Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Resource Types

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> RE: Resource Types Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Resource Types - 2/8/2008 10:05:51 PM   
Froonp


Posts: 7995
Joined: 10/21/2003
From: Marseilles, France
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: marcuswatney
Cardiff coal
Chengtu coal
Chungking coal
Coventry iron
Essen coal
Georgetown British Guyana bauxite
Hanover iron
Katowice coal
Metz iron
Paramaribo Dutch Guyana bauxite
Petsamo cobalt
Pola bauxite
Saarbrucken coal
Belgium phosphates
Bolivia tin

You learn something new every day.  12% of the world's bauxite came from British Guyana and a further 7% from neighbouring Dutch Guyana.  And who would have guessed cobalt at Petsamo?

When I look at the Petsamo entry on wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pechenga_District) they speak about the area being rich in Nickel. So, Cobalt or Nickel ?

Problem is with this, that this opens up a new way for people to say that the game is not well researched if our informations are wrong.

(in reply to marcuswatney)
Post #: 31
RE: Resource Types - 2/8/2008 10:33:05 PM   
ahlner

 

Posts: 15
Joined: 10/7/2006
From: Stockholm, Sweden
Status: offline
According to Swedish National Encyclopedia the Petsamo area was rich in Nickel deposits and in the 1920s a mining industry developed. There is even a town there called Nikel...

(in reply to Froonp)
Post #: 32
RE: Resource Types - 2/8/2008 10:42:43 PM   
Froonp


Posts: 7995
Joined: 10/21/2003
From: Marseilles, France
Status: offline
The list of the 137 resources, as of today :

Cardiff United Kingdom 1 Coal
Chengtu China 1 Coal
Chungking China 2 Coal
Coventry United Kingdom 1 Iron
Essen Germany 1 Coal
Georgetown British Guyana 1 Bauxite
Hanoi Indo-China 1 Coal
Hanover Germany 1 Iron
Indianapolis USA 1
Karaganda USSR 1
Katowice Poland 1 Coal
Kerch USSR 1
Kursk USSR 1
Little Rock USA 1
Louisville USA 1
Magnitogorsk USSR 1
Metz France 1 Iron
Ndola Northern Rhodesia 1
Newcastle Australia 1 Coal
Paramaribo Dutch Guyana 1 Bauxite
Petsamo Finland 1 Cobalt or Nickel ?
Phoenix USA 1
Pittsburgh USA 1
Pola Italy 1 Bauxite
Saarbrücken Germany 1 Coal
Sian China 1 Coal
Stalinsk USSR 1
Sudbury Canada 1
Tsitsihar Manchuria 1 Gold
Béchar Algeria 1
Mount Isa Australia 1 Lead
Broken Hill Australia 1 Silver
Clear 127,52 Belgian Congo 1
Clear 53,32 Belgium 1 Phosphates
Mountain 141,321 Bolivia 1 Tin
Clear 138,343 Brazil 1
Mountain 66,51 Bulgaria 1
Thetford Mines Canada 1 Asbestos
Pembroke Canada 1 Timber
Forest 52,298 Canada 1
Mountain 51,276 Canada 1
Mountain 158,318 Chile 1
Mountain 150,319 Chile 1
Mountain 136,319 Chile 1
Clear 78,146 China 1
Clear 73,143 China 1 Coal
Clear 86,142 China 1 Antimony
Forest 90,138 China 1 Tin
Desert Mountain 68,141 China 1 Iron
Mountain 72,130 China 1 Iron
San Luis Cuba 1 Manganese
Mountain 75,60 Cyprus 1
Forest 54,39 Czechoslovakia 1
Clear 89,148 Formosa 1 Iron
Clear 55,32 France 1
Clear 53,30 France 1
Clear 54,28 France 1
Clear 56,26 France 1
Mountain 62,31 France 1
Clear 50,40 Germany 1
Clear 53,38 Germany 1
Clear 49,36 Germany 1
Clear 51,33 Germany 1
Clear 53,43 Germany 1
Mountain 71,48 Greece 1
Forest 96,139 Hainan 1 Bauxite
Clear 59,44 Hungary 1
Clear 90,113 India 1
Warangal India 1 Granite ?
Forest 90,106 India 1
Mountain 95,110 India 1
Forest 64,37 Italy 1
Mountain 62,33 Italy 1
Mountain 62,171 Japan 1 Coal
Mountain 71,154 Korea 1 Iron
Jungle 115,130 Malaya 1 Rubber
Mountain 113,129 Malaya 1 Tin
Mountain 67,145 Manchuria 1 Iron
Mountain 68,151 Manchuria 1 Iron
Clear 86,288 Mexico 1
Clear 49,33 Netherlands 1
Mountain 142,194 New Caledonia 1 Nickel
Knaben Norway 1 Molybdenum
Mountain 134,318 Peru 1
Mountain 101,151 Philippines 1 Gold
Clear 52,45 Poland 1
Mountain 66,17 Portugal 1
Clear 70,34 Sardinia 1
Kayes Senegal 1 Iron
Clear 155,53 South Africa 1
Premier Mine South Africa 1 Diamond
Mountain 63,22 Spain 1
Mountain 71,21 Spain 1
Mountain 69,19 Spain 1
Mountain 62,18 Spain 1
Gällivare Sweden 2 Iron
Kiruna Sweden 1 Iron
Mountain 71,64 Turkey 1
Mountain 72,55 Turkey 1
Clear 65,299 USA 1
Clear 64,296 USA 1
Clear 69,293 USA 1
Clear 54,273 USA 1
Mountain 74,271 USA 1
Clear 64,313 USA 1
Forest 71,307 USA 1
Mountain 65,310 USA 1
Clear 68,306 USA 1
Forest 72,306 USA 1
Ironwood USA 1 Iron
Mountain 68,309 USA 1
Forest 58,283 USA 1
Mountain 68,284 USA 1
Mountain 66,278 USA 1
Mountain 67,269 USA 1
Clear 55,296 USA 1
Clear 71,299 USA 1
Mountain 74,304 USA 1
Clear 52,145 USSR 1 Tin
Clear 51,64 USSR 1
Clear 43,62 USSR 1
Krivoy Rog USSR 3 Iron
Forest 63,72 USSR 1
Forest 39,88 USSR 1
Suchan USSR 1 Iron
Forest 59,162 USSR 1 Lead
Kokand USSR 1 Cotton ?
Stalinabad USSR 1 Coal
Forest 42,87 USSR 1
Mountain 53,160 USSR 1 Coal
Biisk USSR 1
Forest 63,47 Yugoslavia 1
Mountain 65,47 Yugoslavia 1

