Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Mods and Scenarios >> RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests - 10/27/2013 6:17:41 AM   
e2204588

 

Posts: 170
Joined: 7/12/2013
Status: offline 		#187 Buccaneer S.2A's operator is Royal Navy and Buccaneer S.2 is missing.

S.2 -> RN
S.2A -> RAF

http://www.thunder-and-lightnings.co.uk/buccaneer/history.php

(in reply to .Sirius)
Post #: 61
RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests - 10/27/2013 6:28:34 AM   
e2204588

 

Posts: 170
Joined: 7/12/2013
Status: offline 		#2924 - Sea King HAR.3's operator should be Royal Air Force instead of Royal Navy.

#2926 - Sea King HC.4's operator should be Royal Navy instead of Royal Army.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westland_Sea_King

(in reply to e2204588)
Post #: 62
RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests - 10/27/2013 7:02:01 AM   
e2204588

 

Posts: 170
Joined: 7/12/2013
Status: offline 		Should be River class frigate.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/River-class_frigate




Attachment (1)

(in reply to e2204588)
Post #: 63
RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests - 10/27/2013 7:18:37 AM   
.Sirius


Posts: 1404
Joined: 1/18/2013
Status: offline 		Hi yes and no she was a River Class Frigate and then converted as an Amphib Headquarters and given that NATO designation
quote:

ORIGINAL: fool12342000

Should be River class frigate.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/River-class_frigate





_____________________________

Paul aka Sirius
Command Developer
Warfaresims
Cold War Data Base 1946-1979 Author

Old radar men never die - Their echoes fade away in accordance with the inverse fourth power law

(in reply to e2204588)
Post #: 64
RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests - 10/27/2013 7:23:03 AM   
.Sirius


Posts: 1404
Joined: 1/18/2013
Status: offline 		Fixed in next build
quote:

ORIGINAL: fool12342000

Question:
Many minesweepers doesn't have "MCM Equip" button available. Is it WAD?

Ex. Auk class, Admirable class, Adjutant class, Agile class, Acme class


_____________________________

Paul aka Sirius
Command Developer
Warfaresims
Cold War Data Base 1946-1979 Author

Old radar men never die - Their echoes fade away in accordance with the inverse fourth power law

(in reply to e2204588)
Post #: 65
RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests - 10/27/2013 12:20:27 PM   
e2204588

 

Posts: 170
Joined: 7/12/2013
Status: offline 		RB-57D's max altitude is 40000ft, same as previous models.
But it was designed for high-altitude reconnaissance mission.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_RB-57D_Canberra
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_RB-57F_Canberra

(in reply to .Sirius)
Post #: 66
RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests - 10/27/2013 12:24:54 PM   
.Sirius


Posts: 1404
Joined: 1/18/2013
Status: offline 		Updated
quote:

ORIGINAL: fool12342000

RB-57D's max altitude is 40000ft, same as previous models.
But it was designed for high-altitude reconnaissance mission.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_RB-57D_Canberra
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_RB-57F_Canberra


_____________________________

Paul aka Sirius
Command Developer
Warfaresims
Cold War Data Base 1946-1979 Author

Old radar men never die - Their echoes fade away in accordance with the inverse fourth power law

(in reply to e2204588)
Post #: 67
RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests - 10/27/2013 7:30:49 PM   
Mgellis


Posts: 2054
Joined: 8/18/2007
Status: offline 		Not sure if anyone requested this yet for the CW database...

Auk-class minesweeper
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Auk_class_minesweeper


(in reply to .Sirius)
Post #: 68
RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests - 10/27/2013 8:36:05 PM   
.Sirius


Posts: 1404
Joined: 1/18/2013
Status: offline 		Added
quote:

ORIGINAL: fool12342000

#187 Buccaneer S.2A's operator is Royal Navy and Buccaneer S.2 is missing.

S.2 -> RN
S.2A -> RAF

http://www.thunder-and-lightnings.co.uk/buccaneer/history.php




_____________________________

Paul aka Sirius
Command Developer
Warfaresims
Cold War Data Base 1946-1979 Author

Old radar men never die - Their echoes fade away in accordance with the inverse fourth power law

(in reply to e2204588)
Post #: 69
RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests - 10/27/2013 8:42:05 PM   
.Sirius


Posts: 1404
Joined: 1/18/2013
Status: offline 		Added
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mgellis

Not sure if anyone requested this yet for the CW database...

