Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: MG42 sound, YaG-6, Sturmtiger

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Steel Panthers World At War & Mega Campaigns >> RE: MG42 sound, YaG-6, Sturmtiger Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4] 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: MG42 sound, YaG-6, Sturmtiger - 3/13/2004 1:14:03 AM   
VikingNo2


Posts: 2918
Joined: 1/26/2002
From: NC
Status: offline
Daa dhey mak hat sizez dat big







(in reply to AmmoSgt)
Post #: 91
RE: MG42 sound, YaG-6, Sturmtiger - 3/13/2004 3:45:52 AM   
mine_field


Posts: 95
Joined: 3/10/2004
From: North Carolina, USA
Status: offline
Ahh I knew there was something I didn't know regarding the weapons. Thanks AmmoSgt. Thanks doubly for the information regarding SturmTigers.

(in reply to AmmoSgt)
Post #: 92
RE: MG42 sound, YaG-6, Sturmtiger - 3/13/2004 7:52:41 AM   
AmmoSgt

 

Posts: 1002
Joined: 10/21/2000
From: Redstone Arsenal Al
Status: offline
would i be pushing my luck if i suggested that you add a 4.2 " mortar by copying the current 4.2 to the duplcate M2 60mm in the US OOB and then changing the new 4.2 weapons class to napalm up the HE kill a point and the warhead size by 2 . the all you have to do is create a WP 4.2 Mortar section in the TO&E with the same avilability dates and it will appear on the player buy list as an option.

_____________________________

"For Americans war is almost all of the time a nuisance, and military skill is a luxury like Mah-jongg. But when the issue is brought home to them, war becomes as important, for the necessary periods, as business or sport. And it is hard to decide which

(in reply to mine_field)
Post #: 93
RE: MG42 sound, YaG-6, Sturmtiger - 3/13/2004 2:46:47 PM   
Alby


Posts: 4855
Joined: 4/29/2000
From: Greenwood, Indiana
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: AmmoSgt

would i be pushing my luck if i suggested that you add a 4.2 " mortar by copying the current 4.2 to the duplcate M2 60mm in the US OOB and then changing the new 4.2 weapons class to napalm up the HE kill a point and the warhead size by 2 . the all you have to do is create a WP 4.2 Mortar section in the TO&E with the same avilability dates and it will appear on the player buy list as an option.


Cool Idea

_____________________________



(in reply to AmmoSgt)
Post #: 94
Pz Sf Iva - 3/15/2004 5:30:06 PM   
Veroporo

 

Posts: 62
Joined: 10/20/2002
Status: offline
German 105mm Pz Sf Iva / unit 151 has no formation for dec 49 and thus can't be bought. I know it's a rare unit only two bying built so no matter if it's moved to some other oob too. 8)

_____________________________

Ei kannattais.

(in reply to Alby)
Post #: 95
RE: Pz Sf Iva - 3/16/2004 3:42:56 AM   
rbrunsman


Posts: 1837
Joined: 1/31/2002
From: Phoenix, AZ
Status: offline
I don't know if this has been mentioned or not, but:

The Japanese 70mm FH has a listed weight of 104 and a listed carry capacity of 8. Clearly this is a typo. I even tried to load a unit one the FH and it wouldn't load but you can see these stats in the unit buy roster.

Bob

_____________________________

Everyone is a potential [PBEM] enemy, every place a potential [PBEM] battlefield. --Zensunni Wisdom

(in reply to Veroporo)
Post #: 96
RE: Pz Sf Iva - 3/18/2004 2:00:18 AM   
Frank W.

 

Posts: 1958
Joined: 10/18/2001
From: Siegen + Essen / W. Germany
Status: offline
btw: i made 4.2 inch WP mortar sections and did some tests.

works fine, makes nice fires around the map, but seems a bit
to deadly against tanks. in 2 rounds shooting with 3 WP mortars
on 2 dig in panther g´s i have killed both

(in reply to rbrunsman)
Post #: 97
RE: Pz Sf Iva - 3/19/2004 7:22:33 PM   
RockinHarry


Posts: 2963
Joined: 1/18/2001
From: Germany
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Frank W.

btw: i made 4.2 inch WP mortar sections and did some tests.

works fine, makes nice fires around the map, but seems a bit
to deadly against tanks. in 2 rounds shooting with 3 WP mortars
on 2 dig in panther g´s i have killed both


yes, the main problem is that a single round of "napalm" sets a whole 50 yards hex on fire, no matter if its a zook round or a big 15.5!