(in reply to ahlner)
Post #: 33
RE: Resource Types - 2/8/2008 10:55:05 PM   
Reverend Zombie

 

Posts: 35
Joined: 3/15/2005
Status: offline
How about a different new icon for each resource type?  Color-coding of the existing icon, perhaps?

In truth, I'd be happy if they were left as they were, without description.

(in reply to Froonp)
Post #: 34
RE: Resource Types - 2/8/2008 11:09:01 PM   
Shannon V. OKeets

 

Posts: 22095
Joined: 5/19/2005
From: Honolulu, Hawaii
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Reverend Zombie

How about a different new icon for each resource type?  Color-coding of the existing icon, perhaps?

In truth, I'd be happy if they were left as they were, without description.

Welcome.

Probably too much to change all the icons. Adding the labels seems contenious enough!

_____________________________

Steve

Perfection is an elusive goal.

(in reply to Reverend Zombie)
Post #: 35
RE: Resource Types - 2/8/2008 11:21:27 PM   
Toed

 

Posts: 55
Joined: 8/5/2006
From: Sweden
Status: offline
Well then. The three Swedish resources should be Iron, Iron and Iron.

Some history of the mines if someone is interested. The first texts that mentions the large iron ore fields in the Kiruna Gällivare area is from 1696 but the first registred claim is from 1735. However the remoteness of the find make any profitable mining impossible until the Kiruna-Luleå railway is built. It is finished in 1888 and mining starts at a large scale. In 1898 the Norwegian parlament decides to allow the extention of the railway to Narvik and in 1903 the entire length of Malmbanan is completed and iron ore begins to be shipped out of Narvik as well.
During the German invasion of Narvik in april 1940 they blow up the harbour facilities and the shipping is concentrated to Luleå. After a record month in juli 1940 when 1,2 million tons (metric) of ore are shipped out the production falls off and during the last year of the war is the lowest since the depression. This is due to shipping losses and not lack of demand.

