Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Lawrence of Arabia Gambit for the Rising Sun

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> The War Room >> RE: Lawrence of Arabia Gambit for the Rising Sun Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Lawrence of Arabia Gambit for the Rising Sun - 9/12/2004 8:13:46 AM   
sveint


Posts: 3556
Joined: 1/19/2001
From: Glorious Europe
Status: offline
This thread is funny.

Hirohito, actually you are right and all of us others are wrong - you're a genius and we're fools not to see it.

To everyone else: please don't let the thread die, very entertaining.

< Message edited by sveint -- 9/11/2004 8:16:31 PM >

(in reply to Central Blue)
Post #: 61
Joke thread - 9/12/2004 8:29:31 AM   
mogami


Posts: 12789
Joined: 8/23/2000
From: You can't get here from there
Status: offline
Hi, I get it now. This is a joke by the Banana or Mr Frag under a new name. He is just pulling our tails.

"A foothold on US West Coast to use as a spring board for movement down the coast"

Gave it away. Only the Banana would say Japan could invade the USA and win.

Excellent it was very funny really had be going for quite a while.

_____________________________






I'm not retreating, I'm attacking in a different direction!

(in reply to sveint)
Post #: 62
RE: Joke thread - 9/12/2004 8:36:19 AM   
dtravel


Posts: 4533
Joined: 7/7/2004
Status: offline
Ohhhh, now he's not just cynical, he's getting paranoid too! Come on, Mogami, just a little bit farther and you'll be just like ... ME!



_____________________________

This game does not have a learning curve. It has a learning cliff.

"Bomb early, bomb often, bomb everything." - Niceguy

Any bugs I report are always straight stock games.


(in reply to mogami)
Post #: 63
RE: Joke thread - 9/12/2004 8:41:35 AM   
pasternakski


Posts: 6565
Joined: 6/29/2002
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: dtravel

Ohhhh, now he's not just cynical, he's getting paranoid too!


John Kerrey

(in reply to dtravel)
Post #: 64
RE: Top Ten Best Japanese plans ever - 9/12/2004 8:46:39 AM   
pasternakski


Posts: 6565
Joined: 6/29/2002
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Hirohito
Remember viewers I have 100s of thousands of troops


Arnold Schwarzenegger

(in reply to Hirohito)
Post #: 65
RE: Joke thread - 9/12/2004 9:00:09 AM   
dtravel


Posts: 4533
Joined: 7/7/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: pasternakski

quote:

ORIGINAL: dtravel

Ohhhh, now he's not just cynical, he's getting paranoid too!


John Kerrey




_____________________________

This game does not have a learning curve. It has a learning cliff.

"Bomb early, bomb often, bomb everything." - Niceguy

Any bugs I report are always straight stock games.


(in reply to pasternakski)
Post #: 66
RE: Joke thread - 9/12/2004 10:35:50 AM   
pasternakski


Posts: 6565
Joined: 6/29/2002
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: dtravel

quote:

ORIGINAL: pasternakski

quote:

ORIGINAL: dtravel

Ohhhh, now he's not just cynical, he's getting paranoid too!


John Kerrey





Kerrey's comment on Bush, see ...

(in reply to dtravel)
Post #: 67
RE: Joke thread - 9/12/2004 10:41:21 AM   
pasternakski


Posts: 6565
Joined: 6/29/2002
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: dtravel
Come on, Mogami, just a little bit farther and you'll be just like ... ME!





Attachment (1)

(in reply to dtravel)
Post #: 68
RE: Joke thread - 9/12/2004 2:31:26 PM   
11Bravo


Posts: 2082
Joined: 4/5/2001
Status: offline
Gentlemen...this is a war room! Get that picture of that white chick off the board and replace it with something more appropriate.

_____________________________

Squatting in the bush and marking it on a map.

(in reply to pasternakski)
Post #: 69
RE: Joke thread - 9/12/2004 6:04:39 PM   
Burkowski


Posts: 56
Joined: 9/9/2001
From: West Virginia SRA
Status: offline
Greetings, all...

As I digested this thread, I was reminded of a great read from years ago concerning the beauty and the dangers of our self-created fantasy worlds... anyone read Robert Coover's Universal Baseball Association: J. Henry Waugh, Prop.? Careful, boys, that way madness lies...

Burkowski

(in reply to 11Bravo)
Post #: 70
RE: Joke thread - 9/12/2004 10:17:22 PM   
Central Blue

 

Posts: 695
Joined: 8/20/2004
Status: offline
Burkowski...

thanks for the tip. I'm a Cardinal fan boy. Viva Pujols.

