Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Worst player ever

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> RE: Worst player ever Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Worst player ever - 2/10/2005 7:20:34 PM   
mc3744


Posts: 1957
Joined: 3/9/2004
From: Italy
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Blackwatch_it

quote:

ORIGINAL: mc3744

quote:

ORIGINAL: Blackwatch_it

What about loosing five CVLs and CVEs agaist no allied loss as japanese player in jan 42?


This is real good!


And I'm trying to improve ........


Want to play with me?
I'm available to help your training

(in reply to Blackwatch_it)
Post #: 31
RE: Worst player ever - 2/10/2005 7:43:46 PM   
Mr.Frag


Posts: 13410
Joined: 12/18/2002
From: Purgatory
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Blackwatch_it

What about loosing five CVLs and CVEs agaist no allied loss as japanese player in jan 42?



Sounds like you should play Rob ... between the two of you, you should cancel each other out when it comes to CV losses ... think he's still got you by a few though.

(in reply to Blackwatch_it)
Post #: 32
RE: Worst player ever - 2/10/2005 7:46:16 PM   
mc3744


Posts: 1957
Joined: 3/9/2004
From: Italy
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mr.Frag

quote:

ORIGINAL: Blackwatch_it

What about loosing five CVLs and CVEs agaist no allied loss as japanese player in jan 42?



Sounds like you should play Rob ... between the two of you, you should cancel each other out when it comes to CV losses ... think he's still got you by a few though.


I am playing Rob, how smart am I? LOL

Wait a second ... what if I loose?!?

(in reply to Mr.Frag)
Post #: 33
RE: Worst player ever - 2/10/2005 7:54:39 PM   
Mr.Frag


Posts: 13410
Joined: 12/18/2002
From: Purgatory
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mc3744

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mr.Frag

quote:

ORIGINAL: Blackwatch_it

What about loosing five CVLs and CVEs agaist no allied loss as japanese player in jan 42?



Sounds like you should play Rob ... between the two of you, you should cancel each other out when it comes to CV losses ... think he's still got you by a few though.


I am playing Rob, how smart am I? LOL

Wait a second ... what if I loose?!?



Rob suffers from Manual-Miss-Under-Standish ... once over that he's probably going to kick a lot of peoples butts! Watch yourself ... think he's lost a cv in every possible way there is so he knows better now!

(in reply to mc3744)
Post #: 34
RE: Worst player ever - 2/10/2005 8:15:16 PM   
byron13


Posts: 1589
Joined: 7/27/2001
Status: offline
Well, my congratulations to everyone participating in this thread. First, for being honest, and second for playing each other. I am taking the coward's way out and playing the AI. Maybe one of these days . . .

(in reply to Mr.Frag)
Post #: 35
RE: Worst player ever - 2/10/2005 9:00:08 PM   
Blackwatch_it


Posts: 247
Joined: 2/6/2004
Status: offline
I am playing Rob

(in reply to Mr.Frag)
Post #: 36
RE: Worst player ever - 2/10/2005 9:08:57 PM   
AmiralLaurent

 

Posts: 3351
Joined: 3/11/2003
From: Near Paris, France
Status: offline
In most of my UV games, I was better once I have lost my CVs. So I lost them quickly and then I started to think to anything else than raiding "undefended" parts of the enemy empire. Usually worked some times and then BOOM.

(in reply to byron13)
Post #: 37
RE: Worst player ever - 2/10/2005 9:12:31 PM   
Mr.Frag


Posts: 13410
Joined: 12/18/2002
From: Purgatory
Status: offline
quote:

In most of my UV games, I was better once I have lost my CVs. So I lost them quickly and then I started to think to anything else than raiding "undefended" parts of the enemy empire.


You know, thats probably a true statement for a lot of folks. CV's are held in such godlike reverence that people fixate on them too much to the neglect of everything else.

(in reply to AmiralLaurent)
Post #: 38
RE: Worst player ever - 2/10/2005 9:53:22 PM   
Blackwatch_it


Posts: 247
Joined: 2/6/2004
Status: offline
Want to play with me?
I'm available to help your training

hotseat game?

< Message edited by Blackwatch_it -- 2/10/2005 7:54:30 PM >

(in reply to mc3744)
Post #: 39
RE: Worst player ever - 2/10/2005 10:02:20 PM   
mc3744


Posts: 1957
Joined: 3/9/2004
From: Italy
Status: offline
Unless you are my wife I'd say it's pretty difficult
Of course if you were my wife, I'd be nuts and anything could be possible!


