Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in cheek aar

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East 2 >> After Action Reports >> RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in cheek aar Page: <<   < prev  6 7 [8] 9 10   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in che... - 2/3/2022 8:28:01 PM   
RedJohn

 

Posts: 517
Joined: 9/20/2019
Status: offline 		Turn 19. Practically zero attacks across the front, slight pushing at Voronezh. Dunno why, it'll be an easy +6 VP for me even if I lose it.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to RedJohn)
Post #: 211
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in che... - 2/3/2022 8:38:02 PM   
RedJohn

 

Posts: 517
Joined: 9/20/2019
Status: offline 		We form our first Guards Rifle Corps. The first of hopefully many, it will prove a devastating bludgeon in blizzard.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to RedJohn)
Post #: 212
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in che... - 2/3/2022 8:39:28 PM   
RedJohn

 

Posts: 517
Joined: 9/20/2019
Status: offline 		OOB Turn 19. I am counting down the turns until I get another free 500,000 men from papa Stalin. No doubt it will replace any losses incurred during snow.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to RedJohn)
Post #: 213
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in che... - 2/3/2022 8:40:12 PM   
RedJohn

 

Posts: 517
Joined: 9/20/2019
Status: offline 		Total losses for Barbarossa.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to RedJohn)
Post #: 214
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in che... - 2/3/2022 8:43:52 PM   
RedJohn

 

Posts: 517
Joined: 9/20/2019
Status: offline 		Here's a look at depots. As my OOB increases and the front stagnates, the supply demanded drops ever lower.

Every unit in the Red Army is Green! Except those just arriving, anyway.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to RedJohn)
Post #: 215
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in che... - 2/3/2022 8:46:24 PM   
AlbertN

 

Posts: 3693
Joined: 10/5/2010
From: Italy
Status: offline 		I am not at the same 'level' so to say because in my Russian game I am defending the south - to play fair. And I am at 3M men at Turn8 roughly, on map.
And my supply requirement is like 10k, everything at Priority 4 and pretty much not feeling any shortage in terms of freight.

The real Russian limit is just manpower and gun production there.

(in reply to RedJohn)
Post #: 216
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in che... - 2/3/2022 9:00:28 PM   
Stamb

 

Posts: 1030
Joined: 10/26/2021
Status: offline 		No. You cant say that. I refuse to believe!

(in reply to AlbertN)
Post #: 217
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in che... - 2/4/2022 7:45:58 AM   
RedJohn

 

Posts: 517
Joined: 9/20/2019
Status: offline 		Turn 20. All is quiet on the Eastern Front.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Stamb)
Post #: 218
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in che... - 2/4/2022 8:02:31 AM   
RedJohn

 

Posts: 517
Joined: 9/20/2019
Status: offline 		Very quiet turn, I only make one attack at the VL area. Otherwise, just waiting for blizzard. I am practically out of armies to use.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to RedJohn)
Post #: 219
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in che... - 2/4/2022 8:17:04 AM   
RedJohn

 

Posts: 517
Joined: 9/20/2019
Status: offline 		Whilst we wait for more interesting turns to come, here's a picture of the other soviet game I'm in. In this game I broke AGC's pocket turn 1, which as we all know cripples German momentum. Usually I houserule that the soviets can't break it if the Germans defend it reasonably well, but I was in the mood for highlighting how strong the Soviets can be and so did not.

Very reminiscent of my game against Beethoven. I currently have a 3.7m OOB as of turn 7.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to RedJohn)
Post #: 220
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in che... - 2/4/2022 8:21:19 AM   
RedJohn

 

Posts: 517
Joined: 9/20/2019
Status: offline 		O V E R W H E L M I N G F I R E P O W E R




Attachment (1)

(in reply to RedJohn)
Post #: 221
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in che... - 2/4/2022 8:33:54 AM   
Stamb

 

Posts: 1030
Joined: 10/26/2021
Status: offline 		Why there is no SU from the Axis side?

(in reply to RedJohn)
Post #: 222
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in che... - 2/4/2022 8:50:29 AM   
RedJohn

 

Posts: 517
Joined: 9/20/2019
Status: offline 		Inexperience? I'm not sure if I said this on the thread or on discord, but most German players - especially if they've played wite1 only - aren't used to panzers being so easily hittable.

(in reply to Stamb)
Post #: 223
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in che... - 2/4/2022 9:09:53 AM   
Stamb

 

Posts: 1030
Joined: 10/26/2021
Status: offline 		Axis side has enough artillery to have at least 2-3 SU in each corps. And while advancing they can focus most of their arty/rocket SU under the best leaders which are typically leading panzers/motorized forces. Also it is possible to attach motorized AA units directly to mobile units. It would not change results of that battle but I am sure that artillery would disrupt some Soviet forces. Add this to a multiple turns and its all sum up.

There was Axis player in this thread. It is really useful to manage SU.
Stugs/flame panzers are really great for city battles.

There are 2 RS** something multi role units (around 10 CV each). One is one a map. And another one acts as SU from the start. They are really strong. You can try and attach that SU to a tank division directly. It would make RedJohn's attacks much more costly.

Or you can attach that unit to a SS division and make an unstoppable force.

(in reply to RedJohn)
Post #: 224
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in che... - 2/4/2022 9:45:57 AM   
Jango32

 

Posts: 307
Joined: 3/15/2021
Status: offline 		I suspect he kept his SUs in the corps and the attack was so overwhelmingly hopeless to defend against that the SUs didn't get sent into battle.