_____________________________

USS St. Louis firing on Guam, July 1944. The Cardinals and Browns faced each other in the World Series that year

(in reply to Burkowski)
Post #: 71
I was trying to start a serious conversation - 9/13/2004 6:50:35 AM   
Hirohito

 

Posts: 116
Joined: 9/10/2004
Status: offline
I was trying to start a serious conversation about the pros and cons of using a strategy similar to the one that Lawrence used in the Arabian desert. I see parallels between an ocean of sand and an ocean of water. Sun Tzu also talked about the strategy of severely stressing but not entirely cutting an enemy's supply line as a way to bleed them so badly you can then hit strong points elsewhere.

By not invading PI, Malaya, Singapore, Burma, and the China interior for a while, the troops that would have been there are freed up for operations against targets that are fairly easy to take if you hit them right away but much harder to take if you wait, India, Australia, and possibly Hawaii.

Most of the posts in response to my original post have been along the lines of "it won't work because I say so", but there has been on real discussion as to why it won't work. Most people that responded to the original post either didn't read the whole thing or misunderstood it. Or they quibbled over something unimportant.

I'm not interested in this kind of "arguing". I was looking to have a serious discusion.

Here, again, is the plan, laid out as clearly as I can:

The objective of the plan is to set up several gauntlets though which allied shipping must pass so that these supply convoys can be attacked regularly, so that the true targets can be hit directly and hard because the allies will be busy defending everywhere. The bases making up the gauntlet are to be kept as small in number as possible so that the Empire is not in the position of having to defend everywhere, but is putting the allies in that position. The addition of the Alaska gambit is to try to tie up as many American forces as possible defending the west coast, that gambit probably will eventually fail, but the conquest of America is not the objective, keeping American forces OUT of the way while India, Australia, and the original co-prosperity sphere is conquered at a later date IS the objective.

I'm not certain that PH can hold up to a very determined, aggressive attempt to take it as part of the original Nagumo raid. Sending all ten Empire carriers on the orginal raid plus a large number of capital ships and a large number of replenishment ships puts the USN in a very tight spot at PH. Ships trying to get there will be attacked by swarms of planes and special attack squadrons made up for that purpose that are lurking under the air umbrella that the ten carriers provide. Ships trying to levae the area will face the same fate. The surprise attack will knock out the air force at PH, but ten carriers can provide a more than decent CAP. How long this force can stay on station without a base nearby is questionable, however on Dec 8 forces stream out of Kwajelien, Truk, Palau, Bonin and other places heading for Midway, Johnston Island, Palmyra Island, and every place in the Hawaiin islands that a landing can be made at. These forces come in three waves, first small frces on fast transports made up of fast ships, these forces are trying to find undefended spots, there should be at least one in the Hawaiin islands. The allied player is going to have a tough time moving transports with ten carriers on station harrassing anthing that moves, so getting the defedners from PH to the other potential landing spots int he Hawaiin islands will be tricky. Most of the intial landings will fail, not enough troops, but they aren't supposed to all succeed, the Empire only needs one of them to succeed.

The second wave is a large number of transports wth anyone who can carry a gun who was based in Kwajalein, Truk, Palau, Bonin, and other places in these island chains plus minimal supplies, these forces are to either exploit the initial landing made by the fast transports if one of them succeeded or force a landing at what is deemed to be a weak spot.

The third wave is made up of the engineers, headquarters units and large numbers of supplies and fuel.

Now, if any of the bases anywhere near PH falls between Dec 8 and when the fuel sitation starts getting dicey for the original raiding force, these supply units will be sent to that base and the raiders will switch their home base from wherever they were from in Japan and elsewhere to the newly captured base. The raiders will have to leave, but they will be back. The only question is where will this base be? My bet goes on Kona. But, Johnston Island is almost impossible to hold in the early days of December.

While this is going on the troops that would have been landing in the PI, Malaya, and all the little meaningless islands all over the pacific are instead bypassing Singapore and Malaya and hitting the DEI, not the whole thing but the circle that points from Palau and goes around to end at Medan. To keep from having to get into the "gamey" argument, on Dec 7 I have a rule that no japanese forces can have a destination that is not a japanese base excpet for PH or one of the hawaiin islands, forces from all over japanese held areas leave with destinations that make it look like they are reinforcing other Japanese bases like Palau, Truk, Kwajalein, Saigon, etc. On Dec 8 a huge force moves into the waters between Malaya and Saigon, it looks like they are heading for Malaya but their real destination is Palembang and Batavia. On the 7th figters are moved up to the outer most points south of Saigon and put on long range cap. Again, this force consists of three waves, fast transports to hit everything and anything seeking an undefended spot and to probe for weak spots making up wave 1, large forces infantry forces on transports making up wave two, and HQ and engineer units with lots of supplies and fuel making up wave 3. The waves are made up by the speed of the ships and where they are headed, either for the beach or a point offshore. I use very fast ships for the fast transports, wave two is made up of all the transports that have a speed of 14 in their own TFs, transports of speed 11 follow behind, everything else comes in wave three.

