Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Spanking of the Sheep! - JocMeister(WA) vs Pelton(Axis)

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the West >> After Action Reports >> RE: Spanking of the Sheep! - JocMeister(WA) vs Pelton(Axis) Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Spanking of the Sheep! - JocMeister(WA) vs Pelton(... - 1/30/2015 4:56:21 AM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Seminole
Probably not.
You're sitting in rough terrain and he likely only has the Schmalz PzG Bde in Messina with a routed and non-routed Italian sidekicks.
The ZOC movement costs to cut you off and attack would likely preclude getting back into Messina.
I bet he sits tight and waits for you to force him out.


You were right. No counterattack thankfully. Takes some getting used to playing a human. The AI seems to have less concerns with ZOC.

(in reply to Seminole)
Post #: 31
RE: Spanking of the Sheep! - JocMeister(WA) vs Pelton(... - 1/30/2015 5:00:22 AM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: loki100

I'd go with this, he can't create a situation for a rout, pushing you back will cost him fatigue, so I'd suspect he'll sit tight.

More broadly think you are right to emphasis the mindset of caution and only moving when your air power can really support your ground operations. What is not clear is whether such a methodical approach may end up grinding the Germans down so you can cut loose or if its too conservative a strategy? But given the disasters in a few other AARs of taking chances and over-extending, think you have made the right choice.


It will be very interesting to compare my game and Baelfiins. He seems to be pushing a lot harder then I am so it will be a good comparison. My reasoning for taking it cautiously is that its sooo hard gaining VPs as the WA but it extremely easy to lose them.

My gut feeling says the VP system will require a lot of tweaking to get it right. I don´t think it has the proper balance yet but I have been wrong before.

(in reply to loki100)
Post #: 32
RE: Spanking of the Sheep! - JocMeister(WA) vs Pelton(... - 1/30/2015 5:06:36 AM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: obvert

Week long turns might make me crazy!

Can you just set the strikes for one day, not three? Seems for big Rhur valley industry that is well guarded this might be good policy, just in case. Also it means he still has to guard it, but you can then set a bunch of other missions at higher frequency elsewhere.

Do you notice larger bomber concentrations having more combined protection, or is there a threshold where it doesn't really matter?

Do you feel you have enough recon assets to really get a view of at least the main area you're concentrating on?


Its mostly a matter of adjustment. I don´t like the loss of control but I LOVE the fact that you can finish a game in a couple of months rather then a couple of years. In comparison to AE it actually makes the game playable.

And once you set everything up like ADs and sort out your OOB you can do a turn in fairly quickly. I take about 30 minutes to do a turn. Once I get more experience I can probably get it done in 15 minutes.

Having played a lot of AE (as you know ) I don´t think I can go back to to it now. If they can ace the naval portion as they did the air this game will surpass AE in every aspect. What they did with the air is pure brillance. Whoever thought out the idea of using ADs should get a medal.

(in reply to obvert)
Post #: 33
RE: Spanking of the Sheep! - JocMeister(WA) vs Pelton(... - 1/30/2015 5:08:25 AM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Helpless

quote:

For example in my AI game I just sent a deep strike into Germany to hit a V-weapons factory. On the way there I suffer multiple intercepts losing a lot of planes (40+). But due to the week long turn I had specified the strike to go on for 3 days...so I suffer the losses for 2 more raids.


One way to setup reaction to such events is to set minimum AC requirement for the AD, so it would cancel next days strikes in case of heavy losses.


Thats actually brilliant. Never thought of that!

(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 34
RE: Spanking of the Sheep! - JocMeister(WA) vs Pelton(... - 1/30/2015 8:38:57 AM   
soeren01

 

Posts: 393
Joined: 6/25/2004
From: Bayern
Status: offline
If you have problems hitting something with Bomber Command night attacks, try staying within oboe range.

17.3.4.1. OBOE Radar Targeting System
OBOE ground radar allows better night bombing of
factory targets when bombing within 27 hexes of any of
the following four locations 58,183 – 76, 182 – 87,180 –
90,170. This capability exists during for the entire game.


_____________________________

soeren01, formerly known as Soeren
CoG FoF
PacWar WIR BoB BTR UV WITP WITE WITW

(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 35
RE: Spanking of the Sheep! - JocMeister(WA) vs Pelton(... - 1/30/2015 8:43:26 AM   
marion61

 

Posts: 1688
Joined: 9/8/2011
Status: offline
I'm not sure that slow and methodical will work either. If you can't build up some positive vp's in '43, you can't afford to attack when you land in France, and your losing men just being shipped thru friendly sea lanes. Your absolutely correct about WA air power, and no invasion should land without it. The axis air force has more than enough planes to ruin a halfassed invasion, and the WA cannot afford to screw up, so go all in or don't go.

(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 36
RE: Spanking of the Sheep! - JocMeister(WA) vs Pelton(... - 1/30/2015 11:14:51 AM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: soeren01

If you have problems hitting something with Bomber Command night attacks, try staying within oboe range.

