Rivers style, WitE vs WitE2. Which one looks better?

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

Rivers style, WitE vs WitE2. Which one looks better?

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East 2 >> Rivers style, WitE vs WitE2. Which one looks better?

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

Rivers style, WitE vs WitE2. Which one looks better? - 3/12/2021 7:02:02 PM

husar99

Posts: 8
Joined: 3/12/2021
Status: offline

Where do rivers look better in your opinion, in WitE or WitE2?
For me, new style is a bit odd.

Attachment (1)

Post #: 1

RE: Rivers style, WitE vs WitE2. Which one looks better? - 3/12/2021 7:59:39 PM

Zoetermeer

Posts: 231
Joined: 10/30/2009
Status: offline

I think this has been discussed a lot before. In WITE 2 they went with the WITW-style map which isn't "hand drawn" per se, but drawn tile by tile. I agree the old one looks better and I'll miss my jison custom map, but IIRC this is a tradeoff they made because they can draw the map much more efficiently.

(in reply to husar99)

Post #: 2

RE: Rivers style, WitE vs WitE2. Which one looks better? - 3/12/2021 9:50:37 PM

loki100

Posts: 10920
Joined: 10/20/2012
From: Utlima Thule
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Zoetermeer

I think this has been discussed a lot before. In WITE 2 they went with the WITW-style map which isn't "hand drawn" per se, but drawn tile by tile. I agree the old one looks better and I'll miss my jison custom map, but IIRC this is a tradeoff they made because they can draw the map much more efficiently.

and amend it very easily when research shows that something is wrong - something that is near to impossible with the WiTE1 map style

_____________________________

(in reply to Zoetermeer)

Post #: 3

RE: Rivers style, WitE vs WitE2. Which one looks better? - 3/12/2021 10:13:45 PM

husar99

Posts: 8
Joined: 3/12/2021
Status: offline

I understand benefits of automated map generators. It's the way to go.

But is it possible to make rivers less wiggly? This adds a lot of visual noise to the map.
If developers added that amount of bends in order to make it look more "organic", repetition destroys this illusion completely. Rivers look "busy" and artificial.

(in reply to loki100)

Post #: 4

RE: Rivers style, WitE vs WitE2. Which one looks better? - 3/12/2021 10:18:59 PM

Erik Rutins

Posts: 37503
Joined: 3/28/2000
From: Vermont, USA
Status: offline

Rivers are actually one of the hardest things to do well on a tile-based map vs. a hand-drawn map, while also preserving clarity regarding hexside effects (which matter in WITE2). IMHO the rivers look good, they'll just never look like a non-tiled map. It's always possible to find some areas that look better or worse but the overall effect is better than the comparison you chose above.

_____________________________

Erik Rutins
CEO, Matrix Games LLC

For official support, please use our Help Desk: http://www.matrixgames.com/helpdesk/

Freedom is not Free.

(in reply to husar99)

Post #: 5

RE: Rivers style, WitE vs WitE2. Which one looks better? - 3/13/2021 12:28:19 AM

Bamilus

Posts: 973
Joined: 4/30/2010
From: The Old Northwest
Status: offline

I like the new ones better TBH

_____________________________

Paradox Interactive Forum Refugee

(in reply to Erik Rutins)

Post #: 6

RE: Rivers style, WitE vs WitE2. Which one looks better? - 3/13/2021 12:31:46 AM

pbrowne

Posts: 147
Joined: 8/7/2020
From: Perth, Western Australia
Status: offline

Interesting, there are two separate mechanics:

1. Hexes for game play mechanics.

2. Hexes that are drawn by the game engine to show a map.

If hexes can be drawn in segments (but display as hexes, not segments), say divided into eight segments, then the drawing of a road or river etc would appear to be straighter across connected hexes.

Also, the change of terrain cover could be more granular and the roads, rivers etc could actually show going through a hex, not just around the edges...

However, this may affect game play mechanics when for example a river on a hex border affect defense/attack.

Note: I meant 12 segments not eight...

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by pbrowne -- 3/13/2021 8:10:41 AM >

(in reply to Erik Rutins)

Post #: 7

RE: Rivers style, WitE vs WitE2. Which one looks better? - 3/13/2021 6:12:40 AM

Technopiper

Posts: 182
Joined: 2/11/2019
Status: offline

Very interesting proposal, pbrowne! But do you meant to say "6" segments, not "8"?

Imagine a system in which movement are still hexagonal, but terrain is 6 times more granular. WitE2 could visually employ this system. Gameplay wise, it's probably too late to incorporate granular terrain into the mechanics, not having started out with that in mind.

About map comparison, I think the old map is prettier hex-by-hex. But the new modulized map has many visual advantages. Different parts of the map can use distinct templates to reflect regional weather. Not to mention the new map would load much faster than the old one.

(in reply to pbrowne)

Post #: 8

RE: Rivers style, WitE vs WitE2. Which one looks better? - 3/13/2021 8:00:58 AM

pbrowne

Posts: 147
Joined: 8/7/2020
From: Perth, Western Australia
Status: offline

Actually 12 segments (as per my image), as 6 segments would, I think, result in the same number of hex edges if tracing along the internal lines.

The problem though, which could probably be accounted for via algorithm, is where rivers for example need to be on the edge of a hex, for reasons of attack and defensive calculations. If a river runs through a hex, then units defending that position should be penalised (unless the algorithm determines that they are on the far side of the river), otherwise their forces would be effectively split either side of the river, with problems of command and control.

< Message edited by pbrowne -- 3/13/2021 8:06:33 AM >

(in reply to Technopiper)

Post #: 9