question: mines and wrecks

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

question: mines and wrecks

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Lock ‘n Load: Heroes of Stalingrad >> question: mines and wrecks

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

question: mines and wrecks - 11/22/2005 9:28:57 AM

davebaldini

Posts: 6
Joined: 11/9/2005
Status: offline

1. in the 'ALAMO" scenario you can place all 4 mines in a hex at one time, say 3 remain in the hex after 2 para squads enter it, do you add all 3 mines for a +3 1d6 ROLL OR ARE THERE 3 separate +1 attackes by each mine?

2. do wrecks with their +2 tem afford shaken units a -2 during rally attempts? (ie like woods,buildings,etc.)

Post #: 1

RE: question: mines and wrecks - 11/23/2005 4:11:51 AM

stanguay

Posts: 41
Joined: 9/8/2005
Status: offline

Hi Dave !

quote:

1. in the 'ALAMO" scenario you can place all 4 mines in a hex at one time, say 3 remain in the hex after 2 para squads enter it, do you add all 3 mines for a +3 1d6 ROLL OR ARE THERE 3 separate +1 attackes by each mine?

Based on how you would handle multiple Claymore mines attacks, I would say you make three attack at 1d6+1 each.

quote:

2. do wrecks with their +2 tem afford shaken units a -2 during rally attempts? (ie like woods,buildings,etc.)

Mark said, in a previous post, that units in foxhole do get the benefit of a -2 to their rally roll so I would guess the same can be said for units hiding behind a wreck.

< Message edited by stanguay -- 11/23/2005 4:14:14 AM >

(in reply to davebaldini)

Post #: 2