ShaggyHiK
Posts: 166
Joined: 10/10/2021 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: GibsonPete The given examples show that for local success this can take place, but after that, were the attackers able to develop their offensive right there? In addition, the conditions that you set worked in reality in rather specific conditions, a small number of both groupings / poor preparation of the enemy / unfilled front with troops. Agree, all this on the Eastern Front worked an order of magnitude worse, simply due to the number of people involved in the troops from the very beginning of the war. On the other hand, all the examples that you brought show that I was right, after a large unit is divided into small groups for action in the offensive, they lose all offensive potential. And they will not be able to get together for the offensive quickly, and the depth of the offensive drops sharply. Perhaps I am using the wrong term, when I say offensive I mean a relatively deep operation, which is not carried out for the sake of taking a separate bridge, and in which you need to take the bridge and move further by the bridge on your own, after which to take some advantageous line and the goal of this offensive is some large settlement or, more likely, the encirclement of the enemy grouping.
|