Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent Page: <<   < prev  195 196 [197] 198 199   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/30/2016 5:28:45 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline 		8/24/43

You won't believe the craziness of this turn. There are great opportunities, mostly as a result of the carriers' failure to follow orders. But overshadowing the great opportunities is the fact that I don't know if my carrier TFs are going to follow orders. I think they will, but I'm not certain, and now big enemy TFs are all around the Marshalls. There's no room for "this TF will follow orders and go over here, these TFs won't follow orders and will end up over here." Very vexing. Very troubling. Yet very exciting.

Thin Man: The day opened with Gato launching six torps at Kaga and missing. That's three fleet CVs targeted in four turns, with only one hit to show for it (but it does give proof to the positioning of the Allied subs).

Steroid KB retired west to a point two hexes NW of Eniwetok. I think it is out of the action for tomorrow (unless John orders flank speed).

In a course that I would've bet my house against, Mini KB steams 9 hexes NE (!!!) and is 17 hexes east of Tarawa and 19 hexes southwest of Johnston Island. So John chose a course of action I had eliminated as a real possibility. But what in the world is Mini KB doing out by itself far, far into Indian Country and 37 hexes (!!!) from KB?

Now the weirdest thing of all. The Allied carriers remained a hex east of Mili...and show no detection levels at all. I do not recall any enemy search aircraft having an encounter with my CAP in that hex, but I'm going to re-watch the Movie to see. Now, John did catch wind of TF 402 (the big combat TF) near Tarawa and the host of shipping at Tarawa...and a few Judys sortied from Tabituea and were handled by flak. There's a decent chance John thinks my carriers are down there near Tarawa, although the lack of detection probably worries him a bit.

Which way does John send Mini KB now? Does he continue in this pattern, steaming north as though he had a cloaking device and were exempt from attack? I think he does move north, but I have a history of not guessing correctly. If I guess "north" and he moves south, then suddenly my carriers are way separated from my merchant fleet which is hung up out there in dangerous country....

...for the Kongos are inbound, nine hexes west of Tarawa.

I have a host of vulnerable shipping at Tarawa that now has to vacate that island (I won't take a chance on a nuclear bombardment. I think it's best to send them scurrying N or NNE in the general vicinity of Mili, but there are permutations under which they remain separated from my carriers and get isolated by an enemy force.

Immense destruction is possible....though it works both ways. John can savage a big part of an Allied merchant fleet while the Allies are seeking to savage Mini KB.

To non-top it all off, no supply unloaded at Tarawa. Makin did get a bit.

I think I'm sending my carriers E or NE to try to intercept Mini KB. I hate like the dickens to risk a vast merchant fleet. Things are kind of unraveling as I juggle different missions. But with KB over at Eniwetok, I think I must accept this opportunity.

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 5881
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/30/2016 5:30:55 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline 		Thanks, Poodle. I once knew that, but lost it in the clutter of all the numbers I'm juggling.

By the way, two days in a row Mini KB has moved 9 hexes. How's it doing that? It must not consist of CVEs, but rather CVLs?

(in reply to poodlebrain)
Post #: 5882
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/30/2016 5:33:26 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		What is TF402's destination hex?

(in reply to poodlebrain)
Post #: 5883
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/30/2016 5:39:25 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline 		Thin Man south.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 5884
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/30/2016 5:41:42 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

What is TF402's destination hex?


TF 402 was set to follow TF 425 (three USN DDs in an ASW TF). 425 has the same setting and was supposed to carry on four more hexes to the SW, ending up a hex NW of the "G" in Gilbert Islands.

There were no reactions or altercations to slow the TFs or to confuse the orders. Things went smoothly other than the carriers declining to move.

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 5885
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/30/2016 5:46:42 PM   
JohnDillworth


Posts: 3100
Joined: 3/19/2009
Status: offline
quote:

..for the Kongos are inbound, nine hexes west of Tarawa.

can they bombard a night and get about without your air assets getting a shot? Those guys are pretty quick

_____________________________

Today I come bearing an olive branch in one hand, and the freedom fighter's gun in the other. Do not let the olive branch fall from my hand. I repeat, do not let the olive branch fall from my hand. - Yasser Arafat Speech to UN General Assembly

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 5886
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/30/2016 5:48:02 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline 		Thin Man north.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 5887
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/30/2016 5:49:07 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: JohnDillworth

quote:

..for the Kongos are inbound, nine hexes west of Tarawa.

can they bombard a night and get about without your air assets getting a shot? Those guys are pretty quick


I think they can. So aircraft will mostly leave Tarawa for Mili, and ships will mostly leave Tarawa for open Indian Country since my carriers are moving east.

