anachro

Posts: 2506
Joined: 11/23/2015
From: The Coastal Elite
Status: offline

So, there are a couple of things to consider here from my perspective:

1. Strength and Potential Intervention of KB1: KB1 has been roving around for at least 10-12 days and has traveled a decent little distance; I am unsure as to its fuel situation. It could very well be that he needs to fuel up at Truk first and can not make a run down south, or, more likely, at least not a flank speed run. That said it's not a good idea to bet on this and so we have to assume that he has the fuel to move south. Moreover, the most recent estimate of KB1's strength is most likely not an accurate one, given the fighter/bomber estimates from previous days. Thus, in prudence, we should assume at least decent fighter coverage and strike power from KB1.

2. John's Psychological State and Portents for Situation of KB2 and Intentions: John sent me an email with the most recent turn that I think points to him being a bit depressed as to the results, thereby giving away that perhaps the damage to the carriers of KB2 was a bit worse than what might be expected from the turn replay. In the end, four fleet CVs did receive 3 semi-armor piercing bomb hits apiece: CV Akagi, Amagi, Soryu, and Hiryu. One has sunk, but the others might not be able to move very far and were last seen on fire with some heavy smoking; and I don't think any of these carriers are particularly well-armored. It could well be that at least 1-2 carriers from KB2 will not be able to move very far and might be in range of strikes even if I don't move aggressively east or north. That said, this is tempered by the risky gambits John might try out of desperation to save his carriers: 1) splitting off an SCTF from KB2 to try and hit my carriers in a night action; 2) flank speed south with SCTF's from Truk and KB1. Nonetheless, John's email to me coming immediately after this turn strikes me as someone not very happy at all with the results. What does that tell me about the situation? Furthermore, his mindset will affect his decision-making.

quote:

Just wanted to send this Posting I made earlier on my AAR. Glad I made the decision prior to the last 2-3 turns.

Hello All.

My match with Sean is rolling on and we're in late-August 43. I have decided to stop my AAR due to a new match I will be starting later this month. There is no way that I can have two campaigns and TWO AARs running at the same time. Do not have time in life for all that. Feel like it is better to stop this AAR right now before something happens that cheats you guys when reading. TRUST ME though you WANT the AAR in the next match! There will be tons of excitement and a huge following for each of our AARs! Anybody wanna take a guess??? Naaaaa...that isn't fair to ask.

It is gonna be EPIC!

3. My A/C and Fuel Situation: Finally, my own carriers are in decent shape, if not amazing. Most, of the A/C losses from the past turn were in my bombers. This means I have close to my full fighter complement, which is 445 fighters currently. In addition to this, I still have 284 dive bombers and torpedo bombers. This means I can pack a decent punch while having enough CAP to fend off some good attempts to hit my carriers by air. I could probably even risk a reduced CAP on the morrow, throwing more fighters into escort duty. I have a replenishment carrier at Milne Bay carrying additional TBs and Hellcats. Beyond that, my fuel situation is pretty decent for all of my carrier TFs and very good for two of them. I should not run out of fuel any time soon, but I won't try flank speed runs either.

Thoughts:
With the above in mind, it becomes a question of how far I move towards the danger of the risky moves John might try. I'm more inclined to not move too far. If I move 8 hexes east north-east, for instance, I should have good strike range against a potentially crippled KB2. if that's the case. while also remaining 19 hexes from KB1's current position and 16 hexes from Truk. This is one potential move, as there are others. I think the main thing is to try and avoid a surface action like Spruance immediately after Midway (and no, I don't think this is a Midway situation for Japan...yet) while retaining a good chance of a second day strike, cognizant of KB1's CAP and strike power, as well as the significant IJN surface forces nearby. I don't want to turn a good event into a disaster. I could split off some vessels from all three TFs to create an accompanying surface TF. I could bring up some of my surface ships from Milne Bay, etc.

So many things to ponder as I approach this turn...