Auk-class minesweeper
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Auk_class_minesweeper





_____________________________

Paul aka Sirius
Command Developer
Warfaresims
Cold War Data Base 1946-1979 Author

Old radar men never die - Their echoes fade away in accordance with the inverse fourth power law

(in reply to Mgellis)
Post #: 70
RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests - 10/27/2013 8:42:25 PM   
.Sirius


Posts: 1404
Joined: 1/18/2013
Status: offline 		Updated
quote:

ORIGINAL: fool12342000

RB-57D's max altitude is 40000ft, same as previous models.
But it was designed for high-altitude reconnaissance mission.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_RB-57D_Canberra
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_RB-57F_Canberra



_____________________________

Paul aka Sirius
Command Developer
Warfaresims
Cold War Data Base 1946-1979 Author

Old radar men never die - Their echoes fade away in accordance with the inverse fourth power law

(in reply to e2204588)
Post #: 71
RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests - 10/28/2013 2:20:46 AM   
Grackle

 

Posts: 147
Joined: 9/2/2007
Status: offline 		Aloha,

There are two scenarios I would like to start working on. These are Paracels (Xisha) 1974 - this pits four Republic of Vietnamese ships versus 4-6 PLA Navy ships. All PLA Navy ships are in the database, but there was one EDSALL class (DE) and two BARNETGAT class small seapolane tenders (recast as patrol craft) in the fight. The other battle I am considering is the 06 Aug 1965 Battle of Shantou, where two ROCN subchasers were sunk by the PLA Navy. They were trying to land agent provocatuers to take advantage of the chaos in the PRC as the Cultural Revolution gathered steam. Didn't work out so well. This would be a good cat and mouse scenario with the KMT trying to sneak in at night to the coast and the PLAN trying to guess where they will land. The ships I would for both need are:

RVN Edsall DE (3 x 3"/50 guns)•
2 × 40 mm AA guns (1 × 2)
• 8 × 20 mm AA guns (8 × 1)
• 3 × 21 in (530 mm) torpedo tubes (1 × 3) (U.S. advisors did not provide torps)
• 8 × depth charge projectors
• 1 × depth charge projector (hedgehog)
• 2 × depth charge tracks


RVN Barnegat PF (1 X 5"/38; 2 x 81mm mortars)

TWN/ROCN PC-461 class (290 tons)
Armament: 1 3"/50, 1 40mm, 4 20mm, depth charges, hedgehog (estimate)

I've got some stats (not sure how reliable they are)

Thanks,

Mark

_____________________________

System Specs: Intel(R) Core (TM) i7 CPU 960@3.20 GHZ; 12 GB RAM, AMD RADEON 6800 Series video card, Primary resolution 1920 X 1080, Direct X10

(in reply to e2204588)
Post #: 72
RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests - 10/28/2013 2:43:52 AM   
e2204588

 

Posts: 170
Joined: 7/12/2013
Status: offline 		>>06 Aug 1965 Battle of Shantou, where two ROCN subchasers were sunk by the PLA Navy.

Two ships are
PCE-45 Chien Men (ex-AM-387 Toucan, Auk class)
PC-118 Chang Chiang (ex-PC-1232, PC-461 Class)


< Message edited by fool12342000 -- 10/28/2013 2:44:23 AM >

(in reply to Grackle)
Post #: 73
RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests - 10/28/2013 2:39:47 PM   
f4migcap

 

Posts: 59
Joined: 6/29/2004
From: Baltimore MD, USA
Status: offline 		Canadian CP-107 mk 2: 20 built, carried the ASV-21 radar like the Nimrod MR.1 in CWDB.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canadair_CP-107_Argus

(in reply to e2204588)
Post #: 74
RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests - 10/28/2013 2:42:57 PM   
.Sirius


Posts: 1404
Joined: 1/18/2013
Status: offline 		Platform added
quote:

ORIGINAL: fool12342000

#187 Buccaneer S.2A's operator is Royal Navy and Buccaneer S.2 is missing.

