AG South and AG A ?

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

AG South and AG A ?

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> Tech Support >> AG South and AG A ?

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

AG South and AG A ? - 1/25/2012 3:09:37 PM

Farfarer61

Posts: 713
Joined: 7/21/2004
Status: offline

It split into A and B, then went to A and South. A got 100% of the attached Construction Units.

Attachment (1)

Post #: 1

RE: AG South and AG A ? - 1/25/2012 3:33:27 PM

Helpless

Posts: 15793
Joined: 8/27/2004
Status: offline

B renames to AGS if you don't keep Rostov(115) during the logistics phase.

_____________________________

Pavel Zagzin
WITE/WITW/WITE-2 Development

(in reply to Farfarer61)

Post #: 2

RE: AG South and AG A ? - 1/25/2012 3:50:35 PM

Farfarer61

Posts: 713
Joined: 7/21/2004
Status: offline

Neat. Do you mean " in any Logistics phase subsequent to the original split into A and B " ?

(in reply to Helpless)

Post #: 3

RE: AG South and AG A ? - 1/25/2012 4:10:46 PM

Helpless

Posts: 15793
Joined: 8/27/2004
Status: offline

Yes, I see no time restriction for that.

_____________________________

Pavel Zagzin
WITE/WITW/WITE-2 Development

(in reply to Farfarer61)

Post #: 4

RE: AG South and AG A ? - 1/29/2012 6:01:26 PM

Farfarer61

Posts: 713
Joined: 7/21/2004
Status: offline

Support Units will not flow "up" to the renamed AGS ( former AGB). For several turns I have left the Panzer groups and Armies subordinate to AGN, AGC, and AGS at SL zero and the AG's at 9. The other army group HQs have successfully sucked up all the SU's, but AGS has not, despite being in supply on a rail line, all subordinate HQs in an adjacent hex etc.

Is the re-re-named AGS HQ somehow different or penalized?

< Message edited by Farfarer -- 1/30/2012 12:41:40 PM >

(in reply to Helpless)

Post #: 5

RE: AG South and AG A ? - 1/30/2012 2:04:15 PM

Helpless

Posts: 15793
Joined: 8/27/2004
Status: offline

quote:

Is the re-re-named AGS HQ somehow different or penalized?

There is no difference.

_____________________________

Pavel Zagzin
WITE/WITW/WITE-2 Development

(in reply to Farfarer61)

Post #: 6

RE: AG South and AG A ? - 1/31/2012 12:54:31 PM

Farfarer61

Posts: 713
Joined: 7/21/2004
Status: offline

Thanks, I guess it is a separate issue "why" this AGS will not accept Support Units from subordinate commands. It has been set a SL9 and everything subordinate at 0, but the SU's 'stop' at the three subordinate Army HQs. Essentiually I'm trying to redistribute Axis mobile SU's to mobile formations, and heavy and guns and pioneers to the Infantry, as suggested in several threads.

(in reply to Helpless)

Post #: 7

RE: AG South and AG A ? - 1/31/2012 6:30:26 PM

Helpless

Posts: 15793
Joined: 8/27/2004
Status: offline

Hard to comment without knowing all the details, but sometimes SL 0 can cause that SU won't be able to assigned to the particular HQ and won't be passed down and up the chain. IOW, if you want that SU would "flow" via particular HQ it's SL should be non zero. Otherwise it will be able to give back only what it has.

_____________________________

Pavel Zagzin
WITE/WITW/WITE-2 Development

(in reply to Farfarer61)

Post #: 8

RE: AG South and AG A ? - 2/2/2012 2:19:19 AM

Farfarer61

Posts: 713
Joined: 7/21/2004
Status: offline

Nice to know, thanks. Wish I had read the forums before I did my lasr German turn :)

(in reply to Helpless)

Post #: 9