The nice thing about fast transport missions, those same destroyers and light cruisers can have their missions changed to bombardment or surface combat after they drop their invasion force. So, you can hit a dozen places at once, get repulsed in eleven of them, get a foothold in one and reroute the ships in wave two to head for the foothold or you can convert the ships from the fast transport missions into bombardment missions and hit a weak spot that repulsed you earlier. When you uncover surface warships of the enemy in wave one, you can send the covering forces to meet them and/or covnert the fast transports into surface combat missions and move them to meet them.

Yes, there will be casualties. Perhaps lots of them. But, the Empire can put so many ships in the water bound for so many places it is impossible for the Dutch to stop them all, even with the Brits still in Singapore.

Daylight of the 8th is going to be a rough one on the British navy in Singapore and Malaya thanks to the planes in Saigon and elsewhere.

There is another force heading for the end of the DEI that points at Palau, this force left on the 7th with Japanese possessions as their destinations. Again, this force can hit the DEI in many places at once seeking a weak spot as soon as it is found the successive waves solidify the hold and the planes move in and the DEI are rolled up from the end facing Palau to wherver the force that landed comfing from the diretion of Saigon ended up. Rolling up the DEI from there to Medan is a simple matter.

Meanwhile, small forces have been probing all along the line from Kwajalein through Guadlcanal, Santa Cruz, Espirito Santo, Efate, New Caledonia, and New Zealand, once an undefended spot is found a larger force consolidates.

By Jan 7 the picture should look like this:

Empire holds:
1. Aleutians, Dutch Harbor, Adak Island and hopefully something in the Alaskan panhandle.
2. Midway, Wake, Johnston Island, Palmyra Island, Christmas Island, and hopefully something in the Hawain Islands. I'm not sure that the Hawaiin Islands can hold out under a very determined all out effort to take them.
3. The western end of Papua New Guines and all the bases between Papua New Guinea and Davao.
4. The chain of islands in the DEI that starts at the end pointing at Palau and goes through Timor, Flores, Soembawa, Bali, Java, and Sumatra ending at Medan.
5. The bases between Borneo and the Phillipine Islands proper.

Now, what does the Empire do next? The objective is to keep the US off balance for as long as possible worrying about the west coast and Hawaii while India is taken by sea, followed up by an invasion of Australia. Taking Australia is tough but it can be done. McArther said he could only hold 30% of Australia. So, the Empire can end up with the other 70% at least.

How long to take India? That depends on how the AI engine treats the interior of India if the bases along the coasts are taken. Are these areas making their own supply? Or do they rely on supply from the rest of the commwealth? At the very least it should be possible to slice and dice the interior of India and take it a piece at a time.

In the meantime the gauntlet is making life tough for Malaya, Singapore, Burma, Papua New Guinea, and PI. Taking out the bases that make up the other end of the "Hump" and the Burma Road is a top priority, but this time from the coast instead of over the long jungle trails, it should be possible. What does the AI do about supply in China in this case? That is an unknown. Hopefully, China now has serious supply problems.

So, if all goes well, the second phase of the war looks like this:

The Empire controls:
1. India
2. Australia
3. Alaska including the panhandle
4. Outposts in the Hawaiin islands
5. The Gauntlet bases desribed above

Now, it is time for phase three, the conqest of the original co-prosperity sphere, Malaya, Singapore, PI, Papua New Guinea and all the little nothing islands that were previously bypassed.

If the Hawaiin Islands did not fall previously, once the co-prosperity sphere is established, an all out effort is made to take them.

At the end of phase III, the Empire holds:
1. India
2. Burma
3. Malaya and Singapore
4. DEI
5. PI
6. Australia or 70% of it
7. Papua New Guinea
8. Alaska including the panhandle
9. Hawaii or at least a stronghold on it somewhere
10. All the islands in the pacific outside of Hawii if Hawii still stands

The war is now a ground war on the west coast of the US.

For the US to move out from the west coast, if Hawaii fell it means they have to cross the many miles in between with only carriers for air cover. Taking back the pacific will be a very long, very hard job.

If Hawaii didn't fall and the Empire has a strong outpost on it then building up the invasion force for retaking the Pacific will be made tougher.

What willl the addition of India and Australia do to Japan's resource point situation? Will closing the "hump" and the burma road mean the end for China? If China falls what does the resource situation look like for the Empire?

I am not saying that this plan is not risky. It is. I'm not saying it will definitely work. But, I have planned every move for the first two phases down to the last ship, the last box of ammo, the last gallon of fuel. The amuont of time it takes to play this game makes seeing this plan trhough to the end problematic.

Now, if anyone wants to discuss the merits or the flaws of this plan in detail I will be happy to do so, but if you just want to flame me I won't answer.