S.2 -> RN
S.2A -> RAF

http://www.thunder-and-lightnings.co.uk/buccaneer/history.php




_____________________________

Paul aka Sirius
Command Developer
Warfaresims
Cold War Data Base 1946-1979 Author

Old radar men never die - Their echoes fade away in accordance with the inverse fourth power law

(in reply to e2204588)
Post #: 75
RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests - 10/28/2013 2:43:37 PM   
.Sirius


Posts: 1404
Joined: 1/18/2013
Status: offline 		Platform added
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mgellis

Not sure if anyone requested this yet for the CW database...

Auk-class minesweeper
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Auk_class_minesweeper





_____________________________

Paul aka Sirius
Command Developer
Warfaresims
Cold War Data Base 1946-1979 Author

Old radar men never die - Their echoes fade away in accordance with the inverse fourth power law

(in reply to Mgellis)
Post #: 76
RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests - 10/29/2013 3:28:28 AM   
RoryAndersonCDT

 

Posts: 1830
Joined: 6/16/2009
Status: offline 		I have a few requests I'm making a group of 1950s scenarios where WWIII started right after WWII and soviet naval aviation actually took off! One problem with soviet naval aviation is that its very, very weak in the 1950s and cannot stray more than 50 nautical miles from LBA for lack of air defense. I have a few requests which will make a "WWIII right after WWII with carrier battles" possible!



Could I get an "Internal Guns" loadout for the Tu-91 Boot Strike (id = 572) with an appropriate range?




Also the Yak-25's length according to wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yakovlev_Yak-25 is 15.67 meters which puts it's size as a Medium Aircraft. This affects ids 174, 177, and 2377. This will allow the Yak-25 to possibly be based off of carriers.





Plus the Yak-25M (id: 177) has a RP-6 Sokol (Falcon) air search radar with a 20 mile range. Source: http://www.exacteditions.com/read/aeroplane/june-2009-5197/40/3/ plus wikipedia mentions the RP-6 Sokol radar as well.

RP-6 might also have a 'look down' capability.
http://www.kamov.net/russian-aircraft/yakovlev-yak-25m/

Image of RP-6: http://coldwar.forumcommunity.net/?t=50771571
http://www.secretprojects.co.uk/forum/index.php?topic=18019.5;wap2 ""Scan Three" - X band, 9.3-9.4GHz, 3 modes detected. very high PRF (Yak-25) [RP-6 Sokol]
"





This is a long shot but I guess it can't hurt to ask would it be possible to get a theoretical Yak-25 (id 174) and Yak-25M (id 177) to be Carrier Capable?

I have a few reasons to think that the Yak-25 and Yak-25M might have been carrier capable if Stalin stuck around to demand a Soviet carrier aviation fighter.
First off I'm going to use the Tu-91 as a baseline; as it actually was a prototype soviet carrier capable aircraft.
Tu-91:
Max. takeoff weight: 14,400 kg (31,746 lb)
Wing area: 47.5 m² (511 ft²)
(14 400 kg) / (47.5 (m^2)) = 303.157895 kg / m2
Thus a wing loading of 303kg/m2.

Yak-25:
Loaded weight: 8,675 kg (19,125 lb)
Wing area: 28.94 m² (311.51 ft²)
Wing loading at loaded weight: (8675 kg) / (28.94 (m^2)) = 299.75812 kg / m2

Max. takeoff weight: 9,450 kg (29,760 lb)
Wing loading at max takeoff weight: (9450 kg) / (28.94 (m^2)) = 326.537664 kg / m2

So approximately the same wing loading, and a lighter aircraft overall.

Yak-28R Brewer D (id 151) is carrier capable but isn't introduced until 1967; and dominates the 1950s airspace if I use it.





In conclusion between the wing loading and Yakovlev producing a carrier capable aircraft a decade later I'd like to request
the following:
  • Tu-91 Boot Strike getting an internal guns loadout with appropriate range.
  • Yak-25M being given an additional air search sensor
  • Yak-25 and Yak-25M being made Medium Aircraft
  • Yak-25 and Yak-25M being made carrier capable


    The introduction of the Yak-25 and Yak-25M as a theoretical carrier capable aircraft will make soviet carrier naval aviation able to go toe-to-toe with American carrier naval aviation in the 1950s.

