Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/9/2020 4:10:22 AM   
CaptBeefheart


Posts: 2301
Joined: 7/4/2003
From: Seoul, Korea
Status: offline 		I lifted this from an old JWE post:

USMC Pioneer Sq – Squad type – No Build, Yes AV, Yes Shore Party, No Reduce Forts
USN Constr Eng Sq – Eng type – Yes Build, Yes AV, No Shore Party, No Reduce Forts
USN Spec Eng Sq – Eng type – Yes Build, No AV, Yes Shore Party, No Reduce Forts
USN Base Eng Sq – Eng type – Yes Build, No AV, Yes Shore Party, No Reduce Forts
USA Port Svc Sq – Eng type – Yes Build, No AV, Yes Shore Party, No Reduce Forts
USA Amph Sup Sq – Squad type – No Build, Yes AV, Yes Shore Party, No Reduce Forts

IJA Shipping Eng Sq – Squad type – No Build, No AV, No Reduce Forts, Yes Shore Party, LC = 17
IJA Cmbt Eng Sq – Eng type – Yes Build, Yes AV, Yes Reduce Forts, No Shore Party, LC = 17
IJA Const Eng Sq – Eng type – Yes Build, No AV, No Reduce Forts, No Shore Party, LC = 17
IJA Const Labor Sq – Squad type – No Build, No AV, No Reduce Forts, No Shore Party, LC = 20
IJN Const Eng Sq – Eng type – Yes Build, No AV, No Reduce Forts, No Shore Party, LC = 17
IJN Const Labor Sq – Squad type – No Build, No AV, No Reduce Forts, No Shore Party, LC = 20

Cheers,
CB

_____________________________

Beer, because barley makes lousy bread.

(in reply to PaxMondo)
Post #: 61
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/9/2020 4:41:05 AM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: PaxMondo


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe


quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy


I thought ships undergoing refit/upgrade could not accelerate repairs under any circumstances? In that case. leaving both BBs on normal repairs would be the best option.


These two girls are being repaired now...you can get both of them repaired in under 30 days by jiggering with the settings...but I want Warspite out there.

The Colorado still goes into upgrade at the end of the 30 days ... unless you want to use her without the radar upgrade...


In his post about Warspite, Lowpe mentioned that he kept Colorado at a lower priority because he wanted her to get the radar upgrade. I was questioning the ability to advance Warspite's finish date as I understood that upgrades cannot be shortened. Apparently there is a way ...


_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to PaxMondo)
Post #: 62
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/9/2020 4:46:39 AM   
Evoken

 

Posts: 488
Joined: 10/23/2019
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy


quote:

ORIGINAL: PaxMondo


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe


quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy


I thought ships undergoing refit/upgrade could not accelerate repairs under any circumstances? In that case. leaving both BBs on normal repairs would be the best option.


These two girls are being repaired now...you can get both of them repaired in under 30 days by jiggering with the settings...but I want Warspite out there.

The Colorado still goes into upgrade at the end of the 30 days ... unless you want to use her without the radar upgrade...


In his post about Warspite, Lowpe mentioned that he kept Colorado at a lower priority because he wanted her to get the radar upgrade. I was questioning the ability to advance Warspite's finish date as I understood that upgrades cannot be shortened. Apparently there is a way ...


Well i dont know if Warspite was getting upgraded at Seattle historically but in the game its just damage needs to be repaired so it can be given higher priority and sped up

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 63
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/9/2020 4:56:24 AM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Evoken


quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy


quote:

ORIGINAL: PaxMondo


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe


quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy


I thought ships undergoing refit/upgrade could not accelerate repairs under any circumstances? In that case. leaving both BBs on normal repairs would be the best option.


These two girls are being repaired now...you can get both of them repaired in under 30 days by jiggering with the settings...but I want Warspite out there.

The Colorado still goes into upgrade at the end of the 30 days ... unless you want to use her without the radar upgrade...


In his post about Warspite, Lowpe mentioned that he kept Colorado at a lower priority because he wanted her to get the radar upgrade. I was questioning the ability to advance Warspite's finish date as I understood that upgrades cannot be shortened. Apparently there is a way ...


Well i dont know if Warspite was getting upgraded at Seattle historically but in the game its just damage needs to be repaired so it can be given higher priority and sped up

The US usually did some improvements when it was repairing British ships. Warspite comes out of Seattle with a suite of 20mm AA guns that were not common in the RN at the time.

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Evoken)
Post #: 64
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/9/2020 11:47:26 AM   
PaxMondo


Posts: 9750
Joined: 6/6/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Evoken


quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy


quote:

ORIGINAL: PaxMondo


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe


quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy


I thought ships undergoing refit/upgrade could not accelerate repairs under any circumstances? In that case. leaving both BBs on normal repairs would be the best option.