Hirohito

(in reply to Central Blue)
Post #: 72
RE: I was trying to start a serious conversation - 9/13/2004 6:59:54 AM   
Tankerace


Posts: 6400
Joined: 3/21/2003
From: Stillwater, OK, United States
Status: offline
Your plan is flawed, at least from an AI standpoint, as it has already been said that the AI plays in a historic manner. So, if you do something totally a historic on turn 1, you in effect break the AI, and it will result in a near total capitulation. The only way to truly test your idea is to do it against a human opponet who can react and formulate a defense.

_____________________________

Designer of War Plan Orange
Allied Naval OOBer of Admiral's Edition
Naval Team Lead for War in the Med

Author of Million-Dollar Barrage: American Field Artillery in the Great War coming soon from OU Press.

(in reply to Hirohito)
Post #: 73
RE: Lawrence of Arabia Gambit for the Rising Sun - 9/13/2004 7:07:33 AM   
Hirohito

 

Posts: 116
Joined: 9/10/2004
Status: offline
I don't understand how by limiting the amount of bases that have to be maintained to a far fewer number than the number in the original plan, I am making the Empire's supply situation worse. The guantlet consits of 26 bases. The Empire had hundreds of bases after their running wild period, many of them useless islands. Can India be taken if it is done quickly? I think so. That depends on the AI engine. The commonwealth troops were mostly useless in the first months of the war, and the west coast of India has a huge anti-British, pro-Japanese population. The British were terrified of Japanese troops on the Indian soil because they feared a guerilla war against them. Does the AI engine reflect this? How well will the commonwealth troops of India do in the first few months compared to how useless they were in Malaya and elsewhere?


I know in PacWar taking India out early is easy. If you wait it becomes impossible.

I have done some things to help the supply situation. I turned off construction at all bases, I only build up a few select bases. I also turned off merchant construction, if this gambit fails it won't matter how many ships I build. I stopped building any of the planes that are basically worthless in WWII style airwarfare. I abandoned bases in China that have no real resource significance, until the capture of the hump and the burma road come into effect. I upgrade heavy industry at every turn and upgrade aircraft production of GOOD planes at every turn, I also upgrade Naval construction.

I know you keep saying that without PI, Malaya, Singapore, and Papua New Guinea the Empire will run out of supplies, I didn't say that I wouldn't take them, I said I would bypass them at first to take India and Australia quickly and establish the gauntlet, PI, Malaya, Singapore, and Papua New Guinea can be taken at leisure later.

Is gambling on taking Australia and India a bigger gamble than the original plan? I don't think so. I think it has a bigger pay off for the same risk.

Hirohito

(in reply to mogami)
Post #: 74
RE: I was trying to start a serious conversation - 9/13/2004 7:09:30 AM   
Hirohito

 

Posts: 116
Joined: 9/10/2004
Status: offline
Perhaps AI is the wrong term. I don't play the computer. I meant the part of the program that calculates resources and supply. What will it do about China resources and supply if the hump and the burma road are closed? I don't know what to call that part of the program.

Hirohito

(in reply to Tankerace)
Post #: 75
RE: I was trying to start a serious conversation - 9/13/2004 7:24:41 AM   
WiTP_Dude


Posts: 1434
Joined: 7/3/2004
Status: offline
Sorry, you don't have the shipping, manpower, or transport to achieve all of this. You need to pick and choose. If you try to do it all, you'll end up doing none. Add that with this aggressive strategy, you will end up losing a lot of ships in the first three or four months.

quote:

By Jan 7 the picture should look like this:

Empire holds:

1. Aleutians, Dutch Harbor, Adak Island and hopefully something in the Alaskan panhandle.
2. Midway, Wake, Johnston Island, Palmyra Island, Christmas Island, and hopefully something in the Hawain Islands. I'm not sure that the Hawaiin Islands can hold out under a very determined all out effort to take them.
3. The western end of Papua New Guines and all the bases between Papua New Guinea and Davao.
4. The chain of islands in the DEI that starts at the end pointing at Palau and goes through Timor, Flores, Soembawa, Bali, Java, and Sumatra ending at Medan.
5. The bases between Borneo and the Phillipine Islands proper.


This is a reasonable goal list for the first month.

quote:

Now, what does the Empire do next? The objective is to keep the US off balance for as long as possible worrying about the west coast and Hawaii while India is taken by sea, followed up by an invasion of Australia. Taking Australia is tough but it can be done. McArther said he could only hold 30% of Australia. So, the Empire can end up with the other 70% at least.


Where are you getting enough men, transports, and supply to hold your line effectively and invade India? Guess what, India has plenty of armor, infantry, and ships to defend with. They aren't going down without a lot of fireworks first. With over 2,000 resource points they have plenty of supply.