    I have to say I absolutely love the CWDB! It covers a period in time that not many naval combat simulations cover! I also think if WWIII was going to kick off it would have happened in the 1950s or early 1960s.



    _____________________________

    Command Dev Team
    Technical Lead

    (in reply to .Sirius)
    • Post #: 77
    RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests - 10/29/2013 9:55:18 AM   
    .Sirius


    Posts: 1404
    Joined: 1/18/2013
    Status: offline     		Hi Baloogan
    no problems on your requests, the DB is with Rag at the moment but your requests have been noted as soon as I get it back I will to the platforms and mark them down as proposed aircraft in the comments box on the platform

    _____________________________

    Paul aka Sirius
    Command Developer
    Warfaresims
    Cold War Data Base 1946-1979 Author

    Old radar men never die - Their echoes fade away in accordance with the inverse fourth power law

    (in reply to RoryAndersonCDT)
    Post #: 78
    RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests - 10/29/2013 9:58:03 AM   
    .Sirius


    Posts: 1404
    Joined: 1/18/2013
    Status: offline     		Hi Baloogan

    I can update the proposed Soviet Carriers also if you interested?

    _____________________________

    Paul aka Sirius
    Command Developer
    Warfaresims
    Cold War Data Base 1946-1979 Author

    Old radar men never die - Their echoes fade away in accordance with the inverse fourth power law

    (in reply to .Sirius)
    Post #: 79
    RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests - 10/29/2013 11:42:07 AM   
    RoryAndersonCDT

     

    Posts: 1830
    Joined: 6/16/2009
    Status: offline     		Hi Sirius,

    Thanks so much for OKing my requests I was worried I was overstepping a little.

    I think CWDB already has 3 proposed soviet carriers, AKR Orlitsa (Ex Graf Zeppilin), AKR Project 71 CV, AKR Project 72 CV. I just took a quick glance at them and they seem just about 100%. If there is anything amiss with these platforms I'm very interested in any updates that you might have in mind!

    One thing that would be cool would be UNREP capability! For the 3 carriers (ids 503, 310, 315) could I get "Refuel From Starboard x1 (In)" and "Replenish From Port x 1 (In)"?

    To replenish this fictional blue-water Soviet Navy I might need a Fleet Oiler and an Ammunition Ship, but for that I can just steal another nation's ships.

    Thanks!

    < Message edited by Baloogan -- 10/29/2013 11:43:37 AM >

    _____________________________

    Command Dev Team
    Technical Lead

    (in reply to .Sirius)
    Post #: 80
    RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests - 10/29/2013 1:20:28 PM   
    Barny23