(in reply to ahlner)
Post #: 36
RE: Resource Types - 2/8/2008 11:29:54 PM   
Shannon V. OKeets

 

Posts: 22095
Joined: 5/19/2005
From: Honolulu, Hawaii
Status: offline
All of Patrice's references to hex numbers seemed like a good excuse to show some updated screen shots of the USA map.

The hex numbers aren't shown here, but there is usually some geographical reference close to the resource icons.

The NE, including the Great Lakes.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Steve

Perfection is an elusive goal.

(in reply to Shannon V. OKeets)
Post #: 37
RE: Resource Types - 2/8/2008 11:31:53 PM   
Shannon V. OKeets

 

Posts: 22095
Joined: 5/19/2005
From: Honolulu, Hawaii
Status: offline
USA SE.

Patrice, I am not sure why you chose to label Charlestown West Virginia.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Steve

Perfection is an elusive goal.

(in reply to Shannon V. OKeets)
Post #: 38
RE: Resource Types - 2/8/2008 11:32:36 PM   
marcuswatney

 

Posts: 279
Joined: 2/28/2006
Status: offline
I think it is important not to change the icon, to underline that there is no functional difference.

Yes, Petsamo produced both nickel and cobalt.  My source has lumped Petsamo's pre-war nickel production in with the Soviet Union's in spite of the fact that Petsamo was not ceded until 1945 (so I can't judge its significance).  Presumably the author did this to aid comparison.  At least the source notes the transfer.

All I can tell from the map that comes with the statistics is that there is one red blob for nickel production and two black blobs for cobalt production.  On the other hand, pre-war production of "pig iron and ferro alloys" (which would include cobalt) was only 18,000 tonnes, rising by 1959 to 88,000 tonnes, presumably because of the use of cobalt in nuclear applications.  So by all means change Petsamo to nickel if you want.

The mine at Nikel' (I assume the apostrophe denotes an abbreviation) appears named on my map: it produced cobalt not nickel!

(in reply to Reverend Zombie)
Post #: 39
RE: Resource Types - 2/8/2008 11:34:34 PM   
Shannon V. OKeets

 

Posts: 22095
Joined: 5/19/2005
From: Honolulu, Hawaii
Status: offline
The dry SW.

I had to trim the coast lines to fit the forum size limits on images. These 4 screen shots show all the USA non-oil resources though (I think).




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Steve

Perfection is an elusive goal.

(in reply to Shannon V. OKeets)
Post #: 40
RE: Resource Types - 2/8/2008 11:37:46 PM   
Shannon V. OKeets

 

Posts: 22095
Joined: 5/19/2005
From: Honolulu, Hawaii
Status: offline
4th and last in the series.

I had to trim Canada from this screen shot. I had really wanted to include Calgary and its resource.

Now it is time to get back to code.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Steve

Perfection is an elusive goal.

(in reply to Shannon V. OKeets)
Post #: 41
RE: Resource Types - 2/8/2008 11:41:45 PM   
marcuswatney

 

Posts: 279
Joined: 2/28/2006
Status: offline
Pre-war was there really a railway bridge across the Niagara Falls?

(in reply to marcuswatney)
Post #: 42
RE: Resource Types - 2/8/2008 11:59:19 PM   
Mziln


Posts: 1107
Joined: 2/9/2004
From: Tulsa Oklahoma
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: marcuswatney

Pre-war was there really a railway bridge across the Niagara Falls?


Niagara Falls RAILROADS ~ a history

_____________________________


(in reply to marcuswatney)
Post #: 43
RE: Resource Types - 2/9/2008 12:35:15 AM   
marcuswatney

 

Posts: 279
Joined: 2/28/2006
Status: offline
South Africa: South Africa is famous for diamonds and gold.  Diamonds are mined in both areas marked with a resource symbol, but gold is only mined near the northern one (near Pretoria).  From its location, it would seem likely that the southern resource is supposed to represent the Kimberley diamond mine.