India taken by sea? How are you blockading the PI, Hawaii, Australia, and the western United States at the same time? You've already probably had some significant losses by this point, how many carriers, battleships, ect will you realistically have left?

Then invade Australia? You're going to starve the Aussies out, right? Unfortunately they have 4,000 resource points. That's at least 4,000 supply points per turn they will get. While you are invading India their supply will build up, not down. You're going to have to make a major commitment here by the time you get around to invading in late 1942 or early 1943.

quote:

How long to take India? That depends on how the AI engine treats the interior of India if the bases along the coasts are taken. Are these areas making their own supply? Or do they rely on supply from the rest of the commwealth? At the very least it should be possible to slice and dice the interior of India and take it a piece at a time.


2,000 minimum for India, 4,000 minimum for Australia.

quote:

In the meantime the gauntlet is making life tough for Malaya, Singapore, Burma, Papua New Guinea, and PI.


So you are suffering major losses in the first month, blockading the West Coast, creating a gauntlet for Malaya, Singapore, and PI, and invading India by sea all at the same time?

quote:

The war is now a ground war on the west coast of the US.


By the way, if you invade the West Coast you'll trigger faster reinforcements for the United States. There is zero chance of Japan being sucessfully in a "ground war" in the US.

< Message edited by WiTP_Dude -- 9/13/2004 12:26:57 AM >

(in reply to Hirohito)
Post #: 76
RE: I was trying to start a serious conversation - 9/13/2004 7:33:46 AM   
pasternakski


Posts: 6565
Joined: 6/29/2002
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Hirohito
The objective of the plan is to set up several gauntlets


I told him we've already got one ...

(in reply to Hirohito)
Post #: 77
RE: I was trying to start a serious conversation - 9/13/2004 7:34:55 AM   
mogami


Posts: 12789
Joined: 8/23/2000
From: You can't get here from there
Status: offline
Hi, When you tie yourself to bases you leave Larry in the sand and become just another static defender. In fact the USN becomes Larry and you the Turk.

We have heard your idea. Now we have all moved to Missouri.



(Forget PacWar. The units in Pacwar had to be made bad or the Japanese could not take the SRA. Of course it was exploited by the Japanese players who went for India and knocked out China. There are plenty of good Allied troops on the map in WITP. Their problem is they cannot get at the Japanese. Now if the Japanese come to them instead....................)

< Message edited by Mogami -- 9/13/2004 12:54:19 AM >


_____________________________






I'm not retreating, I'm attacking in a different direction!

(in reply to WiTP_Dude)
Post #: 78
RE: I was trying to start a serious conversation - 9/13/2004 9:06:30 AM   
Raverdave


Posts: 6520
Joined: 2/8/2002
From: Melb. Australia
Status: offline
Hirohito,

IF you think that your plan is so good then lets us all see it in action. Start a game PBEM game and post an AAR. If anything it would make an interesting read.

_____________________________




Never argue with an idiot, he will only drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.

(in reply to mogami)
Post #: 79
RE: I was trying to start a serious conversation - 9/13/2004 2:33:23 PM   
Captain Cruft


Posts: 3652
Joined: 3/17/2004
From: England
Status: offline
Thinking about this a bit more, some of it does make sense. I can see the point of going straight for Oz and India (if possible) but Aleutians and Canada no. There's nothing there worth taking.

The basic plan of, as I would put it, preventing the Allies getting forward and therefore forcing them to fight you earlier than they would like may be sound. If it fails though the subsequent collapse will be far quicker than it would have been. I suppose you could call it a super high risk/super high reward strategy.

Logistics I still doubt are possible.

I second the motion for a Hirohito vs Beta Person PBEM game as a test ...

(in reply to Raverdave)
Post #: 80
RE: I was trying to start a serious conversation - 9/13/2004 6:22:39 PM   
Central Blue

 

Posts: 695
Joined: 8/20/2004
Status: offline
Looking forward to AAR's from a PBEM. Everything else is reiteration.

You can reiterate that taking anything in Alaska is a genuine threat that diverts important resources. Others can reiterate that the West Coast Command and NorPac have all sorts of resources at their disposal that most players probably seldom move... unless IJ were nice enough to bring some forces over for target practice.

You can reiterate that you can starve India and Australia and others can reiterate that the game engine doesn't work that way. Nor does it model popular uprisings by Indians over-joyed at the prospect of being ruled by IJ rather than GB.

And so on.