    Posts: 122
    Joined: 11/1/2012
    From: Denmark
    Status: offline     		Next
    Yak-25 Yak-25M and Yak-25K (Flashlight A )
    Engines:Mikulin RD-5A not RD-9
    Armament Yak-25 Yak-25M : Two N-37L cannons 50rpg - 100 rpg in overload Configuration
    No bombs or unguided rockets and no guided AAMs (Interceptor aircraft not a fighterbomber)
    Armament Yak-25K :four K-5 (RS-1U) (Nato code name AA-1 Alkali) No guns
    Radar:Yak-25 RP-1D (Detection range 12 km 7,5 miles track range 2km 1.25miles)
    Yak-25M RP-6 Sokol limited lock-down capability (target at 300 meters)
    (Detection range 30km 16,2nm : (70km 43,5miles 16sq m target))
    Track 30km 18,6 miles 16sq m target
    Typical service rating night and bad weather medium altitude detection :15km 8,1 nm :lock-on 5km 2,7 nm
    low level detection 8km 4,3 nm lock-on 3 km 1,6 nm
    Yak-25K RP-1U (same as MiG-17PF) Seach range 7.5km 4nm lock on 4.5km 2.4nm
    Performance Yak-25:
    Max speed- 708mph 616kts at 13123ft - 684mph 594kts at 16404ft -(CWDB 990kts)
    Initial climb 9840ft/min - time to hight 2,3 min to 16404ft (avg. 7132ft/min). 6.4min to 32808ft (avg.5126ft/min)
    Service ceiling 45600ft
    Weight empty 6210kg normal loaded 9220kg
    Takeoff run 775 meters landing run 825 meters normal to/weight
    Range: Clean 1305 miles 1134 nm - 1678 miles 1459 nm with ext. tank
    Fuel internal: 3445 l. 758 imp gal (6063lbs 2750 kg) one 151 imp gal belly tank
    Performance Yak-25M:
    Max speed: 682mph 593kts at 9840ft
    Initial climb 8861ft/min time to hight 2,8 min to 16404ft (avg. 5716t/min) 7.9min to 32808ft (avg.4153ft/min)
    Weight empty 6410kg max loaded 10045kg
    Range: Clean 1249 miles 1086 nm - 1591 miles 1383 nm with ext. tank
    Takeoff run 800 meters landing run 850 meters normal
    Fuel internal: 3445 l. 758 imp gal (5952lbs 2700 kg) one 151 imp gal 540 kg 1190lbs conformal aux.tank
    Performance Yak-25K:max speed at 16404ft 621mph 540kts Build in small numbers - less than 40.Hardly a service aircraft (Testbeds)
    All versions no RWR and not designed for Carrier ops.- Impossible for this aircraft to land on a carrier
    with its special undercarriage
    Barny
    Ref:
    Yefim Gordon: Yakolev Yak-25/-23/-27/-28
    Bill Gunston & Yefim Gordon:Yakolev Aircraft since 1924




    Attachment (1)

    < Message edited by Barny -- 10/29/2013 1:38:04 PM >

    (in reply to RoryAndersonCDT)
    Post #: 81
    RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests - 10/29/2013 4:35:31 PM   
    MR_BURNS2


    Posts: 974
    Joined: 7/18/2013
    From: Austria
    Status: offline     		Add Boom refueling for F-105. F-105s were able to be refueled by both boom or probe-drogue.

    Look at the pictures on the right.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aerial_refueling#Compatibility_issues

    _____________________________

    Windows 7 64; Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67GHz (8 CPUs), ~2.7GHz; 6144MB RAM; NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970;



    (in reply to Barny23)
    Post #: 82
    RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests - 10/29/2013 9:14:56 PM   
    Temple

     

    Posts: 529
    Joined: 7/31/2002
    Status: offline     		When building my 1950 scenario, I noticed a lack of civilian and commercial aircraft to add. Only a neutral DC-3 was available. It's a low priority of course, but could we have a few more civilian and commercial prop planes for 1946-? Preferably the bigger ones, like DC-4s. Thanks

    (in reply to MR_BURNS2)
    Post #: 83
    RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests - 10/30/2013 3:10:34 PM   
    e2204588

     

    Posts: 170
    Joined: 7/12/2013
    Status: offline     		Independence class CVL has 17 medium A/C space in current database.
    It is not enough to load her typical A/C complement.
    24x F6F + 9x TBM (24/2 + 9 = 21)
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Independence-class_aircraft_carrier

    French navy's Arromanches (Colossus class CVL) has 11 medium A/C space currently.
    Her A/C complement in Suez Crisis:
    14x F4U + 10x TBM + 2x HUP-2 (14/2 + 10 + 2 = 19 )
    http://www.acig.info/CMS/?option=com_content&task=view&id=205&Itemid=47

    (in reply to Temple)
    Post #: 84
    RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests - 10/30/2013 3:39:22 PM   
    e2204588

     

    Posts: 170
    Joined: 7/12/2013
    Status: offline     		Avenger of Royal Navy has agility 3.
    Other TBM in CWDB has 2.

    (in reply to e2204588)
    Post #: 85
    RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests - 10/30/2013 9:55:27 PM   
    Mgellis


    Posts: 2054
    Joined: 8/18/2007
    Status: offline
    quote:

    ORIGINAL: Temple

    When building my 1950 scenario, I noticed a lack of civilian and commercial aircraft to add. Only a neutral DC-3 was available. It's a low priority of course, but could we have a few more civilian and commercial prop planes for 1946-? Preferably the bigger ones, like DC-4s. Thanks


    Along these lines, a few ideas...

