Return of Fire

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

Return of Fire

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> Return of Fire

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

Return of Fire - 9/28/2004 9:01:17 PM

Nusskuchen

Posts: 10
Joined: 8/13/2004
Status: offline

Ha! I finally managed it to return the game and get my money back!

After endless discussions about the shopsystem which doesnt show the full cost, the lousy Dollar : Euro ratio, the "missing" features in the game, the unanswered mails by Digital River, my Credit Card company just confirmed the charge back of my money :).

Boy, am I glad I have finally got some justice.

May Mr. Frag and his fanclub be happy forever with their stupid "you cant use what you produce" opinion.

Have a nice day Matrixgames.

< Message edited by Nusskuchen -- 9/28/2004 7:03:14 PM >

Post #: 1

RE: Return of Fire - 9/28/2004 9:04:41 PM

WiTP_Dude

Posts: 1434
Joined: 7/3/2004
Status: offline

Well, good luck to you. Everyone here is prety satisfied with the product, however.

(in reply to Nusskuchen)

Post #: 2

RE: Return of Fire - 9/28/2004 9:08:33 PM

Nusskuchen

Posts: 10
Joined: 8/13/2004
Status: offline

I think its a piece of junk. But I can live with the fact, that there are a bunch of people who like this kind of game.

(in reply to WiTP_Dude)

Post #: 3

RE: Return of Fire - 9/28/2004 9:13:19 PM

pasternakski

Posts: 6565
Joined: 6/29/2002
Status: offline

See ya around there, nusskusser.

(in reply to Nusskuchen)

Post #: 4

RE: Return of Fire - 9/28/2004 9:22:23 PM

byron13

Posts: 1589
Joined: 7/27/2001
Status: offline

Well, nutcake, it looks to me like your only beef with Matrix is "missing features." Everything else seem directed at Digital River. Except the exchange rate, that is. I, too, am still furious at Matrix for fixing the world currency markets to make WitP more expensive for non-U.S. gamers. They realized too late that the higher cost for the game outside the U.S. did not translate into extra profits for Matrix. Ha! That'll show Matrix the next time they try and fix a global market (I hear they are behind the $50 a barrel crude price reached today).

And I'm guessing the missing features are the ability to shift Japanese production to build advanced aircraft earlier in the war and then actually use them. Unfortunately, rather than being a missing feature, the ability to produce advanced a/c earlier in the war is more properly characterized as being an extra feature that probably shouldn't have been put in. Given the problems this has caused, I'm sure Matrix would have eliminated or curtailed the ability to shift production (thus eliminating an existing feature) rather than give the Japanese (and then, necessarily, the Allies) the ability to use advanced a/c earlier. They may also have allowed a more flexible upgrading system - but then, this is not a missing feature, is it?

I'm not sure what your criteria for a good game are, but if WitP was such a huge disappointment, I wish you luck in finding a wargame that satisfies you.

(in reply to WiTP_Dude)

Post #: 5

RE: Return of Fire - 9/28/2004 9:26:39 PM

WiTP_Dude

Posts: 1434
Joined: 7/3/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nusskuchen

I think its a piece of junk. But I can live with the fact, that there are a bunch of people who like this kind of game.

It's not that bad! They are fixing various issues as they pop up. However as it is now, WiTP is the best simulation of the Pacific War in gaming history.

(in reply to Nusskuchen)

Post #: 6

RE: Return of Fire - 9/28/2004 9:51:48 PM

byron13

Posts: 1589
Joined: 7/27/2001
Status: offline

Yeah, well, keep in mind that nutcake, the one complaining, has as an avatar a guy constantly dropping a cat/dog/rat down his pants to his crotch. Not sure what that means, but it must mean something! I'm thinking he just likes things a little different.

(in reply to WiTP_Dude)

Post #: 7

RE: Return of Fire - 9/28/2004 10:07:29 PM

tsimmonds

Posts: 5498
Joined: 2/6/2004
From: astride Mason and Dixon's Line
Status: offline

Looks like a French Poodle.

_____________________________

Fear the kitten!

(in reply to byron13)

Post #: 8

Mmm-kay - 9/28/2004 10:24:55 PM

Feinder

Posts: 6589
Joined: 9/4/2002
From: Land o' Lakes, FL
Status: offline

(* Bah. Stupid forum. Not replying to you Irrel, but to original poster. *)

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Feinder -- 9/28/2004 3:26:31 PM >

_____________________________

"It is obvious that you have greatly over-estimated my regard for your opinion." - Me

(in reply to tsimmonds)

Post #: 9

RE: Return of Fire - 9/29/2004 12:01:45 AM

Damien Thorn

Posts: 1107
Joined: 7/24/2003
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: byron13
And I'm guessing the missing features are the ability to shift Japanese production to build advanced aircraft earlier in the war and then actually use them.

He may be referring to the fact that the game was advertised (and I think it still is) as having TCP/IP. I was very disappointed when I heard that feature had been cut but after WitP came out I realized it would never be used unless we could enter orders at the same time. Even then one person would probably be sitting at the computer and waiting for a long time.

(in reply to byron13)

Post #: 10

RE: Return of Fire - 9/29/2004 12:11:08 AM

UncleBuck

Posts: 633
Joined: 10/31/2003
From: San Diego, CA, USA
Status: offline

Yes if it were played with TCP/IP copnnections the only way it was allowed was in Real time. You had to leave it up for 24hrs a day 7 days a week. 1 minute of game time=1 minute of real time. THe days really did take a day.

TCP/IP how would you do that in a turn based game?