These two girls are being repaired now...you can get both of them repaired in under 30 days by jiggering with the settings...but I want Warspite out there.

The Colorado still goes into upgrade at the end of the 30 days ... unless you want to use her without the radar upgrade...


In his post about Warspite, Lowpe mentioned that he kept Colorado at a lower priority because he wanted her to get the radar upgrade. I was questioning the ability to advance Warspite's finish date as I understood that upgrades cannot be shortened. Apparently there is a way ...


Well i dont know if Warspite was getting upgraded at Seattle historically but in the game its just damage needs to be repaired so it can be given higher priority and sped up

The US usually did some improvements when it was repairing British ships. Warspite comes out of Seattle with a suite of 20mm AA guns that were not common in the RN at the time.

Correct, but in game it is repair, not upgrade damage that is being done. Hence, your ability to influence the dock time. Ditto for the Colorado.

_____________________________

Pax

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 65
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/9/2020 9:47:42 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Working on the first Allied turn and the 2nd Japanese turn is absolutely no fun...the chores are done, and I thought to partake in an adult beverage....this was on sale, and I have never, ever had any in my life...so what the hell.

We shall see how much of the turn I can finish while enjoying a glass. To be drunk cold.






Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 9/9/2020 9:48:21 PM >

(in reply to PaxMondo)
Post #: 66
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/9/2020 10:47:00 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline 		I used to drink that waaaay back when I was in my early 20s and enjoyed it then. Probably find it too sweet now. At the time, it came in a nice decanter bottle with a glass stopper (and a plastic sleeve on that to get a good seal). Nowadays I prefer to take tawny port after a good meal rather than sherry as an apèritif.

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 67
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/9/2020 11:00:36 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Pearl Harbor...

Routing a lot of planes out as soon as possible...by ship.

The Cats have flown west...




Attachment (1)

(in reply to CaptBeefheart)
Post #: 68
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/9/2020 11:02:41 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

I used to drink that waaaay back when I was in my early 20s and enjoyed it then. Probably find it too sweet now. At the time, it came in a nice decanter bottle with a glass stopper (and a plastic sleeve on that to get a good seal). Nowadays I prefer to take tawny port after a good meal rather than sherry as an apèritif.


Bought a Tawny too,...have lots of porto experience across the spectrum.

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 69
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/9/2020 11:23:19 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		I had some Maderia a week or two ago and that was sweeter than Harveys...it does have a clean finish and nice aroma, and it is ice cold which is good because I spent today digging up and separating a bearded iris bed that I had neglected for 20 years.

It is not bad for the price....and my wife likes it.


(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 70
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/9/2020 11:34:20 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Almost every destroyer is headed to Baker Island in squadrons of 3-5. We will dance with them along Japan's perimeter...

One Bagley squadron and the two Helena's are off to meet Saratoga.

Another Bagley squadron matches up with the three heavy cruisers for Carrier work.

The Brooklyns paired up with Porters for Baker to give a little muscle.

Battleships are docked at port running exercises and shakedowns.

There are a lot of ships here at Pearl. And Planes.

The DMS, AM will meet ships and provide escort duties...


(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 71
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/10/2020 12:33:26 AM   
RangerJoe


Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

Working on the first Allied turn and the 2nd Japanese turn is absolutely no fun...the chores are done, and I thought to partake in an adult beverage....this was on sale, and I have never, ever had any in my life...so what the hell.

We shall see how much of the turn I can finish while enjoying a glass. To be drunk cold.







Very good in coffee along with Kahlua - especially when you come in from standing around when it is a balmy -20 F besides the nice breeze. Although Carolans is also good for that and cheaper.

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
― Julia Child


(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 72
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/10/2020 2:58:04 AM   
RangerJoe


Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline 		If you want a good drink cold, get ApfelKorn ice cold. Then give it to someone who thinks that it is wine. Then give them another bottle. When they get up, the may just decide to sleep right there - face down on the floor.

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
― Julia Child


(in reply to RangerJoe)
Post #: 73
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/10/2020 3:15:48 PM   
szmike

 

Posts: 345
Joined: 8/30/2009
Status: offline 		which map mod is that? I don't recall.

(in reply to RangerJoe)
Post #: 74
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/10/2020 6:10:37 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: szmike

which map mod is that? I don't recall.

Already asked and answered at post 20 of this AAR.

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to szmike)
Post #: 75
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/10/2020 6:22:17 PM   
RADM.Yamaguchi


Posts: 765
Joined: 6/30/2019
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy


quote:

ORIGINAL: szmike

which map mod is that? I don't recall.

