Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) Page: <<   < prev  50 51 [52] 53 54   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/10/2021 4:26:43 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: witpqs

Is the base at Maryborough damaged? Do you suppose it might make fortifications 3 before the battleships commence nightly runs?


No damage, I have good recon on the enemy bases and there is no AKE presently close by.

I will try to drop some mines in with two DMs, and create some PT boats there, and evacuate a fair bit of planes from Brisbane but leave their PT boats there.

Maryborough has 3 CD units, 2 Australian, 1 Marine. Oh, and three dutch subs on the approach hex...plus maybe some night bombing attacks.




< Message edited by Lowpe -- 2/10/2021 4:27:33 PM >

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 1531
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/10/2021 4:54:02 PM   
Ambassador

 

Posts: 1674
Joined: 1/11/2008
From: Brussels, Belgium
Status: offline 		Did your opponent drop any hint on the number of pilots he’s lost ? A good number of his losses are A2A or flak, so a lot of them happened over your bases. It must start to hurt.

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1532
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/10/2021 9:43:21 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Forgot to mention this nuclear bombardment.

I have forts 2, the MTBs skirmished with the bombardment fleet, and the 1st Indian Coastal CD unit was present with a full compliment of guns...and they didn't fire once but rather were totally destroyed.

Still, after all this only 6 damage to the base, and a few disabled squads on the British division.

Have made plans to attrit his bombardment forces should they reappear.

Night Naval bombardment of Chittagong at 55,41 - Coastal Guns Fire Back!

Japanese Ships
CA Ashigara
CA Chokai
CL Jintsu
DD Kuri
DD Sagiri
DD Asagiri
DD Hibiki
DD Akatsuki
DD Hatsushima
DD Arashio
DD Michishio
DD Oshio

Allied ground losses:
352 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 24 disabled
Non Combat: 9 destroyed, 21 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Guns lost 23 (5 destroyed, 18 disabled)
Vehicles lost 13 (1 destroyed, 12 disabled)

Resources hits 8
Manpower hits 6
Fires 342
Airbase hits 2
Airbase supply hits 4
Runway hits 21
Port hits 16
Port fuel hits 4
Port supply hits 2

F1M2 Pete acting as spotter for CA Ashigara
CA Ashigara firing at 18th British Division
E8N2 Dave acting as spotter for CA Chokai
CA Chokai firing at 1st Indian Coastal Artillery Regiment
1st Indian Coastal Artillery Regiment firing at CA Chokai
E7K2 Alf acting as spotter for CL Jintsu
CL Jintsu firing at Chittagong
DD Kuri firing at 18th British Division
DD Sagiri firing at 18th British Division
DD Asagiri firing at Chittagong
DD Hibiki firing at 18th British Division
DD Akatsuki firing at Chittagong
DD Hatsushima firing at 18th British Division
DD Arashio firing at 18th British Division
DD Michishio firing at Chittagong
DD Oshio firing at 6th Medium Regiment

PS: also had some mines, around 100 not that many. Adding more.

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 2/10/2021 10:34:13 PM >

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1533
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/10/2021 9:45:19 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Ambassador

Did your opponent drop any hint on the number of pilots he’s lost ? A good number of his losses are A2A or flak, so a lot of them happened over your bases. It must start to hurt.


Nope.

Well, now I am using all off map bases including Canada. I created a table with distances and then rated them for safety. Choosing safety now, and will transition later to faster routes.



(in reply to Ambassador)
Post #: 1534
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/10/2021 10:30:28 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

Forgot to mention this nuclear bombardment.

I have forts 2, the MTBs skirmished with the bombardment fleet, and the 1st Indian Coastal CD unit was present with a full compliment of guns...and they didn't fire once but rather were totally destroyed.

Still, after all this only 6 damage to the base, and a few disabled squads on the British division.

Have made plans to attrit his bombardment forces should they reappear.

Night Naval bombardment of Chittagong at 55,41 - Coastal Guns Fire Back!