< Message edited by Anachro -- 12/2/2019 9:51:56 AM >

(in reply to CaptBeefheart)

Post #: 1639

RE: August 23rd, 1943 - The chase continues - 12/2/2019 9:50:07 AM

Anachro

Posts: 2506
Joined: 11/23/2015
From: The Coastal Elite
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

If I were the IJ player, Ponape would be the only refuge nearby that I would feel is far enough from your LBA to have carriers lick their wounds. He would need to use KB1 to cover the cripples and bring in lots of fighters to Ponape. His Netties can operate from Truk.

The only other gambit he has is all those SCTFs that have been bombarding. If he has rearmed them at Truk and runs them flank speed he could soak up your sorties to save his crippled carriers. His CAs are fast enough to try and get into your DS at night.

Yes, this problem is not a very easy one for me to solve. He has a LOT of BBs at Truk from what I can tell based on previous turns (BB Mutsu, Yamato, Nagato, etc.). Again, I'm not sure on the fuel situation as he has been using all his ships a LOT and they are gas guzzlers. If I had to guess, I'd say some have been refueled but not all of them, so it's a question of what he can send and if he's willing to risk losing BBs to my strikes as well. Likewise, I'm not sure how far he can move his carriers based on my sitrep above without running into fuel problems there too. The psychological aspect is interesting me in all of this because if John feels super depressed about last turn, then he might not be willing to take the risks you point out.

quote:

ORIGINAL: CaptBeefheart

Do you have a replenishment TF with CVE replacement squadrons within range? It's like American Express: Don't leave home without it. Barring that, do you have any VMF or VMSB squadrons you could put on your decks to fill them out? That would help your situation a lot.

Also, why did he move the mini-KB you hit to the east? Was it because he didn't think the KB to the north was strong enough to take on the DS? That would suggest he'll continue east with the mini-KB. If you do head east, I would not move the Lae invasion fleet any closer for the time being.

Tough one to read. Another thing to keep in mind is you could detach a surface TF to patrol in one direction while the DS went another.

I'm not sure about sending a SCTF to rove around, but it probably makes sense to have one protecting my carriers. I have BBs/BCs in all my carrier TFs. A replacement CVE is at Milne Bay, but I lost 3 of them a few months back and have no more. I could aggressively send it east, along with some SCTFs and my fighter CVEs to backup my carriers in subsequent days. He moved northeast with his KB2 probably in an attempt to get out of sight and then continue on towards Truk. I do not think he was expecting me to send my carriers aggressively north past Rabaul towards him nonetheless. This might be why he didn't send KB1 down south. OR perhaps KB1 is low on fuel.

< Message edited by Anachro -- 12/2/2019 9:52:42 AM >

(in reply to BBfanboy)

Post #: 1640

RE: August 23rd, 1943 - The chase continues - 12/2/2019 11:54:13 AM

Bearcat2

Posts: 577
Joined: 2/14/2004
Status: offline

What is the fuel situation on your ships, any ship in danger of refueling which would cause a split in your fleets?
With so few A/C losses and so few planes on his CV's, looks like you have holed his CV's and the planes flew to land bases.

John is super aggressive, he is coming for your carriers.

_____________________________

"After eight years as President I have only two regrets: that I have not shot Henry Clay or hanged John C. Calhoun."--1837

(in reply to Anachro)

Post #: 1641

RE: August 23rd, 1943 - The chase continues - 12/2/2019 12:25:29 PM

Anachro

Posts: 2506
Joined: 11/23/2015
From: The Coastal Elite
Status: offline

As you can see from my attached image, the fuel situation is decent for the most part, but it is a tiny bit low for my British task force. Wouldn't cause a problem for the next turn, but could potentially if I had to flank speed in future turns. I also believe, like you, that the CV's for the most part in KB2 have had their flight decks shut down and the majority of A/C has flown off. I suspect John will be aggressive, but the biggest question is if he has the capability of sending KB1 far down. If I were John, I'd make for Ponape and use LBA, KB1 if possible, and SCTF to cover and potentially inflict harm.

