Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: When does the USSR surrender?

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> WarPlan >> RE: When does the USSR surrender? Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: When does the USSR surrender? - 10/31/2019 2:06:23 PM   
AlvaroSousa


Posts: 9927
Joined: 7/29/2013
Status: offline
I am reading all this BTW

_____________________________

Creator Kraken Studios
- WarPlan
- WarPlan Pacific

Designer Strategic Command
- Brute Force (mod) SC2
- Assault on Communism SC2
- Assault on Democracy SC2
- Map Image Importer SC3

(in reply to AlbertN)
Post #: 31
RE: When does the USSR surrender? - 10/31/2019 2:11:00 PM   
Numdydar

 

Posts: 3211
Joined: 2/13/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Flaviusx

The better comparison here is with China, not Japan.

What would it take to force a Chinese surrender? The Japanese never came close to figuring that out. They took the major productive regions of China, drove deep into the interior, and the Chinese, both Nationalist and Communist, kept on trucking, despite a far more catastrophic situation than the Soviets ever faced or would have faced even if they'd lost the three major cities and the oil regions. They still had major productive capacity in Chelyabinsk, Sverdlovsk, etc.

I think the Germans, like the Japanese, could've crippled their larger opponent, but yet find themselves far short of ending the war.

In this circumstance, the Soviets would be bailed out by the Western allies, which is what happened with Japan and China, too. And the game does allow for this to happen, which is the correct design.

If you take the Soviets off the map by some traditional gaming metric, that's a gift to the Germans they never would've had in real life. They would've been stuck leaving major portions of the military holding down their conquests and keeping rump USSR at bay, just as Japan had to with China.




The issue would have been manpower with Russia. If they were pushed that far back, 70% or more of their population would have been under Germany control. So all the material in the world does not matter if you have too few people to use it. So the Allies sending lots of 'stuff' to the Russians would not have done much without the men/women to use it.

Also there are not a lot of good routes going West to East out of the Urals. The Germans could have easily fortified those areas and sent 20-30% of their troops from the East to fight elsewhere. Along with the bulk of their aircraft.

The real question though is when would Stalin been deposed? As that would have a major impact on surrender as well. I am not well versed in that aspect of Russian history, but I would guess that the loss of at least Moscow and Stalingrad would have done it.

Some combination of morale, lack of manpower, and captured territory should cause any country to surrender.

If the UK and Russia surrendered, Germany did not get too involved with helping Japan out so the US could still cause them to surrender, then the I bet the US would have even made peace with Germany. But now we are really going deep into 'what if' lol.



(in reply to Flaviusx)
Post #: 32
RE: When does the USSR surrender? - 10/31/2019 4:07:37 PM   
Fintilgin

 

Posts: 196
Joined: 4/14/2005
Status: offline
It's important to remember when saying Russia would never surrender that Germany FAILED. Barbarossa failed. Case Blue failed.

They never took Moscow, nor Leningrad, nor Stalingrad, nor Baku/the oil.

Thankfully we'll never know what would have happened if some of those had fallen, particularly Moscow in 1941. The Soviet government was not a magically entity immune to collapse and protected by historical inevitability.

(in reply to Numdydar)
Post #: 33
RE: When does the USSR surrender? - 10/31/2019 5:23:21 PM   
wosung

 

Posts: 692
Joined: 7/18/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Alvaro Sousa

The Russians would have NEVER surrendered. The Germans did have a surrender plan on the table. Arkhangelsk to Astrakhan.



No. The German A-A Plan was not at all a surrender plan.

It was a hypothetical line drawn to enable Nazi Germany to
1. protect Greater Germany from air attacks from the East.
2. destroy the Soviet industrial areas further eastward by aerial bombardment.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A-A_line

This means even in case the Germans would reach the AA line, they didn't expect the war against the Soviets to be over.

What Hitler made absolutely clear that Barbarossa was not to be a normal war, like the ones fought in Western Europe. Normal wars were supposed to end with some sort of capitulation or peace talks. Not this one. There simple were no plans for a Soviet capitulation. Barbarossa entailed the Commissar Order, the refusal to accept a capitulation of Leningrad, the no-surrender order to Paulus & to the 6th Army, the starvation policy of the Generalplan Ost. It was all about annihilation and perpetual struggle.


< Message edited by wosung -- 10/31/2019 5:25:26 PM >

(in reply to AlvaroSousa)
Post #: 34
RE: When does the USSR surrender? - 10/31/2019 5:37:11 PM   
Fintilgin

 

Posts: 196
Joined: 4/14/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: wosung

quote:

ORIGINAL: Alvaro Sousa

The Russians would have NEVER surrendered. The Germans did have a surrender plan on the table. Arkhangelsk to Astrakhan.



No. The German A-A Plan was not at all a surrender plan.

It was a hypothetical line drawn to enable Nazi Germany to
1. protect Greater Germany from air attacks from the East.
2. destroy the Soviet industrial areas further eastward by aerial bombardment.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A-A_line

This means even in case the Germans would reach the AA line, they didn't expect the war against the Soviets to be over.