    Douglas DC-6
    Number built: 704
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Douglas_DC-6
    http://www.flugzeuginfo.net/acdata_php/acdata_dc6_en.php
    http://www.airlines-inform.com/commercial-aircraft/Douglas-DC-6%20.html
    http://www.airliners.net/aircraft-data/stats.main?id=190
    http://www.brinkley.cc/AC/dc6f.htm

    Douglas DC-4
    Number built: 80 DC-4 and 1,163 C-54/R5D
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DC-4
    http://www.airliners.net/aircraft-data/stats.main?id=189
    http://www.militaryfactory.com/aircraft/detail.asp?aircraft_id=110
    http://www.boeing.com/boeing/history/mdc/dc-4.page
    http://www.airlines-inform.com/commercial-aircraft/Douglas-DC-4.html

    Douglas DC-8
    Number built: 556
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Douglas_DC-8
    http://www.airliners.net/aircraft-data/stats.main?id=192
    http://www.dc-8.co.uk/specs.htm
    http://www.militaryfactory.com/aircraft/detail.asp?aircraft_id=244
    http://ialcargo.com/specs/dc8.pdf
    http://www.brinkley.cc/AC/dc873f.htm

    Lockheed Constellation
    Number built: 856
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_Constellation
    http://www.airlines-inform.com/commercial-aircraft/Lockheed-Constellation.html
    http://www.historynet.com/the-legendary-lockheed-constellation.htm
    http://www.aviation-history.com/lockheed/1049.html
    http://www.ruudleeuw.com/connie-text.htm
    http://www.mcchord.org/magazine/LockheedConstellation.pdf
    http://www.what2fly.com/manufacturer/lockheed/constellation_l749.php

    Vickers Viscount
    Number built: 445
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vickers_Viscount
    http://www.airliners.net/aircraft-data/stats.main?id=380
    http://www.vickersviscount.net/Pages_Technical/700%20Series%20Specification%20Performance%20Weights%20and%20Dimensions.aspx
    http://www.vickersviscount.net/Pages_Technical/700%20Series%20Specification%20Content.aspx
    http://www.flugzeuginfo.net/acdata_php/acdata_viscount_en.php
    http://www.eastmidlandsairport.com/emaweb.nsf/content/AeroparkAircraftonDisplay/$File/viscount.pdf

    De Havilland Comet
    Number built: 114 (including prototypes)
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Havilland_Comet
    http://www.flugzeuginfo.net/acdata_php/acdata_dh106_en.php
    http://www.canadianwings.com/Aircraft/aircraftDetail.php?COMET-113
    http://www.aer.ita.br/~bmattos/mundo/airliner/comet.htm

    Antonov An-2
    Number built: 18,000+ (!)
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antonov_An-2
    http://www.an2flyers.org/an2specs.html
    http://www.sibwings.com/an2/manual.pdf
    http://www.classicwings-bavaria.com/html/biplane.php

    Tupolev Tu-104
    Number built: 201
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tupolev_Tu-104
    http://www.flugzeuginfo.net/acdata_php/acdata_tu104_en.php
    http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/tu-104.htm
    http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/tu-104-specs.htm
    http://aviation-safety.net/database/types/Tupolev-104/specs

    Tupolev Tu-134
    Number built: 852 (850 + 2 prototypes)
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tu-134
    http://www.airlines-inform.com/commercial-aircraft/Tu-134.html
    http://www.flugzeuginfo.net/acdata_php/acdata_tu134_en.php
    http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/tu-134.htm
    http://www.airliners.net/aircraft-data/stats.main?id=375


    I hope this helps.


    (in reply to Temple)
    Post #: 86
    RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests - 10/30/2013 9:58:43 PM   
    .Sirius


    Posts: 1404
    Joined: 1/18/2013
    Status: offline     		Hi will add and update all your comments for the next DB Builld
    quote:

    ORIGINAL: Mgellis


    quote:

    ORIGINAL: Temple

    When building my 1950 scenario, I noticed a lack of civilian and commercial aircraft to add. Only a neutral DC-3 was available. It's a low priority of course, but could we have a few more civilian and commercial prop planes for 1946-? Preferably the bigger ones, like DC-4s. Thanks


    Along these lines, a few ideas...