However, Ammo Sgt will be pleased about some new stuff in V8.2.

_____________________________

RockinHarry in the web:

https://www.facebook.com/harry.zann

(in reply to Frank W.)
Post #: 98
RE: The new improved 8.1 oob thread - 3/20/2004 8:10:34 AM   
AmmoSgt

 

Posts: 1002
Joined: 10/21/2000
From: Redstone Arsenal Al
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Voriax

Some weapon hit probability and penetration tables...first I though to post these urls to the Pz-IVc thread but they may be more useful here.

Weapon effectiveness (81 pages)
http://www.britwar.co.uk/files/phatfile/WW2eff14May02.PDF

Hit probability (13 pages)
http://www.britwar.co.uk/files/phatfile/WW2hit14May02.PDF

Penetration values (75 pages)
http://www.britwar.co.uk/files/phatfile/WW2pen14May02.PDF

Okay, this may be adding fuel to the flames but enjoy




Voriax


well if ya look in the weapons effectiveness tables above I think you're gonna fine that a 4.2 WP round spreads the WP out to cover about a 40 yard diameter .. which is pretty much a whole hex. one if the reasons it was so effective is good coverage, and very incinderary. I didn;t really think it would get in the game as powerful as it is .

_____________________________

"For Americans war is almost all of the time a nuisance, and military skill is a luxury like Mah-jongg. But when the issue is brought home to them, war becomes as important, for the necessary periods, as business or sport. And it is hard to decide which

(in reply to Voriax)
Post #: 99
RE: WP mortar rounds - 3/21/2004 2:57:47 AM   
Major Destruction


Posts: 881
Joined: 8/10/2000
From: Canada
Status: offline
Have you tried reclassing the weapon as a cluster bomb?
Would that make it more or less realistic/playable?

_____________________________

They struggled with a ferocity that was to be expected of brave men fighting with forlorn hope against an enemy who had the advantage of position......knowing that courage was the one thing that would save them.

Julius Caesar, 57 BC

(in reply to AmmoSgt)
Post #: 100
RE: WP mortar rounds - 3/21/2004 3:43:37 AM   
AmmoSgt

 

