Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: convoy intercepted

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> After Action Reports >> RE: convoy intercepted Page: <<   < prev  27 28 [29] 30 31   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: convoy intercepted - 6/15/2006 5:16:29 PM   
BrucePowers


Posts: 12094
Joined: 7/3/2004
Status: offline 		My first turn even as allies takes me about 4 hours. The second turn took about 45 minutes. Now I spend about 30 minutes looking and clicking even on defense. But based on what you are telling me I'm okay with that. Thank you for the input.

(in reply to Sneer)
Post #: 841
RE: convoy intercepted - 6/15/2006 5:23:19 PM   
Sneer


Posts: 2654
Joined: 10/29/2003
Status: offline 		my 1 st turn  takes 3 hours  - but i have already my battle plan ready
later turns  ap 30 min
after 1st month it goes toward 15 min
so
don't worry
everything is ok



_____________________________


(in reply to BrucePowers)
Post #: 842
RE: convoy intercepted - 6/15/2006 8:47:59 PM   
BrucePowers


Posts: 12094
Joined: 7/3/2004
Status: offline 		I really was not worried persay. I am having fun and enjoying myself which is why we all do it. I do appreciate your responses. It helps the learning curve. When I get into PBEM, I want to be a dependable opponent others will want to play against.

(in reply to Sneer)
Post #: 843
RE: convoy intercepted - 6/16/2006 4:51:56 PM   
Raverdave


Posts: 6520
Joined: 2/8/2002
From: Melb. Australia
Status: offline 		A couple of quite moves.........looks like a mini KB was poking around due east of Noumea but has now vanished....no doubt heading back north now that the element of surprise has been lost.  I have closed down both airfields on Timor so I don't think that there will be much trouble from that direction.  In the meantime I am continuing my build-up in that area with little interuption from Sneer.  I now have seven carriers back online and steaming to their new AO.

_____________________________




Never argue with an idiot, he will only drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.

(in reply to BrucePowers)
Post #: 844
RE: convoy intercepted - 6/16/2006 4:58:07 PM   
Sneer


Posts: 2654
Joined: 10/29/2003
Status: offline 		AO ?
i will get 4 CV within 7 months and naval aviation wing will reach 1000


_____________________________


(in reply to Raverdave)
Post #: 845
RE: convoy intercepted - 6/16/2006 5:07:40 PM   
Raverdave


Posts: 6520
Joined: 2/8/2002
From: Melb. Australia
Status: offline 		Only 4 ? *Snort* I'll be getting another 20 in that time.......I will will this game by numbers ! AO=Area of Operations

_____________________________




Never argue with an idiot, he will only drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.

(in reply to Sneer)
Post #: 846
RE: convoy intercepted - 6/16/2006 5:08:12 PM   
Sneer


Posts: 2654
Joined: 10/29/2003
Status: offline 		7 carriers :
3 UK so only 100 planes
2cvl +yorktown and 1 essex
not too much
especially hiyo will be back in line within 2 weeks / not bad from 38 sys few weeks ago to 10 today
all my CV except Akagi are almost ready for action
and for lost Zuiho I got Taiho

salomons are good place to fight



< Message edited by Sneer -- 6/16/2006 5:13:33 PM >

_____________________________


(in reply to Sneer)
Post #: 847
RE: convoy intercepted - 6/16/2006 5:49:00 PM   
Raverdave


Posts: 6520
Joined: 2/8/2002
From: Melb. Australia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sneer



salomons are good place to fight





Sounds good to me.......I'll see you there in a few months.


_____________________________




Never argue with an idiot, he will only drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.

(in reply to Sneer)
Post #: 848
RE: convoy intercepted - 6/16/2006 5:52:36 PM   
Sneer


Posts: 2654
Joined: 10/29/2003
Status: offline 		I will be there is only you dare to go in force for my property 

_____________________________


(in reply to BrucePowers)
Post #: 849
The new world order - 6/17/2006 10:43:49 AM   
Raverdave


Posts: 6520
Joined: 2/8/2002
From: Melb. Australia
Status: offline 		Your property? How dare you, you conceited jumped up no good imperialistic ratbrained warmonger !

Here we are after two years of warfare which YOU started, and now you claim that all of the territory that you have INVADED is your property ! The hide and gall that you have astounds me. Mark my words, when this war is over and I have bombed you and your imperialistic megalomaniac kind back to the stone age I shall rebuild the world so that the likes of you shall never again have power. I shall form an institution and call it the “United Nations” and all good men of good nations shall join it to prevent such wars as ours from ever happening again !



_____________________________




Never argue with an idiot, he will only drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.

(in reply to Sneer)
Post #: 850
RE: The new world order - 6/17/2006 11:14:20 AM   
pauk


Posts: 4162
Joined: 10/21/2001
From: Zagreb,Croatia
Status: offline

_____________________________


(in reply to Raverdave)
Post #: 851
RE: The new world order - 6/17/2006 3:12:18 PM   
BrucePowers


Posts: 12094
Joined: 7/3/2004
Status: offline 		It looks like this game is turning into psychological warfare.