    Douglas DC-6
    Number built: 704
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Douglas_DC-6
    http://www.flugzeuginfo.net/acdata_php/acdata_dc6_en.php
    http://www.airlines-inform.com/commercial-aircraft/Douglas-DC-6%20.html
    http://www.airliners.net/aircraft-data/stats.main?id=190
    http://www.brinkley.cc/AC/dc6f.htm

    Douglas DC-4
    Number built: 80 DC-4 and 1,163 C-54/R5D
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DC-4
    http://www.airliners.net/aircraft-data/stats.main?id=189
    http://www.militaryfactory.com/aircraft/detail.asp?aircraft_id=110
    http://www.boeing.com/boeing/history/mdc/dc-4.page
    http://www.airlines-inform.com/commercial-aircraft/Douglas-DC-4.html

    Douglas DC-8
    Number built: 556
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Douglas_DC-8
    http://www.airliners.net/aircraft-data/stats.main?id=192
    http://www.dc-8.co.uk/specs.htm
    http://www.militaryfactory.com/aircraft/detail.asp?aircraft_id=244
    http://ialcargo.com/specs/dc8.pdf
    http://www.brinkley.cc/AC/dc873f.htm

    Lockheed Constellation
    Number built: 856
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_Constellation
    http://www.airlines-inform.com/commercial-aircraft/Lockheed-Constellation.html
    http://www.historynet.com/the-legendary-lockheed-constellation.htm
    http://www.aviation-history.com/lockheed/1049.html
    http://www.ruudleeuw.com/connie-text.htm
    http://www.mcchord.org/magazine/LockheedConstellation.pdf
    http://www.what2fly.com/manufacturer/lockheed/constellation_l749.php

    Vickers Viscount
    Number built: 445
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vickers_Viscount
    http://www.airliners.net/aircraft-data/stats.main?id=380
    http://www.vickersviscount.net/Pages_Technical/700%20Series%20Specification%20Performance%20Weights%20and%20Dimensions.aspx
    http://www.vickersviscount.net/Pages_Technical/700%20Series%20Specification%20Content.aspx
    http://www.flugzeuginfo.net/acdata_php/acdata_viscount_en.php
    http://www.eastmidlandsairport.com/emaweb.nsf/content/AeroparkAircraftonDisplay/$File/viscount.pdf

    De Havilland Comet
    Number built: 114 (including prototypes)
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Havilland_Comet
    http://www.flugzeuginfo.net/acdata_php/acdata_dh106_en.php
    http://www.canadianwings.com/Aircraft/aircraftDetail.php?COMET-113
    http://www.aer.ita.br/~bmattos/mundo/airliner/comet.htm

    Antonov An-2
    Number built: 18,000+ (!)
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antonov_An-2
    http://www.an2flyers.org/an2specs.html
    http://www.sibwings.com/an2/manual.pdf
    http://www.classicwings-bavaria.com/html/biplane.php

    Tupolev Tu-104
    Number built: 201
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tupolev_Tu-104
    http://www.flugzeuginfo.net/acdata_php/acdata_tu104_en.php
    http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/tu-104.htm
    http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/tu-104-specs.htm
    http://aviation-safety.net/database/types/Tupolev-104/specs

    Tupolev Tu-134
    Number built: 852 (850 + 2 prototypes)
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tu-134
    http://www.airlines-inform.com/commercial-aircraft/Tu-134.html
    http://www.flugzeuginfo.net/acdata_php/acdata_tu134_en.php
    http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/tu-134.htm
    http://www.airliners.net/aircraft-data/stats.main?id=375


    I hope this helps.





