RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies)

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies)

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies)

Page: << < prev 23 24 [25] 26 27 next > >>

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies) - 3/11/2019 9:29:51 AM

Uncivil Engineer

Posts: 1014
Joined: 2/22/2012
From: Florida, USA
Status: offline

Yeah, that's nothing - I can remember in the early 60's we had to put sweaters on in Miami when it got below 70!!

(in reply to RangerJoe)

Post #: 721

RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies) - 3/11/2019 10:40:56 AM

RangerJoe

Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline

When I was in a nursing home for awhile (I had gotten very ill) I would go outside and visit with the people smoking. It was in the 20s F, snowing slightly but out of the wind, and I was dressed in a T-shirt, shorts, socks, and boots. The ladies would say "put a jacket on, you're making me cold!) But I was warm - of course, I have lots of natural insulation!

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

�Illegitemus non carborundum est (�Don�t let the bastards grind you down�).�
― Julia Child

(in reply to Uncivil Engineer)

Post #: 722

RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies) - 3/11/2019 12:28:33 PM

Lowpe

Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline

Dec 3, 1942

My run silent, run deep strategy writ large...there is a glen equipped Iboat also in hex patrolling, with the glen on nigh naval search.

I like to have 45 ASW points here, and I am 1-2 short.

2 VP tanker is bait.

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 3/11/2019 12:29:06 PM >

(in reply to Uncivil Engineer)

Post #: 723

RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies) - 3/11/2019 12:30:09 PM

Lowpe

Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline

Quiet day...

Chungking continues to lose strength.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)

Post #: 724

RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies) - 3/11/2019 12:33:34 PM

Lowpe

Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline

These are the most heavily damaged troops from Chungking. They are resting, with two HQs to provide support, one hex west of Chungking.

With forts 5, we will most likely rest 3 more days, and 2 days to march back in (recombining on the 2nd day) and attack on the sixth.

I will look to accelerate the rate of attacks as the forts decline in strength.

I have managed to avoid shattering any IJA units, which will hopefully increase the speed of conquest, but sadly won't let me buy out any divisions on the cheap.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)

Post #: 725

RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies) - 3/11/2019 12:34:30 PM

Encircled

Posts: 2024
Joined: 12/30/2010
From: Northern England
Status: offline

Regarding the weather, when I was in the army cadets I was camping on Dartmoor and woke up to sleet in June. Which is pretty bad for the UK.

_____________________________

(in reply to Lowpe)

Post #: 726

RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies) - 3/11/2019 2:35:11 PM

RangerJoe

Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline

Time to buy out trashed units . . .

Wouldn't the trashed units recover more quickly with the HQs when all are in a well supplied Base?

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

�Illegitemus non carborundum est (�Don�t let the bastards grind you down�).�
― Julia Child

(in reply to Encircled)

Post #: 727

RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies) - 3/11/2019 8:42:12 PM

Mike Solli

Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lokasenna

quote:

ORIGINAL: obvert

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

quote:

ORIGINAL: GetAssista

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe
Nov 23, 1942

Chungking...

Hey, just keep on bombarding You don't really need taking CK - it's beginning to look a lot like a VP factory of epic proportions

A bit gamey, upgrading some tank regiments at Neikiang while the infantry rests and sips sake.

I don't know. I was just thinking the same thing. I mean, what is more gamey than the Japanese being able to take all of China and have no Chinese troops in China at all?

If you did just keep it up, as units respawned it would probably get to some kind of equilibrium. Right now it looks like 15-20 VPs a day (assuming you aren't losing any devices). Imagine if it settled down to even 10 VPs a day. Those are permanent, and at 300/month, 3,600/year, and several years to go. It would be much more lucrative for the end game to just sit and keep bombarding.

Of course you'd then never get the Chungking industry and yo'd be using a lot of supply to keep bombarding and bombing for years. Something to ponder though. Or, and this is a really interesting idea, but I think you've already taken it. Keep this up for a good long while until troops are ready to capitulate. Take Chungking, but let them have Chegtu to respawn in and start over there with a bombardment routine.