(in reply to pauk)
Post #: 852
RE: convoy intercepted - 6/18/2006 6:37:17 PM   
Sneer


Posts: 2654
Joined: 10/29/2003
Status: offline 		United "puppet" nations ?
No my Asian co-prosperity zone will stand for next 1000 years


_____________________________


(in reply to BrucePowers)
Post #: 853
RE: convoy intercepted - 6/18/2006 11:45:50 PM   
pauk


Posts: 4162
Joined: 10/21/2001
From: Zagreb,Croatia
Status: offline 		i couldn't agree more with Sneer-san!

we don't need UPN

_____________________________


(in reply to Sneer)
Post #: 854
first fight of Jacks - 6/19/2006 9:23:50 AM   
Sneer


Posts: 2654
Joined: 10/29/2003
Status: offline 		03/2//43

Day Air attack on Jamshedpur , at 28,22

Japanese aircraft
J2M Jack x 27
Ki-44-IIb Tojo x 36
Ki-61 KAIc Tony x 25

Allied aircraft
Liberator VI x 126
P-38G Lightning x 68
B-24D Liberator x 37

Japanese aircraft losses
J2M Jack: 1 destroyed, 21 damaged / 1 destroyed
Ki-44-IIb Tojo: 8 destroyed, 16 damaged / 8 destroyed + 7 on the ground
Ki-61 KAIc Tony: 9 destroyed, 8 damaged / 5 destroyed

Allied aircraft losses
Liberator VI: 31 destroyed, 54 damaged / 37 destroyed
P-38G Lightning: 20 destroyed, 7 damaged / 20 destroyed
B-24D Liberator: 5 destroyed, 4 damaged / 5 destroyed

Japanese ground losses:
39 casualties reported

Airbase hits 26
Airbase supply hits 5
Runway hits 146

unless it will be hard hit next turn it is not closed - dmg close to 50% to both runway and services
but i think there is many damaged bombers on allied side

< Message edited by Sneer -- 6/19/2006 10:28:25 AM >

_____________________________


(in reply to BrucePowers)
Post #: 855
RE: first fight of Jacks - 6/19/2006 10:56:03 AM   
veji1

 

Posts: 1019
Joined: 7/9/2005
Status: offline 		Well this is good result, but not unusual for a first day... The problem is the day after and than the next one... I guess you have fighters in order AFs that you can make LRCAP this base... Since this is an open AAR, you won't be too specific, but I guess as well that all these units had very decent experience ratings...

(in reply to Sneer)
Post #: 856
RE: first fight of Jacks - 6/19/2006 11:39:19 AM   
aztez

 

Posts: 4031
Joined: 2/26/2005
From: Finland
Status: offline 		Where those allied P38 pilots on low experience? I mean those losses were not good at all.

(in reply to veji1)
Post #: 857
RE: first fight of Jacks - 6/19/2006 11:46:37 AM   
veji1

 

Posts: 1019
Joined: 7/9/2005
Status: offline 		I think they were green, but it doesn't really matter, what makes the difference is how the jap fare against the second, third, forth strikes. If after these the AF is open, Bombers morale will be so low that you can call it a jap victory...

(in reply to aztez)
Post #: 858
RE: first fight of Jacks - 6/19/2006 11:59:22 AM   
Sneer


Posts: 2654
Joined: 10/29/2003
Status: offline 		no second strike happened



_____________________________


(in reply to veji1)
Post #: 859
RE: first fight of Jacks - 6/19/2006 12:12:40 PM   
veji1

 

Posts: 1019
Joined: 7/9/2005
Status: offline 		great ! The allies need to go for attrition, whenever they settle for a short battle instead of dragging it in time, it is a mistake, whatever the result may be.

Actually I don't even understand why he launches strikes if he doesn't have the intension to follow it up for the next few days..

(in reply to Sneer)
Post #: 860
RE: first fight of Jacks - 6/19/2006 12:20:51 PM   
Sneer


Posts: 2654
Joined: 10/29/2003
Status: offline 		maybe bombers had low morale and refused to fly last turn ?
it is still probable we will see attack within 2-3 days


_____________________________


(in reply to veji1)
Post #: 861
RE: first fight of Jacks - 6/19/2006 12:31:05 PM   
Sneer


Posts: 2654
Joined: 10/29/2003
Status: offline 		there are wellingotons in the area by they were withdrawn in order to reduce overstacking IMO- so when liberators refused to fly there was no other means to continue attack

_____________________________


(in reply to Sneer)
Post #: 862
RE: first fight of Jacks - 6/19/2006 1:20:48 PM   
Raverdave


Posts: 6520
Joined: 2/8/2002
From: Melb. Australia
Status: offline 		P-38s were at exp 63.  Liberators didn't fly the second day   I might have to have another crack at this.

_____________________________




Never argue with an idiot, he will only drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.