Posts: 1002
Joined: 10/21/2000
From: Redstone Arsenal Al
Status: offline
Major , the problem is WP is just to dang effective in real life, as well as in the game. The problem is NOT the modeling , it models fine as naplam. Read some of the refferences above, I already dumbed it down by leaving the values close to regular HE. Brit tests figured if 100 Brit 3" HE mortar were droped into a 100 yard square box on entrenched infantry you had a 60% chance of causeing 4% casuality , if you used the same number of WP you get 40% casulities on dug in troops , if you switch to 4.2" WP you only need about half the number of rounds ( 50 mortar shells ) for dug in troops to create a high probablity of 40% casulties. 4.2 has aproxomately a 40 yard burst diameter with WP , for troops in the open on the same 100 yard square you only need about 20 rounds for 40& casulties. Tanks, trucks , whatever, if it can burn or be put out of action by fire has a high chance of catching fire , especially from plunging fire , like a mortar.
The only question is can folks deal with the facts about WP and handle the US having it in the game even in the dumbed down slightly better than HE mortar round form with the added smoke and fire effects ? If you understand that most the casulties are going tobe not dead but wounded , the frags from WP are not usually outright killers , but are very painful because they usually very small but continue to burn under the skin for about 15-30 minutes they burn very hot , in open air they burn out in less then 5 minutes , but once a frag either pentrates or burns thru clothing and get in contact with the skin it burns in thru the skin and smolders, still very hot but chances are a fair sized chunk will still be burning for sometime until it is litterally cut out by a surgeon.
Bottom line is a 4.2 WP mortar round will produce about 20 times the casulties of a 3"/81mm HE round , a single 4.2" WP mortar round has an area of effect for smoke and fire of just slighly smaller than one full hex ( 40 yards v 50 yards) . Five 4.2" WP rounds will on average ( about 60% of the time) ,ale casulities of about half ( 40%) of DUG IN Infantry in a 50 yard target hex in real life. The way I suggested it be modeled in the game it is much less of a casulity producer than in real life the fact it smokes and burn a full hex is about right , especially compared to flame throwers and other flame weapons that effect a much smaller portion of a hex in real life , the 4.2" WP round's problem is not that it is modeled wrong, but that folks just aren't used to it , if you attemped to model in US VT fuseing on regular HE Arty , you would have the same problems , players sinply are not used to the power of some of the Allied weapons because they have been left out of the game so long and folks are simply not used to the power of some of them. The problem is not one of modeling, it is wether or not the players and OOB team is simply willing to let a few of the Allied weapon that were seriously powerful and exteremely common ( 4.2" WP was the most common 42" mortar round used in WW2) into the game. Same issues with US/Brit arty after sept '44 lethality should in fact be 5 times higher than before sept'44 due to VT fuzing. If the players can't hamdle it for whatever reason , or the OOB's guys think it might unbalance the game , then don't put it in , but just be honest about why it isn't in the game. It models just fine, and it works just fine , and it is as common as dirt for the US to have WP , and after sept "44 for the US/Brits to have VT fuzing on almost all HE Arty 90mm and larger making it 5 times as lethal. There is a lot that will work and can be modeled correctly in US ? allied arty that has been left out of the game , I usually get some really lame BS answers that are simply not true from folks who have other real reasons they don't have the guts to admit. Well here is the big chance , I don't much care if it gets in the game or not , I do care that the guys who make the call one way or the other be honest about why it does or doesn't get in the game . You have all the refferences about the weapons performance above you now know it works within the game engine. Now you have to decide what to do .

_____________________________

"For Americans war is almost all of the time a nuisance, and military skill is a luxury like Mah-jongg. But when the issue is brought home to them, war becomes as important, for the necessary periods, as business or sport. And it is hard to decide which

(in reply to Major Destruction)
Post #: 101
RE: WP mortar rounds - 3/21/2004 3:59:51 AM   
AmmoSgt

 

Posts: 1002
Joined: 10/21/2000
From: Redstone Arsenal Al
Status: offline
Oh and just so ou know on theVT fusing issue , the VT fusing was used by the US Navy starting about mid '43, the decision to not use it over land was for security reasons , we ( the US) had plenty of VT fuses . They decide to use them in AAA against V-1's in sept '44 and then imediately decided that since that would mean use over land in Belgium that they might as well go ahead and release the VT fuses to regular Arty. Just so I am clear on the point that sept"44 is an across the board full scale almost instant change to a fuze that revolutionized arty effectiveness. No testing period , no availability lag, all that was worked out in the Pacfic Theater by the US Navy using it for AAA fire. Uping US and Brit arty to reflect this historical fact, it is another "political" call by the folks who control the game OOB's . Put them in or don't , the info is in the above references , no "game engine " issues , no it won't work in the game issues. If the OOB guys think they are just flat out to unbalancing in the game or would upset some folks to much, just have the guts to say so. Time for a little Honesty.

_____________________________

"For Americans war is almost all of the time a nuisance, and military skill is a luxury like Mah-jongg. But when the issue is brought home to them, war becomes as important, for the necessary periods, as business or sport. And it is hard to decide which

(in reply to AmmoSgt)
Post #: 102
RE: WP mortar rounds - 3/21/2004 4:30:51 AM   
JJKettunen


Posts: 3530
Joined: 3/12/2002
From: Finland
Status: offline
There would be no balance problems with WPs or VTs if they were priced according to their overall capability...like every unit in the game should...

_____________________________

Jyri Kettunen

The eternal privilege of those who never act themselves: to interrogate, be dissatisfied, find fault.

- A. Solzhenitsyn

(in reply to AmmoSgt)
Post #: 103
RE: WP mortar rounds - 3/21/2004 6:00:19 PM   
Kevin E. Duguay

 

Posts: 1044
Joined: 4/24/2002
From: Goldsboro, North Carolina
Status: offline
AmmoSgt,

Were VT fuses also issued to Free French, Polish, Australian and other allied Nations Durring this time period?