17.3.4.1. OBOE Radar Targeting System
OBOE ground radar allows better night bombing of
factory targets when bombing within 27 hexes of any of
the following four locations 58,183 – 76, 182 – 87,180 –
90,170. This capability exists during for the entire game.



Thanks! Didn´t know that. I think the Ruhr are within 27 hexes though?


quote:

ORIGINAL: meklore61

I'm not sure that slow and methodical will work either. If you can't build up some positive vp's in '43, you can't afford to attack when you land in France, and your losing men just being shipped thru friendly sea lanes. Your absolutely correct about WA air power, and no invasion should land without it. The axis air force has more than enough planes to ruin a halfassed invasion, and the WA cannot afford to screw up, so go all in or don't go.


Yeah, I think I will probably end up with a big negative score. I just can´t seem to get any positive VPs. Those inital -36 VPs I began with doesn´t help either. Pelton knows I need to hit the U-boat factories and he is covering them well. The lower AC pools in the last patch means I can´t maintain the losses hitting the U-boats. Add to that the constant loss of shipping and drowned troops adding negative VPs...I think I have had 1(!) turn with positive VPs so far. On top of that the U-boats seem to repair REALLY fast. Right now they are repairing faster then I can bomb them.

Very hard to get a positive score as the WA. Only thing that give you VPs are cities and bombing. And cities require heavy losses on the ground and the bombers are all tied up trying to keep the U-boat negative VPs from spiraling out of control.

Then again playing against Pelton probably isn´t a good measure of things.

(in reply to soeren01)
Post #: 37
RE: Spanking of the Sheep! - JocMeister(WA) vs Pelton(... - 1/30/2015 11:45:59 AM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline
______________________________________________________________________________

Turn 5 and 6. August 1943
______________________________________________________________________________

------------------------
Bombing the Reich
------------------------

On turn 5 we hit smaller targets around the bigger cities in Northern Germany. I needed a turn with low losses to rest and recover.

On turn 6 though we have to go after the U-boats again. Negative VPs went from -2 to -6 and its still repairing. Its a black day for Bomber Command when 169 bombers fail to return. We do inflict some damage though so its not totally in vain.

The 8th hit Kiel again witch had repaired all or most prior damage. Its a good raid considering the relatively low losses. I can only afford to send them once per week now. Another FG of P38s arrived this turn and was immediately sent to the 8th. Hopefully they can make a big difference!






Attachment (1)

< Message edited by JocMeister -- 1/30/2015 12:46:36 PM >

(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 38
RE: Spanking of the Sheep! - JocMeister(WA) vs Pelton(... - 1/30/2015 11:50:24 AM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline
______________________________________________________________________________

Turn 5 and 6. August 1943
______________________________________________________________________________

------------------------
Mediterranean
------------------------


Strategic and Tactical take a pounding hitting Messina. Lots and lots of AA. Luckily we evict the defenders on the first try using overwhelming force.

Progress on the western Island is slow. But the British XIII Corps is coming to help.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 39
RE: Spanking of the Sheep! - JocMeister(WA) vs Pelton(... - 1/30/2015 11:50:59 AM   
Helpless


Posts: 15793
Joined: 8/27/2004
Status: offline
quote:

Its a black day for Bomber Command when 169 bombers fail to return. We do inflict some damage though so its not totally in vain.


Could you post air losses details for the night raid to Bremenhaven? Thanks.

_____________________________

Pavel Zagzin
WITE/WITW/WITE-2 Development

(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 40
RE: Spanking of the Sheep! - JocMeister(WA) vs Pelton(... - 1/30/2015 12:16:05 PM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Helpless

quote:

Its a black day for Bomber Command when 169 bombers fail to return. We do inflict some damage though so its not totally in vain.


Could you post air losses details for the night raid to Bremenhaven? Thanks.


Ah, its actually a daylight raid.

(in reply to Helpless)
Post #: 41
RE: Spanking of the Sheep! - JocMeister(WA) vs Pelton(... - 1/30/2015 12:31:49 PM   
Helpless


Posts: 15793
Joined: 8/27/2004
Status: offline
quote:

Ah, its actually a daylight raid.


Oh.. got scared of such NF performance, which is boosted a bit in coming patch.

_____________________________

Pavel Zagzin
WITE/WITW/WITE-2 Development

(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 42
RE: Spanking of the Sheep! - JocMeister(WA) vs Pelton(... - 1/30/2015 12:45:03 PM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Helpless

quote:

Ah, its actually a daylight raid.


Oh.. got scared of such NF performance, which is boosted a bit in coming patch.



(in reply to Helpless)
Post #: 43
RE: Spanking of the Sheep! - JocMeister(WA) vs Pelton(... - 1/30/2015 4:24:23 PM   
Q-Ball


Posts: 7336
Joined: 6/25/2002
From: Chicago, Illinois
Status: offline
Joc, nice AAR as usual

Looks like you learned the hard way, as I did, but daylight bombing with no escorts over areas of Germany covered by fighters is a bad idea.

One thing Pelton is learning the hard way vs. Baelfin is that Corsica and Sardinia and traps for the Germans, so when Italy flips, you should be able to walk-in.

Good luck!



_____________________________


(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 44
RE: Spanking of the Sheep! - JocMeister(WA) vs Pelton(... - 1/30/2015 5:06:26 PM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Q-Ball

Joc, nice AAR as usual

Looks like you learned the hard way, as I did, but daylight bombing with no escorts over areas of Germany covered by fighters is a bad idea.

One thing Pelton is learning the hard way vs. Baelfin is that Corsica and Sardinia and traps for the Germans, so when Italy flips, you should be able to walk-in.

Good luck!


Thanks Brad!

I pretty much knew the outcome of the raid. But I had to knock out the U-boat factories and oddly enough the British have far more robust pools then the US. Lost the same amount of escorted 8th planes 3-4 turns back and their pools are critical right now. The new patch makes things extremely tight.

I have been looking at Corsica and Sardinia. Might go there as I messed up my prepping soooo badly. Was going to change the prepp on two Amphibs but did it on the wrong two. Being a server game I couldn´t go back when I realized my mistake 2 minutes after. So now I have to wait...and wait...and wait.

Learning by doing.

(in reply to Q-Ball)
Post #: 45
RE: Spanking of the Sheep! - JocMeister(WA) vs Pelton(... - 2/1/2015 8:29:30 AM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline
______________________________________________________________________________

Turn 7 August 1943
______________________________________________________________________________

Forgot to take screens again.

Basically I´m in major problems right now. Despite getting some good damage done to he U-boats factories last turn (and wrecking Bomber Command in the process) VP loss increase from -5 to -7 this turn. I had to stand BC down due to low MRL. And thats not the worst of it...

8th AF is down to only about 70% strength and dropping each turn... P38 pool is gone. B17 pool is gone. B24 pool is almost gone...so each turn I will get weaker and Pelton has less damage to repair increasing the VP loss.

Not looking good. 2 more turns until I get access to the B17G. Pretty frustrating to see 700 of them in the pool while not being able to use them. After they become available it will be at least one more turn until I´m back to full strength.I´m probably looking at a 30-50 VP loss to U-boats during those turns.

So far I have only had "time" to switch BC and the 8th from U-boats to something else for 1 turn. The only turn I had a positive VP score (+2). Clearly I´m doing something very wrong. Need to figure out what. Perhaps its just better to ignore the U-boats and try to balance the negative score with a positive bomber score?

Sicily will be cleared next turn. But due to my prior mistakes on the Amphib prepping the next invasion will be some time off. I though about crossing over at Medina but trying that in a AI game ended in disaster. Not worth the chance.

Simply put. I´m f*****d. -48 VPs and dropping faster and faster. The Luftwaffe is pretty much intact and so is the Wehrmacht. This while both the 8th and BC are pretty much wrecked. So my only means to gain positive VPs are pretty much shot. And soon the weather turns bad. In my AI game I had crappy weather over Germany from November to April. By this time I also had over 150 positive VPs instead of a negative score... I think my hope of making a German minor victory is over.

< Message edited by JocMeister -- 2/1/2015 9:50:18 AM >

(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 46
RE: Spanking of the Sheep! - JocMeister(WA) vs Pelton(... - 2/1/2015 9:16:21 AM   
JeffroK


Posts: 6391
Joined: 1/26/2005
Status: offline
The air war against Germany requires patience, you will never win the war in 1 turn, but as you have found out you cant put a serious dent in the Allied efforts.
Hold back the deep raids by 8AF until you can escort them.

You have a long war to fight, keep slogging away and work out what strategies & tactics will work.

_____________________________

Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum

(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 47
RE: Spanking of the Sheep! - JocMeister(WA) vs Pelton(... - 2/1/2015 9:27:41 AM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: JeffK

The air war against Germany requires patience, you will never win the war in 1 turn, but as you have found out you cant put a serious dent in the Allied efforts.
Hold back the deep raids by 8AF until you can escort them.

You have a long war to fight, keep slogging away and work out what strategies & tactics will work.


You can´t have patience with the U-boats. The negative VPs can get very big. -5 last turn and -7 this turn and that is with a fair bit of damage already done.

Except the 1st turn when the 8th hit Danzig all raids have been to the Hamburg area and the u-boat factories there. All raids have been escorted.

(in reply to JeffroK)
Post #: 48
RE: Spanking of the Sheep! - JocMeister(WA) vs Pelton(... - 2/1/2015 10:25:37 AM   
loki100


Posts: 10920
Joined: 10/20/2012
From: Utlima Thule
Status: offline
I'm coming to see the two bombing results (manpower vs u-boats/v weapons) as a single number to be honest, even vs AI I can't improve on a +2 (say after about 6 turns when you've wrecked a lot of u-boat factories) and the balance will simply vary between the two aspects.