(in reply to JohnDillworth)
Post #: 5888
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/30/2016 5:53:18 PM   
Bullwinkle58


Posts: 11302
Joined: 2/24/2009
Status: offline 		I think you have 1-2 days max to deal or not deal with MKB. His fuel situation, etc.

_____________________________

The Moose

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 5889
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/30/2016 6:00:42 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline 		I just re-watched the movie. I don't think John got detection on my carriers. He probably thinks there close to the combat TF east of Makin, but I'm sure not knowing has ratcheted up his own stress level.

So what does he do? Does he retire Mini KB due south in hopes that the Solomons offer the closest refuge from Allied assets? Or does he steam north in blissful ignorance?

(in reply to Bullwinkle58)
Post #: 5890
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/30/2016 6:10:11 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel

quote:

ORIGINAL: JohnDillworth

quote:

..for the Kongos are inbound, nine hexes west of Tarawa.

can they bombard a night and get about without your air assets getting a shot? Those guys are pretty quick


I think they can. So aircraft will mostly leave Tarawa for Mili, and ships will mostly leave Tarawa for open Indian Country since my carriers are moving east.



7 hexes with no ops points spent and plenty of fuel -- 8 hexes if they are very lucky. 9 hexes is way too iffy. A heavy bomber presence could make the Kongo's approach 3-4 hexes and dally...

Bombardments are such a crap shoot...if it were me there is no way I would send them in from so far. But I can think of other things to do with them.

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 5891
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/30/2016 6:11:03 PM   
JohnDillworth


Posts: 3100
Joined: 3/19/2009
Status: offline 		After all of this sabre rattling it would be a shame to go home empty handed, but that is just from a guy reading AAR's. right now it looks like McClellan vs. McClellan

_____________________________

Today I come bearing an olive branch in one hand, and the freedom fighter's gun in the other. Do not let the olive branch fall from my hand. I repeat, do not let the olive branch fall from my hand. - Yasser Arafat Speech to UN General Assembly

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 5892
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/30/2016 6:25:04 PM   
IJV

 

Posts: 34
Joined: 11/18/2015
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel

8/24/43

You won't believe the craziness of this turn.



No argument there. Were I in your position I think I'd be getting greedy and trying to whack the Kongo group on one day and nerd-with-glasses KB (that made me laugh) on the next (or next couple - where are they going, Panama?). I do wonder, though - especially in light of how bombardments have been decisive so far, is taking out a battlecruiser squadron worth [more/as much/less] to you than beating up on the carriers? Seems you could probably interfere a couple of destroyer squadrons and hold them where you think they're going for them to be taken to pieces the next morning...

As far as detection - I think 'extreme overcast' is supposed to be the very worst weather for detection purposes, so your carrier fleet is essentially hidden by a fog bank ie no surprise that they weren't detected.

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 5893
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/30/2016 6:41:55 PM   
Encircled


Posts: 2024
Joined: 12/30/2010
From: Northern England
Status: offline 		I know he has a beefed up IJN in this, but just how powerful can the Mini KB be?

He's acting like someone whose just spotted every single one of your carriers in port at Karachi.

_____________________________


(in reply to IJV)
Post #: 5894
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/30/2016 6:44:09 PM   
Miller


Posts: 2226
Joined: 9/14/2004
From: Ashington, England.
Status: offline 		Weird behaviour by John. The only logic I could think of in his mini KB movement would be to draw your CVs away and leave the way clear for the main KB to steam in among your transports, but its position is pretty far away even to make that a possibility at full speed.

In this mod are the Allies still limited to a max strike range of 7 hexes for CV a/c?

(in reply to IJV)
Post #: 5895
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/30/2016 6:49:21 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Miller

Weird behaviour by John. The only logic I could think of in his mini KB movement would be to draw your CVs away and leave the way clear for the main KB to steam in among your transports, but its position is pretty far away even to make that a possibility at full speed.