Already asked and answered at post 20 of this AAR.

I didn't realize that opponents maps in the same PBEM game could look so different. I guess they don't have to use the same map in the same game.

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 76
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/10/2020 6:24:14 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: RADM.Yamaguchi


quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy


quote:

ORIGINAL: szmike

which map mod is that? I don't recall.

Already asked and answered at post 20 of this AAR.

I didn't realize that opponents maps in the same PBEM game could look so different. I guess they don't have to use the same map in the same game.

The map art is irrelevant to game play, only the three files that contain the map coding for the game to use have to match. Art is just eye candy for the user.

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to RADM.Yamaguchi)
Post #: 77
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/10/2020 6:35:45 PM   
szmike

 

Posts: 345
Joined: 8/30/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy


quote:

ORIGINAL: szmike

which map mod is that? I don't recall.

Already asked and answered at post 20 of this AAR.

shame I missed the post

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 78
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/10/2020 9:36:47 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Dec 8th will likely be a bloodbath here...






Attachment (1)

(in reply to CaptBeefheart)
Post #: 79
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/10/2020 11:41:34 PM   
offenseman


Posts: 768
Joined: 2/24/2007
From: Sheridan Wyoming, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

If you want a good drink cold, get ApfelKorn ice cold. Then give it to someone who thinks that it is wine. Then give them another bottle. When they get up, the may just decide to sleep right there - face down on the floor.


Apfelkorn. Been many years since I've had that delightful drink. So long, I have forgotten it existed. :)

_____________________________

Sometimes things said in Nitwit sound very different in English.

(in reply to RangerJoe)
Post #: 80
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/11/2020 12:30:57 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Finished the turn! Yeah...these first turns are killers. Still I expect I missed a fair bit...and dababes is very different to stock...lots to relearn, plus pdu off.

Bought out two B17 units from the Philippines...

Two armored units in India...

2nd Marine Division elements to Cape Town, with along a half dozen or more base forces, plus V Bomber and a Fighter Squadron.

2 Fighter Squadrons from Pearl leaving for Oz, along with every Cat squadron for Luzon...

Cap traps and some targeted naval attacks and moving forces into hiding spots...

I will probably wake up tomorrow with another turn in the mail box...but I want to take a day or two off! We are on opposite sides of the world, but I suspect we might flip quite a few turns very fast either early in the morning or late in the evening...but not just now. I need to go slow and learn the ob.



< Message edited by Lowpe -- 9/11/2020 12:34:23 AM >

(in reply to offenseman)
Post #: 81
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/11/2020 3:27:41 AM   
ny59giants


Posts: 9869
Joined: 1/10/2005
Status: offline 		In my experience with Nathan, we did 2 plus weekdays and up to 4 on weekends. Nice thing to do with your morning coffee before work.

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 82
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/11/2020 6:13:47 AM   
CaptBeefheart


Posts: 2301
Joined: 7/4/2003
From: Seoul, Korea
Status: offline 		You call that a booze? Been sipping a bit of this. Buddy of mine got it from the Class 6 from Camp Humphreys.

Cheers,
CB




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by CaptBeefheart -- 9/11/2020 6:25:43 AM >

_____________________________

Beer, because barley makes lousy bread.

(in reply to ny59giants)
Post #: 83
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/11/2020 10:26:57 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Dec 9th, 1941

NJP gets me the turn back with the dawn...argh. Still doing Lok's turn, won't get to this till tomorrow.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to CaptBeefheart)
Post #: 84
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/11/2020 10:27:46 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		What is he trying to do, set up a huge Thundering Herd pincer?






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 85
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/11/2020 10:28:41 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Two strikes on Shanghai had fires over 1000. Hopefully something is damaged...it almost always takes a solid day for accurate reports to flow back in.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 86
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/11/2020 10:29:34 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Not too bad...






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 87
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/11/2020 10:33:37 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Thoughts?

Forgot to withdraw planes yesterday...

Thracian found six merchant ships, but they skeddadled after three hits...

Boise and Houston heading east from Luzon...I guess the Thundering Herd will follow and meet up with Lady Lex and E, which are approaching Wake Island.

Going to be using PP to buy troops for early deployment I think...






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 88
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/11/2020 10:36:28 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Can I get these guys into Rangoon? DejaVu.






Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 9/11/2020 10:44:15 PM >

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 89
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/12/2020 6:42:25 AM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

What is he trying to do, set up a huge Thundering Herd pincer?






Looks like he wants to secure Palembang, Java and the Eastern DEI ASAP and backfill the bypassed areas later.

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 90
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

2.844