Rather than have both resource hexes labelled 'diamonds', I suggest the north be 'gold' and the south be 'diamonds'.  This would mean deleting Premier Mine (which anyway is 40km east of Pretoria).

(in reply to Shannon V. OKeets)
Post #: 44
RE: Resource Types - 2/9/2008 12:40:31 AM   
marcuswatney

 

Posts: 279
Joined: 2/28/2006
Status: offline
Steve, could all maps go in the maps thread please, and this thread be reserved for resources?

It would be very helpful if the maps were reorganised into their appropriate threads.  South Africa seems to have ended up in the America thread!  And I am still looking for a recent Central Africa...

(in reply to marcuswatney)
Post #: 45
RE: Resource Types - 2/9/2008 1:05:23 AM   
Norman42


Posts: 244
Joined: 2/9/2008
From: Canada
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Shannon V. OKeets

All of Patrice's references to hex numbers seemed like a good excuse to show some updated screen shots of the USA map.

The hex numbers aren't shown here, but there is usually some geographical reference close to the resource icons.

The NE, including the Great Lakes.







First time post, long time (has it really been 4 years?) reader of this forum, and 20 year WiF player. Great work on everything involved in MWiF so far, I've been waiting for this game for...well, 20 years.

With regards to the 'showing the resources' issue, I think it is a bit of information overkill since the information is irrelevant to gameplay. I think it should only be shown on a hex fly-out data panel or something, or *only* visible at zoom 8 (if someone cares enough to wonder about the resource present they can zoom in for data).

Having lived in Canada for some time, I can throw out some information on the various resources.


1. Thetford - Mainly known for its huge Asbestos mines, this region also has extensive dairy and livestock farming.

2. Sudbury - One of the worlds largest Nickel mines is in Sudbury (The city sign is a massive 11 ton model of our favorite 5-cent coin, hence its nickname Nickel City) and during WW2 it supplied nearly 30% of all of Britain's Nickel needs.

3. Resource near Fort William - My former hometown so I know it well. It is now known as Thunder Bay, formerly the twin cities of Fort William and Port Arthur. It was mentioned in the north america map thread as a potential N.A. additional city. In my opinion it really should be a city, over 100000pop in the combined twin cities(85k official plus well over 20000 in temporary labor workers and overseas shippers during the war) in the 40s, and the center of industry and transport(major rail yards and junctions) between Winnipeg and Toronto. It was both the main export port for 75% of ALL Canadian grain, with the 3 largest grain elevators in the world from 1933 til 1965, that went to Europe(via the St Lawrence Seaway), and it was also the source of 30% of all paper mill products and lumber used by the west during the war (5 large paper/lumber mills including the 2 largest in the world in 1943). In addition, 220 Hawker Hurricaines and 300+ Douglas and Curtiss torpedo and dive bombers were built there on license in the Canadian Car Foundry. As the major transportation crossroads, the main military armory of the area, and the hub of all North Ontario commerce I think it rates a city in an area of Canada on map that is supply starved currently. The resource to the northwest of Fort William would represent extensive lumber operations and possibly the Atikokan Iron/Copper mines. One last nitpick. Fort William should be one hex east (on the coast of Lake Superior, where the rail line bends up north eastwards).

4. Pembroke - Some lumber operations and magnesium mines in this region. Really, this resource should be moved 1hex east and 1 hex northeast, to Mont Laurier on the rail spur heading northwest of Montreal. This is the Noranda-Val D'Or region, which are Canada's largest mines of Copper, Zinc, and Gold. By far Noranda (Mont Laurent) exceeds Pembroke as a resource site, as it is one of the largest mining complexes in the world.

5. Western Canada resource - This would represent an amalgamation of all of Alberta's Livestock, Grain, and Oil production. As these sites were spread out across the province no single location is any better.

.




< Message edited by Norman42 -- 2/9/2008 1:10:05 AM >

(in reply to Shannon V. OKeets)
Post #: 46
RE: Resource Types - 2/9/2008 1:19:22 AM   
Mziln


Posts: 1107
Joined: 2/9/2004
From: Tulsa Oklahoma
Status: offline


Has it really been 4 years? LOL this forum had a birthday just 2 days ago and no one noticed.



