Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: convoy intercepted

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> After Action Reports >> RE: convoy intercepted Page: <<   < prev  25 26 [27] 28 29   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: convoy intercepted - 6/12/2006 11:24:23 AM   
Sneer


Posts: 2654
Joined: 10/29/2003
Status: offline 		as expected today more ships were sunk
5 in naval and 7 in air phase
i see 4 transports remaining
so next turn enemy will be eliminated

AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 03/04/43

Night Time Surface Combat at 79,101

Japanese Ships
BB Haruna /Haruna has experience from such night hunting from 42
CA Tone
DD Tanikaze



Allied Ships
AK Crater,  on fire
AK Carina,  on fire,  heavy damage
AK Cassiopeia, Shell hits 2, Torpedo hits 2, and is sunk
AK Mintaka,  on fire,  heavy damage
AK Sterope, Shell hits 9,  on fire,  heavy damage
AK George Vancouver,  on fire,  heavy damage
AK James Schureman, Shell hits 11, and is sunk
AK Juan Cabrillo, Shell hits 8, and is sunk
AK Peter H. Burnett, Shell hits 2, Torpedo hits 2, and is sunk
AK William E. Channing, Shell hits 6,  on fire,  heavy damage
AK William P. McArthur, and is sunk

Naval bombardment of Tenimbar, at 36,81


Allied aircraft
no flights


Allied aircraft losses
P-40E Warhawk: 2 destroyed

Japanese Ships
DD Yunagi
DD Asanagi
DD Matsukaze
DD Yuzuki
DD Mikazuki
DD Fumizuki
DD Yugiri
DD Hatsuyuki
DD Isonami
DD Shirakumo
DD Shinonome
DD Hamakaze
CL Yubari
CL Tama
CL Nagara
CA Kako
CA Furutaka
CA Kinugasa
CA Aoba


Allied ground losses:
321 casualties reported
Vehicles lost 2

Runway hits 8
Port hits 1
Port supply hits 3

Day Air attack on TF at 80,101

Japanese aircraft
A6M3a Zero x 6
B5N Kate x 12
E13A1 Jake x 12

No Japanese losses

Allied Ships
AK Carina, Bomb hits 3, Torpedo hits 2,  on fire,  heavy damage
AK William E. Channing, Bomb hits 4, Torpedo hits 1,  on fire,  heavy damage
AK Crater, Bomb hits 2,  on fire,  heavy damage

Aircraft Attacking:
4 x E13A1 Jake bombing at 2000 feet
4 x B5N Kate launching torpedoes at 200 feet
4 x E13A1 Jake bombing at 2000 feet
4 x E13A1 Jake bombing at 2000 feet
4 x B5N Kate launching torpedoes at 200 feet
4 x B5N Kate launching torpedoes at 200 feet
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on TF at 80,101

Japanese aircraft
B5N Kate x 5

No Japanese losses

Allied Ships
AK Mintaka, Torpedo hits 1,  on fire,  heavy damage
AK Sterope, Torpedo hits 1,  on fire,  heavy damage

Aircraft Attacking:
1 x B5N Kate launching torpedoes at 200 feet
4 x B5N Kate launching torpedoes at 200 feet
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on TF at 83,101

Japanese aircraft
D3A Val x 27
A6M3a Zero x 24
B5N Kate x 13

No Japanese losses

Allied Ships
AK Cetus, Bomb hits 16, Torpedo hits 1,  on fire,  heavy damage


Allied ground losses:
51 casualties reported

Aircraft Attacking:
9 x D3A Val bombing at 2000 feet
1 x B5N Kate launching torpedoes at 200 feet
9 x D3A Val bombing at 2000 feet
9 x D3A Val bombing at 2000 feet
4 x B5N Kate launching torpedoes at 200 feet
4 x B5N Kate launching torpedoes at 200 feet
4 x B5N Kate launching torpedoes at 200 feet
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on TF at 83,102

