Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Optimum fighter altitudes - how do I know whats best AE

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Optimum fighter altitudes - how do I know whats best AE Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Optimum fighter altitudes - how do I know whats best AE - 6/12/2009 6:54:35 PM   
Cavalry Corp

 

Posts: 3107
Joined: 9/2/2003
From: Sampford Spiney Devon UK
Status: offline 		AE question on optimum altitude for air combat , CAP, sweep etc

Is there anywhere on a screen that tells you your P38 does not do well at a certain altitude etc ?

I do not know how I would find it out and for sure it says nothing in stock now .

Cav
Post #: 1
RE: Optimum fighter altitudes - how do I know whats bes... - 6/12/2009 6:59:31 PM   
Erik Rutins

 

Posts: 37503
Joined: 3/28/2000
From: Vermont, USA
Status: offline 		Yes, when you look at the aircraft info, it shows the maneuver ratings for each range band. In addition to that info, you also now get info in the combat report telling you roughly what altitude the enemy planes are coming in at. So you can use those two to make a determination about what altitude may be best for your own missions.

_____________________________

Erik Rutins
CEO, Matrix Games LLC



For official support, please use our Help Desk: http://www.matrixgames.com/helpdesk/

Freedom is not Free.

(in reply to Cavalry Corp)
Post #: 2
RE: Optimum fighter altitudes - how do I know whats bes... - 6/12/2009 7:32:40 PM   
Cavalry Corp

 

Posts: 3107
Joined: 9/2/2003
From: Sampford Spiney Devon UK
Status: offline 		Erik

It gets better and better - thanks

Michael

(in reply to Erik Rutins)
Post #: 3
RE: Optimum fighter altitudes - how do I know whats bes... - 6/14/2009 12:23:50 AM   
HistoryGuy


Posts: 80
Joined: 1/7/2009
From: Woodbridge, VA
Status: offline 		The impression that I get from reading the "performance bands" A2A discussion is that a favored P-38 tactic of diving from high altitude to make an attack and then zooming back up to repeat cannot be replicated in AE (at least as effectively). It seems like "performance bands" equates to dogfighting at certain altitudes??

(in reply to Erik Rutins)
Post #: 4
RE: Optimum fighter altitudes - how do I know whats bes... - 6/14/2009 12:37:12 AM   
Jorm


Posts: 545
Joined: 6/25/2002
From: Melbourne
Status: offline 		I that right about the p38, didnt most models suffer badly from high speed compressability issues, ie in a high speed dive ? So was this high speed dive pass an actual tactic used by the P38 ?

cheers

(in reply to HistoryGuy)
Post #: 5
RE: Optimum fighter altitudes - how do I know whats bes... - 6/14/2009 2:53:00 AM   
Nikademus


Posts: 25684
Joined: 5/27/2000
From: Alien spacecraft
Status: offline 		early models did, but only came into play if the plane power dived and reached too fast a speed. Making a fast, but more shallow diving boom and zoom pass on a fighter would not be a problem for the most part. P-38's strength in this was that it's supercharged engines allowed it to retain power and regain and/or retain altitude advantage vs. earlier 1st generation allied planes. Being more at home in the higher alt bands also faciliated the 38 starting a battle with alt advantage.

_____________________________


(in reply to Jorm)
Post #: 6
RE: Optimum fighter altitudes - how do I know whats bes... - 6/14/2009 3:53:26 AM   
tigercub


Posts: 2004
Joined: 2/3/2003
From: brisbane oz
Status: offline 		over 20,000 feet the P38j performance dropped off markedly.

_____________________________


You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life

(in reply to Nikademus)
Post #: 7
RE: Optimum fighter altitudes - how do I know whats bes... - 6/14/2009 7:45:30 AM   
Howard Mitchell


Posts: 449
Joined: 6/3/2002
From: Blighty
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tigercub

over 20,000 feet the P38j performance dropped off markedly.


No it didn't. I didn't even reach its maximum speed until 25,000 feet.

_____________________________

While the battles the British fight may differ in the widest possible ways, they invariably have two common characteristics – they are always fought uphill and always at the junction of two or more map sheets.

General Sir William Slim

(in reply to tigercub)
Post #: 8
RE: Optimum fighter altitudes - how do I know whats bes... - 6/14/2009 8:58:08 AM   
Terminus


Posts: 41459
Joined: 4/23/2005
From: Denmark
Status: offline 		Maybe he's thinking about the -G...?

_____________________________

We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.

