Warrior
Posts: 1808
Joined: 11/2/2000
From: West Palm Beach, FL USA
Status: offline
|
[QUOTE=RockinHarry]
Maybe Panzer Leo adds the original common MMG´s to the norway or czech OOB, for use in human vs. AI designed user scenarios? That´s sort of stuff that I already contributed to V8.0 OOBs and we can do the same for H2H fr! ;) Make their availability December 1949 and don´t add formations, so that these units only can be added/replaced by scenario makers. This also helps keeping these units out of the AI picklist.;)
Well, scenario makers. Lets stick heads together! What do we need?
I´ll add common MMGs (MG34, MG42 ect.) and a loadable bunker/shelter that works better than the stuff we already have, is already added to my norway OOB (H2H fr). The solution simply is using "APC tracked" class. Other non-APC class drop their passengers when they take a hit by any ordnance![/QUOTE]
Excellent idea, Harry! It would certainly be much easier to simply replace an MG42 (Laf) Grp, for instance, with an H2Hce version from the Norway Oob than to replace the H2Hfr unit with a Finnish HMG and then have to change the name and all the weapons. And the picture would be correct! Of course, there are those who say H2H is only for two player action, and in that case it wouldn't matter, but I want my scenarios to work against the AI also, which is why I go to the trouble to fixing them.
I haven't tried any of the bunkers yet, but they sound good, too.
_____________________________
Retreat is NOT an option.  |
Printable Version
- 
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread