Best tactics for using PCs and PGs?

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

Best tactics for using PCs and PGs?

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> Best tactics for using PCs and PGs?

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

Best tactics for using PCs and PGs? - 2/14/2005 8:24:27 PM

DeepSix

Posts: 395
Joined: 12/22/2004
From: Music City
Status: offline

I can't ever seem to decide how best to use these. They're either lacking in speed, range, or firepower. Just wondering how other people choose to put them to use.

_____________________________

Post #: 1

RE: Best tactics for using PCs and PGs? - 2/14/2005 8:30:38 PM

drstat

Posts: 17
Joined: 12/21/2004
From: Waukegan, IL (Just N of Great Lakes Naval Station)
Status: offline

I generally use them to escort short convoys between islands where the risk of attack is not great, but not zero either. Many of them do have decent AA and ASW capability, in case you run into an attack. For me, this frees up destroyers to do more important work.

_____________________________

dr_stat

"They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security deserve neither liberty or security." -- Benjamin Franklin

(in reply to DeepSix)

Post #: 2

RE: Best tactics for using PCs and PGs? - 2/14/2005 8:30:42 PM

byron13

Posts: 1589
Joined: 7/27/2001
Status: offline

Some of the Allied ships have darned good ASW - especially for the early war. They contribute a lot to my ASW effort off Australia. Otherwise I'll throw them into short convoy TFs to boost the morale of the soldiers and sailors. Truth is, I pretty much ignore them.

Since you can't invade a hex without first disposing of all enemy ships in the hex/port (at least I think that's the rule) placing them in moderately threatened ports would/should prevent a cake-walk landing and require the other side to include combat escorts with the invasion force. If he doesn't, you might get lucky and hole a few APs.

They could be used as decoys since recon may report them as DDs or CL/CAs.

(in reply to DeepSix)

Post #: 3

RE: Best tactics for using PCs and PGs? - 2/14/2005 9:56:25 PM

Zeke

Posts: 42
Joined: 2/1/2005
Status: offline

I use them to block some narral waterways between islands, no need to move, just sit there :)

(in reply to byron13)

Post #: 4

RE: Best tactics for using PCs and PGs? - 2/14/2005 10:19:05 PM

pad152

Posts: 2871
Joined: 4/23/2000
Status: offline

PC's and PG's

Japan, I use them the ASW escorts for TKs to bring in oil and ASW missions with mix of PC/PG's and MSW/APD's.

They are useless in combat, I once had a group of PC/PG's attack unescorted AK's, the AK's sunk 2 PC's and badly damaged 2 PG's. All it takes is one hit from a 3in gun and it's bye-bye PC/PG.

< Message edited by pad152 -- 2/14/2005 8:22:09 PM >

(in reply to Zeke)

Post #: 5

RE: Best tactics for using PCs and PGs? - 2/14/2005 10:50:15 PM

Feinder

Posts: 6589
Joined: 9/4/2002
From: Land o' Lakes, FL
Status: offline

Japanese PGs = Actually, these have larger displacement (are harder to sink, worth more VPs) than most DDs. Their durability is 10. They don't sink all that easily. Their range is limited, but you've got about 70 of them (as I recall). If it were me, I'd use them to escort convoys in SRA.

Japanese PCs = There are several classes of these. But yes, they're small, and tend to have very little in the way of AA and ASW. You'll use them to escort your convoys to free up your DDs for fleet work. But yes, they pretty much suck.

Allied PGs - The UK PGs (actually Flower class Corvetts and Swann class Frigates), are quite potent ASW hunters. They've also got fair range, and be used to escort a convoy with longer legs. They're too slow and short-legged for fleet work tho. Of course, if you're just going to pair them with a Ramillies class BB and sail around the Bay of Bengal, their speed and range (or lack thereof), isn't really a problem.

USN PGs - I don't know much about the USN PGs. I think they can converted to PT boat tenders and landing craft assault coordships, right? Also, a few of them have radar, which ironically, few of the USN ships have early war (wherease most RN, RAN, RDN ships -do- have radar, go figure).

USN PCs - Subchasers. Go ye forth, and hunt subs! (just stick close to friendly bases, your range sucks).