Yup this forum is 4 years old.

< Message edited by Mziln -- 2/9/2008 1:21:39 AM >


_____________________________


(in reply to Norman42)
Post #: 47
RE: Resource Types - 2/9/2008 2:16:26 AM   
Shannon V. OKeets

 

Posts: 22095
Joined: 5/19/2005
From: Honolulu, Hawaii
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: marcuswatney

Steve, could all maps go in the maps thread please, and this thread be reserved for resources?

It would be very helpful if the maps were reorganised into their appropriate threads.  South Africa seems to have ended up in the America thread!  And I am still looking for a recent Central Africa...

Reorganizing posts and threads I assume to be virtually impossible, or too time consuming for the benefit gained.

But I will try to exert a little more self-discipline (I can't guarantee that however).

_____________________________

Steve

Perfection is an elusive goal.

(in reply to marcuswatney)
Post #: 48
RE: Resource Types - 2/9/2008 2:20:53 AM   
Shannon V. OKeets

 

Posts: 22095
Joined: 5/19/2005
From: Honolulu, Hawaii
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Norman42

quote:

ORIGINAL: Shannon V. OKeets

All of Patrice's references to hex numbers seemed like a good excuse to show some updated screen shots of the USA map.

The hex numbers aren't shown here, but there is usually some geographical reference close to the resource icons.

The NE, including the Great Lakes.







First time post, long time (has it really been 4 years?) reader of this forum, and 20 year WiF player. Great work on everything involved in MWiF so far, I've been waiting for this game for...well, 20 years.

With regards to the 'showing the resources' issue, I think it is a bit of information overkill since the information is irrelevant to gameplay. I think it should only be shown on a hex fly-out data panel or something, or *only* visible at zoom 8 (if someone cares enough to wonder about the resource present they can zoom in for data).

Having lived in Canada for some time, I can throw out some information on the various resources.


1. Thetford - Mainly known for its huge Asbestos mines, this region also has extensive dairy and livestock farming.

2. Sudbury - One of the worlds largest Nickel mines is in Sudbury (The city sign is a massive 11 ton model of our favorite 5-cent coin, hence its nickname Nickel City) and during WW2 it supplied nearly 30% of all of Britain's Nickel needs.

3. Resource near Fort William - My former hometown so I know it well. It is now known as Thunder Bay, formerly the twin cities of Fort William and Port Arthur. It was mentioned in the north america map thread as a potential N.A. additional city. In my opinion it really should be a city, over 100000pop in the combined twin cities(85k official plus well over 20000 in temporary labor workers and overseas shippers during the war) in the 40s, and the center of industry and transport(major rail yards and junctions) between Winnipeg and Toronto. It was both the main export port for 75% of ALL Canadian grain, with the 3 largest grain elevators in the world from 1933 til 1965, that went to Europe(via the St Lawrence Seaway), and it was also the source of 30% of all paper mill products and lumber used by the west during the war (5 large paper/lumber mills including the 2 largest in the world in 1943). In addition, 220 Hawker Hurricaines and 300+ Douglas and Curtiss torpedo and dive bombers were built there on license in the Canadian Car Foundry. As the major transportation crossroads, the main military armory of the area, and the hub of all North Ontario commerce I think it rates a city in an area of Canada on map that is supply starved currently. The resource to the northwest of Fort William would represent extensive lumber operations and possibly the Atikokan Iron/Copper mines. One last nitpick. Fort William should be one hex east (on the coast of Lake Superior, where the rail line bends up north eastwards).

4. Pembroke - Some lumber operations and magnesium mines in this region. Really, this resource should be moved 1hex east and 1 hex northeast, to Mont Laurier on the rail spur heading northwest of Montreal. This is the Noranda-Val D'Or region, which are Canada's largest mines of Copper, Zinc, and Gold. By far Noranda (Mont Laurent) exceeds Pembroke as a resource site, as it is one of the largest mining complexes in the world.

5. Western Canada resource - This would represent an amalgamation of all of Alberta's Livestock, Grain, and Oil production. As these sites were spread out across the province no single location is any better.

.


Welcome, and thanks. I expect Patrice will take immediate advantage of the information you provided.