(in reply to Sneer)
Post #: 863
RE: first fight of Jacks - 6/19/2006 1:46:09 PM   
Sneer


Posts: 2654
Joined: 10/29/2003
Status: offline 		exactly as I thought
fear samurais


_____________________________


(in reply to Raverdave)
Post #: 864
RE: convoy intercepted - 6/19/2006 2:24:22 PM   
Sneer


Posts: 2654
Joined: 10/29/2003
Status: offline 		AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 03/30/43

and they come again
Day Air attack on Jamshedpur , at 28,22

Japanese aircraft
J2M Jack x 28
Ki-44-IIb Tojo x 11
Ki-61 KAIc Tony x 36

Allied aircraft
Liberator VI x 96
P-38G Lightning x 45
B-24D Liberator x 43

Japanese aircraft losses
J2M Jack: 9 destroyed, 11 damaged
Ki-44-IIb Tojo: 8 destroyed
Ki-61 KAIc Tony: 16 destroyed, 4 damaged
Ki-46-III Dinah: 2 destroyed

mostly ground losses - pilots are alive and there is enough reserve planes to laugh today

Allied aircraft losses
Liberator VI: 31 destroyed, 34 damaged
P-38G Lightning: 11 destroyed, 2 damaged
B-24D Liberator: 5 destroyed, 2 damaged

Japanese ground losses:
135 casualties reported

Airbase hits 15
Airbase supply hits 2
Runway hits 69

Day Air attack on TF at 81,126

Trap was set on allied LOC - carrier TF sneaked 15 hexes east of Auckland
no convoy found unfortunately
but small fish was a fat one
whole 72 planes group of P38 is out of war

Japanese aircraft
D3A Val x 26
A6M3a Zero x 8
B5N Kate x 18

Japanese aircraft losses
D3A Val: 1 damaged

Allied Ships
AK Kalani, Bomb hits 15, on fire, heavy damage




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to BrucePowers)
Post #: 865
RE: convoy intercepted - 6/19/2006 2:26:04 PM   
castor troy


Posts: 14330
Joined: 8/23/2004
From: Austria
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sneer

AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 03/30/43

and they come again
Day Air attack on Jamshedpur , at 28,22

Japanese aircraft
J2M Jack x 28
Ki-44-IIb Tojo x 11
Ki-61 KAIc Tony x 36

Allied aircraft
Liberator VI x 96
P-38G Lightning x 45
B-24D Liberator x 43

Japanese aircraft losses
J2M Jack: 9 destroyed, 11 damaged
Ki-44-IIb Tojo: 8 destroyed
Ki-61 KAIc Tony: 16 destroyed, 4 damaged
Ki-46-III Dinah: 2 destroyed

mostly ground losses - pilots are alive and there is enough reserve planes to laugh today

Allied aircraft losses
Liberator VI: 31 destroyed, 34 damaged
P-38G Lightning: 11 destroyed, 2 damaged
B-24D Liberator: 5 destroyed, 2 damaged

Japanese ground losses:
135 casualties reported

Airbase hits 15
Airbase supply hits 2
Runway hits 69

Day Air attack on TF at 81,126

Trap was set on allied LOC - carrier TF sneaked 15 hexes east of Auckland
no convoy found unfortunately
but small fish was a fat one
whole 72 planes group of P38 is out of war

Japanese aircraft
D3A Val x 26
A6M3a Zero x 8
B5N Kate x 18

Japanese aircraft losses
D3A Val: 1 damaged

Allied Ships
AK Kalani, Bomb hits 15, on fire, heavy damage






Now that AK was like a Spanish treashure ship!!!!!!

(in reply to Sneer)
Post #: 866
RE: convoy intercepted - 6/19/2006 2:27:45 PM   
Sneer


Posts: 2654
Joined: 10/29/2003
Status: offline 		As many People wrote on this forum allied LOC are not longer safe

_____________________________


(in reply to castor troy)
Post #: 867
RE: convoy intercepted - 6/19/2006 2:43:20 PM   
veji1

 

Posts: 1019
Joined: 7/9/2005
Status: offline 		God that must hurt like hell !!!!

How many daitais upgrade to Jacks ? How many new ones do you get ?

(in reply to Sneer)
Post #: 868
RE: convoy intercepted - 6/19/2006 2:50:24 PM   
Sneer


Posts: 2654
Joined: 10/29/2003
Status: offline 		not many new ones but all navy fighters which are land based can be converted - i currently produce 230 per month and over 200 is already on frontline
Jack is best japanese fighter at the moment
marginally better statistics than Tojo and Tony but 4 20 mm cannons
they are excellent 4E can openers

to be honest during salomons campaign all allied shiping was coverd by navy - and what is real fun - Raverdave will never know where or if in areas between his bases are my hunting carriers
time to go for map border again

 


_____________________________


(in reply to veji1)
Post #: 869
RE: convoy intercepted - 6/19/2006 4:11:02 PM   
Raverdave


Posts: 6520
Joined: 2/8/2002
From: Melb. Australia
Status: offline 		Crap !   I'm still trying to plug the gaps and within the next month these priate raids should be much more detectable.

_____________________________




Never argue with an idiot, he will only drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.

(in reply to Sneer)
Post #: 870
Page:   <<   < prev  27 28 [29] 30 31   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> After Action Reports >> RE: convoy intercepted Page: <<   < prev  27 28 [29] 30 31   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.992