Japanese aircraft
B5N Kate x 30

No Japanese losses

Allied Ships
AK Celeno, Torpedo hits 4,  on fire,  heavy damage


Allied ground losses:
44 casualties reported

Aircraft Attacking:
2 x B5N Kate launching torpedoes at 200 feet
4 x B5N Kate launching torpedoes at 200 feet
4 x B5N Kate launching torpedoes at 200 feet
4 x B5N Kate launching torpedoes at 200 feet
4 x B5N Kate launching torpedoes at 200 feet
4 x B5N Kate launching torpedoes at 200 feet
4 x B5N Kate launching torpedoes at 200 feet
4 x B5N Kate launching torpedoes at 200 feet
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on TF at 83,102

Japanese aircraft
A6M5 Zeke x 27
D4Y Judy x 26

No Japanese losses

Allied Ships
AK Draco, Bomb hits 10,  on fire,  heavy damage


Allied ground losses:
51 casualties reported

Aircraft Attacking:
3 x A6M5 Zeke bombing at 2000 feet
2 x D4Y Judy bombing at 2000 feet
4 x A6M5 Zeke bombing at 2000 feet
4 x A6M5 Zeke bombing at 2000 feet
4 x A6M5 Zeke bombing at 2000 feet
4 x A6M5 Zeke bombing at 2000 feet
4 x A6M5 Zeke bombing at 2000 feet
4 x A6M5 Zeke bombing at 2000 feet
4 x D4Y Judy bombing at 2000 feet
4 x D4Y Judy bombing at 2000 feet
4 x D4Y Judy bombing at 2000 feet
4 x D4Y Judy bombing at 2000 feet
4 x D4Y Judy bombing at 2000 feet
4 x D4Y Judy bombing at 2000 feet
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on TF at 82,102

Japanese aircraft
B6N Jill x 16

Japanese aircraft losses
B6N Jill: 1 damaged

Allied Ships
AK William M. Stewart, Torpedo hits 3,  on fire,  heavy damage

Aircraft Attacking:
4 x B6N Jill launching torpedoes at 200 feet
4 x B6N Jill launching torpedoes at 200 feet
4 x B6N Jill launching torpedoes at 200 feet
4 x B6N Jill launching torpedoes at 200 feet
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on TF at 83,102

Japanese aircraft
A6M3a Zero x 6
E13A1 Jake x 11

Japanese aircraft losses
E13A1 Jake: 1 damaged

Allied Ships
AK William C. Claiborne

Aircraft Attacking:
3 x E13A1 Jake bombing at 2000 feet
4 x E13A1 Jake bombing at 2000 feet
4 x E13A1 Jake bombing at 2000 feet
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on TF at 83,101

Japanese aircraft
D3A Val x 27
A6M3a Zero x 24

No Japanese losses

Allied Ships
AK Eridanus, Bomb hits 5,  on fire,  heavy damage


Allied ground losses:
58 casualties reported

Aircraft Attacking:
9 x D3A Val bombing at 2000 feet
9 x D3A Val bombing at 2000 feet
9 x D3A Val bombing at 2000 feet
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on TF at 83,101

Japanese aircraft
B5N Kate x 13

No Japanese losses

Allied Ships
AK Albireo, Torpedo hits 4,  on fire,  heavy damage


Allied ground losses:
44 casualties reported

Aircraft Attacking:
1 x B5N Kate launching torpedoes at 200 feet
4 x B5N Kate launching torpedoes at 200 feet
4 x B5N Kate launching torpedoes at 200 feet
4 x B5N Kate launching torpedoes at 200 feet
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on TF at 82,102

Japanese aircraft
B5N Kate x 15

Japanese aircraft losses
B5N Kate: 1 destroyed

Allied Ships
AK George Read, Torpedo hits 2,  on fire,  heavy damage


Allied ground losses:
58 casualties reported

Aircraft Attacking:
2 x B5N Kate launching torpedoes at 200 feet
4 x B5N Kate launching torpedoes at 200 feet
4 x B5N Kate launching torpedoes at 200 feet
4 x B5N Kate launching torpedoes at 200 feet



