Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) Page: <<   < prev  32 33 [34] 35 36   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 12/29/2020 1:41:37 PM   
Encircled


Posts: 2024
Joined: 12/30/2010
From: Northern England
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

Merry Christmas, Happy New Year, Happy Holidays!!!

We had lots of Family, and when you get to our age, the kids return home for the Holidays spending half on one side of the family and the other with their spouse's side. No grandchildren yet, but we did have a 9 month old white German Shepherd for Christmas....forget how much work a puppy is.

But, now the war is back on, sent the turn out this morning...looking to make some more daring intercepts in this bloodbath of a game!




Over here in the (soon to be defunct!) UK it was a very weird, socially distanced Xmas.

Hoping for a much better 2021 in has to be said

On the plus side though, managed to do a lot more turns in my game than normal for this time of year!


_____________________________


(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 991
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/1/2021 1:30:55 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Jan 18, 1942

Looking for several night time encounters in this area, but we miss....that is until the morning!

4 Inch US shells are deadly to ships with fuel and supplies.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Encircled)
Post #: 992
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/1/2021 1:35:51 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Beasts strike again.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 993
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/1/2021 1:37:52 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		KB is busy, now the IJN seems focused on extending the perimeter. I think there is a fair bit of VP on these islands.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 994
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/1/2021 1:39:41 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		These guys are strafing tanks with machine guns, can't be too effective, but I hoped to gain experience and more importantly raise DL for the Banshees.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 995
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/1/2021 1:42:06 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Keeping the damage on Geraldton...






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 996
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/1/2021 1:50:39 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		The day ends...Japan pulls off a surprising shock attack, shouldn't be since it is the IJA MO, in Burma routing a third of the Burma 1st Div...but most importantly no paratroop landing in India which was the Allies greatest fear.






Unfortunately, Japan has good DL on Pensacola and the surviving destroyer squadron from the morning fight.

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 1/1/2021 1:51:20 PM >

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 997
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/1/2021 2:16:33 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Lots happening on this map...

Supplies are being flown in small numbers from India to China...two Commonwealth units air transported in (Indian Mtn Guns and British AT guns), while most of five Chinese Divisions have been air lifted out to India.

I think Japan made a tactical error in not cutting the Lanchow road...oil/fuel will continue to trickle down and eventually reach the remaining Chinese heavy industry.

The 43rd Cavalry is a scant 26 miles from the Chinese border with Burma, and although they lack Stuarts, they will eventually get them and prove quite the counter...the 254th is now moving east to join them, after securing Magwe from paratroop landing ensuring the good order evacuation from Prome. They also lack decent tanks, but they had more than enough for paratroops.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 998
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/1/2021 2:22:46 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Perth




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 999
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/1/2021 2:40:01 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		I think I am doing ok here...of course, very little Americans have sought to reinforce the islands between Pearl and Australia.

Over by Perth, a Commonwealth Bde and a heavy AA unit seem likely to make Albany...they have come a long way from India.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1000
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/1/2021 2:41:43 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		I continue to spend destroyers....and will continue the entire game.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1001
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/1/2021 2:52:16 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Cape Town is a bustling port!




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1002
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/1/2021 2:55:30 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Ouch, and double ouch. I think the Djambi number will grow more as intel catches up.






Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 1/1/2021 2:57:24 PM >

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1003
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/1/2021 2:59:45 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Ok, I think that is my day's posts, now to work on the turn...won't really get back into cranking out turns till Sunday though and hopefully might be able to string a couple of 2 turns a day to catch up.

Japan lost 30 VP of land combat troops this turn!


Happy New Year Everyone!!!

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 1/1/2021 3:06:35 PM >

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1004
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/1/2021 3:03:03 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Ok, one last post.

His float planes did a great job spotting 2 of my 4 fleet carriers.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Encircled)
Post #: 1005
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/1/2021 3:27:19 PM   
Ambassador

 

Posts: 1674
Joined: 1/11/2008
From: Brussels, Belgium
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

I continue to spend destroyers....and will continue the entire game.


This is a good rate of exchange.

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1006
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/1/2021 5:35:05 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

These guys are strafing tanks with machine guns, can't be too effective, but I hoped to gain experience and more importantly raise DL for the Banshees.






The P-40Es and later models carry a 500 lb bomb (range permitting) when they do ground attack, even at 100 feet. They strafe and bomb - but it takes a while to get enough skill and experience to score the hits. When they do, they kill tanks.

I did note that your attack uses P-40Bs that do not have bombs, but their strafing can knock off the trucks that support the tanks. Too bad the game lumps them into the AFV category rather than Motorized Support for clarity. The big gain from strafing is Defensive skill.

< Message edited by BBfanboy -- 1/1/2021 5:53:17 PM >

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1007
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/1/2021 5:54:17 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

Ok, one last post.

His float planes did a great job spotting 2 of my 4 fleet carriers.






Maybe that will make him think twice about a Canton Is. invasion ...

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1008
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/2/2021 2:25:21 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		I don't think my carriers will give him pause...but it will probably allow my destroyers and cruiser to get away...