Japanese Ships
CA Ashigara
CA Chokai
CL Jintsu
DD Kuri
DD Sagiri
DD Asagiri
DD Hibiki
DD Akatsuki
DD Hatsushima
DD Arashio
DD Michishio
DD Oshio

Allied ground losses:
352 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 24 disabled
Non Combat: 9 destroyed, 21 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Guns lost 23 (5 destroyed, 18 disabled)
Vehicles lost 13 (1 destroyed, 12 disabled)

Resources hits 8
Manpower hits 6
Fires 342
Radiation 247 <---
Airbase hits 2
Airbase supply hits 4
Runway hits 21
Port hits 16
Port fuel hits 4
Port supply hits 2

F1M2 Pete acting as spotter for CA Ashigara
CA Ashigara firing at 18th British Division
E8N2 Dave acting as spotter for CA Chokai
CA Chokai firing at 1st Indian Coastal Artillery Regiment
1st Indian Coastal Artillery Regiment firing at CA Chokai
E7K2 Alf acting as spotter for CL Jintsu
CL Jintsu firing at Chittagong
DD Kuri firing at 18th British Division
DD Sagiri firing at 18th British Division
DD Asagiri firing at Chittagong
DD Hibiki firing at 18th British Division
DD Akatsuki firing at Chittagong
DD Hatsushima firing at 18th British Division
DD Arashio firing at 18th British Division
DD Michishio firing at Chittagong
DD Oshio firing at 6th Medium Regiment



_____________________________

Intel Monkey: https://sites.google.com/view/staffmonkeys/home

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1535
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/10/2021 11:11:06 PM   
RangerJoe


Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: witpqs


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

Forgot to mention this nuclear bombardment.

I have forts 2, the MTBs skirmished with the bombardment fleet, and the 1st Indian Coastal CD unit was present with a full compliment of guns...and they didn't fire once but rather were totally destroyed.

Still, after all this only 6 damage to the base, and a few disabled squads on the British division.

Have made plans to attrit his bombardment forces should they reappear.

Night Naval bombardment of Chittagong at 55,41 - Coastal Guns Fire Back!

Japanese Ships
CA Ashigara
CA Chokai
CL Jintsu
DD Kuri
DD Sagiri
DD Asagiri
DD Hibiki
DD Akatsuki
DD Hatsushima
DD Arashio
DD Michishio
DD Oshio

Allied ground losses:
352 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 24 disabled
Non Combat: 9 destroyed, 21 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Guns lost 23 (5 destroyed, 18 disabled)
Vehicles lost 13 (1 destroyed, 12 disabled)

Resources hits 8
Manpower hits 6
Fires 342
Radiation 247 <---
Airbase hits 2
Airbase supply hits 4
Runway hits 21
Port hits 16
Port fuel hits 4
Port supply hits 2

F1M2 Pete acting as spotter for CA Ashigara
CA Ashigara firing at 18th British Division
E8N2 Dave acting as spotter for CA Chokai
CA Chokai firing at 1st Indian Coastal Artillery Regiment
1st Indian Coastal Artillery Regiment firing at CA Chokai
E7K2 Alf acting as spotter for CL Jintsu
CL Jintsu firing at Chittagong
DD Kuri firing at 18th British Division
DD Sagiri firing at 18th British Division
DD Asagiri firing at Chittagong
DD Hibiki firing at 18th British Division
DD Akatsuki firing at Chittagong
DD Hatsushima firing at 18th British Division
DD Arashio firing at 18th British Division
DD Michishio firing at Chittagong
DD Oshio firing at 6th Medium Regiment


Nuke them 'til they glow, then shoot them in the dark - it is easier that way.

or

Nuke them 'til they are glass then polish them with Windex.

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
― Julia Child


(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 1536
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/11/2021 9:27:14 AM   
Encircled


Posts: 2024
Joined: 12/30/2010
From: Northern England
Status: offline 		Hmm, as soon as he brings up AKEs then he's going to be very hard to stop at Maryborough

Danger is that he wins and your 3 Aussie Divs become completely combat incapable

But you know all this!

I'm sure you have a plan!

_____________________________


(in reply to RangerJoe)
Post #: 1537
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/11/2021 11:23:37 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Feb 8th, 1942

You can watch the replay and think you had a horrendous turn, and then in digging in a bit realize it wasn't so bad.

The really bad: Iboat sinks the large oiler Neosho. But examining the turn it was the Tippecanoe instead.

The very bad: Heavy Cruiser Canberra takes two torpedoes hits in two different attacks.

The nots so bad: Zeroes sweep Brisbane, where I put 1/3rd of the fighters on providing CAP for Canberra and the replay makes me think our P40s really suffered.

