Possible Bugs?

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

Possible Bugs?

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [Age of Muskets] >> For Liberty! & 1848 >> Possible Bugs?

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

Possible Bugs? - 10/20/2010 9:18:24 PM

Mark Breed

Posts: 342
Joined: 9/4/2003
From: Orange County, CA
Status: offline

I have a few issues that don't seem to be right.

(1) Cavalry unsuccessful in evading a non-cavalry force.

(2) Cannons not being included in the battle (two separate events, one very significant).

I do have the file copies for review. Where do I send them.

Regards,
Mark

Post #: 1

RE: Possible Bugs? - 10/22/2010 11:40:14 AM

HussarGames

Posts: 253
Joined: 10/18/2006
Status: offline

1. You must set your cavalry to cautious / retreat to surely evade a non-cavalry force. Use these settings for recon.
2. Heavy cannons are very slow and they have little chance to participate in regular battles. They have increased chance to participate in or against fortified positions. Regular cannons will not participate in full force either and this is also affected by terrain and weather. Eg. Do not expect your artillery to show up if its raining and you are attacking in the mountains.

_____________________________

(in reply to Mark Breed)

Post #: 2

RE: Possible Bugs? - 10/22/2010 6:47:08 PM

Mark Breed

Posts: 342
Joined: 9/4/2003
From: Orange County, CA
Status: offline

(1) My cavalry was/is set to cautious / retreat and is still being forced into battle.

(2) My cannon were part of a garrison in a fort when attacked.

Regards,
Mark

(in reply to HussarGames)

Post #: 3

RE: Possible Bugs? - 10/22/2010 9:48:47 PM

Mark Breed

Posts: 342
Joined: 9/4/2003
From: Orange County, CA
Status: offline

Another issue just came up. I had an American cavalry force of less than 500 men again set to cautious / retreat attacked by an army of 2,800 and 23 cannon. Instead of withdrawing it stayed and fought, which caused an adjoining American army of 3,000+ join the battle. Not only did the army join in, but the leader who was a higher rank and had better values did not assume command of the battle.

Regards,
Mark

(in reply to Mark Breed)

Post #: 4

RE: Possible Bugs? - 10/22/2010 9:57:02 PM

Mark Breed

Posts: 342
Joined: 9/4/2003
From: Orange County, CA
Status: offline

It appears that supplies a fort generates will only feed the garrison. Is this correct? I say this because when I have a force show up at a fort, the supplies keep decreasing even though the fort is showing a stockpile of supplies. I have to transfer units to the garrison in order to get them fed.

Thank you for your support in these matters.

Regards,
Mark

(in reply to Mark Breed)

Post #: 5

RE: Possible Bugs? - 10/25/2010 10:50:45 PM

kool_kat

Posts: 558
Joined: 7/7/2008
From: Clarksville, VA.
Status: offline

Another bug report:

I did note a "bug" on my British 1776 Oct Week I turn. Event interface indicated British New York reinforcements, but no new troops appeared on the map at New York!

Note - I had British units occupying New York... and have been in control of NY for almost 1 year!

< Message edited by mwest -- 10/25/2010 10:52:08 PM >

_____________________________

Regards, - Mike

"You have to learn the rules of the game. And then you have to play better than anyone else." - Albert Einstein

(in reply to Mark Breed)

Post #: 6

RE: Possible Bugs? - 10/25/2010 11:38:19 PM

Mark Breed

Posts: 342
Joined: 9/4/2003
From: Orange County, CA
Status: offline

And, I had a cavalry unit just surrender after being repeatedly attacked by infantry even thought it was set to retreat / cautious the entire time! Could it be the readiness level is over-riding the cavalry/infantry rule? If so, I think that this should be corrected. Tired horses can still outrun a man on foot.

Mark

< Message edited by Mark Breed -- 10/25/2010 11:41:21 PM >

(in reply to kool_kat)

Post #: 7