(in reply to Howard Mitchell)
Post #: 9
RE: Optimum fighter altitudes - how do I know whats bes... - 6/14/2009 10:58:06 AM   
tigercub


Posts: 2004
Joined: 2/3/2003
From: brisbane oz
Status: offline 		Quoting of the top of my head can lead to poor memory lol yes there best performance was 25,000 But Quote:P38J in NW Europe. over 20,000 the Allison engines suffered sluggish oil that refused to flow properly in the intense cold of high altitude,leading to heavy oil consumption an engine life of only 80 hours and frequent engine failure....The turbo-superchargers were troublesome.. main reasons it was taken out of NW Europe and trying to fight Me109 at high Alts and high maintenance but successful fighting the japs not having to fly at high altitude so much...and warmer air.. slower jap planes.

Tiger!


< Message edited by tigercub -- 6/14/2009 1:18:47 PM >

_____________________________


You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life

(in reply to Terminus)
Post #: 10
RE: Optimum fighter altitudes - how do I know whats bes... - 6/14/2009 1:29:50 PM   
Erik Rutins

 

Posts: 37503
Joined: 3/28/2000
From: Vermont, USA
Status: offline 		Keep in mind that in AE, maneuver is not the be all/end all. Speed and Altitude advantage can count for a lot. So a plan that's faster and higher (and less maneuverable) can beat a more maneuverable, slower and lower altitude enemy. I'm guessing that answers the question regarding whether "boom and zoom" or slashing type attacks are possible? In AE, yes. You should also look at the maneuverability of your enemy's planes as while you may have a drop of in maneuverability as your plan goes higher, perhaps the enemy plane drops off even more, etc. Finding the right altitude is an interesting exercise in AE, combining friendly and enemy speed and maneuver and current altitude info, in my experience.

_____________________________

Erik Rutins
CEO, Matrix Games LLC



For official support, please use our Help Desk: http://www.matrixgames.com/helpdesk/

Freedom is not Free.

(in reply to tigercub)
Post #: 11
RE: Optimum fighter altitudes - how do I know whats bes... - 6/14/2009 1:43:06 PM   
Mike Scholl

 

Posts: 9349
Joined: 1/1/2003
From: Kansas City, MO
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Jorm

I that right about the p38, didnt most models suffer badly from high speed compressability issues, ie in a high speed dive ?



ALL aircraft sufferred from "compressibility issues" if they went fast enough. P-38's were just among the first to be able to go fast enough to discover "compressibility".

(in reply to Jorm)
Post #: 12
RE: Optimum fighter altitudes - how do I know whats bes... - 6/14/2009 2:30:46 PM   
Yakface


Posts: 846
Joined: 8/5/2006
Status: offline 		How is the altitude at which combat takes place determined.

For example if the CAP is at 10,000ft and a sweep comes in at 25,000ft where does combat take place?

(in reply to Mike Scholl)
Post #: 13
RE: Optimum fighter altitudes - how do I know whats bes... - 6/14/2009 2:39:27 PM   
Hard Sarge


Posts: 22741
Joined: 10/1/2000
From: garfield hts ohio usa
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Terminus

Maybe he's thinking about the -G...?


I would go with the G and the H, after that, that was not much of a issue anymore, the alot of the power/engine stuff was corrected starting with the J also(plus as been stated, the issues above 20 K in the ETO are not the same issues in the PTO)

plus fighting Zeros is not the same as fighting 109s

_____________________________


(in reply to Terminus)
Post #: 14
RE: Optimum fighter altitudes - how do I know whats bes... - 6/14/2009 5:04:25 PM   
TheElf


Posts: 3870
Joined: 5/14/2003
From: Pax River, MD
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mike Scholl


quote:

ORIGINAL: Jorm

I that right about the p38, didnt most models suffer badly from high speed compressability issues, ie in a high speed dive ?



ALL aircraft sufferred from "compressibility issues" if they went fast enough. P-38's were just among the first to be able to go fast enough to discover "compressibility".

I'd rather be "plagued" with compressibility issues, than "I can't keep up" issues...


_____________________________

IN PERPETUUM SINGULARIS SEDES



(in reply to Mike Scholl)
Post #: 15
RE: Optimum fighter altitudes - how do I know whats bes... - 6/14/2009 7:57:59 PM   
byron13


Posts: 1589
Joined: 7/27/2001
Status: offline 		And will the P-39 provide at least respectable performance at lower altitudes?