I thought seriously about surging two to three more destroyers into Canton island...but ultimately decided against it. I have regrets now not doing it....

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 1009
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/2/2021 2:29:19 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		I was looking at Fulmars, and noticed they have cameras...so I enlarged the squadron to 12 planes and flew them off the carrier...they will train for a bit and then hopefully provide some good short range recon...kind of like how I use Sonia for Japan.

To compensate I also enlarged the Sea Hurricanes a bit, to 18. Don't have the planes to fully fill them out, but they are training too. Noticed these are Canadian pilots.

I have a Dutch fighter squadron belonging to ABDA at Singers. I can withdraw them for a few months, but they would likely only respawn on Java?

I didn't look, but there are 40 P40s at Singers too, I wonder if I can disband them back to the pools...and get those planes to Australia pretty quickly? The squadrons do get recalled sometime in 42 anyhow.

Bombing Medan today.

My carriers are doglegging to Pearl...a little replenishment is in order before hitting Hokkaido.



< Message edited by Lowpe -- 1/2/2021 2:31:21 PM >

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1010
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/2/2021 2:41:57 PM   
Q-Ball


Posts: 7336
Joined: 6/25/2002
From: Chicago, Illinois
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

I have a Dutch fighter squadron belonging to ABDA at Singers. I can withdraw them for a few months, but they would likely only respawn on Java?



Dutch air units, if they are withdrawn to return in 90 days, will come back at Aden if Java is gone and attached to ABDA command, so they will no longer be restricted. Some game versions (like DDB-C) all Dutch units are perm-restricted, so this is a good way of "saving" Dutch units.

The ones most worth saving are the PA units, because Dutch have a deep pool of Catalinas for whatever reason that you can use all game

Fighter units are not very useful because they end at P-40E. The modern bomber models can be used by RAAF in most versions if the Dutch don't use them, so you don't really need Dutch bomber units back.

_____________________________


(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1011
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/2/2021 3:04:24 PM   
Ambassador

 

Posts: 1674
Joined: 1/11/2008
From: Brussels, Belgium
Status: offline 		You would also need to save enough pilots, as you get no replacements (at least in stock, I’m not sure for the mods).

(in reply to Q-Ball)
Post #: 1012
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/2/2021 3:14:09 PM   
RangerJoe


Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline 		The replacement units come in at Tjilatjap, at least when you repurchase them.

But even at P-40Es, they are still useful in the back areas as anti Glen, Mavis, and Emily units. Or even long ranged anti-Nell units.

The bomber units would still be useful in the Naval Search and ASW modes in the rear areas. Not to mention bombing starving Japanese garrisons. They could also be used to haul some supplies.

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
― Julia Child


(in reply to Q-Ball)
Post #: 1013
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/2/2021 3:16:59 PM   
PaxMondo


Posts: 9750
Joined: 6/6/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Ambassador

You would also need to save enough pilots, as you get no replacements (at least in stock, I’m not sure for the mods).

+1

This has always been the bane of conserving Dutch units ... lack of pilots. If you intend to use the PA's, then you need to really conserve pilots, don't fly any kami missions with the Dutch or you will have an aircraft pool that you can never use.

_____________________________

Pax

(in reply to Ambassador)
Post #: 1014
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/5/2021 12:26:08 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Jan 18, 1942

Our destroyer squadrons and Pensacola look to escape due west...from the looming KB, but the IJN has other plans, and sends out the Tachekaze, which must be low on ammo, to intercept...




A 2nd engagement immediately follows, and Tachekaze puts two rounds into a destroyer and one round into another all the time avoiding the USN counter fire.

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 1/5/2021 12:27:31 AM >

(in reply to Encircled)
Post #: 1015
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/5/2021 12:30:22 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		21st Division continues to get pummeled.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1016
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/5/2021 12:38:39 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Can the Pensacola escape...




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1017
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/5/2021 12:39:37 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		No air attacks on Pensacola...some IJ sweeps, over Singers, and in Oz.

Touch battle here, but we are gaining experience and the heavy guns are coming up.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1018
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/5/2021 12:43:10 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: PaxMondo


quote:

ORIGINAL: Ambassador

You would also need to save enough pilots, as you get no replacements (at least in stock, I’m not sure for the mods).

+1

This has always been the bane of conserving Dutch units ... lack of pilots. If you intend to use the PA's, then you need to really conserve pilots, don't fly any kami missions with the Dutch or you will have an aircraft pool that you can never use.


I saved the pilots...and probably lots of air frames too, but didn't switch most of their HQs to ABDA. Oh well.



(in reply to PaxMondo)
Post #: 1019
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/5/2021 12:44:23 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Pensacola learned from the previous 2 fights, surprises Myoko and at close range pumps three 8" shells into her in rapid procession.

Looks like an all out push on my raiders here...






oops, this post is out of order, happened during the night after two rounds of combat with the Tachekaze.

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 1/5/2021 12:45:17 AM >

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1020
Page:   <<   < prev  32 33 [34] 35 36   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) Page: <<   < prev  32 33 [34] 35 36   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.703