(in reply to Bearcat2)

Post #: 1642

RE: August 23rd, 1943 - The chase continues - 12/2/2019 1:18:21 PM

HansBolter

Posts: 7704
Joined: 7/6/2006
From: United States
Status: offline

If his main carrier force to the north contains all fast ships it will be capable of moving 18 hexes with a full speed sprint.

Add 8 hexes to that for his potential strike range and make sure your target hex for movement is at least 27 hexes away from his current location.

This likely means a foray to the south of the crippled carriers rather than to the north of them.

If you can find a location within 7 hexes of his expected travel range with the cripples and 27 hexes from the main carrier force, then a foray against the cripples is viable.

If not, don't pursue and be satisfied with what you already accomplished.

_____________________________

Hans

(in reply to Anachro)

Post #: 1643

RE: August 23rd, 1943 - The chase continues - 12/2/2019 1:38:31 PM

Anachro

Posts: 2506
Joined: 11/23/2015
From: The Coastal Elite
Status: offline

So, here's a question for you: KB1 has been at sea for around 11-12 days. I've traced its path up above. In that time, it hasn't been fueled by AOs, nor has it visited a port. Do you think it has enough fuel/ops points to flank speed down 18 hexes? I'm not so sure. On top of this, it conducts a strike with ~120 AC against Milne Bay along the way, which also consumed fuel/op points if I remember from the manual.

I've separated out a SCTF to accompany my carriers and have so far added 16 additional fighters and 33 dive bombers to my carriers from marine squadrons. I am looking around for more at the moment. I still have not decided on the path of my carriers.

(in reply to HansBolter)

Post #: 1644

RE: August 23rd, 1943 - The chase continues - 12/2/2019 2:50:03 PM

Anachro

Posts: 2506
Joined: 11/23/2015
From: The Coastal Elite
Status: offline

The turn is away to John. I opted to send my carriers east just south of KB2 and then up 1 hex above it, one hex or so east of its current position. Hopefully, this keeps me out of trouble while getting a chance to hit any crippled carriers. In case John comes south with his carriers and SCTFs, my replenishment CVE, my ~120 fighter CVE Task Force, a CA/DD TF, and a fast BB TF head at flank speed from Milne to the dot hex just above Buin. This means they can participate in future action if needed and provide assistance. I have put a decent amount of fighters at Buin as well.

< Message edited by Anachro -- 12/2/2019 2:52:32 PM >

(in reply to Anachro)

Post #: 1645

RE: August 23rd, 1943 - The chase continues - 12/2/2019 7:50:03 PM

BBfanboy

Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline

Good move. Now is the time to bring all your reserves to bear and make the tactical victory a strategic one that will shift the balance for good. Sink three crippled carriers without losing any of yours and you have that.

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Anachro)

Post #: 1646

RE: August 23rd, 1943 - The chase continues - 12/2/2019 9:43:25 PM

Timotheus

Posts: 481
Joined: 12/13/2013
Status: offline

Wow, he is alive.

This is one of the most fun AAR's to follow.
Anarcho is a good enough player so that the Japanese star wars force composition is not soul crushing, but a challenge.

WWHN (what will happen next)

_____________________________

NEWBIE GUIDE Distant Worlds Universe
http://tinyurl.com/k3frrle

War in the Pacific Poradnik po Polsku
http://tinyurl.com/nxd4cesh

INSTALL WITPAE on modern PC
https://tinyurl.com/l5kr6rl

(in reply to BBfanboy)

Post #: 1647

RE: August 24th, 1943 - A Carrier Battle, kind of... - 12/2/2019 9:52:52 PM

Chickenboy

Posts: 24520
Joined: 6/29/2002
From: San Antonio, TX
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Anachro
So this is really a turn in which I ask the panel of readers. What do you think I should do with Death Star? Feel free to ask additional questions. The Lae invasion force is at Milne Bay with a strong covering CVE force (~120 fighters) and SCTF's. It can probably continue on towards Lae with additional LRCAP from Port Moresby. My Death Star carriers still have the large majority of their fighter strength, it was really only their bombers that were cut into. That said, they still have decent strike power.