The good news, a strong hold by the Chinese Army near Kweilin. 31st Corp didn't even have to come out of reserve mode to bolster the lines. Slowly but surely our experience is climbing.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 2/11/2021 12:42:47 PM >

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1538
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/11/2021 11:30:01 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Bad, but perhaps salvageable.

The Indians showed up at Maryborough, leaving Toowoomba a bit on the weak side...but with lots of units.

Forts at Maryborough almost to 3. In a few more days the Perth defenders start to arrive...some of them at least.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1539
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/11/2021 11:38:56 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Perth...aiming for a few surprises here.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1540
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/11/2021 2:11:06 PM   
RangerJoe


Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline 		Any forces prepped for Geraldton? If you could somehow stage an invasion if most of his combat troops were gone . . .

Hopefully the Canberra can survive. If not, you do get another one.

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
― Julia Child


(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1541
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/11/2021 3:00:41 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Nope, but other surprises in store. Stay tuned.


(in reply to RangerJoe)
Post #: 1542
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/11/2021 3:17:27 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		More snow...

Will ponder the Chinese situation while I work in the driveway...

Morale...some of my troops are getting to 99. I am starting to think getting morale up (and a side effect disablements down) is a better option than digging in to forts off base. Course it is situational, and you have to feel free to throw away Chinese Corps to slow down the IJA -- in which case you aren't throwing them away!

Prioritizing reinforcements now to the US TOE and 8th Communist units.

Moving forward my one battery of 105mm howitzers...I think they are the best AT platforms China has. To the mountains or x3 terrain with them. I will ponder where the next batch of 105s go...to a artillery unit or into a US TOE unit.

Stuarts at Kunming need perhaps another 2 weeks before all the imp tanks are replaced with Stuarts, but also another 35-40 days to get the prep to 100 and their abysmal experience up.

Lashio looks like it will hold...

Ledo is building up nicely...flying in around 70 supplies with only a plane loss every three days. Blenheims. Might raise the rest percentage to 40%.

12 Yankee squadrons at Bombay now...half arrived with no problem, the other half in the next 2-3 days. Then the base forces start to arrive. Really need those base forces, but more training is never amiss.

Got a 3 plane squadron of beasts with recon pilots in the high 60s, they are starting to nose around looking for targets. Got a small squadron in US of Lightning recon planes....I guess these guys will head for Australia.

Looking to convert some bomber squadrons in Bombay to LB30s. I think I can manage two...

Got another transport squadron at Karachi...I am really using all transports to move troops in China/Ledo. They have been very busy.


(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1543
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/11/2021 7:20:56 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline 		LB30s were designed for Naval Search, to suppress the U-boats in the Atlantic. Therefore they have very poor defensive armament. Don't send them anywhere CAP might be flying.

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1544
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/11/2021 9:54:11 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		They have a large payload...and should not really come near the enemy.

Here is a link about the death of Consolidated's Chief Test Pilot flying one of these...

https://www.thisdayinaviation.com/tag/consolidated-lb-30-liberator-ii/

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 1545
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/12/2021 6:24:05 AM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline 		Sad story. I wonder if it was something as simple as the B-24 having more sensitive controls - requiring less input movement from the pilot than the four engine British bombers. If the pilot pulled back too much on the "stick", he would get that vertical climb. It is much harder to get the nose back down than to pull it up because you are losing airspeed very quickly.


_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1546
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/12/2021 3:24:58 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		What a beast of a Division.

Wow.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1547
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/12/2021 3:38:14 PM   
RangerJoe


Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

What a beast of a Division.

Wow.





Yes, that one is more than capable to standing up to a Japanese division.

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
― Julia Child


(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1548
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/13/2021 12:34:33 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Feb 9th 1942

The battle for Brisbane...and Maryborough.

IJN goes after stricken Canberra and runs into the minefield.