But while you continue to tell us where your forces are going, the rest of us are making plans for all the Allied forces you aren't engaging. As Mogami observes, your plan seems intent on turning Lawrence into the Ottomans

< Message edited by Central Blue -- 9/13/2004 8:32:10 AM >


_____________________________

USS St. Louis firing on Guam, July 1944. The Cardinals and Browns faced each other in the World Series that year

(in reply to Captain Cruft)
Post #: 81
RE: I was trying to start a serious conversation - 9/13/2004 6:34:42 PM   
Oliver Heindorf


Posts: 1911
Joined: 5/1/2002
From: Hamburg/Deutschland
Status: offline
Hirohito, your plan is very interesting. personally, I doubt that it will work but thats another story. You say you conquer only some bases, which makes sense to me ...I think you gave too much points of interests to the allies, they will find a few bases where you are weak and you dont have the proper numer of escorts aviable..I think he can do early harm you very much.
and harm on one or two bases in this strategy will pulverise your plan as your plan needs 100% security that the plan goes ahead.

my main point against your strategy : you have absolutly no shipment/forces left to cover the uncertainity of war. You plan is good but you cannot plan war or what your opponent is doing. I hope to see an AAR maybe you can proove me wrong. Why dont you take one of these endless offers here to test your plan ? we are all hot

< Message edited by Oliver Heindorf -- 9/13/2004 5:35:28 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to Central Blue)
Post #: 82
RE: I was trying to start a serious conversation - 9/13/2004 10:22:34 PM   
freeboy

 

Posts: 9088
Joined: 5/16/2004
From: Colorado
Status: offline
Great plan, just add 6 yamatos 5 para divisions, 1200 transport planes, 8 carriers with highly capable trained pilots, and no restrictions on the use of Manchurian garason, ie no USSR.. and then maybe you could survive awhile till the us brings all it assets in in 44

< Message edited by freeboy -- 9/14/2004 4:23:04 AM >

(in reply to Oliver Heindorf)
Post #: 83
RE: I was trying to start a serious conversation - 9/13/2004 10:36:34 PM   
Tankerace


Posts: 6400
Joined: 3/21/2003
From: Stillwater, OK, United States
Status: offline
As an Allied player, the easiest way to defeat his plan, IMO, is to sortie Forze Z, and all available British and Dutch ships to the Central Pacific, and the Aussies aswell. With his carriers and battleships ravaging the US fleet, ABD forces could tear his invasion convoys to pieces, or even better cut his supply lines. Without food, his landing forces would starve, and the US could pass those islands by, and in fact shorten the war.


Hirohito's plan is bold, and against just the US it could work. But in his rear he is leaving 2 BBs, 1 BC, about 15-18 CA, CL, and CLAAs, and about 10-15 destroyers from the British Far Eastern Fleet, the Butch Fleet, the US Asiatic Fleet, and the Australian Navy. If 1 German heavy cruiser can be extremly effective at disrupting convoys, think of what this firepower could do.

If he truly had to account for "every last drop of fuel and supply", then the loss of 1 transport, or 1 tanker, could wreck the entire plan. Also remembr, you are leaving about 30-45 submarines in your rear as well. And I know in my games by your Jan 7 starting date my subs bag usually 10-15 transports. That right there could throw a monkey wrench into your plans.

TO be truly effective, you are going to have to account for losses. You are going to have to figure in a "net casualty rating". For an enterprise such as yours, I would figure 25%. So, if your plan can still succeed with loosing 1/4 of your transports, then you have a master plan. But if it can't, then I suggest you go back to the drawing board, and come up with a lightly less bold plan.

I agree with Captain Cruft. If you confine it to 1 or two regions (India/Australia), you might be able to do it. But if you over extend yourself all over the place, then you will make yourself vulnerable to commerce raiding.

< Message edited by Tankerace -- 9/13/2004 2:38:54 PM >


_____________________________

Designer of War Plan Orange
Allied Naval OOBer of Admiral's Edition
Naval Team Lead for War in the Med

Author of Million-Dollar Barrage: American Field Artillery in the Great War coming soon from OU Press.

(in reply to freeboy)
Post #: 84
RE: I was trying to start a serious conversation - 9/13/2004 11:18:15 PM   
mogami


Posts: 12789
Joined: 8/23/2000
From: You can't get here from there
Status: offline
Hi, If he wants to be Larry of Pacific he has to first forget about holding any base. It is fine that they can be taken. There are many that can be taken. Ignore the ones that can be taken while empty. Instead find the ones that can be taken and in the process Japan kills off an allied unit or two. Go ahead and pretend that you are going to set up a massive complex and when the allies finally come to take it back be gone. Be off far away taking another base and killing a few more allied units. But never under any circumstance remain in any location where the Allies can bring a force and kill Japanese material.
Don't defend the base. Ambush the invasion. If that is not an option then let the attack land on thin air. Of course this is the way the faction of Japanese players that do not believe in base defense/capture in phase 2 have always planned to fight. This is the way a player who considers the enemy force his objective fights. Not fixating on geography.