Kill KB2. Repeat Kill KB2. That is all.

_____________________________

(in reply to Anachro)

Post #: 1648

RE: August 24th, 1943 - A Carrier Battle, kind of... - 12/2/2019 10:20:12 PM

Anachro

Posts: 2506
Joined: 11/23/2015
From: The Coastal Elite
Status: offline

@CB
We'll certainly try to sink KB2. In the battle, all four of John's fleet carriers in KB2 took 3 SAP bomb hits, with a fuel explosion and an ammo explosion for Hiryu and Soryu respectively. One is definitely sunk, with another most likely severely mauled and I'm hoping poor Japanese DC means the others are in trouble. I hope they are slowed down just enough on the morrow that we can have 4 CVs sunk and perhaps a CVL in addition. CVL Aso is a new CVL-class for this mod, CV Amagi is a new Shokaku-kai class, so I'm not sure how durable she is, but Akagi, Hiryu, and Soryu can be relative tinder boxes, at least historically! At Midway, Soryu took 3 SAP hits and burned up, Hiryu took 4, Akagi took (a very lucky) 1!

Of course, I could guess incorrectly tomorrow and not hit anything, or John can run into my CVs with SCTFs (the most likely bring ships split off from the mauled KB2), or John's KB1 can play a role (but in that case I think my own CAP should give me good protection). As BB states, sinking 3-4 Japanese CV's would give me a nice boost; however, it would only create parity, maybe a slight margin of superiority for me currently, but would have a big effect as more carriers come online in '43 and '44. I could then be more free in operations even in places where the IJN is also in force. I'm pretty sure John was trying to combine KB1 and KB2 because then he would have had CV superiority over me in the SoPac, especially with his CV-capable Georges coming online soon. CV Illustrious is 5 days from full repair in port at Sydney, CV Lexington is repairing at Capetown. 2 more Essex-class CVs come online in the next two months.

But let's not get ahead of ourselves...we're not through it yet. I might end up with damage to my carriers and only a Hiryu-class CV sunk for all of this.

< Message edited by Anachro -- 12/2/2019 10:22:38 PM >

(in reply to Chickenboy)

Post #: 1649

August 25th, 1943 - 12/3/2019 4:49:59 PM

Anachro

Posts: 2506
Joined: 11/23/2015
From: The Coastal Elite
Status: offline

August 25th, 1943

I waited a long time for this turn, hoping there'd be some action. Unfortunately, it turns out to be a dud and NOTHING happens in the air in the South Pacific. Indeed, their is no DL on my carriers, either the fleet carriers heading east or my CVE's near Rabaul.

However, there is some interesting information that portends well for the Allies I think. First, a second sinking sound is heard and more Japanese naval A/C are shown to be destroyed on the ground. I'm guessing now that both CV Hiryu and CV Soryu have sunk (and the VP gain points to this). More interesting is what the intelligence screen shows me in regards to CV Akagi and Amagi. CV Amagi is shown as sunk at a hex north of Ontong Java. Akagi is shown sunk near Nauru Island, at a hex east of it. We can surmise that this is the path of the leftover crippled KB2 carriers: eastward.

As for my CVEs and such, I'll probably move them back towards Milne Bay to sit tight and provide CAP along with heavy LBA cover and in the mean time bombard Rabaul to hit any ships and planes that might be there. Death Star seems in good shape and can probably hold its own as it seems KB2 is no longer a force to be reckoned with and I do NOT want John to come down with KB1 on my transports while my carriers chase KB2.

Anyways, the important news: 2 IJN Fleet CVs SUNK! 2 more perhaps in trouble.

Now where to send my carriers. I will probably set them to naval strike at seven hexes again and move in a east, north-eastern direction. I'd love to sink 2 Akagi-class CVs with their nice A/C capacity.

< Message edited by Anachro -- 12/4/2019 12:06:16 AM >

(in reply to Anachro)

Post #: 1650