_____________________________

Steve

Perfection is an elusive goal.

(in reply to Norman42)
Post #: 49
RE: Resource Types - 2/9/2008 2:47:45 AM   
marcuswatney

 

Posts: 279
Joined: 2/28/2006
Status: offline
The results of tonight's work:

For accuracy, each of British Guyana's and Dutch Guyana's resource hexes should be moved one hex eastwards along the coast.

Ndola copper 13%
Algeria coal
Belgian Congo diamonds 63%!
Brazil bauxite (move to 2N Sao Paulo)

Chile: I cannot find anything near Arica in extreme north.  Chile produced 18% of the world's copper from three big fields, so recommend move Arica resource to 1NE Antofagusta and label all three resources 'copper'.

China 78,146 (if moved to Tsingkow, which should be renamed Haichow) phosphates
Cuba manganese 2% (no, cigars are not a war materiel, unless you are a Former Naval Person)
Peru antimony 3%
South Africa 148,56 gold
South Africa 155,53 diamonds

I am leaving USA and Canada to others as I know little of their economies.

(in reply to Shannon V. OKeets)
Post #: 50
RE: Resource Types - 2/9/2008 3:55:17 AM   
Shannon V. OKeets

 

Posts: 22095
Joined: 5/19/2005
From: Honolulu, Hawaii
Status: offline
Northeastern resource in Pennsylvania (next to the A) is coal. The mountain hex in West Virginia is coal too. Pittsburgh is iron, but I am not sure if both of them are iron.

_____________________________

Steve

Perfection is an elusive goal.

(in reply to marcuswatney)
Post #: 51
RE: Resource Types - 2/9/2008 5:15:51 AM   
YohanTM2

 

Posts: 1143
Joined: 10/7/2002
From: Toronto
Status: offline
Please do not clutter the map with any notes on the type of resource as it has zero impact on game function and frankly the map is going to be very busy anyway.

If you have to list the type of resource for whatever reason please use a flyover or have the player click on the resource. I'm sure some people mihgt like to see it the first game or two but after that it will just be clutter.

(in reply to Shannon V. OKeets)
Post #: 52
RE: Resource Types - 2/9/2008 9:12:15 AM   
Froonp


Posts: 7995
Joined: 10/21/2003
From: Marseilles, France
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Shannon V. OKeets
Patrice, I am not sure why you chose to label Charlestown West Virginia.

Because it is the capital of the State.
I placed all States' capitals on the map, as well as some other famous cities.
Charlestown is both, famous and a capital of State.

(in reply to Shannon V. OKeets)
Post #: 53
RE: Resource Types - 2/9/2008 9:28:59 AM   
Norman42


Posts: 244
Joined: 2/9/2008
From: Canada
Status: offline

Some Soviet resources:

Karaganda USSR = Coal Fields
Kerch USSR = Iron Ore
Kursk USSR = Iron Ore/Phosphates
Magnitogorsk USSR = (surprise) Iron Ore
Stalinsk USSR = Coal Fields

Some Balkans:

Greece = Bauxite(Aluminim)
Bulgaria = Lead/Zinc
Forest Yugoslavia = Copper
Mountain Yugoslavia = Chromium
Hungary = Bauxite(Aluminum)
Turkey = Chromium (both resources, though the eastern one really should be 2 hexes further east)



I dont have the above map coordinates on my maps so can't help on the un-named clear hex ones in USSR.

< Message edited by Norman42 -- 2/9/2008 9:48:40 AM >

(in reply to Froonp)
Post #: 54
RE: Resource Types - 2/9/2008 11:06:28 AM   
Shannon V. OKeets

 

Posts: 22095
Joined: 5/19/2005
From: Honolulu, Hawaii
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Froonp

quote:

ORIGINAL: Shannon V. OKeets
Patrice, I am not sure why you chose to label Charlestown West Virginia.

Because it is the capital of the State.
I placed all States' capitals on the map, as well as some other famous cities.
Charlestown is both, famous and a capital of State.

Ok. I figured that out.

But the famous Charlestown is in South Carolina.

_____________________________

Steve

Perfection is an elusive goal.