That's a huge supply and opportunity cost investment, though, as you mention. The Chinese units that respawn, assuming about 500 devices, are only worth about 40 additional VPs. I'd rather have the base and gamble that I keep it for long enough for the huge base VPs to matter.

And be able to use that artillery elsewhere.

Same here. Take Chungking and put the Chinese out of the war. Lots of high experience infantry units that you can buy out and put in level 6-9 fort islands and watch the Allied player cry when he invades them.

_____________________________

Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to Lokasenna)

Post #: 728

RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies) - 3/11/2019 8:56:12 PM

Mike Solli

Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

I fondly remember it frequently being -30 F on Christmas eve . . .

I understand that at Sault Sainte Marie that people would sometimes have to get out of the second story window to shovel the snow. Think if you lived in a one story house . . .

A friend of mine moved to Scottsdale, Arizona, from Sault Saint Marie. I wonder why . . .

One time, the city crew in my hometown was clearing the snow from the streets, the grader with the wing out decided to take the roof off a car parked on the side of the street.

One time, I understand that Duluth, Minnesota, only had 36 inches of snow for Halloween. The snow did not melt until the next spring. I also understand that the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources let people use snowmobiles to get the their deer stands for deer hunting season.

A couple of times in Texas, the Army cancelled the day because there was an inch and a half of snow on the ground. That was rough on a Friday morning . . .

I was in an extreme cold weather unit for 4-5 years (Capstone mission was the Aleutians

). We used to go to the field in the winter to practice freezing. That was before we had all that nice gortex gear. Just a field jacket...

_____________________________

Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to RangerJoe)

Post #: 729

RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies) - 3/11/2019 9:17:16 PM

RangerJoe

Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline

A field jacket with a liner is great. I heard that nylons are very warm. I understand that the NFL football players wear king size panty hose . . .

I believe that an airbase on Shemya Island is used to having 60 mph breezes on the runway. Just think if you were flying in a plane with a low stall speed. You could just land without using much runway.

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

�Illegitemus non carborundum est (�Don�t let the bastards grind you down�).�
― Julia Child

(in reply to Mike Solli)

Post #: 730

RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies) - 3/11/2019 9:54:37 PM

Mike Solli

Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

A field jacket with a liner is great. I heard that nylons are very warm. I understand that the NFL football players wear king size panty hose . . .

I believe that an airbase on Shemya Island is used to having 60 mph breezes on the runway. Just think if you were flying in a plane with a low stall speed. You could just land without using much runway.

Yep, I still have my field jacket & liner. I use it to shovel snow. That part wasn't too bad. The leather work gloves and the old leather boots made for a miserable time. An intermediate sleeping bag didn't really help at all.

My last deployment was to the desert in the Middle East. I loved 130F heat there!

_____________________________

Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to RangerJoe)

Post #: 731

RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies) - 3/12/2019 12:09:25 AM

RangerJoe

Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline

quote:

Yep, I still have my field jacket & liner. I use it to shovel snow.

You never washed it and it got that stiff?

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

�Illegitemus non carborundum est (�Don�t let the bastards grind you down�).�
― Julia Child

(in reply to Mike Solli)

Post #: 732

RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies) - 3/12/2019 3:57:59 AM

PaxMondo

Posts: 9750
Joined: 6/6/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

quote:

Yep, I still have my field jacket & liner. I use it to shovel snow.

You never washed it and it got that stiff?

_____________________________

Pax

(in reply to RangerJoe)

Post #: 733

RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies) - 3/12/2019 4:07:08 AM

PaxMondo

Posts: 9750
Joined: 6/6/2008
Status: offline

Back home, 9000ft, I think it was Freshman year for me � we had a week of -50. Lowest was one morning, -68 at the bus stop. I do believe the bus was late that day. Anyway �.

Now the cool thing about -50 is that when you spit, it bounces. But -68, when you spit, it pops before it can hit the ground. Yep, that what we did for fun, popped spit. Kids these days, they have no idea.