_____________________________


(in reply to TheElf)
Post #: 16
RE: Optimum fighter altitudes - how do I know whats bes... - 6/14/2009 8:55:56 PM   
Nikademus


Posts: 25684
Joined: 5/27/2000
From: Alien spacecraft
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tigercub

Quoting of the top of my head can lead to poor memory lol yes there best performance was 25,000 But Quote:P38J in NW Europe. over 20,000 the Allison engines suffered sluggish oil that refused to flow properly in the intense cold of high altitude,leading to heavy oil consumption an engine life of only 80 hours and frequent engine failure....The turbo-superchargers were troublesome.. main reasons it was taken out of NW Europe and trying to fight Me109 at high Alts and high maintenance but successful fighting the japs not having to fly at high altitude so much...and warmer air.. slower jap planes.

Tiger!



P-38 in Pacific didn't have nearly the trouble at the mentioned higher alts due to climate. The light Zero didn't have as much preformance loss vs. the heavier 1st gen Allied planes but it was at it's best under 20K, while the 109 was more at home up higher. In the mentioned warmer climate, the P-38 was also comfortably at home above 20K in the pacific ...where it had the edge in speed, climb rate and firepower over the zero. Standard tactic was to use this and the superior dive speed to make slashing attacks from alt advantage zooming upwards afterwards in a climb the Zero couldn't match. Because of their high alt preformance edge over the Zero, they were rarely caught in a position where they would be forced to engage in close quarter combat. (Bergerud - Fire in the Sky)



< Message edited by Nikademus -- 6/14/2009 9:06:12 PM >

_____________________________


(in reply to tigercub)
Post #: 17
RE: Optimum fighter altitudes - how do I know whats bes... - 6/14/2009 8:58:19 PM   
jwilkerson


Posts: 10525
Joined: 9/15/2002
From: Kansas
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: TheElf

I'd rather be "plagued" with compressibility issues, than "I can't keep up" issues...




Yeah, in my game with Nik, my Rufe's seem to be having that "anti-compressibility" issue - I keep seeing a message like "can't catch bombers" when I put my Rufe's on cap. It's that darned "anti-compressibility" issue again!



_____________________________

AE Project Lead
New Game Project Lead

(in reply to TheElf)
Post #: 18
RE: Optimum fighter altitudes - how do I know whats bes... - 6/14/2009 9:01:16 PM   
Nikademus


Posts: 25684
Joined: 5/27/2000
From: Alien spacecraft
Status: offline 		my heavy bombers laugh at your funny looking pseudo fighters.

_____________________________


(in reply to jwilkerson)
Post #: 19
RE: Optimum fighter altitudes - how do I know whats bes... - 6/14/2009 9:02:09 PM   
jwilkerson


Posts: 10525
Joined: 9/15/2002
From: Kansas
Status: offline 		Your heavy bombers must be having "compressibility" issues.


_____________________________

AE Project Lead
New Game Project Lead

(in reply to Nikademus)
Post #: 20
RE: Optimum fighter altitudes - how do I know whats bes... - 6/14/2009 9:06:27 PM   
Nikademus


Posts: 25684
Joined: 5/27/2000
From: Alien spacecraft
Status: offline 		naw....i'd say their having laughability issues which in turn are affecting their accuracy due to teary eyes.

_____________________________


(in reply to jwilkerson)
Post #: 21
RE: Optimum fighter altitudes - how do I know whats bes... - 6/14/2009 11:25:12 PM   
crsutton


Posts: 9590
Joined: 12/6/2002
From: Maryland
Status: offline 		The J model (I think) had dive brakes added to help it pull out of high speed dives. Really were multi use combat brakes. Top pilots could manipulate them in combat and do some nasty manuevers. I don't know if the J model was used in NW Europe, but it would have been a match for about any other fighter. Late model P38 was a "hot" fighter. Only real fault was that it was too expensive to make vs single engine planes.

_____________________________

I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg

(in reply to Nikademus)
Post #: 22
RE: Optimum fighter altitudes - how do I know whats bes... - 6/15/2009 4:11:37 AM   
Dili

 

Posts: 4708
Joined: 9/10/2004
Status: offline 		It is not a very good idea to use brakes in air combat, unless you are risking to be a mush in the ground.

(in reply to crsutton)
Post #: 23
RE: Optimum fighter altitudes - how do I know whats bes... - 6/15/2009 4:47:24 AM   
tigercub


Posts: 2004
Joined: 2/3/2003
From: brisbane oz
Status: offline 		P38 a hot fighter...NO way good Fighter VS Japs its speed and diving gave it a Distinct Advantage its slashing attacks were very had to counter for slow Jap planes VS German fighters was far harder for this type of attack, P38 was No world beater in Europe but it was very usefull in 1943 in Italy were it did best.
Twin engine planes all ways had a problem fighting single engine planes but the P38 was one of the better ones.
Nikademus(The Zero out climbed the P38 its only the Bounce attack of using its speed diving onto a zero and climbing away is when it was better)
from a standing start to 20,000 feet the zero was a faster climber.
Tiger!
  