You can use 8 Air for Manpower rather than just for industry and that can help.

I think, especially against a player, you need to be creative. Look for where the fighter intercepts are, plan for 1 turn to go round that (north and south). Vary the pattern of raids. For the longer range ones don't ignore the merits of a one day really big raid (at worst, all those fighters are then left looking rather isolated for the other 6 days).

While over time, I reckon that HI (and to a lesser extent fuel/oil) is the best target to wreck the German economy, that won't pay off in 1943, you need the additional stress on German capacity of the late 43/44 Soviet offensives. As such, you can probably not fuss too much over HI till the autumn of 1943

I'm not sure about any of this, nor how what works vs AI stands up in MP, but the air war seems to be a huge exercise in linear programming and even if you do it by heuristics its worth thinking that way. And mixing stuff up, do the same raid every week (says he who tends to do this to the Ruhr), you'll get much the same results.

As set up, the air game is effective rock-paper-scissors, with both sides trying to find the ideal set up


< Message edited by loki100 -- 2/1/2015 11:26:37 AM >


_____________________________


(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 49
RE: Spanking of the Sheep! - JocMeister(WA) vs Pelton(... - 2/1/2015 10:39:21 AM   
marion61

 

Posts: 1688
Joined: 9/8/2011
Status: offline
Are plotting your own course to the targets? You can avoid a great deal of flak and intercepts by flying over the North Sea and then turning into the targets. Use Shift-o to see where and what flak your facing, and JeffK is right, don't fly unescorted. Your losses will be unsustainable, but that doesn't mean you can get Danzig and the other U-Boat pens. Just make sure your bombers have partial escorts, and plot a course where they escort you thru the fighter cover. Once you get to a certain point in Germany, the fighter cover drops off, so you need escorts to that point.

Use Fighter Command and 2nd RAF Tactical to recon air fields on the approaches to to your targets and use your FB's to take out fighter's within range and on your bomber approaches. Bomber Cmd can't reach much past Wilhelmshaven, and you won't have many escorts for them. Take all your night fighters from Fighter Command, and your other English based Air Commands, and put them into bomber command as escorts. Change their load outs so they have the fuel to escort them into Germany, and put cannons on them with fuel if you can. Also change out all your P40's and P47's in 8th AF. Get the P38's and P51's in as escorts as soon as you can. Make your raid altitudes low enough for all the planes in Bomber Command to fly the mission, and stagger the days that you fly, and not the altitudes your flying. You want one big raid, instead of two or three medium raids at different altitudes. Also make sure your not dropping incendiaries on Sub Pens, check your bomber loads. You can minimize your losses, but it takes a little work to accomplish but it's do able. I can't stress this enough, but RECON! Strategic Recon is your best friend, and don't fly Recon unescorted either. Those 8th AF Recon planes are vital for a good bombing campaign. Split your recon flights up so that you can fly recon for Bomber Command also.

The Strategic Bombing Campaign can't be won easily, and you have to be thinking a few months ahead. It's all about the long haul, and don't play into his strengths, play into your own strengths and be patient.

< Message edited by meklore61 -- 2/1/2015 11:42:27 AM >

(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 50
RE: Spanking of the Sheep! - JocMeister(WA) vs Pelton(... - 2/1/2015 10:49:28 AM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: loki100

I think, especially against a player, you need to be creative. Look for where the fighter intercepts are, plan for 1 turn to go round that (north and south). Vary the pattern of raids. For the longer range ones don't ignore the merits of a one day really big raid (at worst, all those fighters are then left looking rather isolated for the other 6 days).

While over time, I reckon that HI (and to a lesser extent fuel/oil) is the best target to wreck the German economy, that won't pay off in 1943, you need the additional stress on German capacity of the late 43/44 Soviet offensives. As such, you can probably not fuss too much over HI till the autumn of 1943

I'm not sure about any of this, nor how what works vs AI stands up in MP, but the air war seems to be a huge exercise in linear programming and even if you do it by heuristics its worth thinking that way. And mixing stuff up, do the same raid every week (says he who tends to do this to the Ruhr), you'll get much the same results.

As set up, the air game is effective rock-paper-scissors, with both sides trying to find the ideal set up



Good thoughts. The problem is that (from my limited experience) the U-boat penalties are too harsh. These massive penalties pretty much anchors the WA player to hit U-boats during 43 or suffer a massive VP hit. But this also have the drawback of allowing the Axis player to focus most of his AA and fighter defenses around U-boat targets. This increases losses to beyond what the WA can sustain. As an example both my B17 and P38 pools are now empty. Despite that I havn´t knocked enough U-boats out to avoid a negative VP drain.

