RE: Not bad turn 1 air

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

RE: Not bad turn 1 air

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East 2 >> The War Room >> RE: Not bad turn 1 air

Page: << < prev 1 [2] 3 next > >>

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Not bad turn 1 air - 3/28/2021 10:03:05 AM

loki100

Posts: 10920
Joined: 10/20/2012
From: Utlima Thule
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: CapAndGown

quote "1 bombing mission per airfield"

Since you only get 10 air directives that would seem to mean only 30 airfields bombed (10 per Luftflotte) with no ground support or recon. I am not understanding. Is this what is intended?

...

doesn't really mean that. You set an AD, can be anything from a single hex (0) to 10*10. The game routine then does a rough calculation of how many targets are in the box, what your mission intensity is and how many planes you allocate (or leave to auto), and comes up with a number of strikes. What you can do is over-ride that number, so lets say your box has 4 airfields, set that to 8 strikes and (if the mileage/time is available) each gets hit twice from just the one AD.

edit - you also have more than 10 ADs so not sure where you have taken that from. Each Air command can have 30 on their own (not a good idea as its going to be chaotic but the capacity is there)

< Message edited by loki100 -- 3/28/2021 11:31:17 AM >

_____________________________

(in reply to CapAndGown)

Post #: 31

RE: Not bad turn 1 air - 3/28/2021 11:17:17 AM

dudefan

Posts: 139
Joined: 2/26/2021
Status: offline

Did you check if automatic naval patrol was on? In my experience this brings only heavy LB losses with no gain

(in reply to TheFerret)

Post #: 32

RE: Not bad turn 1 air - 3/28/2021 1:27:10 PM

HardLuckYetAgain

Posts: 6987
Joined: 2/5/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: king171717

quote:

ORIGINAL: HardLuckYetAgain

quote:

ORIGINAL: dudefan

Air superiority missions as well?

Even though i only do Medium intensity day1 bombing I lose at least 500 and destroy around 2500-3000

1. The order in which you bomb Soviet air bases matter.

2. Altitude matters.

3. Bomb load out matters (I know many in BETA said it does not but it does, this goes hand-in-hand with altitude)

4. I don't fly Air Superiority missions 1st turn.

5. Anything bombing past 8 - 10 hexes requires an escort of fighter(s). Otherwise you are going to get mauled if intercepted flying un-escorted on the first turn. I do use drop tanks but only when needed.

6. I don't do wide hex bombing.

thank you for this! this is definitely helping me.

You are welcome :)

(in reply to king171717)

Post #: 33

RE: Not bad turn 1 air - 3/28/2021 1:39:30 PM

HardLuckYetAgain

Posts: 6987
Joined: 2/5/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: TheFerret

To the original point, here's the end-of-turn losses. Despite destroying over 300 more airframes than HardLuckYetAgain's example, I eliminated over 150 fewer pilots - and I gather from loki's AAR that losing pilots hurts a lot more than losing airframes. And my ops losses were over twice as high as HardLuck's - all of the extra were level bombers, which I assume means I flew my bombers harder in the air execution phase.

(sorry they're just attachments - I think I have another week until I'm able to actually link pictures inline, haha)

Yes, the lose of pilots hurt :( You almost lost two times your trained pilots in the first turn for Germany. May be something else to consider when you are doing your Air War :) (You can look up your airframe rate)

Attachment (1)

(in reply to TheFerret)

Post #: 34

RE: Not bad turn 1 air - 3/28/2021 2:56:20 PM

MagicMissile

Posts: 1629
Joined: 10/11/2014
From: Stockholm, Sweden
Status: offline

Hello everyone,

I was thinking about starting a new thread but since it concerns 1st turn bombing I thought I could just post my question here.

I played a fair amount of WitW so I skipped the AI help and bravely set sail on my own

.

I have been dabbling a bit with the 41 campaign. My problem is that autoassign with my manually set up ADs work fine for Luftflotte 1 but both 2 and 4 refuse to autoassign any bombers. I do exactly the same thing for all Luftflotte and when I execute Luftflotte 1 bomb and everythng is fine but Luftflotte 2 and 4 do not fly at all. Anyone have an idea why?

Also I saw that recon airplanes losses on turn 1 looks awfully high if you follow the AI set up. Anyone else felt the same? And what to do about it? I am thinking maybe only recon one time per week.