In this mod are the Allies still limited to a max strike range of 7 hexes for CV a/c?


What's this? Is this a feature I'm not familiar with? My carriers are mostly carrying Hellcats, Helldivers, and SBD5s. I've set all of these to range 10 (with drop tanks). Is there some feature that restricts maximum range to 7 (or were you just thinking I still had SBD3s, etc.)?

(in reply to Miller)
Post #: 5896
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/30/2016 6:51:29 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: JohnDillworth

After all of this sabre rattling it would be a shame to go home empty handed, but that is just from a guy reading AAR's. right now it looks like McClellan vs. McClellan


And I'm posting so much that you guys have every right to skim, bow out, avoid, offer off-the-seat suggestions, etc. It's my job to know when suggestions are coming from informed readers and when they're coming from those skimming or just checking in for the first time. But it's hard to know, sometimes.

(in reply to JohnDillworth)
Post #: 5897
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/30/2016 6:59:49 PM   
Naskra

 

Posts: 325
Joined: 3/12/2005
Status: offline 		I have no certain knowledge, but I suspect the source of the TF insubordination lies in the follow-the-follower order. 425 slows down to accommodate 402, which in turn slows down for 400 but also speeds up to catch 425. Then 402 remains on station, which is 425's destination, while 400 retires after reaching its destination which might be 425's, or 402's, depending on how it interprets the follow the leader of the leader order. Meanwhile, ASW, Surface Combat, and Air Combat missions, are tempted every which way in the presence of enemy threats.

(in reply to Miller)
Post #: 5898
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/30/2016 7:00:52 PM   
jwolf

 

Posts: 2493
Joined: 12/3/2013
Status: offline 		Thoughts on the mini KB: maybe he thinks you have transports or oilers behind the carriers (say, halfway to Pearl or something like that) and he hopes to wipe them out while your carriers are focused on the Big KB. If he's really gutsy he'll order the mini KB all the way around your forces a la JEB Stuart.

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 5899
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/30/2016 7:03:34 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline 		My fellow Forumites. I have looked at the map as through a glass darkly. I confess to much uncertainty under unprecedented circumstances. I have made the best decisions possible, but I'm operating on guesswork (which is a level below hunchwork; usually I have really good hunches for John's play).

I have concluded that John is most likely to steam Mini KB south. I am separating my carriers, with the fleet CVs steaming SE to try to intercept. The CVEs will follow, making slower time, but allowing the two to recombine the following turn. The fleet carriers will follow a CL/DD force to provide some surface protection. The BBs will go with the CVEs.

The Separated Fleet at and near Tarawa to retire to Mili under beefed up CAP. TF 402 (Massachusetts and North Carolina) are heading that way too.

This is the weirdest dance ever. It looks awfully awkward. John can leave me looking clumsy and foolish. But I like the course of action and feel most comfortable with it.

Now I just hope my TFs follow orders.

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 5900
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/30/2016 7:14:12 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline 		Scratch that. New guess. With John seeing the host of Allied shipping around Tarawa, perhaps he thinks that's the more dangerous vector of retreat for Mini KB. No I'm thinking he sprints north, maybe even at flank speed. And maybe even sends Steroid KB east at flank speed (probably not, just "maybe."). So my carriers will look to intercept on ENE course.

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 5901
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/30/2016 7:21:46 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Task forces slowing down to let others catch up should be listed in the ops report. At least they do, when they slow down for a merge.


(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 5902
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/30/2016 7:24:32 PM   
Miller


Posts: 2226
Joined: 9/14/2004
From: Ashington, England.
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel

quote:

ORIGINAL: Miller

Weird behaviour by John. The only logic I could think of in his mini KB movement would be to draw your CVs away and leave the way clear for the main KB to steam in among your transports, but its position is pretty far away even to make that a possibility at full speed.

In this mod are the Allies still limited to a max strike range of 7 hexes for CV a/c?


What's this? Is this a feature I'm not familiar with? My carriers are mostly carrying Hellcats, Helldivers, and SBD5s. I've set all of these to range 10 (with drop tanks). Is there some feature that restricts maximum range to 7 (or were you just thinking I still had SBD3s, etc.)?



Yes I'm pretty sure the Allies are limited to 7 hexes and the IJN 8. However I don't think this applies to port or airfield strikes. Can anyone else confirm this?