During phase 3 Japan will be forced to fight static defensive battles and pay high costs to win them. In phase 2 Japan can still dance. Is still mobile can still vanish to reappear far from where the Allies expect. Don't tie this mobilty down to defending bases. The bases mean nothing. You cannot predict where you will go. Where you will go depends on the enemy. Where ever he maks a mistake you jump on him. Where he protrudes you lop him off where he is slow you are fast. You go where he provides a victory. Before you do your recon scouting and learn all you can about his dispositions you can't predict where to go. (Peeking before start does not count because you have work to do in phase 1 and that is securing your empire. The SRA is why you are fighting. In phase two you get to decide how you are fighting.

< Message edited by Mogami -- 9/13/2004 4:29:45 PM >


_____________________________






I'm not retreating, I'm attacking in a different direction!

(in reply to Tankerace)
Post #: 85
RE: I was trying to start a serious conversation - 9/14/2004 3:35:02 PM   
tsimmonds


Posts: 5498
Joined: 2/6/2004
From: astride Mason and Dixon's Line
Status: offline
quote:

But in his rear he is leaving 2 BBs, 1 BC, about 15-18 CA, CL, and CLAAs, and about 10-15 destroyers from the British Far Eastern Fleet, the Butch Fleet, the US Asiatic Fleet, and the Australian Navy.

Is this the fleet crewed by lady rugby players?

_____________________________

Fear the kitten!

(in reply to Tankerace)
Post #: 86
RE: I was trying to start a serious conversation - 9/14/2004 6:03:09 PM   
UncleBuck

 

Posts: 633
Joined: 10/31/2003
From: San Diego, CA, USA
Status: offline
Good point, I can't beleive we all forgot abut those Lovely Dutch and Brit Subs in the beginng of the game. The 30 or 40 US subs get a lucky hit now and again, but have faulty torpedoes. Luckily the deck guns work great, and Hirohito will not have enough DD's to escort every convoy. The Dutch and Brit Subs are very nasty. There are many choke points on his invasion route that would be prime for torpedo attacks. Do not forget the Mine Layers as well at key positions. If you can lay mines then move them to India so they can rearm, those Indian ports may be a bit troubleing. All of those Arty units in India also make good Beach defense units as well.

I can see bypassing the P.I. But taking Sumatra and Java are a must or you will get cut off trying to get to India. Even the P.I. woudl need limited invasions just to allow for suprression of Manila, and Clark. The US will get the 75 B-17's by Jan 15 1942. The real problem for Japan comes if the US can start re-enforcing P.I. by running teh Gauntlet. Land a couple more Marine Divisons or the USA units from Pearl along with a couple Hundred thousand in Supply, and engineers and the P.I. becomes a Japanese Death trap.

If you do a limited offensive in P.I. to keep them supressed taking Borneo, and Sulawesi, can be done with light forces. Going for INdia is Bold but I beleive it woudl be far to dangerous. I do think taking Northern Austrailia is possible, in fact Perth, Broome, Wyndham, Derby and Darwin could all be taken fairly cheaply. Then Back fill Timor, Java and Sumatra. The problem for Japan is going to be keeping these bases supplied. Very few of them are going ot supply themselves. You are not goingto take them intact, and they will be in danger of LBA very quickly. the Bonus to this is that if you have the forces Taking NG may be easier since teh Allied player will need to re-enforce Alice SPrings and the East Coast cities to prevent JP expansion.

I think there are great ideas in the plan but as it is now it is not possible to accomplish. It must have the scope reduced. You must pick a Continent to invade. I woudl Pick Austrailia. Easier to supply and easier to conquer. It will also hurt the allied attacks through DEI. India is just to far. the Supply lines woudl be enormous and vulnerable. Take, Rangoon if you can, as well as the Thai/Burma Area then Defend. You woudl then be secure on the Left and with Aussieland in your hands the DEI is a tough and safe nut for Japan. THis is going to push US forces into the Central arena but, they are coming for you someplace.

UB

_____________________________


(in reply to tsimmonds)
Post #: 87
RE: I was trying to start a serious conversation - 9/14/2004 6:30:06 PM   
mogami


Posts: 12789
Joined: 8/23/2000
From: You can't get here from there
Status: offline
Hi, His plan prevents Allied operations before mid 1943 exactly as much as moving the entire Japanese Armed forces back to the Home Islands prevents Allied Operations before mid 1943. They are not coming. They are not coming because you are preventing them they are not coming because it takes a year to raise and train and organize the force required.
Japanese units sitting in northern Austraila are as much out of the real war as those sent to Alaska or the moon. They are not on the route to Saipan.

Saipan, Saipan Saipan. The USAAF lusts for Saipan. The USN and USMC will knock themselves out to provide Saipan for the Allied player to use B-29.

