Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

A-Bomb

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> A-Bomb Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
A-Bomb - 1/30/2017 5:26:04 AM   
koniu


Posts: 2763
Joined: 2/28/2011
From: Konin, Poland, European Union
Status: offline 		Game with Docup is moving slowly forward and in next few weeks of gameplay Docup will have first A-Bomb
What effect in game have drooping bomb. I know about VP impact. But how this impacting troops, ships in port, ships in TF, air groups or industry in bombed hex, etc?

_____________________________

"Only the Dead Have Seen the End of War"
Post #: 1
RE: A-Bomb - 1/30/2017 11:22:50 AM   
PaxMondo


Posts: 9750
Joined: 6/6/2008
Status: offline 		There are a couple of AAR's that describe it.

_____________________________

Pax

(in reply to koniu)
Post #: 2
RE: A-Bomb - 1/30/2017 1:39:43 PM   
Revthought


Posts: 523
Joined: 1/14/2009
From: San Diego (Lives in Indianapolis)
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: PaxMondo

There are a couple of AAR's that describe it.


Do you know which? I don't need a link, just if you know the players off the top of your head. I find myself incredibly curious.

_____________________________

Playing at war is a far better vocation than making people fight in them.

(in reply to PaxMondo)
Post #: 3
RE: A-Bomb - 1/30/2017 2:56:04 PM   
pws1225

 

Posts: 1166
Joined: 8/9/2010
From: Tate's Hell, Florida
Status: offline 		In a word, the effect is underwhelming. The greatest impact that I saw in my last PBEM was to manpower (about a 20-30% reduction if I recall correctly) with less damage to industry. And impact on ships, ports, etc. was minimal. I would fear low level strategic bombing more than the an atomic attack.

(in reply to Revthought)
Post #: 4
RE: A-Bomb - 1/30/2017 2:58:49 PM   
Revthought


Posts: 523
Joined: 1/14/2009
From: San Diego (Lives in Indianapolis)
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: pws1225

In a word, the effect is underwhelming. The greatest impact that I saw in my last PBEM was to manpower (about a 20-30% reduction if I recall correctly) with less damage to industry. And impact on ships, ports, etc. was minimal. I would fear low level strategic bombing more than the an atomic attack.


Does it reduce supply/resources/oil stockpiled in the hex?

_____________________________

Playing at war is a far better vocation than making people fight in them.

(in reply to pws1225)
Post #: 5
RE: A-Bomb - 1/30/2017 3:02:49 PM   
pws1225

 

Posts: 1166
Joined: 8/9/2010
From: Tate's Hell, Florida
Status: offline 		Not that I recall, but I was focused more on the effect on industry and military assets.

(in reply to Revthought)
Post #: 6
RE: A-Bomb - 1/30/2017 3:04:06 PM   
Revthought


Posts: 523
Joined: 1/14/2009
From: San Diego (Lives in Indianapolis)
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: pws1225

Not that I recall, but I was focused more on the effect on industry and military assets.


Yep, sounds like low-level manpower bombings is scarier.

_____________________________

Playing at war is a far better vocation than making people fight in them.

(in reply to pws1225)
Post #: 7
RE: A-Bomb - 1/31/2017 1:56:57 AM   
PaxMondo


Posts: 9750
Joined: 6/6/2008
Status: offline 		When I tested them years ago, the effect had a great deal of randomness to it (surprise!). It seemed it could affect anything and everything, so like a firestorm. But sometimes the damage was minimal and other times pretty extensive. Only once did I see a Hiroshima-type disaster ... everything obliterated many factories wiped out entirely. I can't find my notes right now ... still checking.

_____________________________

Pax

(in reply to Revthought)
Post #: 8
RE: A-Bomb - 1/31/2017 2:00:12 AM   
MakeeLearn


Posts: 4278
Joined: 9/11/2016
Status: offline 		Can/has the plane carrying the bomb be shot down?

(in reply to PaxMondo)
Post #: 9
RE: A-Bomb - 1/31/2017 10:26:32 AM   
LargeSlowTarget


Posts: 4443
Joined: 9/23/2000
From: Hessen, Germany - now living in France
Status: offline 		It can be engaged by CAP, so I would say yes.

Found this in an AAR:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Morning Air attack on Osaka/Kyoto , at 109,59

Weather in hex: Light rain

Raid spotted at 20 NM, estimated altitude 22,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 6 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M5c Zero x 2



Allied aircraft
B-29B Superfort x 1


No Japanese losses

No Allied losses



ATOMIC BOMB hits 1

CAP engaged:
S-310 Hikotai with A6M5c Zero (0 airborne, 0 on standby, 0 scrambling)
(2 plane(s) diverted to support CAP in hex.)
Group patrol altitude is 20000
Raid is overhead


_____________________________

AE Mod "Bottlenecks" UPDATED 01/2022

(in reply to MakeeLearn)
Post #: 10
RE: A-Bomb - 1/31/2017 10:52:53 AM   
Hotei

 

Posts: 110
Joined: 1/30/2017
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LargeSlowTarget

It can be engaged by CAP, so I would say yes.

Found this in an AAR:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Morning Air attack on Osaka/Kyoto , at 109,59

Weather in hex: Light rain

Raid spotted at 20 NM, estimated altitude 22,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 6 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M5c Zero x 2



Allied aircraft
B-29B Superfort x 1


No Japanese losses

No Allied losses



ATOMIC BOMB hits 1

CAP engaged:
S-310 Hikotai with A6M5c Zero (0 airborne, 0 on standby, 0 scrambling)
(2 plane(s) diverted to support CAP in hex.)
Group patrol altitude is 20000
Raid is overhead



And in theory the CAP can succeed in making the bomb miss the city proper and hitting more rural areas causing less damage?


(in reply to LargeSlowTarget)
Post #: 11
RE: A-Bomb - 1/31/2017 11:38:29 AM   
LargeSlowTarget


Posts: 4443
Joined: 9/23/2000
From: Hessen, Germany - now living in France
Status: offline 		If the A-bomb attacks are treated the same way as ordinary bombing attacks, I would expect so. However, there is already a lot of variation in the effectiveness of the A-bombs, even without CAP. So it would be difficult to measure the impact of CAP on the accuracy of A-bomb attacks without a large sample of A-bomb attacks with and without CAP. Given that few games reach August 1945 and the low number of bombs, I don't think anyone has enough data to give a definite answer. Best tactic is to clear the skies over the target base before sending atomic greetings.

_____________________________

AE Mod "Bottlenecks" UPDATED 01/2022

(in reply to Hotei)
Post #: 12
RE: A-Bomb - 1/31/2017 12:26:00 PM   
MakeeLearn


Posts: 4278
Joined: 9/11/2016
Status: offline
quote:

It can be engaged by CAP, so I would say yes.




Thanks. Ive not gotten that far in a game and did not know if it was a normal bombing process or automatic. Good that its a normal bombing process.

(in reply to LargeSlowTarget)
Post #: 13
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> A-Bomb Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.142