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 5903
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/30/2016 7:31:08 PM   
Bullwinkle58


Posts: 11302
Joined: 2/24/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Miller


quote:

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel

quote:

ORIGINAL: Miller

Weird behaviour by John. The only logic I could think of in his mini KB movement would be to draw your CVs away and leave the way clear for the main KB to steam in among your transports, but its position is pretty far away even to make that a possibility at full speed.

In this mod are the Allies still limited to a max strike range of 7 hexes for CV a/c?


What's this? Is this a feature I'm not familiar with? My carriers are mostly carrying Hellcats, Helldivers, and SBD5s. I've set all of these to range 10 (with drop tanks). Is there some feature that restricts maximum range to 7 (or were you just thinking I still had SBD3s, etc.)?



Yes I'm pretty sure the Allies are limited to 7 hexes and the IJN 8. However I don't think this applies to port or airfield strikes. Can anyone else confirm this?

http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=2519074

Second post from Michael

Also read post #10. Very important.

Don't ask me why I have this thread bookmarked.

< Message edited by Bullwinkle58 -- 4/30/2016 7:34:21 PM >

_____________________________

The Moose

(in reply to Miller)
Post #: 5904
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/30/2016 7:39:17 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		I have been attacked at greater ranges than 7 by American CVs in 1944 against ships. I detailed them in my AAR vs Tiemanj.

I have heard that there is a sliding scale for what year, or experience, or just die rolls that allow US strikes past 7 hexes. And we seem to have confirmation that morale & experience might be the deciding factor.

I have suffered port strikes and sweeps at 10 hexes, too.

Nothing is certain, but there does seem to be merit that that Allies are limited to 7 hexes, especially in 1942. 1943 and beyond is anyone's guess.

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 4/30/2016 7:41:46 PM >

(in reply to Bullwinkle58)
Post #: 5905
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/30/2016 7:41:29 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline 		Thanks, Moose, for a timely assist.

This makes it nearly impossible to intercept an enemy that doesn't wish to be intercepted in open ocean when said enemy TF starts a turn at 18 hexes distant and has about 200 degree of arc to choose from for travel.

Realistically, John has two vectors to choose from: due north or due south. To close within range, I have to use Flank Speed. I don't think it's worth it, do you? Fuel consumption and wear and tear on the off chance of a strike. I feel like I'd be trying to pull an inside straight. If it was just my carriers that would be fine. But I have a fleet to worry about too.

I think I'll scrub, dadgum it, and stay on mission.

Thanks, Moose, for screwing up the drama (thank you, Moose, for helping).

(in reply to Bullwinkle58)
Post #: 5906
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/30/2016 7:52:48 PM   
Miller


Posts: 2226
Joined: 9/14/2004
From: Ashington, England.
Status: offline 		I think you might be making the right decision to be honest. If John has any inkling as to where your CVs are he has to retreat south with the mini KB or risk having it destroyed.

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 5907
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/30/2016 8:06:36 PM   
Mike McCreery


Posts: 4232
Joined: 6/29/2013
Status: offline 		I have always had trouble with TF's following ASW TF's.

I thought it might be related to the ASW burning up ops points actively searching for subs.

_____________________________


(in reply to Miller)
Post #: 5908
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/30/2016 8:11:38 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline 		I've had no problems with the carriers following properly during the game and during this op until this turn. I hope it was an anomaly.

(in reply to Mike McCreery)
Post #: 5909
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent - 4/30/2016 8:11:40 PM   
KenchiSulla


Posts: 2948
Joined: 10/22/2008
From: the Netherlands
Status: offline 		I've had issues with following other TFs before but mostly because of refueling.. When you want to be 100% sure of reaction, set the TFs to remain on station and manually select the hex you want them to end up in... the method has never failed me...

< Message edited by KenchiSulla -- 4/30/2016 8:13:38 PM >

_____________________________

AKA Cannonfodder

"It happened, therefore it can happen again: this is the core of what we have to say. It can happen, and it can happen everywhere.”
¯ Primo Levi, writer, holocaust survivor

(in reply to Mike McCreery)
Post #: 5910
Page:   <<   < prev  195 196 [197] 198 199   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent Page: <<   < prev  195 196 [197] 198 199   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.672