_____________________________

Pax

(in reply to PaxMondo)

Post #: 734

RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies) - 3/12/2019 11:26:00 AM

RangerJoe

Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline

The air temperature usually decreases 3 F for every 1000 feet. If it is moisture added (clouds/fog form) then it is -1 F. On the other side, after losing the moisture, it increases 5 F for every 1000 foot drop. That is why on the windward side of the mountains, you can get a warm wind - even during the winter.

When it got that -60 F, people were throwing buckets of hot water in the air. The water was frozen when it hit the ground. Some people even camped in tents/shelters outside in that weather.

But can you guess what U.S. state has the most days when it snows during the year? On average, it snows 200 days a year in that state.

< Message edited by RangerJoe -- 3/12/2019 1:08:58 PM >

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

�Illegitemus non carborundum est (�Don�t let the bastards grind you down�).�
― Julia Child

(in reply to PaxMondo)

Post #: 735

RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies) - 3/12/2019 2:17:58 PM

Uncivil Engineer

Posts: 1014
Joined: 2/22/2012
From: Florida, USA
Status: offline

Has this game started yet? Or has this thread become the Weather Channel? Just asking.

(in reply to RangerJoe)

Post #: 736

RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies) - 3/12/2019 2:54:37 PM

Bif1961

Posts: 2014
Joined: 6/26/2008
From: Phenix City, Alabama
Status: offline

(in reply to Uncivil Engineer)

Post #: 737

RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies) - 3/12/2019 3:31:33 PM

Lowpe

Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline

Dec 4th, 1942

The run silent run deep puts good hits on another sub. Bombardment group has to wade thru Allied subs.

ASW attack near Adak Island at 162,52

Japanese Ships
DD Yugumo
TB Kasasagi
DD Sanae
DD Oite

Allied Ships
SS Perch

SS Perch is sighted by escort
Perch bottoming out ....
DD Sanae fails to find sub and abandons search
DD Oite fails to find sub, continues to search...
DD Oite fails to find sub, continues to search...
DD Oite fails to find sub, continues to search...
DD Oite fails to find sub, continues to search...
DD Oite fails to find sub, continues to search...
Escort abandons search for sub

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ASW attack near Adak Island at 162,52

Japanese Ships
DD Matsukaze
DD Yugumo
TB Kasasagi
DD Sanae
DD Oite

Allied Ships
SS Sealion, hits 3

SS Sealion launches 4 torpedoes at DD Matsukaze
Sealion bottoming out ....
DD Sanae fails to find sub, continues to search...
DD Oite fails to find sub, continues to search...
DD Sanae fails to find sub and abandons search
DD Oite fails to find sub, continues to search...
DD Oite fails to find sub, continues to search...
DD Oite fails to find sub, continues to search...
DD Oite fails to find sub, continues to search...
DD Oite attacking submerged sub ....
Escort abandons search for sub

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ASW attack near Adak Island at 161,52

Japanese Ships
PB Tosho Maru
PB Shinko Maru #2
SC Ch 39
TK Nissho Maru
PB Bisaku Maru
PB Taijin Maru
PB Hokuyo Maru
PB Takunan Maru

Allied Ships
SS S-46

SS S-46 is sighted by escort
S-46 bottoming out ....
PB Bisaku Maru fails to find sub and abandons search
PB Taijin Maru fails to find sub and abandons search
PB Hokuyo Maru fails to find sub, continues to search...
PB Takunan Maru fails to find sub and abandons search
PB Hokuyo Maru fails to find sub, continues to search...
PB Hokuyo Maru fails to find sub, continues to search...
PB Hokuyo Maru fails to find sub, continues to search...
PB Hokuyo Maru fails to find sub, continues to search...
PB Hokuyo Maru fails to find sub, continues to search...
PB Hokuyo Maru fails to find sub, continues to search...
PB Hokuyo Maru fails to find sub, continues to search...
Escort abandons search for sub

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Night Naval bombardment of Adak Island at 162,52 - Coastal Guns Fire Back!