_____________________________

KED

(in reply to JJKettunen)
Post #: 104
RE: WP mortar rounds - 3/21/2004 8:12:17 PM   
AmmoSgt

 

Posts: 1002
Joined: 10/21/2000
From: Redstone Arsenal Al
Status: offline
VT fuses were US/Brit only , they were a highly classified technology , jointly developed by US and Brit scientists in the US as one of those "special relationship " items much like the Manhatten project. WP was almost exclusively US during WW2, the Brits getting some small quanities later in the war as far as i know.

PS: as always on subjects like this, for folks who think the modeling might be wrong, or the unit is "too powerful" , I would love to see your refferences that you used to come to your conculsions.

_____________________________

"For Americans war is almost all of the time a nuisance, and military skill is a luxury like Mah-jongg. But when the issue is brought home to them, war becomes as important, for the necessary periods, as business or sport. And it is hard to decide which

(in reply to Kevin E. Duguay)
Post #: 105
RE: WP mortar rounds - 3/21/2004 8:22:15 PM   
AmmoSgt

 

Posts: 1002
Joined: 10/21/2000
From: Redstone Arsenal Al
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Keke

There would be no balance problems with WPs or VTs if they were priced according to their overall capability...like every unit in the game should...


LOL Keke , yes that is one way of doing these things , but if we are pricing by rarity the WP 4.2" would have to be cheaper than the regular HE version since WP was the most common 4.2" round fired .
But I do happened to support the concept of strictly pricing by utility, so I think they should run maybe double the cost in the some what watered down version I have suggested. If the OOB gurus want to properly represent them in their full times 10 casulity producing version then priced even higher. But the values I have suggested are mostly to represent the persistent extermely dense smoke screen with some casulity producing features just slightly more powerful than regular HE but producing much more suppresion , due to the "terror factor" .

_____________________________

"For Americans war is almost all of the time a nuisance, and military skill is a luxury like Mah-jongg. But when the issue is brought home to them, war becomes as important, for the necessary periods, as business or sport. And it is hard to decide which

(in reply to JJKettunen)
Post #: 106
Crews and popping smoke - 3/23/2004 5:21:48 PM   
Major_Johnson

 

Posts: 280
Joined: 6/29/2000
From: Beach Haven, NJ, USA
Status: offline
Well I must say I found all this information very interesting. I'm always impressed by the detail.

Anyway, my subject pales in comparision, and I'm not even sure if this is the right thread to post it in, but here goes. I mentioned in another thread about crews (tank crews specifically) not popping smoke in v8 even though the option is active. One person said that it was that way for some sort of cheating reason, which really didn't make any sense to me. And the reason being is that the crews did pop smoke if directed to do so by the AI. For example, I have a crew that bails out of a tank, so I want to pop some smoke to buy them some time. No smoke pops but it does draw more enemy fire. So I don't do anything. Then when I watch the replay of my opponents turn, and he of course starts firing away at the crew to kill them off and then retreat and pop smoke! So it appears to me to be a bug (yes, that nasty word! ) Any info on this being addressed?? Thanks.

_____________________________

M.J.!
We serve others best when at the same time we serve ourselves.

(in reply to VikingNo2)
Post #: 107
RE: Crews and popping smoke - 3/23/2004 7:50:08 PM   
VikingNo2


Posts: 2918
Joined: 1/26/2002
From: NC
Status: offline
The thing about the crews popping smoke an it being a bending the rules tactic refers to have a crew bail and pop smoke to cover a tank that does not have smoke. It goes like this place a couple of tanks in you rear area bail there crews pop smoke. It now looks like arty is firing the crew gets back in the next turn and the crew drives off. Or a tank is moving up but not to the battle front yet, its "willy meter" goes off. So the crew bails and pops smoke. Also in cheap vehicle like that German car race it up front bail the crew and assaults your oppenent becuase even a 1% chance of assault piles of loads of suppression. So basiclly now you have a 3pts vehicle that can assault a tank. IMHO make the crew SKI class infantry(cant assault) with one smoke grenade, one regular grenade and pistols range of one. I think that would make most happy. my .02

(in reply to Major_Johnson)
Post #: 108
RE: Crews and popping smoke - 3/23/2004 7:58:52 PM   
Veroporo

 

Posts: 62
Joined: 10/20/2002
Status: offline
The smoke's were denied from crews because of this. (And if they got one smoke popper, they could do bail out many times and have one smoke granade all the times :/ )

_____________________________

Ei kannattais.