-F-

< Message edited by Feinder -- 2/14/2005 4:09:13 PM >

_____________________________

"It is obvious that you have greatly over-estimated my regard for your opinion." - Me

(in reply to pad152)

Post #: 6

RE: Best tactics for using PCs and PGs? - 2/14/2005 11:02:27 PM

marky

Posts: 5780
Joined: 3/8/2004
From: Wisconsin
Status: offline

ive been using them playing the GC scenario, along with DDs

and its earyl october and ive sunk about a dozen jap subs

_____________________________

(in reply to Feinder)

Post #: 7

RE: Best tactics for using PCs and PGs? - 2/15/2005 12:22:58 AM

bbbf

Posts: 493
Joined: 7/16/2000
From: Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Feinder

USN PGs - I don't know much about the USN PGs. I think they can converted to PT boat tenders and landing craft assault coordships, right? Also, a few of them have radar, which ironically, few of the USN ships have early war (wherease most RN, RAN, RDN ships -do- have radar, go figure).

-F-

Why wouldn't the RN ships have radar, after all it was a British invention!

_____________________________

Robert Lee

(in reply to Feinder)

Post #: 8

RE: Best tactics for using PCs and PGs? - 2/15/2005 12:45:27 AM

DeepSix

Posts: 395
Joined: 12/22/2004
From: Music City
Status: offline

Hey these are all good ideas and most I had not considered. The only action my Allied patrol boats (except for the PTs which are very handy) have seen so far has been ASW around Pearl Harbor to help the DDs after 12/7. I put them into a small TF with the minesweepers and let the slow patrol handle the hex right around the base. There are lots of Jap subs lurking about. But other than that, I've been pretty slack about sending them out for anything, so this really helps. I don't think I've deployed any of the patrol boats at the British and ABDA bases.

Thanks!

_____________________________

(in reply to DeepSix)

Post #: 9

RE: Best tactics for using PCs and PGs? - 2/15/2005 12:52:01 AM

rtrapasso

Posts: 22653
Joined: 9/3/2002
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: bbbf

quote:

ORIGINAL: Feinder

USN PGs - I don't know much about the USN PGs. I think they can converted to PT boat tenders and landing craft assault coordships, right? Also, a few of them have radar, which ironically, few of the USN ships have early war (wherease most RN, RAN, RDN ships -do- have radar, go figure).

-F-

Why wouldn't the RN ships have radar, after all it was a British invention!

Arghhh - radar was NOT a British invention!

EDIT - ideas for using radio waves for aircraft/ship detection date back all the way to Marconi. Radar was "invented" in about a dozen different countries - and Britain can't really claim it as the first inventor. Pretty much no one can claim credit for "inventing" it.

Even most of the critical components of radar were not British invention (i.e. cavity magnetron was invented independently in about 4 countries - first being Germany!)

However, Britain took radar seriously and implemented it more seriously than anyone else as they thought (correctly) that their national survival depended on it. In actuality, some of the most successful British radar systems were considered hopelessly antiquated - i.e. - the CHAIN HOME system (which defended Britain in the Battle of Britain) was called by the British "the steam wireless". It was so antiquated that the Germans did not recognize the towers are radar systems. Where the British really shown was in the organization they brought to implementing radar systems. Nobody came near them in this aspect early in the war.

< Message edited by rtrapasso -- 2/14/2005 8:01:03 PM >

_____________________________

(in reply to bbbf)

Post #: 10

RE: Best tactics for using PCs and PGs? - 2/15/2005 1:40:42 AM

bbbf

Posts: 493
Joined: 7/16/2000
From: Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
Status: offline

Fair enough, I've fallen for the propaganda!

_____________________________

Robert Lee

(in reply to rtrapasso)

Post #: 11

RE: Best tactics for using PCs and PGs? - 2/15/2005 3:16:49 AM

byron13

Posts: 1589
Joined: 7/27/2001
Status: offline

Actually rtrapasso is wrong. Since it was a good invention, it was obviously invented in the US of A.

I guess it is the CW PGs that have the good ASW. The American PGs really are a waste of time. Like I say, I use them to improve the morale of the convoys they escort, though it doesn't seem to have an effect in game terms. As in the real war, they can be used (and lost) as a stop-gap in the DEI when there ain't nothin' else around. Reading the stories about the PGs sacrificing themselves so a merchant could get away is pathetic while heroic. I'm thinking the port invasion prevention is about the best use for ones without ASW. As for AA, it is so negligible as to not really be worth consideration.