Personally I feel I lack any kind of freedom (or creativity) to choose targets myself. I simply HAVE to target the U-boats. I´m not sure I like that from a game perspective. Historically accurate or not in the end the game has to be fun. And its not much fun when the only option (as it seems from my POV) is to throw everything you have at a certain location where you opponent know you will come.

Granted this is only from one game and a very skilled opponent. Will be interesting to see how Baelfiin ends up. Especially since he seem to have ignored the U-boats up to turn 9.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Baelfiin
Turn 8-9ish
U-boat VP losses are out of control.


Quite a different approach from mine. And he may have been able to counter the VP loss from U-boats with positive VPs coming in from hitting MAN/HI in other parts of Germany.

I love figuring stuff like this out. Eventually I will.

(in reply to loki100)
Post #: 51
RE: Spanking of the Sheep! - JocMeister(WA) vs Pelton(... - 2/1/2015 10:58:40 AM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: meklore61

Are plotting your own course to the targets? You can avoid a great deal of flak and intercepts by flying over the North Sea and then turning into the targets. Use Shift-o to see where and what flak your facing, and JeffK is right, don't fly unescorted. Your losses will be unsustainable, but that doesn't mean you can get Danzig and the other U-Boat pens. Just make sure your bombers have partial escorts, and plot a course where they escort you thru the fighter cover. Once you get to a certain point in Germany, the fighter cover drops off, so you need escorts to that point.


Yes, of course I am. All raids fly over water as much as possible. I´ve only flown unescorted once and that was on the first turn to Danzig.

quote:

ORIGINAL: meklore61
Use Fighter Command and 2nd RAF Tactical to recon air fields on the approaches to to your targets and use your FB's to take out fighter's within range and on your bomber approaches. Bomber Cmd can't reach much past Wilhelmshaven, and you won't have many escorts for them. Take all your night fighters from Fighter Command, and your other English based Air Commands, and put them into bomber command as escorts. Change their load outs so they have the fuel to escort them into Germany, and put cannons on them with fuel if you can. Also change out all your P40's and P47's in 8th AF. Get the P38's and P51's in as escorts as soon as you can. Make your raid altitudes low enough for all the planes in Bomber Command to fly the mission, and stagger the days that you fly, and not the altitudes your flying. You want one big raid, instead of two or three medium raids at different altitudes. Also make sure your not dropping incendiaries on Sub Pens, check your bomber loads. You can minimize your losses, but it takes a little work to accomplish but it's do able. I can't stress this enough, but RECON! Strategic Recon is your best friend, and don't fly Recon unescorted either. Those 8th AF Recon planes are vital for a good bombing campaign. Split your recon flights up so that you can fly recon for Bomber Command also.

The Strategic Bombing Campaign can't be won easily, and you have to be thinking a few months ahead. It's all about the long haul, and don't play into his strengths, play into your own strengths and be patient.


Thanks for the advice. I´m doing almost exactly what you suggest. The only thing I´m not doing is hitting AFs. From my AI game I learned that hitting AFs with FBs is very, very costly in terms of losses. Right now I can´t afford any additional losses. The fighters I have good pool of (Spits, Hurris, P39s and P40s) are too short legged to reach Peltons AFs in Europe. The only Fighters that can are the P38 and they are all devoted to the 8th and their pool is shot.




< Message edited by JocMeister -- 2/1/2015 12:32:15 PM >

(in reply to marion61)
Post #: 52
RE: Spanking of the Sheep! - JocMeister(WA) vs Pelton(... - 2/1/2015 11:09:23 AM   
loki100


Posts: 10920
Joined: 10/20/2012
From: Utlima Thule
Status: offline
knowing something of Pelton's approach (from WiTE), he tends to be very single minded about what he has decided is the key variable(s) ... and since he is a good player he is often right.

But that either means he has found a game breaking approach [1] or there are responses. Baelfin may be onto something. Knowing that allied players are going for U-boats, I'd suspect he will have set up his fighters and flak with that in mind. If so, writing off that line of VPs may be a good strategy. Also given he is tending to strip France to reinforce Italy, I'd not ignore his rail yards. Not only does that reduce his rail capacity, it also will seriously increase the (movement) costs he'll face when he returns stuff to France?

If you can hamper his movement, and damage his industry, you may get the capacity to run up late game VPs (or not )

edit - re fighters, don't forget to think about swapping them to use long range fuel tanks, that'll help contest air superiority in some areas where he might be hitting your bombers?

[1] I *think* this is going to be harder in WiTW as there are few if any key mechanisms that sit outside the core rule set, the worst in WiTE is its version of supply prioritisation where the magic supply fairy added extra supply to HQs (which wasn't deducted from the overall stock). Add to this the little known ability of Ju-88s/He-111s etc to act as flying petrol stations has always made logistics in WiTE open to abuse (partially closed in the latest patches)

< Message edited by loki100 -- 2/1/2015 12:10:17 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 53
RE: Spanking of the Sheep! - JocMeister(WA) vs Pelton(... - 2/1/2015 11:47:03 AM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: loki100

knowing something of Pelton's approach (from WiTE), he tends to be very single minded about what he has decided is the key variable(s) ... and since he is a good player he is often right.