Japanese Ships
BB Ise
BB Fuso

Allied Ships
SS S-45, hits 1, heavy fires, heavy damage (two ships showing up back in port, both AO).

Allied ground losses:
156 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 2 disabled
Non Combat: 5 destroyed, 11 disabled
Engineers: 2 destroyed, 2 disabled
Vehicles lost 12 (7 destroyed, 5 disabled)

Airbase hits 6
Airbase supply hits 1
Runway hits 8
Port hits 2
Port fuel hits 1

BB Ise firing at Adak Island
F1M2 Pete acting as spotter for BB Fuso
BB Fuso firing at 57th Coastal Artillery Regiment
57th Coastal Artillery Regiment firing at BB Fuso

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ASW attack near Adak Island at 161,52

Japanese Ships
PB Tosho Maru
SC Ch 39
TK Nissho Maru
PB Bisaku Maru
PB Taijin Maru
PB Hokuyo Maru
PB Takunan Maru

Allied Ships
SS S-46, hits 2, heavy damage (direct hits)

SS S-46 is sighted by escort
S-46 bottoming out ....
PB Bisaku Maru fails to find sub, continues to search...
PB Taijin Maru fails to find sub and abandons search
PB Hokuyo Maru fails to find sub and abandons search
PB Takunan Maru fails to find sub and abandons search
PB Bisaku Maru fails to find sub, continues to search...
PB Bisaku Maru fails to find sub, continues to search...
PB Bisaku Maru fails to find sub, continues to search...
PB Bisaku Maru attacking submerged sub ....
Escort abandons search for sub

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------
ASW attack near Adak Island at 161,52

Japanese Ships
TB Kasasagi
DD Yugumo
DD Sanae
DD Oite

Allied Ships
SS Grayback

SS Grayback launches 4 torpedoes at TB Kasasagi
Grayback bottoming out ....
DD Sanae fails to find sub, continues to search...
DD Oite fails to find sub, continues to search...
Escort abandons search for sub

(in reply to Uncivil Engineer)

Post #: 738

RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies) - 3/12/2019 3:34:18 PM

Lowpe

Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline

Aerial attacks on Chungking:

Morning Air attack on 49th Chinese Division, at 76,45 (Chungking)

Weather in hex: Overcast

Raid spotted at 40 NM, estimated altitude 9,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 11 minutes

Japanese aircraft
Ki-21-IIa Sally x 25
Ki-43-IIa Oscar x 12
Ki-45 KAIa Nick x 38

No Japanese losses

Allied ground losses:
581 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 7 disabled
Non Combat: 16 destroyed, 31 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Aircraft Attacking:
31 x Ki-45 KAIa Nick bombing from 6000 feet
Ground Attack: 2 x 250 kg GP Bomb
25 x Ki-21-IIa Sally bombing from 6000 feet
Ground Attack: 4 x 250 kg GP Bomb
9 x Ki-43-IIa Oscar bombing from 6000 feet
Ground Attack: 2 x 250 kg GP Bomb
5 x Ki-45 KAIa Nick bombing from 6000 feet
Ground Attack: 2 x 250 kg GP Bomb
3 x Ki-43-IIa Oscar bombing from 6000 feet
Ground Attack: 2 x 250 kg GP Bomb
2 x Ki-45 KAIa Nick bombing from 6000 feet
Ground Attack: 2 x 250 kg GP Bomb

Also attacking 28th New Chinese Division ...
Also attacking China Command ...
Also attacking CAF HQ ...
Also attacking 28th Chinese Corps ...
Also attacking 40th Chinese Corps ...
Also attacking 1st Chinese Base Force ...
Also attacking 3rd New Chinese Corps ...
Also attacking 49th Chinese Division ...
Also attacking 28th New Chinese Division ...
Also attacking China Command ...
Also attacking CAF HQ ...
Also attacking 28th Chinese Corps ...
Also attacking 28th New Chinese Division ...

