rkr1958
Posts: 23483
Joined: 5/21/2009 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: brian brian For the French defense, a double line is infinitely more important than a strong front line. Ideally the second line is overrun-proof after an offensive chit is played, which means having 6 factors per clear hex. 2 hints: the BEF MOT corps have that level of strength, and defending the Maginot for too long also stretches the length of the French line for too long. The Maginot does not defend Paris, only weakens it. And the Allies should trade in the BEF for an entire turn of the Axis schedule, not deploy them as beach holiday spectators and then sail them away again. Brian, thanks! No doubt that the French defense was lacking. I do attribute the luck the axis had with initiative and end of turn to the French collapse. Germany (i.e., the axis) got to move last and first in a turn twice in a row during the critical MA40/MJ40/JA40 turns. The MA40 turn ending when it did just after Germany captured Brussels and with Germany (i.e., axis) getting the initiative the next turn before the French & British could march into Belgium was very fortunate for the axis. Also, Germany (i.e., axis) got 3 more impulses over these three turns than did the allied. That is, the axis got 14 impulses versus the allied 11 over. Not sure if you'd call my Case Yellow a spectacular axis success, allied failure or combination of the both? But it was fun and for the axis a bit lucky I think with end of turn, initiative and I'll also throw weather in there too.
_____________________________
Ronnie
|