But that either means he has found a game breaking approach [1] or there are responses. Baelfin may be onto something. Knowing that allied players are going for U-boats, I'd suspect he will have set up his fighters and flak with that in mind. If so, writing off that line of VPs may be a good strategy. Also given he is tending to strip France to reinforce Italy, I'd not ignore his rail yards. Not only does that reduce his rail capacity, it also will seriously increase the (movement) costs he'll face when he returns stuff to France?


You are right about Pelton I think. He has most of his Fighters covering the U-boats. The rest are covering the Ruhr I believe. NFs seem to be concentrated around the Ruhr as well. So he and I seem to have the same opinion regarding the importance of the U-boat VPs. Which is probably bad news for me since I´m clearly loosing that fight!

I think he wrote something in one of his AARs about settings he was using to attack incoming raids. Can´t find it now though. I think he was using AS ADs rather then relying on automatic intercepts!

I have been using Medium bombers to hit Railyards and Ports in France since T2. At day. Completely unopposed so almost no losses. Hopefully this can have some impact later on.

quote:

ORIGINAL: loki100
edit - re fighters, don't forget to think about swapping them to use long range fuel tanks, that'll help contest air superiority in some areas where he might be hitting your bombers?

[1] I *think* this is going to be harder in WiTW as there are few if any key mechanisms that sit outside the core rule set, the worst in WiTE is its version of supply prioritisation where the magic supply fairy added extra supply to HQs (which wasn't deducted from the overall stock). Add to this the little known ability of Ju-88s/He-111s etc to act as flying petrol stations has always made logistics in WiTE open to abuse (partially closed in the latest patches)


He is keeping his planes out of reach for anything but P38s (I´m out of those) and P51 (extremely few left). Not sure if I´m better off using Air superiority or Escort? Can´t do both. At least not now!

(in reply to loki100)
Post #: 54
RE: Spanking of the Sheep! - JocMeister(WA) vs Pelton(... - 2/1/2015 12:36:12 PM   
marion61

 

Posts: 1688
Joined: 9/8/2011
Status: offline
I'm playing Pelton also, but we are only on turn 4. I'm only losing 300 or so planes a turn over the entire western front, and right now it's about a 3 to 1 loss ration which I can sustain and he can't. He has his air force protecting his Uboats, and for now his fighters are not in range to attack, but don't use your P38s for anything but escorting. I'm not understanding why your pools are so low, but you get a huge infusion of planes late in 43 and I don't know what your cut off for morale to fly is, but you can reduce operational losses by not flying every day and putting groups on rest if they fall below 50 to 60 morale. 8th AF can take out sub pens in a city in just a few days of bombing. I took out all the sub pens in Hamburg on turn two with 3 days of bombing. 20 uboats and 20 armor factories destroyed. According to recon.

I only asked if you plotted paths because the ai loves to plot courses thru a lot of flak, and your smart to plot your own paths. Make sure you check your air battles over Germany. See where his planes are and where he's intercepting you and at what altitudes. Change up your altitudes every few turns because a big difference in altitude can decrease his interceptions.

(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 55
RE: Spanking of the Sheep! - JocMeister(WA) vs Pelton(... - 2/1/2015 12:43:01 PM   
Baelfiin


Posts: 2978
Joined: 6/7/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: JocMeister

quote:

ORIGINAL: loki100

I think, especially against a player, you need to be creative. Look for where the fighter intercepts are, plan for 1 turn to go round that (north and south). Vary the pattern of raids. For the longer range ones don't ignore the merits of a one day really big raid (at worst, all those fighters are then left looking rather isolated for the other 6 days).

While over time, I reckon that HI (and to a lesser extent fuel/oil) is the best target to wreck the German economy, that won't pay off in 1943, you need the additional stress on German capacity of the late 43/44 Soviet offensives. As such, you can probably not fuss too much over HI till the autumn of 1943

I'm not sure about any of this, nor how what works vs AI stands up in MP, but the air war seems to be a huge exercise in linear programming and even if you do it by heuristics its worth thinking that way. And mixing stuff up, do the same raid every week (says he who tends to do this to the Ruhr), you'll get much the same results.

As set up, the air game is effective rock-paper-scissors, with both sides trying to find the ideal set up




Good thoughts. The problem is that (from my limited experience) the U-boat penalties are too harsh. These massive penalties pretty much anchors the WA player to hit U-boats during 43 or suffer a massive VP hit. But this also have the drawback of allowing the Axis player to focus most of his AA and fighter defenses around U-boat targets. This increases losses to beyond what the WA can sustain. As an example both my B17 and P38 pools are now empty. Despite that I havn´t knocked enough U-boats out to avoid a negative VP drain.