    _____________________________

    Paul aka Sirius
    Command Developer
    Warfaresims
    Cold War Data Base 1946-1979 Author

    Old radar men never die - Their echoes fade away in accordance with the inverse fourth power law

    (in reply to Mgellis)
    Post #: 87
    RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests - 10/30/2013 11:22:21 PM   
    Mgellis


    Posts: 2054
    Joined: 8/18/2007
    Status: offline
    quote:

    ORIGINAL: Temple

    When building my 1950 scenario, I noticed a lack of civilian and commercial aircraft to add. Only a neutral DC-3 was available. It's a low priority of course, but could we have a few more civilian and commercial prop planes for 1946-? Preferably the bigger ones, like DC-4s. Thanks


    And a few more...

    Yakovlev Yak-40
    Number built: 1,011
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yakovlev_Yak-40
    http://www.airliners.net/aircraft-data/stats.main?id=386
    http://www.flugzeuginfo.net/acdata_php/acdata_yak40_en.php

    de Havilland Canada DHC-4 Caribou
    Number built: 307
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Havilland_Canada_DHC-4_Caribou
    http://www.airliners.net/aircraft-data/stats.main?id=180
    http://www.militaryfactory.com/aircraft/detail.asp?aircraft_id=164
    http://www.flugzeuginfo.net/acdata_php/acdata_dhc4_en.php
    http://www.aviastar.org/air/canada/dehavilland_caribou.php

    de Havilland Canada DHC-6 Twin Otter
    Number built: 850+
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Havilland_Canada_DHC-6_Twin_Otter
    http://www.airliners.net/aircraft-data/stats.main?id=181
    http://www.719skvadron.no/dhc6/dhc6-spec.htm
    http://www.airlines-inform.com/commercial-aircraft/Twin-Otter.html

    Piper PA-31 Navajo
    Number built: 3942
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piper_PA-31_Navajo
    http://www.airliners.net/aircraft-data/stats.main?id=311
    https://www.aopa.org/Pilot-Resources/Aircraft-Ownership/Aircraft-Fact-Sheets/Piper-Navajo-Chieftain.aspx

    de Havilland Canada DHC-2 Beaver
    Number built: 1,657
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DHC-2
    http://www.dhc-2.com/Tech_Specs.html
    http://www.pilotfriend.com/aircraft%20performance/dehavilland/6.htm
    http://www.airlines-inform.com/commercial-aircraft/Beaver.html

    de Havilland Dove
    Number built: 542
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Havilland_Dove
    http://www.flugzeuginfo.net/acdata_php/acdata_dh104_en.php
    http://www.natureandtech.com/?cat=78
    http://www.airliners.net/aircraft-data/stats.main?id=184

    Convair CV-240
    Number built: 1,181 (all versions)
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convair_CV-240_family
    http://www.aviastar.org/air/usa/convair-240.php
    http://www.prop-liners.com/c240tech.htm
    http://www.airliners.net/aircraft-data/stats.main?id=169

    I hope this helps.


    (in reply to Temple)
    Post #: 88
    RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests - 10/31/2013 2:40:17 PM   
    RoryAndersonCDT

     

    Posts: 1830
    Joined: 6/16/2009
    Status: offline     		Is this thread a good place for CWDB errors? Loadout for Lincoln B.30 RAF 2000lb LDGP, RAF 250lb LDGP includes RAF 500lb LDGP not RAF 250lb LDGP.

    _____________________________

    Command Dev Team
    Technical Lead

    (in reply to Mgellis)
    Post #: 89
    RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests - 10/31/2013 3:38:17 PM   
    .Sirius


    Posts: 1404
    Joined: 1/18/2013
    Status: offline     		Noted
    quote:

    ORIGINAL: Baloogan

    Is this thread a good place for CWDB errors? Loadout for Lincoln B.30 RAF 2000lb LDGP, RAF 250lb LDGP includes RAF 500lb LDGP not RAF 250lb LDGP.



    _____________________________

    Paul aka Sirius
    Command Developer
    Warfaresims
    Cold War Data Base 1946-1979 Author

    Old radar men never die - Their echoes fade away in accordance with the inverse fourth power law

    (in reply to RoryAndersonCDT)
    Post #: 90
    Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
    All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Mods and Scenarios >> RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
    Jump to:





    New Messages No New Messages
    Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
    Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
     Post New Thread
     Reply to Message
     Post New Poll
     Submit Vote
     Delete My Own Post
     Delete My Own Thread
     Rate Posts


    Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

    2.156