TF 80 encounters mine field at Brisbane (96,160)

Japanese Ships
SS I-174, Mine hits 1






Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 2/13/2021 12:36:17 PM >

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1549
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/13/2021 12:38:12 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Normally very reliable Truant unloads and misses:

Submarine attack near Rangoon at 54,53

Japanese Ships
DD Suzukaze

Allied Ships
SS Truant

DD Suzukaze is sighted by SS Truant
SS Truant launches 2 torpedoes


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Submarine attack near Rangoon at 54,53

Japanese Ships
AK Sakito Maru

Allied Ships
SS Truant

AK Sakito Maru is sighted by SS Truant
SS Truant launches 2 torpedoes at AK Sakito Maru


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Submarine attack near Rangoon at 54,53

Japanese Ships
DD Suzukaze

Allied Ships
SS Truant

DD Suzukaze is sighted by SS Truant
SS Truant launches 2 torpedoes


(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1550
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/13/2021 12:40:47 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Bombay




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1551
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/13/2021 12:48:44 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		I am enjoying the logistical mini game for the Allies. My intention is to use lots and lots of Hubs and routes.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1552
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/13/2021 1:36:29 PM   
RangerJoe


Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline 		Look at the bright side, your Australian units will be very cheap to buy out!

If you can put even a small LRCAP at his fighters originating bases, then his OPs losses should go up even more. Even just a part part of a divided air unit should help, while the others train, rest, and/or repair aircraft.

Are your Aussie units from the Middle East going to try to make it to Australia?

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
― Julia Child


(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1553
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/13/2021 1:42:55 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

Are your Aussie units from the Middle East going to try to make it to Australia?


No... They will secure India, and most importantly Ledo. Then they will prep for the Tavoy/Pegu area invasion. Another sweet unit appeared today in Aden, combat veterans with good TOE!



(in reply to RangerJoe)
Post #: 1554
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/13/2021 1:46:40 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe


If you can put even a small LRCAP at his fighters originating bases, then his OPs losses should go up even more. Even just a part part of a divided air unit should help, while the others train, rest, and/or repair aircraft.



Any idea of what an effective altitude is for that mission? He is flying high altitude sweeps and search.

(in reply to RangerJoe)
Post #: 1555
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/13/2021 1:57:35 PM   
RangerJoe


Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe


quote:

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe


If you can put even a small LRCAP at his fighters originating bases, then his OPs losses should go up even more. Even just a part part of a divided air unit should help, while the others train, rest, and/or repair aircraft.



Any idea of what an effective altitude is for that mission? He is flying high altitude sweeps and search.


I usually do it lower. This actually happened where the US Navy put CAP over Japanese bases on Formosa to catch the enemy aircraft landing while low on fuel. You would tend to see the results in higher OPs losses. Even a 10% LRCAP should help. A higher percentage would put more fighters over the base but at increases in fatigue levels. It is a good use for fighters such as the Buffalo . . .

As Japanese, think if this were done over Ledo with lots of unarmed transports. A player can't sweep their own base and as far as I know, the only way that CAP and such enemy LRCAP interact is if there is also a bombing attack since the LRCAP would show up as escorts.

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
― Julia Child


(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1556
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/13/2021 2:48:06 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Ok, I will give it a try, range 2 from Maryborough, with drop tanks but range set to 0 for LRCAP. Not really expecting much...

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1557
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/13/2021 2:51:38 PM   
ny59giants


Posts: 9869
Joined: 1/10/2005
Status: offline 		CA Canberra - Can you replace leader with one with a higher Naval skill?

(in reply to RangerJoe)
Post #: 1558
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/13/2021 2:52:30 PM   
RangerJoe


Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline 		Post #16, this describes the situation.

quote:

LoBaron
quote:

ORIGINAL: adarbrauner

Is the LRCAP on enemy's airport effective only against transport planes, or even against other outbound missions and planes?

It is effective on all outbound missions. Note that this is highly abstracted to mitigate limitations in the game engine, which is to my best knowledge also the reason for losses not showing up as A2A but rather as op losses.


http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/fb.asp?m=4210898

The entire thread is short but a good reading.

Since the opponent's aircraft is flying low when taking off and has to fly low to land, that is why I suggest a lower level LRCAP. Since it is not shown as A2A, then it does not matter about the quality of the fighter as much - especially if the target is low on fuel and ammo with a tired pilot although I do not know if that is modeled.

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
― Julia Child


(in reply to RangerJoe)
Post #: 1559
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/14/2021 1:11:38 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		30th Wedding Anniversary today!






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1560
Page:   <<   < prev  50 51 [52] 53 54   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) Page: <<   < prev  50 51 [52] 53 54   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.672