(in reply to Froonp)
Post #: 55
RE: Resource Types - 2/9/2008 11:07:15 AM   
Shannon V. OKeets

 

Posts: 22095
Joined: 5/19/2005
From: Honolulu, Hawaii
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Norman42


Some Soviet resources:

Karaganda USSR = Coal Fields
Kerch USSR = Iron Ore
Kursk USSR = Iron Ore/Phosphates
Magnitogorsk USSR = (surprise) Iron Ore
Stalinsk USSR = Coal Fields

Some Balkans:

Greece = Bauxite(Aluminim)
Bulgaria = Lead/Zinc
Forest Yugoslavia = Copper
Mountain Yugoslavia = Chromium
Hungary = Bauxite(Aluminum)
Turkey = Chromium (both resources, though the eastern one really should be 2 hexes further east)



I dont have the above map coordinates on my maps so can't help on the un-named clear hex ones in USSR.

I'll try to find time to do a couple of screen shots of teh USSR tomorrow.

_____________________________

Steve

Perfection is an elusive goal.

(in reply to Norman42)
Post #: 56
RE: Resource Types - 2/9/2008 11:31:22 AM   
Froonp


Posts: 7995
Joined: 10/21/2003
From: Marseilles, France
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: marcuswatney

South Africa: South Africa is famous for diamonds and gold.  Diamonds are mined in both areas marked with a resource symbol, but gold is only mined near the northern one (near Pretoria).  From its location, it would seem likely that the southern resource is supposed to represent the Kimberley diamond mine.

Well, Kimberley is east / northwest of Bloemfontein (on the rail junction south of the hex written "Vaal"), so it can't be it either.
The southern resource is placed southwest of Bloemfontein, in the vicinity of Colesberg, which is northeast of Middleburg, Middleburg wich is on the rail junction east of the words "Cape colony". Problem is, there seem to be nothing in this area warranting a RP. Maybe we should move the southern resource to Kimberley ? Or 1 hex eastwards, toward the coal fields shown on the attached map ? Preferably the latter, as I prefer stay minimalistic with changes, and I'd prefer keep the RP south of Bloemfontein (as on the WiF FE original maps).

quote:

Rather than have both resource hexes labelled 'diamonds', I suggest the north be 'gold' and the south be 'diamonds'.  This would mean deleting Premier Mine (which anyway is 40km east of Pretoria).

I agree the Premier Mine is placed wrongly. But from the attached map, it seems that the Gold mines are in the Pretoria hex or in the Johannesburg hex.
As the original resource is placed north of the Pretoria city icon (in the same hex), on the railway that heads north, and as I want to keep minimalistic changes from the original CWiF map, I would not change the place of this resource, but I would say that it represents the northern coal fields.

What do you think ?

Attached map is from 1979.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Froonp -- 2/9/2008 11:32:36 AM >

(in reply to marcuswatney)
Post #: 57
RE: Resource Types - 2/9/2008 11:56:37 AM   
warspite1


Posts: 41353
Joined: 2/2/2008
From: England
Status: offline
I agree with Yohan. These maps are a work of art and there is a danger that they will become too cluttered - certainly in North West Europe. As a compromise I like the idea of being able to examine the resource by clicking on the hex though. If this is the route taken please use the full name or an agreed abbreviation but not abbreviations from the periodic table which are not always intuitive and so will need a good memory or a chemistry degree to remember - Sn = Tin?!?

(in reply to Froonp)
Post #: 58
RE: Resource Types - 2/9/2008 12:05:31 PM   
Froonp


Posts: 7995
Joined: 10/21/2003
From: Marseilles, France
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Norman42
With regards to the 'showing the resources' issue, I think it is a bit of information overkill since the information is irrelevant to gameplay. I think it should only be shown on a hex fly-out data panel or something, or *only* visible at zoom 8 (if someone cares enough to wonder about the resource present they can zoom in for data).

Well, that's a good idea.
Why not have those informations writen in a "special font size" (for example size 1), and have some code that would say : all text defined in size 1 don't appear on the map, but instead appear in a fly-out after the mouse has been hovering the hex for 1 second ?

And also : Why not having the text that appears on the map in a given hex (any text, be it a river name or a city name), also appear in a fly-out too after the mouse hover the given hex for 1 second ? Then, texts written in size 1 (as a "special font size" as defined above) would also appear in a fly-out.