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Morning Air attack on 49th Chinese Division, at 76,45 (Chungking)

Weather in hex: Overcast

Raid spotted at 34 NM, estimated altitude 7,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 8 minutes

Japanese aircraft
Ki-43-IIa Oscar x 25
Ki-45 KAIa Nick x 13

No Japanese losses

Allied ground losses:
182 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 4 disabled
Non Combat: 10 destroyed, 5 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Aircraft Attacking:
25 x Ki-43-IIa Oscar bombing from 6000 feet
Ground Attack: 2 x 250 kg GP Bomb
13 x Ki-45 KAIa Nick bombing from 6000 feet
Ground Attack: 2 x 250 kg GP Bomb

Also attacking 14th Chinese Corps ...
Also attacking 68th Chinese Corps ...
Also attacking 49th Chinese Division ...
Also attacking 14th Chinese Corps ...
Also attacking 68th Chinese Corps ...

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Morning Air attack on 60th Chinese Corps, at 76,45 (Chungking)

Weather in hex: Overcast

Raid spotted at 37 NM, estimated altitude 9,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 10 minutes

Japanese aircraft
Ki-21-Ic Sally x 9
Ki-21-IIa Sally x 22
Ki-45 KAIa Nick x 19

Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-45 KAIa Nick: 1 damaged

Allied ground losses:
382 casualties reported
Squads: 4 destroyed, 33 disabled
Non Combat: 4 destroyed, 34 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Aircraft Attacking:
12 x Ki-21-IIa Sally bombing from 7000 feet
Ground Attack: 4 x 250 kg GP Bomb
9 x Ki-21-Ic Sally bombing from 7000 feet
Ground Attack: 4 x 250 kg GP Bomb
19 x Ki-45 KAIa Nick bombing from 6000 feet
Ground Attack: 2 x 250 kg GP Bomb
10 x Ki-21-IIa Sally bombing from 7000 feet
Ground Attack: 4 x 250 kg GP Bomb

Also attacking 77th Chinese Corps ...
Also attacking 90th Chinese Corps ...
Also attacking 91st Chinese Corps ...
Also attacking 32nd Chinese Corps ...
Also attacking 80th Chinese Corps ...
Also attacking 77th Chinese Corps ...
Also attacking 60th Chinese Corps ...
Also attacking 77th Chinese Corps ...
Also attacking 90th Chinese Corps ...

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Morning Air attack on 60th Chinese Corps, at 76,45 (Chungking)

Weather in hex: Overcast

Raid spotted at 2 NM, estimated altitude 11,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 0 minutes

Japanese aircraft
Ki-21-Ic Sally x 9

No Japanese losses

Allied ground losses:
148 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 4 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 6 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Aircraft Attacking:
9 x Ki-21-Ic Sally bombing from 7000 feet
Ground Attack: 4 x 250 kg GP Bomb

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Morning Air attack on 28th New Chinese Division, at 76,45 (Chungking)

Weather in hex: Overcast

Raid spotted at 39 NM, estimated altitude 11,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 11 minutes

Japanese aircraft
Ki-21-IIa Sally x 22

No Japanese losses

Allied ground losses:
178 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 7 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 8 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Aircraft Attacking:
22 x Ki-21-IIa Sally bombing from 6000 feet
Ground Attack: 4 x 250 kg GP Bomb

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Morning Air attack on 14th Chinese Corps, at 76,45 (Chungking)

Weather in hex: Overcast

Raid spotted at 32 NM, estimated altitude 9,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 7 minutes

Japanese aircraft
Ki-43-IIa Oscar x 18

No Japanese losses

Allied ground losses:
78 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 4 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 3 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Aircraft Attacking:
18 x Ki-43-IIa Oscar bombing from 6000 feet
Ground Attack: 2 x 250 kg GP Bomb

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Morning Air attack on 45th Chinese Corps, at 76,45 (Chungking)