(in reply to VikingNo2)
Post #: 109
RE: Crews and popping smoke - 3/23/2004 11:13:22 PM   
Major_Johnson

 

Posts: 280
Joined: 6/29/2000
From: Beach Haven, NJ, USA
Status: offline
Now I'll tell ya, I never even thought of bailing a crew just to pop smoke. I mean, you can't be sure that they are going to get back in by the next turn, and then they're dead meat and you've lost a tank. I guest it's just one of those grey areas.

_____________________________

M.J.!
We serve others best when at the same time we serve ourselves.

(in reply to VikingNo2)
Post #: 110
RE: Crews and popping smoke - 3/23/2004 11:27:37 PM   
Veroporo

 

Posts: 62
Joined: 10/20/2002
Status: offline
In fact, I haven't seen them not taking their seats back if not bombed or shot. And nobody will shoot them if they haven't been seen.

_____________________________

Ei kannattais.

(in reply to Major_Johnson)
Post #: 111
RE: Crews and popping smoke - 3/24/2004 12:21:06 AM   
VikingNo2


Posts: 2918
Joined: 1/26/2002
From: NC
Status: offline
MJ, I don't do it either but I have played a few where it is a common tactic, not to mention using the crews as recon, since in 7.1 they fought just as good as most recon and cost nothing,

If they have one smoke, does that meen they get the smoke every time they bail ?

(in reply to Veroporo)
Post #: 112
RE: Crews and popping smoke - 3/24/2004 2:42:21 AM   
Major_Johnson

 

Posts: 280
Joined: 6/29/2000
From: Beach Haven, NJ, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Veroporo

In fact, I haven't seen them not taking their seats back if not bombed or shot. And nobody will shoot them if they haven't been seen.



Well a smart player will know that the tank is there, and that the crew has bailed out, and if a fast response artillery is available, like a 60mm mortar squad for instance, will pound that area to keep them suppressed until other units could move into place to take them out. Might not be the case every time, but you know, it is possible.

_____________________________

M.J.!
We serve others best when at the same time we serve ourselves.

(in reply to Veroporo)
Post #: 113
RE: Crews and popping smoke - 3/24/2004 3:55:57 AM   
AmmoSgt

 

Posts: 1002
Joined: 10/21/2000
From: Redstone Arsenal Al
Status: offline
Not to take sides is the smoke grenade debate , but if anybody would look at the ammo load outs on US Army Armored vechicles in the US Army Standard Ordnance catalog, you would find that the typical loadout for a US halftrack or tank or TD was about a dozen smoke grenades 4 to 6 smoke pots , thermite and WP grenades as well as frags or some combination of the above. Amother small detail that is often missed is that US Tanks had Smoke and WP main gun ammo in many cases , which is why they didn't have smoke launchers mounted on the tank. Germans had trouble with smoke launchers to some extent and switched to that Neblethingy which is counted as a weapon in the game despite the lack of any real documnetation of it ever being used as such, and it certainly didn't throw a 3 hex smoke screen( see the great concern about the 4.2" WP mortar not filling the whole hex , but only 80% of a hex above). Different armies depolyed smoke thru different means, seems odd to me that only the method of mounted smoke launchers ( that never really worked well , and had to be removed from many tanks due to being hazarious to the crews) are the only ones represented in the game. However annoying your opponent using smoke might prove to be , and however folks might feel about folks using smoke being a "cheat" , the simple fact is that , at least for US tanks and other AFV , hand thrown grenades are perfectly historically and technically correct. The fact that in the GAME folks have to dismount to use them is not correct, they were actually thrown out of the hatches/ over the side of halftracks ect.. While we are discusing smoke launchers I would point out that many US and Brit Sherman types mounted a 50mm Brit type smoke mortar/launcher , usually mounted firing out of the loaders hatch, details on that piece of ordnance is also in the catalog.
So if we are talking technical/ historical correct modeling on this issue , the whole smoke thing really needs to be looked at, and fixed.