You can draw a line from Dec 7 1941 to the date the first B-29 group is ready. everything the Allied player does down the entire line is directed at Saipan.


The only way this plan makes any sense at all is if the Japanese player is going for Auto Victory because it prepares no defense for late in war. It has a life or value of less then 1 year before it cannot work any further and the deployments become a handicap rather then an asset.

To score Auto Victory the Japanese player must have 4 times the VP the Allied player has on 1 Jan 1943 or any day in 1943. 3 times on 1 Jan 1944 or any day in 1944.

The Japanese player begins down over 5k points. So in 400 days he has to catch up and then out score the enemy by 4 to 1 or more. No problem against the AI. I never even bother to discuss strategy against the AI you don't need it. Just learn where the AI screws up and then spank it.

Against a human scoring 4 to 1 for 400 turns is a little harder then it sounds. You send a bombing mission against enemy airfield with 40 bombers. You destroy 10 on the ground but have 1 shot down by AA and lose 2 to ops. (you didn't score 4 to 1)
The first time your bombers are unescorted and meet enemy CAP (you don't score 4 to 1)
Dutch submarine sinks 10 point AK you sink submarine your minus points. You fly groups you don't need to and lose op points every day. The Allied player moves everything out of range and grounds them all. You must fly patrol and CAP. The Allied player does not have to bother except for certain locations where he can conduct air ops to his advantage.

The Allied player stays in port. All his areas outside the SRA produce supply that will move overland in time. Japanese submarines have no targets. Try that as Japan.

OK I am being extreme in the examples to show the line of thought the Allies can use to produce their actions. They won't ground all aircraft or keep every ship in port but they can limit these operations much more then the Japanese player can.

In the beginning a large Allied force is unprepared and can be isolated and defeated in detail but the most excellent Japanese player with all the luck in the world cannot finish this jonb in under 90 days . And it will like as not require closer to 120 for even the best results.

Any action the Japanese take outside the SRA will like as not add to the time the SRA operations require. Without the timely arrival of reinforecments provided by the release of units at the CONCLUSION of SRA operations all operations outside the SRA can be meet with superiour LOCAL force. I mean you can run a unit far in advance and sieze a base or two or 20 but you can't hold any of them without troops that begin commited to SRA operations. If you remove them from SRA to go adventure seeking you lengthen the time the SRA operations require and these operations are vital because your supply production depends on them.

Now even if you move SRA forces early to give power to these early forward lunges all you have done is move forces into unsupplied status and left them in range of enemy counter attacks and still your economy has not benifited.

Thats why I say you might as welll send them all back to Japan. At least they will be supplied and the Allies cannot kill them.

You cannot present a plan for the entire war that does not begin with taking the SRA ahead of schedule and below cost and getting it in good working condition. No Japanese plan that does not do this basic thing first is a good plan. It can't be.

It is like saying. "I don't know what the moves will be but on move 25 my queen will move to E5 and mate the opposing King. There is nothing you can do to stop me." Sounds really bold. But untill I see you do it I'll think your full of cow crap.

This long line from Alaska to Oz looks like a fishing net that the ALlied player just keeps running into? Where are you scoring 4 to 1. What if he just says "OK" and stays at home? You don't force him to do anything where do the 4-1 points come from. When he comes he will come at the most isolated location and he will win. Then he will go to the next. And so on.

< Message edited by Mogami -- 9/14/2004 11:36:11 AM >


_____________________________






I'm not retreating, I'm attacking in a different direction!

(in reply to UncleBuck)
Post #: 88
RE: I was trying to start a serious conversation - 9/14/2004 7:38:16 PM   
Central Blue

 

Posts: 695
Joined: 8/20/2004
Status: offline
As with Alaska, any foray into Australia allows the Allies to begin to attrit Japanese forces with troops that would almost certainly never see action otherwise; Australia Command is not insignifigant. So unless IJ shows up in force, anyone that lands in Derby or Darwin or Cairns is expendable, or will be forced to retreat quickly. Any forces committed to successful Australian landings are forces not in play elsewhere--and the Beauforts and Hudson will have a field day with the invasion fleets if IJ doesn't have local air superiority from somewhere.

Making it easy for the enemy to deploy forces against you at a price cheaper than your own seems un-Larry like to me.

_____________________________

USS St. Louis firing on Guam, July 1944. The Cardinals and Browns faced each other in the World Series that year

(in reply to mogami)
Post #: 89
RE: I was trying to start a serious conversation - 9/14/2004 7:41:10 PM   
tsimmonds


Posts: 5498
Joined: 2/6/2004
From: astride Mason and Dixon's Line
Status: offline
(pssst! Who's Larry...?)

_____________________________

Fear the kitten!

(in reply to Central Blue)
Post #: 90
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> The War Room >> RE: Lawrence of Arabia Gambit for the Rising Sun Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.125