Personally I feel I lack any kind of freedom (or creativity) to choose targets myself. I simply HAVE to target the U-boats. I´m not sure I like that from a game perspective. Historically accurate or not in the end the game has to be fun. And its not much fun when the only option (as it seems from my POV) is to throw everything you have at a certain location where you opponent know you will come.

Granted this is only from one game and a very skilled opponent. Will be interesting to see how Baelfiin ends up. Especially since he seem to have ignored the U-boats up to turn 9.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Baelfiin
Turn 8-9ish
U-boat VP losses are out of control.


Quite a different approach from mine. And he may have been able to counter the VP loss from U-boats with positive VPs coming in from hitting MAN/HI in other parts of Germany.

I love figuring stuff like this out. Eventually I will.

You also can score bomb points from hitting fuel/oil targets outside of Germany. The thing about going deep into Germany after the Uboats is that by the time you get there you have had a chance to be intercepted by every fighter in Germany. In my game with Pelton I got my head handed to me early and I had to make a conscious decision to NOT go after Uboats and just deal with the VP loss until September ish when the b17g's come online and I had enough p38 and p51 built up.
If the Luftwaffe is concentrated in northern Germany, try blasting the fuel and oil in Belgium and France.
If you decide to go after a uboat target, only go with 8th air force at 31k plus. Make sure you are going only once per day for however many days you bomb for that turn. And then make sure to max out requested aircraft for the raid, and put a minimum of 96 required.

BTW I don't think the VP's losses for U-boats are too harsh, good German players are not going to make it easy to go after them without losses.

_____________________________

"We are going to attack all night, and attack tomorrow morning..... If we are not victorious, let no one come back alive!" -- Patton
WITE-Beta
WITW-Alpha
The Logistics Phase is like Black Magic and Voodoo all rolled into one.

(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 56
RE: Spanking of the Sheep! - JocMeister(WA) vs Pelton(... - 2/1/2015 1:42:22 PM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Baelfiin

You also can score bomb points from hitting fuel/oil targets outside of Germany. The thing about going deep into Germany after the Uboats is that by the time you get there you have had a chance to be intercepted by every fighter in Germany. In my game with Pelton I got my head handed to me early and I had to make a conscious decision to NOT go after Uboats and just deal with the VP loss until September ish when the b17g's come online and I had enough p38 and p51 built up.
If the Luftwaffe is concentrated in northern Germany, try blasting the fuel and oil in Belgium and France.
If you decide to go after a uboat target, only go with 8th air force at 31k plus. Make sure you are going only once per day for however many days you bomb for that turn. And then make sure to max out requested aircraft for the raid, and put a minimum of 96 required.

BTW I don't think the VP's losses for U-boats are too harsh, good German players are not going to make it easy to go after them without losses.


Well, I havn´t been going deep into Germany. I´ve been hitting the U-boat factories around Hamburg. That means I can make 95% of the trip over the North sea minimizing losses. It also means P38 can escort all the way. My thinking was that it would minimize losses to sustainable levels. I was wrong.

I´ll try to up the altitude to 31k and see if losses drop a bit. I feel I have to keep going for the U-boats now or the losses have been in vain. I´m in too deep to back down now.

Obviously you made a different choice and I´m can´t wait to compare results. I hope you will continue to update your AAR?

I think they may be too harsh in the sense that it might force the allied player to go after the U-boats regardless of losses. Obviously I have nothing more then a gut feeling to back that up. I think your game might be a good indicator on if I´m right or not. I HOPE I´m wrong because clearly there should be other options.

(in reply to Baelfiin)
Post #: 57
RE: Spanking of the Sheep! - JocMeister(WA) vs Pelton(... - 2/1/2015 2:57:44 PM   
loki100


Posts: 10920
Joined: 10/20/2012
From: Utlima Thule
Status: offline
re the VPs, I think the game design problem is with no representation of the naval war the designers need something to reflect the large diversion of effort that went into effectively beating the U-boats over 1943. So the WA either pay the price in the currency of VPs or of diverted effort?

Now it may well be that the game is yet to be balanced in VP terms, that I suspect will take quite a few completed games to come to a judgement over, but I think they are on the right lines with the mechanism. The problem with this type of routine, which is to some extent outside the games' core systems, is that is where imbalances more easily arise.

If Pelton is using AS directives, then things that occur to me are:

a) he takes some operational losses if you are there or not?
b) go in mob handed on just 1 or 2 days, so he flies the rest of time to no effect
c) annoy him by hitting something else most of the time, then do raids say 1 week in three over Hamburg et al.