_____________________________

"For Americans war is almost all of the time a nuisance, and military skill is a luxury like Mah-jongg. But when the issue is brought home to them, war becomes as important, for the necessary periods, as business or sport. And it is hard to decide which

(in reply to Major_Johnson)
Post #: 114
RE: Crews and popping smoke - 3/28/2004 12:39:05 PM   
o4r

 

Posts: 257
Joined: 1/31/2003
Status: offline
GE Special Ops Sqd had a MG42 in 1939.

GE Rifle Sqd in 1935 had the text of an Sdkf 10/4

(in reply to AmmoSgt)
Post #: 115
GE Special Ops Sqd - 3/28/2004 7:13:09 PM   
Kevin E. Duguay

 

Posts: 1044
Joined: 4/24/2002
From: Goldsboro, North Carolina
Status: offline
As you may know the German OOB is filled to capacity. So as of right now there is only one type of Spec. Ops. Sqd In the German OOB. It could be armed with a MG34 but they decided on a MG42. If it were up to me, this unit would be armed with a MG34 for the simple reason that it was a more accurate, reliable and versitile weapon.

As far as the GE Rifle Sqd with SdKfz 10/4 stats, I could not find it!! Could you be more specific. Give us the unit number. The only Squad I could find in the German OOB with a 1935 date looked fine.

_____________________________

KED

(in reply to o4r)
Post #: 116
RE: GE Special Ops Sqd - 3/28/2004 10:21:34 PM   
Steve Wilcox

 

Posts: 103
Joined: 8/17/2001
From: Victoria, BC, Canada
Status: offline
It's not the stats, it's the text number (112). Unit 152 German Rifle Sqd has the text number for Unit 079 SdKfz-10/4. I just checked in the encyclopedia.

PS It's been like this for quite a while, i.e. pre-version 8 (I checked some old version 7.x OOBs from 2002). I hadn't noticed until o4r pointed it out, though.

< Message edited by Steve Wilcox -- 3/28/2004 11:23:40 AM >

(in reply to Kevin E. Duguay)
Post #: 117
RE: GE Special Ops Sqd - 3/28/2004 10:52:07 PM   
KG Erwin


Posts: 8981
Joined: 7/25/2000
From: Cross Lanes WV USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Steve Wilcox

It's not the stats, it's the text number (112). Unit 152 German Rifle Sqd has the text number for Unit 079 SdKfz-10/4. I just checked in the encyclopedia.

PS It's been like this for quite a while, i.e. pre-version 8 (I checked some old version 7.x OOBs from 2002). I hadn't noticed until o4r pointed it out, though.


Yep, the text error slipped through 8.2. Steve, you can make the change yourself, if you wish, but this doesn't affect gameplay at all. The encyclopedia text changes were not essential to gameplay, so these can be addressed as "icing on the cake" at a later date.

< Message edited by KG Erwin -- 3/28/2004 3:59:05 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to Steve Wilcox)
Post #: 118
RE: GE Special Ops Sqd - 3/29/2004 6:17:12 PM   
Steve Wilcox

 

Posts: 103
Joined: 8/17/2001
From: Victoria, BC, Canada
Status: offline
Cool. I just added some detail to what o4r said because Kevin wanted more specific information, not because the text error bothered me or anything.

(in reply to KG Erwin)
Post #: 119
RE: GE Special Ops Sqd - 3/30/2004 10:55:29 AM   
Renaud

 

Posts: 9
Joined: 2/27/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kevin E. Duguay

As you may know the German OOB is filled to capacity.


What about creating a 2 German OOB's, say one for 1930-41 and the other for 1942-49 ? It could work just in the same way as the French OOB and it would solve so many problems...

(in reply to Kevin E. Duguay)
Post #: 120
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4] 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Steel Panthers World At War & Mega Campaigns >> RE: MG42 sound, YaG-6, Sturmtiger Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4] 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

2.734