(in reply to Stamb)
Post #: 225
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in che... - 2/4/2022 11:17:39 AM   
AlbertN

 

Posts: 3693
Joined: 10/5/2010
From: Italy
Status: offline 		First time I see also the vvs that mighty in the grind support. I am used to the list of 0 hits by the 90 experience lufwaffe pilots. Here I see the 30 vvs surviving bombers blasting 5 panzer è damaging 12 more lol.

(in reply to Jango32)
Post #: 226
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in che... - 2/4/2022 11:28:24 AM   
Jango32

 

Posts: 307
Joined: 3/15/2021
Status: offline 		Now the fundamental question is if the same performance can be repeated by the Luftwaffe or if the Stukas are just going to be duds...

(in reply to AlbertN)
Post #: 227
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in che... - 2/4/2022 4:46:58 PM   
RedJohn

 

Posts: 517
Joined: 9/20/2019
Status: offline 		Mostly quiet, though some tough pushing at Crimea. He falls back from Voronezh - a wise decision. I will avoid advancing so he cannot build level 3 forts.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Jango32)
Post #: 228
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in che... - 2/4/2022 5:02:29 PM   
RedJohn

 

Posts: 517
Joined: 9/20/2019
Status: offline 		OOB Turn end. We make no moves, besides further movement for blizzard. Lots of leader replacements.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to RedJohn)
Post #: 229
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in che... - 2/4/2022 9:04:57 PM   
RedJohn

 

Posts: 517
Joined: 9/20/2019
Status: offline 		All is quiet in the eas-




Attachment (1)

(in reply to RedJohn)
Post #: 230
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in che... - 2/4/2022 9:06:22 PM   
RedJohn

 

Posts: 517
Joined: 9/20/2019
Status: offline 		Nevermind. Crimea is broken! I was sort of expecting something like this to happen, but was hoping blizzard would be a big enough dissuasion to make him avoid doing it.

So it looks like sadly Sevastapol will, if nothing else, become under siege.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to RedJohn)
Post #: 231
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in che... - 2/4/2022 9:26:53 PM   
RedJohn

 

Posts: 517
Joined: 9/20/2019
Status: offline 		OOB Turn end. We make no moves, and await blizzard still.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to RedJohn)
Post #: 232
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in che... - 2/4/2022 11:39:35 PM   
RedJohn

 

Posts: 517
Joined: 9/20/2019
Status: offline 		Turn 24. Blizzard is approaching. I think a picture says a thousand words.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to RedJohn)
Post #: 233
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in che... - 2/5/2022 2:01:10 AM   
AlbertN

 

Posts: 3693
Joined: 10/5/2010
From: Italy
Status: offline 		Clearly the Supply-Unit per Soldier is less and so is the Ammo-Unit per Soldier too.

Supposedly a static 5M men should require way more Supply than a static - whichever the Axis army is, it is less than that.

(in reply to RedJohn)
Post #: 234
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in che... - 2/5/2022 10:42:10 AM   
Beethoven1

 

Posts: 754
Joined: 3/25/2021
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: AlbertN

Clearly the Supply-Unit per Soldier is less and so is the Ammo-Unit per Soldier too.

Supposedly a static 5M men should require way more Supply than a static - whichever the Axis army is, it is less than that.


Soviet soldiers don't actually use less supply. "Sup need" is just misleading as compared to what the name intuitively sounds like it would be, because it is not taking into account the fact that different units will have different amounts of supply already in stock at the beginning of the logistics phase.

Germany has 0 "Sup need" at the start of the first turn and comparatively low "Sup need" on turn 2 for the same reason - because all of its units start with full supply, so at least for that one turn they would not lack supply if there were 0 delivery of additional supplies to supplement what they already start off with in stock.

(in reply to AlbertN)
Post #: 235
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in che... - 2/5/2022 11:18:03 AM   
Stamb

 

Posts: 1030
Joined: 10/26/2021
Status: offline 		German ID that has enough freight nearby and did not participate in any battle is consuming around 100 tons of supplies. Not ammo and not fuel.

(in reply to Beethoven1)
Post #: 236
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in che... - 2/5/2022 11:45:21 AM   
AlbertN

 

Posts: 3693
Joined: 10/5/2010
From: Italy
Status: offline 		That is so for the first turns but come static front '42 / '43 the supply needs of Axis skyrocket then even if troops stay litterally put in place.

There is a difference - and that is beyond what units have already in stock!

(in reply to Beethoven1)
Post #: 237
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in che... - 2/5/2022 11:53:00 AM   
MechFO

 

Posts: 669
Joined: 6/1/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: RedJohn

O V E R W H E L M I N G F I R E P O W E R





An attack of that size in early August should be suffering massive penalties.

(in reply to RedJohn)
Post #: 238
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in che... - 2/5/2022 9:30:21 PM   
RedJohn

 

Posts: 517
Joined: 9/20/2019
Status: offline 		Turn 25. Blizzard around Voronezh, nowhere else. We shall advance and see if any hexes can be hit.

Next turn predicts blizzard across the front though, and is when our attack shall commence.

Crimea continues to collapse.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to MechFO)
Post #: 239
RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in che... - 2/5/2022 9:38:42 PM   
RedJohn

 

Posts: 517
Joined: 9/20/2019
Status: offline 		Vatutin's cavalry corps come online.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to RedJohn)
Post #: 240
Page:   <<   < prev  6 7 [8] 9 10   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East 2 >> After Action Reports >> RE: The Red Army Is (Not) Overpowered - A tongue in cheek aar Page: <<   < prev  6 7 [8] 9 10   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.875