UB

_____________________________

(in reply to Damien Thorn)

Post #: 11

RE: Return of Fire - 9/29/2004 12:15:06 AM

Nikademus

Posts: 25684
Joined: 5/27/2000
From: Alien spacecraft
Status: offline

Only real way you can do it is the way Battlefields.com scripted their Combat Mission series. Because it incorporates aspects of both real time and turn based wargaming, TCP/IP play is possible and even practical.

Essentially each player turning the orders phase, inputes his directions. When both players have finished and submitted the computer then plays out the turn internally and creates a "replay" that either player can view at their leasure.....all while online (same as when playing solo or hotseat)

Only way for Witp to do this is to incorporate the same idea...both sides have to give orders while online and hit "end turn" at which point the turn can be run/finished. Given the scale of the game, dont see how it could be practical.

_____________________________

(in reply to UncleBuck)

Post #: 12

RE: Return of Fire - 9/29/2004 12:22:52 AM

hithere

Posts: 432
Joined: 4/13/2004
From: Atlanta
Status: offline

I think Civ3 does a good job, I don't believe that it would be as bad as it seems...that is, the way it could work, i have no idea if the coding would allow that, and i have no expectation of 2by3/matrix re doing the game. I did not even realize that TCP was considered option though.....guess from UV days

_____________________________

Quote from one of my drill sergeants, "remember, except for the extreme heat, intense radiation, and powerful blast wave, a nuclear explosion is just like any other explosion"

(in reply to Nikademus)

Post #: 13

RE: Return of Fire - 9/29/2004 12:34:24 AM

RUPD3658

Posts: 6922
Joined: 8/28/2002
From: East Brunswick, NJ
Status: offline

Nuss (nut) Kuchen (Cake) (20 years but I still remember my High School German)

What an appropriate name!

I don't know about his katzen and lederhosen avitar though.....

_____________________________

"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has limits"- Darwin Awards 2003

"No plan survives contact with the enemy." - Field Marshall Helmuth von Moltke

(in reply to Nusskuchen)

Post #: 14

RE: Return of Fire - 9/29/2004 12:46:12 AM

2ndACR

Posts: 5665
Joined: 8/31/2003
From: Irving,Tx
Status: offline

Your loss.

Even though there are a few quirks, I still feel the game is the best around. I may throw a fit when these quirks slap me in the face, but the game is still new so I have faith that improvements can and will be made farther down the road.

Bugs first. Kill them suckers.

(in reply to RUPD3658)

Post #: 15

RE: Return of Fire - 9/29/2004 2:41:55 AM

Admiral DadMan

Posts: 3627
Joined: 2/22/2002
From: A Lion uses all its might to catch a Rabbit
Status: offline

Personally, I like bugs.

I can't decided whether I like them crunchy or slimy.

Sometimes I feel like a nut... sometimes I don't!

Crunchy!!

Slimy!!

Crunchy!!

Slimy!!

Crunchy!!

Slimy!!

Crunchy!!

Slimy!!

Crunchy!!

Slimy!!

_____________________________

Scenario 127: "Scraps of Paper"
(\../)
(O.o)
(> <)

CVB Langley:

(in reply to 2ndACR)

Post #: 16

RE: Return of Fire - 9/29/2004 2:44:55 AM

Mr.Frag

Posts: 13410
Joined: 12/18/2002
From: Purgatory
Status: offline

quote:

I can't decided whether I like them crunchy or slimy.

Go with the slimy and fry 'em until crunchy ... best of both worlds!

(in reply to Admiral DadMan)

Post #: 17

RE: Return of Fire - 9/29/2004 3:56:43 PM

Halsey

Posts: 5069
Joined: 2/7/2004
Status: offline

Looks like a Gerbel to me.

All wargames, computer or board, have their own unique problems. Board games have rule interpretation problems. Spent many hours hashing out those, then writing down what was decided. Computer games have programing and information errors.

These are all part of wargaming. They have been all of my 35+ years in wargaming. Anyone remember Seapower rules for miniatures with all those dice? How about Fletcher Pratt rules for miniatures, guessing ranges and laying out torpedo spreads? Then watching your opponent like a hawk as he put the turning radius protractor down to move his ship. Yes, even AH games had rule interprtation problems. In "Bulge" you could move down a river line at normal cost, only when you cross a river does the cost increase. Years after, we are still having problems getting games to realize that distinction.

So it all comes with the package. You either accept it and drive on. Or you curl up in the fetal position and cry "foul". It all depends on what you as an individual are made of. I love wargaming, and I'm willing to take the good and the bad. I say, drive on Matrix and keep it up. You are in a market where few dare to tread! Certainly not the main stream companies.

_____________________________

(in reply to tsimmonds)

Post #: 18

RE: Return of Fire - 9/29/2004 4:07:47 PM

Hartley

Posts: 255
Joined: 6/2/2003
Status: offline

No idea why people are trying to give this dude the benefit of the doubt.

(in reply to Halsey)

Post #: 19

RE: Return of Fire - 9/29/2004 4:10:40 PM

tsimmonds

Posts: 5498
Joined: 2/6/2004
From: astride Mason and Dixon's Line
Status: offline

Nice one Halsey.

_____________________________

Fear the kitten!

(in reply to Halsey)

Post #: 20

RE: Return of Fire - 9/29/2004 5:50:43 PM

Ron Saueracker

Posts: 12121
Joined: 1/28/2002
From: Ottawa, Canada OR Zakynthos Island, Greece
Status: offline

What's that line in South Park when Cartman's mom is revealed to have participated in German poop porn? "Damn German's" or something? Appropriate given his crotch rabbit avatar.

_____________________________