< Message edited by Sneer -- 6/12/2006 1:31:13 PM >

_____________________________


(in reply to Sneer)
Post #: 781
RE: convoy intercepted - 6/12/2006 2:25:00 PM   
Sneer


Posts: 2654
Joined: 10/29/2003
Status: offline 		03/05/43
enemy convoy finished today
4 next transports sunk (24 total )
I assume I will see 2 usmc para no more :-)

< Message edited by Sneer -- 6/12/2006 2:32:14 PM >

_____________________________


(in reply to Sneer)
Post #: 782
RE: boring turn - 6/12/2006 3:05:17 PM   
Raverdave


Posts: 6520
Joined: 2/8/2002
From: Melb. Australia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: veji1

waow, Id like to now how fatigued they were and what was the range they were flying from... Because shooting that many P38 doesn't happen very often..



The pilot exp is only 58 for this group....they are but babes still suckling from their mother.

_____________________________




Never argue with an idiot, he will only drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.

(in reply to veji1)
Post #: 783
RE: boring turn - 6/12/2006 3:06:34 PM   
veji1

 

Posts: 1019
Joined: 7/9/2005
Status: offline 		hmm than result is pretty logical really...

(in reply to Raverdave)
Post #: 784
RE: boring turn - 6/12/2006 3:07:48 PM   
Sneer


Posts: 2654
Joined: 10/29/2003
Status: offline 		for me too

_____________________________


(in reply to veji1)
Post #: 785
RE: boring turn - 6/12/2006 3:11:45 PM   
Raverdave


Posts: 6520
Joined: 2/8/2002
From: Melb. Australia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ADavidB

quote:

And once again KB action is successful
I thought at first it is an invasion - but it is even better
enemy convoy intercetped between santa cruz and nanomuea atoll
I counted 22 AKs ( 8 sunk this turn , at least 7 next are heavy damaged and only 2 unscratched )


I'm astounded that Raver sent unprotected transports in Harm's Way like that. The way things are going, you'll run out of naval targets in another game-month or so...

Dave Baranyi


I have well over 80+ TFs running around all over the place and this wee little TF got missed on my usual scan and so sailed into harms way Human error only. They had a battalion of marines onboard and a ****e load of supplies.


_____________________________




Never argue with an idiot, he will only drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.

(in reply to ADavidB)
Post #: 786
RE: boring turn - 6/12/2006 3:14:21 PM   
Raverdave


Posts: 6520
Joined: 2/8/2002
From: Melb. Australia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ADavidB


quote:

ORIGINAL: veji1

waow, Id like to now how fatigued they were and what was the range they were flying from... Because shooting that many P38 doesn't happen very often..


P-38s in WitP are kitty cats. In UV they were pure Death-In-The-Skies, but somewhere along the way things were changed...

Every WitP Allied player does the same thing with P-38s the first time. It comes from frustration from playing nearly 360 turns without being able to stand up to Japanese fighters...

Dave Baranyi

(The idiotic Forum S/W "starred out" p*u*s*s*y when I first wrote it instead of "kitty". )

If you can get P-38 Squadrons to live long enough and make an exp level of 70 then you have a chance of doing some damage.........other wise they are just fodder for the Jap pilots.



_____________________________




Never argue with an idiot, he will only drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.

(in reply to ADavidB)
Post #: 787
enemy activity - 6/13/2006 3:45:39 PM   
Sneer


Posts: 2654
Joined: 10/29/2003
Status: offline 		glen spotted CA and BB north of Perth
activity in Darwin area rises on daily basis


_____________________________


(in reply to Sneer)
Post #: 788
RE: enemy activity - 6/13/2006 4:38:48 PM   
Ron Saueracker


Posts: 12121
Joined: 1/28/2002
From: Ottawa, Canada OR Zakynthos Island, Greece
Status: offline 		I don't think Raverdave is really trying.