All this 'advice' may well be, as in my local venacular, complete mince, its one problem when playing someone very able is they seem to have all the options closed off and seemingly more capacity than appears reasonable. I'm in a roughly similar situation in my current WiTE PBEM where all I seem to do is to play into my opponents hands - so face the choice of sticking to what may work in the long term, or coming up with something new (that may well in reality work no better)

good fun really


_____________________________


(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 58
RE: Spanking of the Sheep! - JocMeister(WA) vs Pelton(... - 2/1/2015 3:41:12 PM   
Baelfiin


Posts: 2978
Joined: 6/7/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: JocMeister


quote:

ORIGINAL: Baelfiin

You also can score bomb points from hitting fuel/oil targets outside of Germany. The thing about going deep into Germany after the Uboats is that by the time you get there you have had a chance to be intercepted by every fighter in Germany. In my game with Pelton I got my head handed to me early and I had to make a conscious decision to NOT go after Uboats and just deal with the VP loss until September ish when the b17g's come online and I had enough p38 and p51 built up.
If the Luftwaffe is concentrated in northern Germany, try blasting the fuel and oil in Belgium and France.
If you decide to go after a uboat target, only go with 8th air force at 31k plus. Make sure you are going only once per day for however many days you bomb for that turn. And then make sure to max out requested aircraft for the raid, and put a minimum of 96 required.

BTW I don't think the VP's losses for U-boats are too harsh, good German players are not going to make it easy to go after them without losses.


Well, I havn´t been going deep into Germany. I´ve been hitting the U-boat factories around Hamburg. That means I can make 95% of the trip over the North sea minimizing losses. It also means P38 can escort all the way. My thinking was that it would minimize losses to sustainable levels. I was wrong.

I´ll try to up the altitude to 31k and see if losses drop a bit. I feel I have to keep going for the U-boats now or the losses have been in vain. I´m in too deep to back down now.

Obviously you made a different choice and I´m can´t wait to compare results. I hope you will continue to update your AAR?

I think they may be too harsh in the sense that it might force the allied player to go after the U-boats regardless of losses. Obviously I have nothing more then a gut feeling to back that up. I think your game might be a good indicator on if I´m right or not. I HOPE I´m wrong because clearly there should be other options.

If its out of p47 and spit range is what I mean by deep into Germany.
My last screenshot of bombing raid at U-boats I took the entire 8th air force to Hamburg 1 raid a day for 3 days.
300 plus p38 and p51's (for some reason only could get 144 escorts per raid)
600 plus b17 b24 (only would fly 330ish per raid)
I faced raid1 300 fighters
raid2 280
raid3 254
My losses from flak and a2a-- 44 fighters, 64 bombers, Germans 23 fighters
Bombed the U-boat factory from 27k and did 79 percent damage to 35 factories.
The next turn U-boat points went down to -1
I am actually happy that I didn't lose more planes on the first raid being outnumbered 2-1 in fighters.
Its hard for me to do really good aar with server game but I will try to put some air details into the next one vp charts etc.
One thing is for sure, my experience is that if you play Pelton, bring your a+game 8)


_____________________________

"We are going to attack all night, and attack tomorrow morning..... If we are not victorious, let no one come back alive!" -- Patton
WITE-Beta
WITW-Alpha
The Logistics Phase is like Black Magic and Voodoo all rolled into one.

(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 59
RE: Spanking of the Sheep! - JocMeister(WA) vs Pelton(... - 2/1/2015 4:03:38 PM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: meklore61

I'm playing Pelton also, but we are only on turn 4. I'm only losing 300 or so planes a turn over the entire western front, and right now it's about a 3 to 1 loss ration which I can sustain and he can't. He has his air force protecting his Uboats, and for now his fighters are not in range to attack, but don't use your P38s for anything but escorting. I'm not understanding why your pools are so low, but you get a huge infusion of planes late in 43 and I don't know what your cut off for morale to fly is, but you can reduce operational losses by not flying every day and putting groups on rest if they fall below 50 to 60 morale. 8th AF can take out sub pens in a city in just a few days of bombing. I took out all the sub pens in Hamburg on turn two with 3 days of bombing. 20 uboats and 20 armor factories destroyed. According to recon.

I only asked if you plotted paths because the ai loves to plot courses thru a lot of flak, and your smart to plot your own paths. Make sure you check your air battles over Germany. See where his planes are and where he's intercepting you and at what altitudes. Change up your altitudes every few turns because a big difference in altitude can decrease his interceptions.


Gah, sorry meklore. Missed your post among the others.

I have been averaging around 4-500 losses per turn. About the same as in my AI game. But this game was started under the BETA which cut allied starting pools a bit. So I have basically lost more then I can replace.

Pelton has lost some 500-700 planes on certain turns. But ONLY Italian planes. He is losing 50-80 German fighters hitting the 8th and BC.

Good advice on changing altitudes. I have been flying the 8th on 27k all the time. In hindsight I realize now that was probably pretty stupid.

I´m grounding everything with a morale under 50. Started flying the 8th 3 days per week. Then had to cut it to 2 days and now I´m down to only 1 day per week...

(in reply to marion61)
Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the West >> After Action Reports >> RE: Spanking of the Sheep! - JocMeister(WA) vs Pelton(Axis) Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.938