The text in the fly out would be written in a standard font size.
If there are multiple texts in the hex, then all appear one below the other.

Also, this could be turned off as a game interface option.

(in reply to Norman42)
Post #: 59
RE: Resource Types - 2/9/2008 12:49:55 PM   
Froonp


Posts: 7995
Joined: 10/21/2003
From: Marseilles, France
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Norman42
1. Thetford - Mainly known for its huge Asbestos mines, this region also has extensive dairy and livestock farming.

2. Sudbury - One of the worlds largest Nickel mines is in Sudbury (The city sign is a massive 11 ton model of our favorite 5-cent coin, hence its nickname Nickel City) and during WW2 it supplied nearly 30% of all of Britain's Nickel needs.

So we are OK with these two.

quote:

3. Resource near Fort William - My former hometown so I know it well. It is now known as Thunder Bay, formerly the twin cities of Fort William and Port Arthur. It was mentioned in the north america map thread as a potential N.A. additional city. In my opinion it really should be a city, over 100000pop in the combined twin cities(85k official plus well over 20000 in temporary labor workers and overseas shippers during the war) in the 40s, and the center of industry and transport(major rail yards and junctions) between Winnipeg and Toronto.

Fort William has 26k inhabitants in 1935 (31k in 1944) and Port Arthur has 20k inhabitants in 1935 and 24k in 1944, this does not warrant a city. I agree that Sudbury with its 32k inhabitants in 1944 do not warrant a city either, but this one was added to keep the supply level reflected by the WiF FE original map North of Lake Huron.

quote:

It was both the main export port for 75% of ALL Canadian grain, with the 3 largest grain elevators in the world from 1933 til 1965, that went to Europe(via the St Lawrence Seaway), and it was also the source of 30% of all paper mill products and lumber used by the west during the war (5 large paper/lumber mills including the 2 largest in the world in 1943). In addition, 220 Hawker Hurricaines and 300+ Douglas and Curtiss torpedo and dive bombers were built there on license in the Canadian Car Foundry. As the major transportation crossroads, the main military armory of the area, and the hub of all North Ontario commerce I think it rates a city in an area of Canada on map that is supply starved currently.

Yes, but it is supply starved on the WiF FE America map too, so for consistency reasons, it has to be the same level of supply IMO on the MWiF map.

quote:

The resource to the northwest of Fort William would represent extensive lumber operations and possibly the Atikokan Iron/Copper mines.

If I tell you that originaly the resource on the WiF FE maps was on the railway junction from Fort William and Winnipeg, what do you think it could be ? Still lumber ?

quote:

One last nitpick. Fort William should be one hex east (on the coast of Lake Superior, where the rail line bends up north eastwards).

Done. It was its hex position though but I had the name shifted so that it was not written on the lake. I've shifted is so that the first letter of the name is placed to the right of the place (as for all non city nor ports place names).

quote:

4. Pembroke - Some lumber operations and magnesium mines in this region. Really, this resource should be moved 1hex east and 1 hex northeast, to Mont Laurier on the rail spur heading northwest of Montreal. This is the Noranda-Val D'Or region, which are Canada's largest mines of Copper, Zinc, and Gold. By far Noranda (Mont Laurent) exceeds Pembroke as a resource site, as it is one of the largest mining complexes in the world.

Well, Noranda / Rouyn is not around Mont Laurier, it is on the Quebec-Cochrane railway (on a southward spur), I'd say 2 hexes east of Cochrane. At least on my 1944 Collier Atlas map. I agree though that it is a Copper Mine.
Before moving this resource in Noranda, I would like to know something : Originaly (on the WiF FE maps), this "Prembroke" resource is placed 1 hex west of Ottawa, 1 hex northeast of Toronto. Do you see what it could be ? If you see nothing, I might move it to Noranda, but this is quite far away from the original position.

quote:

5. Western Canada resource - This would represent an amalgamation of all of Alberta's Livestock, Grain, and Oil production. As these sites were spread out across the province no single location is any better.

OK, so no specific type of resource. Say it is "Mixed".

(in reply to Norman42)
Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> RE: Resource Types Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.141