_____________________________





Yammas from The Apo-Tiki Lounge. Future site of WITP AE benders! And then the s--t hit the fan

(in reply to Sneer)
Post #: 789
RE: enemy activity - 6/13/2006 5:22:26 PM   
Sneer


Posts: 2654
Joined: 10/29/2003
Status: offline 		who knows
if there is no serious operation it can be raid on palembang or sth like that
or fleet transfer to india to cover operation on this theater

< Message edited by Sneer -- 6/13/2006 5:23:19 PM >

_____________________________


(in reply to Ron Saueracker)
Post #: 790
RE: enemy activity - 6/13/2006 6:57:25 PM   
Sneer


Posts: 2654
Joined: 10/29/2003
Status: offline 		3/10/43
USS Barb heavily damaged by my hunter killer group at bataan Isl
she is far from home so maybe it will be a kill


_____________________________


(in reply to Sneer)
Post #: 791
RE: enemy activity - 6/14/2006 12:09:17 AM   
ADavidB


Posts: 2464
Joined: 9/17/2001
From: Toronto, Canada
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Ron Saueracker

I don't think Raverdave is really trying.



After losing so much, the only thing that Raver should be trying is to pull back and rebuild.

Dave Baranyi

(in reply to Ron Saueracker)
Post #: 792
RE: convoy intercepted - 6/14/2006 6:10:55 AM   
Sneer


Posts: 2654
Joined: 10/29/2003
Status: offline 		...but did anybody tell it Raverdave ????

_____________________________


(in reply to Sneer)
Post #: 793
RE: convoy intercepted - 6/14/2006 1:38:33 PM   
Raverdave


Posts: 6520
Joined: 2/8/2002
From: Melb. Australia
Status: offline 		Pull back ??????????????????? Is that not simply a nice way of saying retreat???????

_____________________________




Never argue with an idiot, he will only drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.

(in reply to Sneer)
Post #: 794
RE: convoy intercepted - 6/14/2006 1:41:47 PM   
Sneer


Posts: 2654
Joined: 10/29/2003
Status: offline 		it is
but allied potential is not only in carriers so i doubt i will see quiet 6 months as forecasted
that's why i stand ready


_____________________________


(in reply to Raverdave)
Post #: 795
RE: convoy intercepted - 6/14/2006 2:45:26 PM   
jumper

 

Posts: 489
Joined: 2/23/2006
Status: offline 		Hi,
the main problem with allies is that no matter how hard they are beaten, they keep coming back. You kick them out of the door - they are coming back through the window..

It will be interesting "what if" game. Not easy for both sides for much longer period than usual..
Good fun for both of you (Go, Japan, go.. !!! - I can´t resist)




(in reply to Sneer)
Post #: 796
RE: convoy intercepted - 6/14/2006 2:55:39 PM   
Raverdave


Posts: 6520
Joined: 2/8/2002
From: Melb. Australia
Status: offline 		With no carriers i am forced to go under the cover of land based aircraft.....that makes it easy for sneer to determin where I will hit next.

_____________________________




Never argue with an idiot, he will only drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.

(in reply to jumper)
Post #: 797
RE: convoy intercepted - 6/14/2006 3:11:24 PM   
veji1

 

Posts: 1019
Joined: 7/9/2005
Status: offline 		yeah, but the thing is, Japan can do something against allied carriers even late in war, it is very hard to pull, but it is possible to manage something... but against allied LBA... when 200 bombers and 80 P38 go for a base, even the best jap sentais can't do anything after the first day...

(in reply to Raverdave)
Post #: 798
RE: convoy intercepted - 6/14/2006 3:29:02 PM   
Sneer


Posts: 2654
Joined: 10/29/2003
Status: offline 		in think that i'm able to stand such force even after 3rd day - at least in southern DEI



_____________________________


(in reply to Sneer)
Post #: 799
RE: convoy intercepted - 6/14/2006 3:46:06 PM   
veji1

 

Posts: 1019
Joined: 7/9/2005
Status: offline 		well I can't wait to see that... The thing is you might be able to pull that once or twice, but what then ? he comes back 2 weeks later having recuperated while your 90 exp samurais are gone forever...