(in reply to rtrapasso)

Post #: 12

RE: Best tactics for using PCs and PGs? - 2/15/2005 7:43:42 AM

stubby331

Posts: 268
Joined: 10/24/2001
From: Perth, Western Australia
Status: offline

quote:

Reading the stories about the PGs sacrificing themselves so a merchant could get away is pathetic while heroic.

Im curious (but you can call me stubby). Just how many times did the "whole convoy scatter while I impale myself on their 8 inchs" happen? The only instance I'm aware of is HMAS Yarra.

_____________________________

In the End, we will remember not the words of our enemies, but the silence of our friends.
- Martin Luther King Jr. (1929-1968)

(in reply to byron13)

Post #: 13

RE: Best tactics for using PCs and PGs? - 2/15/2005 7:50:28 AM

stubby331

Posts: 268
Joined: 10/24/2001
From: Perth, Western Australia
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: stubby331

quote:

Reading the stories about the PGs sacrificing themselves so a merchant could get away is pathetic while heroic.

Im curious (but you can call me stubby). Just how many times did the "whole convoy scatter while I impale myself on their 8 inchs" happen? The only instance I'm aware of is HMAS Yarra.

See HMAS Yarra link below (note the extensive Med service before the Pacific opened up.) HMAS Yarra crew had seen heaps of action before the WITP commenced, the Ship experience ratings should reflect this for RN and RAN ships. Of course, they do not.

http://www.navy.gov.au/spc/history/ships/yarra2.htm

_____________________________

In the End, we will remember not the words of our enemies, but the silence of our friends.
- Martin Luther King Jr. (1929-1968)

(in reply to stubby331)

Post #: 14

RE: Best tactics for using PCs and PGs? - 2/15/2005 9:22:19 AM

Ron Saueracker

Posts: 12121
Joined: 1/28/2002
From: Ottawa, Canada OR Zakynthos Island, Greece
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: stubby331

quote:

ORIGINAL: stubby331

quote:

Reading the stories about the PGs sacrificing themselves so a merchant could get away is pathetic while heroic.

Im curious (but you can call me stubby). Just how many times did the "whole convoy scatter while I impale myself on their 8 inchs" happen? The only instance I'm aware of is HMAS Yarra.

See HMAS Yarra link below (note the extensive Med service before the Pacific opened up.) HMAS Yarra crew had seen heaps of action before the WITP commenced, the Ship experience ratings should reflect this for RN and RAN ships. Of course, they do not.

http://www.navy.gov.au/spc/history/ships/yarra2.htm

Problem I find with crew ratings is they are permanent. Your demand for higher ratings for Yarra does not wash because many crew would have been transferred to man new construction like Tribals, Bathursts, etc. Crew ratings would be better served as an average which is Fleet wide.

_____________________________

Yammas from The Apo-Tiki Lounge. Future site of WITP AE benders! And then the s--t hit the fan

(in reply to stubby331)

Post #: 15

RE: Best tactics for using PCs and PGs? - 2/15/2005 9:42:20 AM

stubby331

Posts: 268
Joined: 10/24/2001
From: Perth, Western Australia
Status: offline

Ron,
In principle I agree with you, but not in Yarra�s particular case. When she was lost in action in March 1942 she hadn�t touched Australia�s shores since she left for active service in August 1940.

Yes, there would�ve been some crew movement but pretty minimal I would�ve thought.

I think I�m going to have wade through the rest the RAN to see how many HMA Ships crews were in the same boat (pardon the pun) as Yarra.

When Yarra comes into Scen 15 her experience is woeful (same goes for most of the RAN), whereas, in reality, the RAN (and the RN and the RCN for that matter) had been working their arse off for the last two and a half years.

_____________________________

In the End, we will remember not the words of our enemies, but the silence of our friends.
- Martin Luther King Jr. (1929-1968)

(in reply to Ron Saueracker)

Post #: 16

RE: Best tactics for using PCs and PGs? - 2/15/2005 5:55:09 PM

Ron Saueracker

Posts: 12121
Joined: 1/28/2002
From: Ottawa, Canada OR Zakynthos Island, Greece
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: stubby331

Ron,
In principle I agree with you, but not in Yarra�s particular case. When she was lost in action in March 1942 she hadn�t touched Australia�s shores since she left for active service in August 1940.