(in reply to Blackwatch_it)
Post #: 40
RE: Worst player ever - 2/10/2005 10:18:06 PM   
Tom Hunter


Posts: 2194
Joined: 12/14/2004
Status: offline
Blackwatch forgot that he sunk the Enterprise in January 42 he also sunk most of the escorts and it war the largest CV escort force I had. In exchange I caused him to lose large number of bombs, torpedeos and bullets that I took to the bottom with my ships.

After reading other AARs and Mogamis thread on scores I do think we are chewing eachother up faster than most people do. I see games with few losses on either side or with massive losses on one side but only a few where there is a lot of blood shed by both.

< Message edited by Tom Hunter -- 2/10/2005 8:19:55 PM >

(in reply to mc3744)
Post #: 41
RE: Worst player ever - 2/10/2005 10:19:33 PM   
herbieh

 

Posts: 804
Joined: 8/30/2002
From: Sydney Australia
Status: offline
You know, I feel a bit better now, losing 3BB and a cvl in Jan as japan doesnt feel so bad now.
OK then, best player you have encountered?

For sheer toughness I rate Wobbly pretty highly, Tabpub for tactical skills.

_____________________________

Big seas, Fast ships, life tastes better with salt

(in reply to mc3744)
Post #: 42
RE: Worst player ever - 2/10/2005 10:31:08 PM   
kaleun

 

Posts: 5145
Joined: 5/29/2002
From: Colorado
Status: offline
I lost all my carriers (US, I still have the Brit ones) versus Warspite by Feb 42. Have played a little better since (See Shame and Execration AAR thread)

Oh I forgot, my attemted invasion of batavia against Freeboy must be close to a record in the: How not to do things thread! (See: Death of isolationism)

< Message edited by kaleun -- 2/10/2005 2:32:46 PM >


_____________________________

Appear at places to which he must hasten; move swiftly where he does not expect you.
Sun Tzu

(in reply to herbieh)
Post #: 43
RE: Worst player ever - 2/10/2005 10:38:35 PM   
EUBanana


Posts: 4552
Joined: 9/30/2003
From: Little England
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: herbieh

OK, Wobbly spread me all over the place and beat the crap out of me everywhere I invaded, and we go for a restart in Feb 42

Tabpub smashes half my fleet, lures me into a trap, and kills more APs and men than even he realises by Feb 42, and I have to ask for a restart....

This is developing into a very nasty pattern.

How many other guys out there so badly got it wrong so early

(my crime - trying to take it all at once, right now, and forgetting there is an opposition)


I've been getting my ass handed to me constantly as the Allies.
But the Allies are forgiving of error.

(in reply to herbieh)
Post #: 44
RE: Worst player ever - 2/10/2005 10:49:40 PM   
EUBanana


Posts: 4552
Joined: 9/30/2003
From: Little England
Status: offline
...mind you I've not lost any CVs.

Yet.

But then I've not used them yet, as soon as I do an op with them I'm sure they'll suffer.

(in reply to EUBanana)
Post #: 45
RE: Worst player ever - 2/11/2005 12:16:47 AM   
Blackwatch_it


Posts: 247
Joined: 2/6/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Hunter

Blackwatch forgot that he sunk the Enterprise in January 42 he also sunk most of the escorts and it war the largest CV escort force I had. In exchange I caused him to lose large number of bombs, torpedeos and bullets that I took to the bottom with my ships.

After reading other AARs and Mogamis thread on scores I do think we are chewing eachother up faster than most people do. I see games with few losses on either side or with massive losses on one side but only a few where there is a lot of blood shed by both.


Anyway the loss of the CVLs and CVEs was a very bad move.

(in reply to Tom Hunter)
Post #: 46
RE: Worst player ever - 2/11/2005 12:47:41 AM   
Grotius


Posts: 5798
Joined: 10/18/2002
From: The Imperial Palace.
Status: offline
quote:

I ran several fleets into Rons fortress Batavia... oops.. next game I took Batavia via the overland route.. lessen learned

Forgive me for asking a dumb question. How do you tell if there are CD units at an enemy base, short of actually attacking it with a land unit to see what pops up on the ground-combat screen? I mean, air recon will give you some info about ground units, but not that kind of detail. I guess "Ground Attack" can identify the ground units for you, but that mission doesn't always fly, and I'm always reluctant to commit Betties and Nells to that mission anyway.

(in reply to Blackwatch_it)
Post #: 47
RE: Worst player ever - 2/11/2005 12:55:38 AM   
Titanwarrior89


Posts: 3283
Joined: 8/28/2003
From: arkansas
Status: offline
And i thought i was the only one getting creamed! It's june 42 in my pbem game against Akit (jap) and he is landing everywhere. I've lost two Cv's. PM, canton and other vacationing points.

< Message edited by Titanwarrior89 -- 2/10/2005 5:56:40 PM >


_____________________________

"Before Guadalcanal the enemy advanced at his pleasure. After Guadalcanal, he retreated at ours".