What Hitler made absolutely clear that Barbarossa was not to be a normal war, like the ones fought in Western Europe. Normal wars were supposed to end with some sort of capitulation or peace talks. Not this one. Barbarossa entailed the Commissar Order, the refusal to accept a capitulation of Leningrad, the no-surrender order to Paulus & to the 6th Army, the starvation policy of the Generalplan Ost. It was all about annihilation and perpetual struggle.



Hitler said a lot of melodramatic crap though. If taking, say, Leningrad and Moscow in 1941 had resulted in Stalin getting purged and a semi-collapse of the Soviet government who know what might have happened?

If Case Blue had been more successful, Baku seized and Stalingrad held, then who knows what might have happened? After three years of increasingly brutal war who knows? Formal peace with a secret plan for Germany to lick its wounds and polish off the gutted remains of Russia five years down the line?

There also comes the point where the Russian government would no longer be capable of meaningful resistance. In my game I had control of basically every Russian city and resource by late 1942. They may have well have surrendered because they're totally occupied and have no chance of coming back.

At the end of the day it's a game too. My gut feeling is that the Soviets should be more prone to collapse early on. Let's be real... if I own Leningrad/Moscow/Stalingrad/Baku by late 1942... the game is OVER. The Allies are not launching a successful Overlord 70% of the German army is planted in France. Why drag it out? A human Allied player would concede at that point. Honestly I feel like if the Germans have collapsed Russia and there are no Allied units in France/Italy/Germany the game (vs the allied AI) should end in Sudden Death Victory (with the option to keep playing and mop up).

Similarly, if Russia is on the ropes, Western Allied successes (breaching Fortress Europa) should boost their will to keep fighting.

< Message edited by Fintilgin -- 10/31/2019 5:38:35 PM >

(in reply to wosung)
Post #: 35
RE: When does the USSR surrender? - 10/31/2019 5:40:58 PM   
Numdydar

 

Posts: 3211
Joined: 2/13/2004
Status: offline
+1 ^ This

(in reply to Fintilgin)
Post #: 36
RE: When does the USSR surrender? - 10/31/2019 5:50:29 PM   
wosung

 

Posts: 692
Joined: 7/18/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Fintilgin

Hitler said a lot of melodramatic crap though. If taking, say, Leningrad and Moscow in 1941 had resulted in Stalin getting purged and a semi-collapse of the Soviet government who know what might have happened?

If Case Blue had been more successful, Baku seized and Stalingrad held, then who knows what might have happened? After three years of increasingly brutal war who knows? Formal peace with a secret plan for Germany to lick its wounds and polish off the gutted remains of Russia five years down the line?

There also comes the point where the Russian government would no longer be capable of meaningful resistance. In my game I had control of basically every Russian city and resource by late 1942. They may have well have surrendered because they're totally occupied and have no chance of coming back.

At the end of the day it's a game too. My gut feeling is that the Soviets should be more prone to collapse early on. Let's be real... if I own Leningrad/Moscow/Stalingrad/Baku by late 1942... the game is OVER. The Allies are not launching a successful Overlord 70% of the German army is planted in France. Why drag it out? A human Allied player would concede at that point. Honestly I feel like if the Germans have collapsed Russia and there are no Allied units in France/Italy/Germany the game (vs the allied AI) should end in Sudden Death Victory (with the option to keep playing and mop up).

Similarly, if Russia is on the ropes, Western Allied successes (breaching Fortress Europa) should boost their will to keep fighting.


Ok, you haven't any hint about German plannings for a Soviet capitulation. Just your gut feeling.



(in reply to Fintilgin)
Post #: 37
RE: When does the USSR surrender? - 10/31/2019 6:53:29 PM   
Fintilgin

 

Posts: 196
Joined: 4/14/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: wosung

Ok, you haven't any hint about German plannings for a Soviet capitulation. Just your gut feeling.



If we went solely by 'German Plans' and 'Things Hitler said' then the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact never would have happened, Sea Lion would have been launched, no German soldier would have ever retreated, etc etc. LOL.

If the Germans had had much greater the historic successes against the Soviets, to the point Stalin was deposed and the upper leadership was desperate for peace, BUT Germany had also been bled white by years of brutal war and was facing invasion from the West, it's absolutely plausible that Hitler might have pulled another Molotov-Ribbentrop style pact and signed something that in his mind was a temporary peace (for 5-10 years).

Historic Soviets were in no mood for a peace once they started winning, but if they'd been largely crushed we're looking at a counterfactual situation where 'what Hitler fantasized about in 1940' isn't necessarily relevant.

Edit: the idea of Germany fighting an endless generational war against the slavic hordes beyond the urals is lurid comic book melodrama. At some point, with enough German success they would have dictated a peace. They failed, thankfully, so it was Russia who dictated it.

< Message edited by Fintilgin -- 10/31/2019 8:09:38 PM >

(in reply to wosung)
Post #: 38
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> WarPlan >> RE: When does the USSR surrender? Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

3.359