Yes, there would�ve been some crew movement but pretty minimal I would�ve thought.

I think I�m going to have wade through the rest the RAN to see how many HMA Ships crews were in the same boat (pardon the pun) as Yarra.

When Yarra comes into Scen 15 her experience is woeful (same goes for most of the RAN), whereas, in reality, the RAN (and the RN and the RCN for that matter) had been working their arse off for the last two and a half years.

You have a point. Simple editor change. I'll make a note for the big uber scenario.

_____________________________

Yammas from The Apo-Tiki Lounge. Future site of WITP AE benders! And then the s--t hit the fan

(in reply to stubby331)

Post #: 17

RE: Best tactics for using PCs and PGs? - 2/15/2005 6:45:02 PM

Bobthehatchit

Posts: 1478
Joined: 4/27/2003
From: GREAT BRITAIN
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DeepSix

I can't ever seem to decide how best to use these. They're either lacking in speed, range, or firepower. Just wondering how other people choose to put them to use.

Weld them to the out side of your tankers and remove all combutsables

_____________________________

"Look at yours before laughing at mine". Garfield 1984.

Wanted: ISDII Low millage in Imperial gray.

Just my 2 pence worth.
I might not be right.
Hell I am probaby wrong.
But thats my opinion for what its worth!

(in reply to DeepSix)

Post #: 18

RE: Best tactics for using PCs and PGs? - 2/15/2005 9:41:00 PM

byron13

Posts: 1589
Joined: 7/27/2001
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: stubby331

quote:

Reading the stories about the PGs sacrificing themselves so a merchant could get away is pathetic while heroic.

Im curious (but you can call me stubby). Just how many times did the "whole convoy scatter while I impale myself on their 8 inchs" happen? The only instance I'm aware of is HMAS Yarra.

That would be the one. So:

Reading the story about the Yarra sacrificing itself so two merchants could get away is pathetic while heroic.

(in reply to stubby331)

Post #: 19

RE: Best tactics for using PCs and PGs? - 2/15/2005 9:54:09 PM

DeepSix

Posts: 395
Joined: 12/22/2004
From: Music City
Status: offline

Since there's a 50% chance the Captain is going to go down with the ship, even if it sinks at it's moorings in port, and since we're talking about the deaths of a Sim Crew, I'm leaning towards heroic sacrifice.

Of course, I'd rather not lose the ship at all, but if it buys time for the oil and resources to escape, or ensures delivery of those supplies so the fortifications can keep building, I'm pretty much for it. I don't mean just throw them away as submarine fodder, though. A few posts back, someone mentioned putting them into convoy service on short hops and in areas where they are not likely to encounter the enemy. Anything's possible, but I think this kind of service makes the most sense. It suits their shorter range and slower speed - does it really affect morale? I guess it kind of depends, though, on which side you're playing and what the enemy sub doctrine is.

_____________________________

(in reply to byron13)

Post #: 20

RE: Best tactics for using PCs and PGs? - 2/15/2005 10:53:35 PM

tsimmonds

Posts: 5498
Joined: 2/6/2004
From: astride Mason and Dixon's Line
Status: offline

They don't have to be short hops; PC/PG will refuel from AP/AK in the TF.

_____________________________

Fear the kitten!

(in reply to DeepSix)

Post #: 21

RE: Best tactics for using PCs and PGs? - 2/15/2005 11:08:21 PM

DeepSix

Posts: 395
Joined: 12/22/2004
From: Music City
Status: offline

True.... I was actually thinking more of the short runs in rear areas might not have as much wear and tear (SYS) on them, but true enough - they could be put on longer trips.

_____________________________

(in reply to tsimmonds)

Post #: 22

RE: Best tactics for using PCs and PGs? - 2/16/2005 12:51:38 AM

Andy Mac

Posts: 15222
Joined: 5/12/2004
From: Alexandria, Scotland
Status: offline

Beaverford and HMS Jervis Bay spring to mind when we talk about ships saving convoys....

Although a different Ocean

Andy

(in reply to DeepSix)

Post #: 23

Page: [1]

All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> Best tactics for using PCs and PGs?

Page: [1]