panzer51
Posts: 215
Joined: 9/16/2021 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: loki100 quote:
ORIGINAL: panzer51 ... I see no difference, the group was not at the front lines for over a year, shouldn't it be removed? The groups you're talking about were all new, sometimes formed from one squadron of an existing group, or simply their personnel. The old groups continued on but sometimes were disbanded. this maybe an unfair question as I realise you are keen to see bias and errors. But .. have you played the Soviets in the game? Across 1942 and into 1943, the VVS is constantly evolving as commands are removed, repurposed and returned. So since that is in the game (it really is), I'm really confused as to what point you are trying to make. I mean the Soviets see plenty of ground units removed and redesignated, just that mostly this follows the flow of 1941/2 rather than scripted redeployments to other fronts or to retrain on new equipment. As far as I know, from 1942 onwards the Soviets didn't tend to redesignate existing formations as something else? There is no equivalent of taking a motorised division and training as a PzrGr formation or from PzrGr to Pzr (most of which I believe happen in situ on the map) I'm reworking Soviet and Romanian airforce as well as ground troops. I don't see bias anywhere but I see incorrect TOEs and missing withdrawals and disbanding of Soviet airgroups. I see German groups being withdrawn all the time and I understand the repositioning. However, retraining from I-16 to MiG, Yak or LaGG wasn't something that could've been accomplished in a couple of weeks, those planes handled completely differently and that's why groups were withdrawn from front lines for months. So, yes I believe if the group is to be rebuilt with completely new planes, this only can be done in reserve with a delay.
|