Weather in hex: Overcast

Raid spotted at 27 NM, estimated altitude 9,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 7 minutes

Japanese aircraft
Ki-21-IIa Sally x 21

Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-21-IIa Sally: 1 damaged

Allied ground losses:
160 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 15 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 17 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Aircraft Attacking:
21 x Ki-21-IIa Sally bombing from 6000 feet
Ground Attack: 4 x 250 kg GP Bomb

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Morning Air attack on 45th Chinese Corps, at 76,45 (Chungking)

Weather in hex: Overcast

Raid spotted at 37 NM, estimated altitude 9,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 12 minutes

Japanese aircraft
Ki-49-Ia Helen x 22

No Japanese losses

Allied ground losses:
252 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 6 disabled
Non Combat: 2 destroyed, 16 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Aircraft Attacking:
22 x Ki-49-Ia Helen bombing from 6000 feet
Ground Attack: 4 x 250 kg GP Bomb

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Morning Air attack on 99th Chinese Corps, at 76,45 (Chungking)

Weather in hex: Overcast

Raid spotted at 19 NM, estimated altitude 11,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 5 minutes

Japanese aircraft
Ki-45 KAIa Nick x 5

No Japanese losses

Allied ground losses:
50 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 5 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Aircraft Attacking:
5 x Ki-45 KAIa Nick bombing from 6000 feet
Ground Attack: 2 x 250 kg GP Bomb

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Morning Air attack on 99th Chinese Corps, at 76,45 (Chungking)

Weather in hex: Overcast

Raid spotted at 26 NM, estimated altitude 9,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 7 minutes

Japanese aircraft
Ki-21-IIa Sally x 11

No Japanese losses

Allied ground losses:
85 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 4 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 2 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Aircraft Attacking:
11 x Ki-21-IIa Sally bombing from 7000 feet
Ground Attack: 4 x 250 kg GP Bomb

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Afternoon Air attack on 28th Chinese Corps, at 76,45 (Chungking)

Weather in hex: Clear sky

Raid spotted at 34 NM, estimated altitude 9,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 8 minutes

Japanese aircraft
Ki-43-IIa Oscar x 19

No Japanese losses

Allied ground losses:
172 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 3 disabled
Non Combat: 2 destroyed, 11 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Aircraft Attacking:
19 x Ki-43-IIa Oscar bombing from 6000 feet
Ground Attack: 2 x 250 kg GP Bomb

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Afternoon Air attack on 28th Chinese Corps, at 76,45 (Chungking)

Weather in hex: Clear sky

Raid spotted at 25 NM, estimated altitude 10,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 6 minutes

Japanese aircraft
Ki-43-IIa Oscar x 7

No Japanese losses

Allied ground losses:
53 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 4 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Aircraft Attacking:
7 x Ki-43-IIa Oscar bombing from 6000 feet
Ground Attack: 2 x 250 kg GP Bomb

(in reply to Lowpe)

Post #: 739

RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies) - 3/12/2019 3:35:14 PM

Lowpe

Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline

Ground bombardment of Chungking:

Ground combat at Chungking (76,45)

Japanese Bombardment attack

Attacking force 9630 troops, 698 guns, 616 vehicles, Assault Value = 1998

Defending force 207369 troops, 301 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 2490

Allied ground losses:
1763 casualties reported
Squads: 72 destroyed, 15 disabled
Non Combat: 21 destroyed, 8 disabled
Engineers: 2 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 1 (1 destroyed, 0 disabled)

(in reply to Lowpe)

Post #: 740

RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies) - 3/12/2019 3:42:47 PM

Lowpe

Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline

After 1 day of rest in the fields west of Chungking. A few units are back at 100% TOE or more.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)

Post #: 741

RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies) - 3/12/2019 3:44:19 PM

Lowpe

Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

Time to buy out trashed units . . .

Wouldn't the trashed units recover more quickly with the HQs when all are in a well supplied Base?

My point is I am attacking in such a manner as to avoid trashing any units.

