Tankerace
Posts: 6400
Joined: 3/21/2003 From: Stillwater, OK, United States Status: offline
|
Let me try and answer all these questions (Boy, I got swamped). quote:
I'll pay. This sounds great. As long as it is less than 150 Euros. If that is around $80 USD, then it will be MUCH less than 150 Euros. quote:
WPO, as well as some of the user-defined scenarios now being published, needs graphics files that are altered from the basic game. Wouldn´t it be nice to be able to assign a dedicated graphics directory to a scenario in the Scenario Editor so the game engine automatically loads the correct graphics when you select that scenario? (There doesn´t seem to be an official Wish List where I could post this idea). On that, I have no control of. However, War Plan Orange's ship graphics fit in with War in the Pacific's, and will not affect the main game in any way. quote:
Second comment: Somewhere I read that WPO contains all four planned Hoods for the RN, and for budgetary reasons none of the advanced ships under order at the time of the Washington Conference. I think you did this for play balance. This would never have happened in RL. After digesting the Jutland lessons, the RN realized how much the original design was dead on birth, in fact the Director of Naval Construction lobbied hard to have Hood scrapped on the stocks "to make way for something useful". The design was heavily modified to increase its protection, and just Hood was actually laid down, a case of wartime expediency, the other ships were suspended and then cancelled when it was clear that the German 15-inch battlecruisers they were intended to counter wouldn´t be built. The RN put all its effort behind the G3 battlecruiser design which had the kind of protection they felt to be necessary in future. If you remember that Hood cost 6,25 million pounds to build, you can be very certain that the RN would have preferred building two G3´s instead of three Hoods, whatever the budgetary restraints. I think you should change the OOB of WPO accordingly. I did this for two reasons, and it was an early design decision. The main one is the RN will not figure too heavily into WPO. In the later stages of the campaign you will see them, but not a whole lot. The other reason, is when I began War Plan Orange, while I was going to ignore the Washington Treaty, I also wanted to have a firm foot in fact, or possibility. The three Hoods could have been laid down, however plans for the G3 design were never finalized, nor even ordered. This means that the three Hoods stood a better chance at being completed than the unamed G3s. In all probability (using the Nelsons as a guide), the G3s would have been laid down around February of 1923, and completed around early-mid 1928. After working up, they could possibly be slated for use sometime in late 1929 in the Pacific. If the world had not agreed to the Treaty of 1922, as is assumed by the mod, considering that they were almost bankrupt (which is why they hastily agreed to accept parity with the United States), IF they were going to get more ships, it would have been cheaper and quicker to resume construction of the three Hoods, and ignore the G3s. The three Hoods could have been had by 1926, around the time the Tosas, Amagis, South Dakotas, and Lexingtons were completed. The G3s would have to be delayed to around 1928-29. I believe the G3s were estimated to cost around 8.9 million pounds, so from an economic the British could have built 2 and 3/4 more Hoods than the cost of the G3s. I personal am of the opinion the G3s would never have been completed, Washington Treaty or not. As of right now, this was a design decision made early on, and will not be changed. However, if there is an overwhelming desire to have them in, I will add them. But, you must consider this. I am going to give the player, through the first campaign, 2 Hoods, and in the second, 3. IF the G3s are to be added (and the 3 Hoods removed), then the player will receive 1 Hood in the first, and 1 Hood and 1 G3 (the latter LATE in the second campaign). quote:
PS....not to diminish your contribution in any way Tanker, but if Matrix is going to put their logo on this you guys just have to do something about those A/C graphics of yours. You don't like my a/c graphics? I think they look pretty good, considering I'm not just pasting line drawings of books on them. As of right now, I don't think the Matrix guys are going to change them. They aren't perfect, but they get the job done. quote:
Tanker - maybe you could whip up a quick poll to post on the forum, like the earlier one about how to "fix" night bombing. Although it would not be scientific, you could at least get a sense of how many people will pay for the Warplan Orange mod and what they would be willing to pay. I would be willing to pay, but not as much as I did for WiTP - maybe about $25. I don't think I can post a poll, but right nnow it seems that most people are in favor of purchasing it. I can state, as to the price, that it will cost around what expansions for most games cost, maybe even a little less. It will not cost as much as a regular full game. No where near that. That I can say with certainty.
< Message edited by Tankerace -- 12/8/2004 2:50:28 PM >
_____________________________
Designer of War Plan Orange Allied Naval OOBer of Admiral's Edition Naval Team Lead for War in the Med Author of Million-Dollar Barrage: American Field Artillery in the Great War coming soon from OU Press.
|