"Mama, There's Rabbits in the Garden"

(in reply to Blackwatch_it)
Post #: 48
RE: Worst player ever - 2/11/2005 1:00:56 AM   
mogami


Posts: 12789
Joined: 8/23/2000
From: You can't get here from there
Status: offline
Hi, Losing empty bases does not make you bad.
An Allied player who trades CV is good (The Jap is bad)
From Dec 41 to May 42 really only the Japanese player can be bad, unless the Allied player is moving his rear area troops to places they are lost. Losing the ones in the SRA and Burma to Akyab is normal there are few players good enough to prevent that against good Japanese players.

< Message edited by Mogami -- 2/10/2005 6:01:30 PM >


_____________________________






I'm not retreating, I'm attacking in a different direction!

(in reply to Titanwarrior89)
Post #: 49
RE: Worst player ever - 2/11/2005 1:46:46 AM   
Zeta16


Posts: 1199
Joined: 11/20/2002
From: Columbus. Ohio
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: freeboy

Current game vs Zeta 16, lst 1000 plus heavy bombers using them unescorted ...
oh well, lost five cv in 42 to his 2
lost five bb in one month in mid 43 and wanted to quit! relly upset by my mistake not setting to retire and having three old boats torpedoed...
everyone makes mistakes
Z did once I think???



I have made a few. I try to be careful in everything I do. If a fleet gets spotted I usually turn around. I escort every convoy like it is my last. I have a big lead at the moment but, it is slowly going away. it's 9/43 and the allies are starting to roll. The heavies destory any airfield in range. You can't stop you can only hope to take as many out as you can on the first try. 200 or more heavies does the trick, he may lose 60 or so. However, they damage about every plane on the field. This coupled with service damage dooms the Japanese planes.

_____________________________

"Ours was the first revolution in the history of mankind that truly reversed the course of government, and with three little words: 'We the people.' 'We the people' tell the government what to do, it doesn't tell us." -Ronald Reagan

(in reply to freeboy)
Post #: 50
RE: Worst player ever - 2/11/2005 5:38:55 AM   
Mike Scholl

 

Posts: 9349
Joined: 1/1/2003
From: Kansas City, MO
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mogami

Hi, Losing empty bases does not make you bad.
An Allied player who trades CV is good (The Jap is bad)
From Dec 41 to May 42 really only the Japanese player can be bad, unless the Allied player is moving his rear area troops to places they are lost. Losing the ones in the SRA and Burma to Akyab is normal there are few players good enough to prevent that against good Japanese players.


Something that strikes me continually about players getting beaten on as the Allies is WHY?
Why were your CV's anywhere that they could be lost by January of 1942? If you have
paid any attention to this forum at all you would know that your chances of winning a
CV vs CV action before mid-1942 are almost nil..., so what they He11 are you doing
sending you CV's into harms way? If you do a cost benefits study just what goal is out
there that could possibly be worth the loss of your carriers? This feeling that you have to
"get out there and DO SOMETHING" plays right into your opponanants hands. Just because you have a lot of toys does not mean you have to play with all of them at once.

_____________________________


(in reply to mogami)
Post #: 51
RE: Worst player ever - 2/11/2005 5:49:07 AM   
Ron Saueracker


Posts: 12121
Joined: 1/28/2002
From: Ottawa, Canada OR Zakynthos Island, Greece
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mike Scholl

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mogami

Hi, Losing empty bases does not make you bad.
An Allied player who trades CV is good (The Jap is bad)
From Dec 41 to May 42 really only the Japanese player can be bad, unless the Allied player is moving his rear area troops to places they are lost. Losing the ones in the SRA and Burma to Akyab is normal there are few players good enough to prevent that against good Japanese players.


Something that strikes me continually about players getting beaten on as the Allies is WHY?
Why were your CV's anywhere that they could be lost by January of 1942? If you have
paid any attention to this forum at all you would know that your chances of winning a
CV vs CV action before mid-1942 are almost nil..., so what they He11 are you doing
sending you CV's into harms way? If you do a cost benefits study just what goal is out
there that could possibly be worth the loss of your carriers? This feeling that you have to
"get out there and DO SOMETHING" plays right into your opponanants hands. Just because you have a lot of toys does not mean you have to play with all of them at once.


Exactly! I laugh reading lots of the AARs but then I'm a freak. Guess I think I'm going to be able to play through 45 without another patch restart or something.

_____________________________





Yammas from The Apo-Tiki Lounge. Future site of WITP AE benders! And then the s--t hit the fan

(in reply to Mike Scholl)
Post #: 52
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2]
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> RE: Worst player ever Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.727