Trashed units would recover slightly faster in the base, but it would add four more days of travel time breaking my timetable.

(in reply to RangerJoe)

Post #: 742

RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies) - 3/12/2019 3:49:25 PM

Lowpe

Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline

The first Dinah fighter squadron. It will be split into thirds and sent to the following bases for night fighter duty: Chengtu, Magwe, & Rangoon. It will take a little bit more than a month to fill out all the way, but once the first group of 12 replacements is added they will move out and start night fighter duty.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to Uncivil Engineer)

Post #: 743

RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies) - 3/12/2019 3:56:11 PM

RangerJoe

Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline

I just thought that I would ask. But I understand your reasoning.

A question on CAP vs Sweeps, then bombers coming. Sometimes my fighters sweep and there is no CAP but when the bombers come in, there are fighters attacking them. Are those on a training mission and, if so, could some fighter units be put on training to intercept said bombing raids? Maybe a small CAP percentage but a large training percentage? This would be to try and hit the bombers. If he tries to sweep for a few days and finds few fighters opposing him, might the other player conclude then that it is safe to send in the bombers? Then the fighters in training sort of ambush the bombers? Granted, there would not be as many fighters opposing the bombers, but at least there might be some.

edited for spelling.

< Message edited by RangerJoe -- 3/12/2019 4:02:48 PM >

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

�Illegitemus non carborundum est (�Don�t let the bastards grind you down�).�
― Julia Child

(in reply to Lowpe)

Post #: 744

RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies) - 3/12/2019 10:19:22 PM

mind_messing

Posts: 3393
Joined: 10/28/2013
Status: offline

You've had some good success with the day model of the Dinah previously in the NF role, haven't you?

I'm surprised at that, from what I remember from reviewing it, it didn't appear to be that great a platform.

Now I understand how you think regarding my views on the Ki-74

(in reply to RangerJoe)

Post #: 745

RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies) - 3/13/2019 12:45:01 PM

Lowpe

Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline

Yes, Dinah fighter has proven herself to me over many, many night fights.

A look at the Fighter Bomber strength of Japan...and we are still growing.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to mind_messing)

Post #: 746

RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies) - 3/13/2019 12:50:16 PM

Lowpe

Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

A question on CAP vs Sweeps, then bombers coming. Sometimes my fighters sweep and there is no CAP but when the bombers come in, there are fighters attacking them. Are those on a training mission and, if so, could some fighter units be put on training to intercept said bombing raids? Maybe a small CAP percentage but a large training percentage? This would be to try and hit the bombers. If he tries to sweep for a few days and finds few fighters opposing him, might the other player conclude then that it is safe to send in the bombers? Then the fighters in training sort of ambush the bombers? Granted, there would not be as many fighters opposing the bombers, but at least there might be some.

edited for spelling.

Yes, Wargamr used that tactic against me over Luzon, but his poor pilots got eaten alive by my escorting Zeroes.

Not sure how well it would work against escorted bombers with better fighter pilots, but it might have a role to play.

(in reply to RangerJoe)

Post #: 747

RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies) - 3/13/2019 12:59:17 PM

Lowpe

Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline

I am running a little slow because of RL, got this note from the Allies which points to their state of mind:

No worries. Despite my best efforts it seems you are going to win by AV in 1943 anyway.

I just have to prove it true.

(in reply to Uncivil Engineer)

Post #: 748

RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies) - 3/13/2019 2:50:38 PM

RangerJoe

Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline

At least you are still fighting. Never give up . . .

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

�Illegitemus non carborundum est (�Don�t let the bastards grind you down�).�
― Julia Child

(in reply to Lowpe)

Post #: 749

RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies) - 3/17/2019 3:30:56 PM

Lowpe

Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline

Dec 5th, 1942

Chungking bombardment. Lost 3 more AMcs sweeping Adak, but got 150 more mines.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to Uncivil Engineer)

Post #: 750

Page: << < prev 23 24 [25] 26 27 next > >>

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Lowpe (Japan) vs Wargamr (Allies)