_____________________________


You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life

(in reply to crsutton)
Post #: 24
RE: Optimum fighter altitudes - how do I know whats bes... - 6/15/2009 5:03:30 AM   
Grotius


Posts: 5798
Joined: 10/18/2002
From: The Imperial Palace.
Status: offline
quote:

How is the altitude at which combat takes place determined.

For example if the CAP is at 10,000ft and a sweep comes in at 25,000ft where does combat take place?

I'm curious about this too.

_____________________________


(in reply to tigercub)
Post #: 25
RE: Optimum fighter altitudes - how do I know whats bes... - 6/15/2009 2:43:25 PM   
Nikademus


Posts: 25684
Joined: 5/27/2000
From: Alien spacecraft
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tigercub
Nikademus(The Zero out climbed the P38 its only the Bounce attack of using its speed diving onto a zero and climbing away is when it was better)
from a standing start to 20,000 feet the zero was a faster climber.
Tiger!
  


The reference i cited referred to the P-38 engaging Zeros from alt advantage above 20,000 feet from which it could then zoom climb after it's pass, utilzing it's power and speed to regain and retain altitude advantage. Under these conditions, the Lightning could outclimb the Zero.


_____________________________


(in reply to tigercub)
Post #: 26
RE: Optimum fighter altitudes - how do I know whats bes... - 6/15/2009 3:01:50 PM   
Sardaukar


Posts: 9847
Joined: 11/28/2001
From: Finland/Israel
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: TheElf

I'd rather be "plagued" with compressibility issues, than "I can't keep up" issues...



I think I'd be quite disturbed about compressiblity...words come to my mind..like "auger" and "lawn dart" But that's why I don't fly planes...

BTW, as others have asked, how does the program determine in which altitude opposing aircraft meet in A2A combat? For example, CAP is at 20k and Sweep is coming in at 25k? Is it some function of detection and climb rates etc. ? Or does the lower altitude participant try to climb at all to meet enemy at more equal ground? If I recall correctly, higher altitude plane has quite an advantage in AE, lowering the maneuverability of the lower altitude one?


_____________________________

"To meaningless French Idealism, Liberty, Fraternity and Equality...we answer with German Realism, Infantry, Cavalry and Artillery" -Prince von Bülov, 1870-


(in reply to TheElf)
Post #: 27
RE: Optimum fighter altitudes - how do I know whats bes... - 6/15/2009 5:32:01 PM   
Kwik E Mart


Posts: 2447
Joined: 7/22/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Dili

It is not a very good idea to use brakes in air combat, unless you are risking to be a mush in the ground.


Why not? It worked great for Maverick...

_____________________________

Kirk Lazarus: I know who I am. I'm the dude playin' the dude, disguised as another dude!
Ron Swanson: Clear alcohols are for rich women on diets.

(in reply to Dili)
Post #: 28
RE: Optimum fighter altitudes - how do I know whats bes... - 6/15/2009 9:44:22 PM   
medicff

 

Posts: 710
Joined: 9/11/2004
From: WPB, Florida
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Grotius

quote:

How is the altitude at which combat takes place determined.

For example if the CAP is at 10,000ft and a sweep comes in at 25,000ft where does combat take place?

I'm curious about this too.


I will third that request

(in reply to Grotius)
Post #: 29
RE: Optimum fighter altitudes - how do I know whats bes... - 6/15/2009 11:04:53 PM   
tondern


Posts: 38
Joined: 3/26/2004
From: Foggy Bottom, DC
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: medicff


quote:

ORIGINAL: Grotius

quote:

How is the altitude at which combat takes place determined.

For example if the CAP is at 10,000ft and a sweep comes in at 25,000ft where does combat take place?

I'm curious about this too.


I will third that request



I will "fourth it" and add two other altitude questions.

If you have your fighters on escort, are they most effective at EXACTLY the same altitude as the bombers, or if they fly high cover (plus several thousand feet). I don't want to learn this the hard way by losing many of my available bombers in the first two weeks.

And if you expect enemy bombers at, say 17,000, should you set CAP at exactly 17,000 or try to give them a couple of thousand feet of altitude advantage?

Thanks,
Johnny



(in reply to medicff)
Post #: 30
Page:   [1] 2   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Optimum fighter altitudes - how do I know whats best AE Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.902