(in reply to Sneer)
Post #: 800
RE: convoy intercepted - 6/14/2006 3:57:03 PM   
Sneer


Posts: 2654
Joined: 10/29/2003
Status: offline 		i doubt i will loose so many of them during 2-3 weeks
in long term you are right
but think that my navy fighters are currently being rearmed to Jacks - it is one class higher equipment than zero family when it comes to fighting against bombers and durable fighters
if I was able to halt 300 b 17 unescorted with zeros and tonys i think i will be able to halt the same force with p 38 with tonys and jacks

_____________________________


(in reply to veji1)
Post #: 801
RE: convoy intercepted - 6/14/2006 4:16:58 PM   
veji1

 

Posts: 1019
Joined: 7/9/2005
Status: offline 		you are right, no point in being gloomy, you are going to lose anyway...

I can't wait to see the next battle...

(in reply to Sneer)
Post #: 802
RE: convoy intercepted - 6/14/2006 4:28:59 PM   
Sneer


Posts: 2654
Joined: 10/29/2003
Status: offline 		3/14/43
uss barb sunk - confirmed

_____________________________


(in reply to Sneer)
Post #: 803
RE: convoy intercepted - 6/14/2006 4:29:40 PM   
Sneer


Posts: 2654
Joined: 10/29/2003
Status: offline 		RN fleet is going to Darwin area so maybe you will not wait long

_____________________________


(in reply to Sneer)
Post #: 804
RE: convoy intercepted - 6/14/2006 4:37:52 PM   
Raverdave


Posts: 6520
Joined: 2/8/2002
From: Melb. Australia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sneer

RN fleet is going to Darwin area so maybe you will not wait long




What game are you looking at ?????????????????????????

_____________________________




Never argue with an idiot, he will only drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.

(in reply to Sneer)
Post #: 805
RE: convoy intercepted - 6/14/2006 4:39:00 PM   
Sneer


Posts: 2654
Joined: 10/29/2003
Status: offline 		ours
recon found CA BB
later BB
and avenger I was spotted at perth


_____________________________


(in reply to Raverdave)
Post #: 806
RE: convoy intercepted - 6/14/2006 4:39:37 PM   
BrucePowers


Posts: 12094
Joined: 7/3/2004
Status: offline 		Raver;
Without revealing too much, how are you doing. Has he hurt you too bad. I realize loose lips can sink ships.

(in reply to Sneer)
Post #: 807
RE: convoy intercepted - 6/14/2006 5:02:07 PM   
Ron Saueracker


Posts: 12121
Joined: 1/28/2002
From: Ottawa, Canada OR Zakynthos Island, Greece
Status: offline 		I want to see the sunk ship list!!

_____________________________





Yammas from The Apo-Tiki Lounge. Future site of WITP AE benders! And then the s--t hit the fan

(in reply to BrucePowers)
Post #: 808
RE: convoy intercepted - 6/14/2006 5:08:50 PM   
Raverdave


Posts: 6520
Joined: 2/8/2002
From: Melb. Australia
Status: offline 		Yup I am crippled at this point.....at least from the POV of naval ships.  I would love to post the sunk ships list but it would take up too much bandwidth to post it.


Sneer.....just because your sub thought they saw a BB does not make it a BB    But if you want to think that I have have BBs in Perth go right ahead.  Two moves ago my spotter planes reported a CA near Timor.....turns out to be a sub

_____________________________




Never argue with an idiot, he will only drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.

(in reply to Ron Saueracker)
Post #: 809
RE: convoy intercepted - 6/14/2006 5:08:59 PM   
Sneer


Posts: 2654
Joined: 10/29/2003
Status: offline 		i will publicate within few hours if there is interest

_____________________________


(in reply to Ron Saueracker)
Post #: 810
Page:   <<   < prev  25 26 [27] 28 29   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> After Action Reports >> RE: convoy intercepted Page: <<   < prev  25 26 [27] 28 29   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.828