/MM

(in reply to HardLuckYetAgain)

Post #: 35

RE: Not bad turn 1 air - 3/28/2021 5:24:59 PM

Nix77

Posts: 561
Joined: 10/2/2016
From: Finland
Status: offline

Wrote this on another thread, might as well add it here too. I've been practicing the German T1 air war on Road to Leningrad scenario:

quote:

My lessons learned:
- Read the manual :D
- Continuing from the above point, I learned that Turn 1 Day 1 the Germans have a surprise bonus, so use that to your advantage. I ran bombing sorties only on D1 without any recon (didn't seem to need it)
- Read everything about altitude from the manual. At least on German T1, 6000-9000 feet seemed to be a good setting. Could be different later on (AA, opposition, air mile optimization, more experienced pilots etc.)
- Air mission priority, use that! Make escorted sorties on Very High to hit fighter airfield at first (on T1). In general, get the opposition fighters out first, then fly bombing. You can do this on RtL scenario quite easily once you figure it out, and optimally destroy 800ish Soviet airplanes with only 10-20 casualties. Not sure how Air Superiority missions fit into this later on, but on T1 AS seems useless. You can fly bombing and ground recon later on with Low priority with just a few operational casualties.
- Use drop tanks selectively if needed, don't overdo it. I separated JG53 to be my "drop tank wing" and escorted the sorties to more distant Soviet fighter airfields with them. Check which staging base suits best to your escorts range.
- You'll probably want your best pilots on the fighters, so tag "Trained Pilots" on them
- You can evade AA by editing mission pathing nodes. Use the "Show AA" map mode, tag "Follow Path" and fly through low AA gaps.
- At least on GE T1, you need only 1-2 strikes per airfield with 50kg bombs. You can actually limit the number of bombers and escorts on the strikes manually to reduce fatigue and you'll still do OK. 20-30 bombers with 10 Bf-109 escorts do short work of most airfields.
- The more Air Directives you plan, the more you can control the results. But you'll do perfectly fine with bigger area directives if you consider them carefully.

I managed to get 800 SU aircraft destroyed in Air Phase alone with only 10-20 losses for Luftwaffe on the RtL scenario, using the full 10 Air Directives. And I'm sure there's still room for improvement though!

About recon, at least on T1 it's probably not worth flying any. Or if you want to do it, do it after you've cleaned up enemy fighters from the air, maybe Low priority on D1 (close fighter cleanup: Very High, long range fighter cleanup: High, unescorted bombing: Medium)

< Message edited by Nix77 -- 3/28/2021 5:27:38 PM >

(in reply to MagicMissile)

Post #: 36

RE: Not bad turn 1 air - 3/28/2021 10:59:03 PM

Hanny

Posts: 422
Joined: 7/5/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: HardLuckYetAgain

quote:

ORIGINAL: TheFerret

To the original point, here's the end-of-turn losses. Despite destroying over 300 more airframes than HardLuckYetAgain's example, I eliminated over 150 fewer pilots - and I gather from loki's AAR that losing pilots hurts a lot more than losing airframes. And my ops losses were over twice as high as HardLuck's - all of the extra were level bombers, which I assume means I flew my bombers harder in the air execution phase.

(sorry they're just attachments - I think I have another week until I'm able to actually link pictures inline, haha)

Yes, the lose of pilots hurt :( You almost lost two times your trained pilots in the first turn for Germany. May be something else to consider when you are doing your Air War :) (You can look up your airframe rate)

Lw aircrew personnel losses June 41
Kia 92
Wia 162
Mia 322
Total 585

_____________________________

To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.

(in reply to HardLuckYetAgain)

Post #: 37

RE: Not bad turn 1 air - 3/28/2021 11:28:06 PM

Dreamslayer

Posts: 452
Joined: 10/31/2015
From: St.Petersburg
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: loki100
edit - you also have more than 10 ADs so not sure where you have taken that from. Each Air command can have 30 on their own (not a good idea as its going to be chaotic but the capacity is there)

Also a small remark - Soviet AF's should not have 37mm AA guns and DShK's at beginning of the war in their TOE.

_____________________________

(in reply to loki100)

Post #: 38

RE: Not bad turn 1 air - 3/29/2021 3:05:31 AM

TheFerret

Posts: 64
Joined: 3/9/2021
Status: offline

Continuing thinking about pilot vs. airframe losses - I tested the theory that letting the VVS fly and beating them in the air will eliminate more pilots than destroying the VVS on the ground. I launched very limited airfield strikes, targeting a few of the largest fighter bases near the border plus most of the bases in the Bessarabia/Odessa region since there's no ground combat there T1, turned on ground support, set a couple of AS directives over Bialystok and Lvov, and let the air battle work itself out during my ground phase.

The result: compared to HardLuck's example, I lost 350 more Axis pilots - but eliminated 600 more Soviet pilots. I'm sure this approach can be optimized (this time around I tried adding drop tanks to all the fighters, which I assume contributed to the very high ops losses) but I'd still expect to lose 300+ Axis pilots - the question is, what is a favorable loss ratio for pilots, and how many losses can the Axis realistically afford at that loss ratio? And note that my airframe losses are shifted away from bombers and toward fighters - I'm not sure what to think of that; while I like the idea of having more bombers around, they won't be worth much if they're sitting around twiddling their thumbs for lack of fighter escorts.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to Dreamslayer)

Post #: 39

RE: Not bad turn 1 air - 3/29/2021 3:06:06 AM

CapAndGown

Posts: 3206
Joined: 3/6/2001
From: Virginia, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dreamslayer

quote:

ORIGINAL: loki100
edit - you also have more than 10 ADs so not sure where you have taken that from. Each Air command can have 30 on their own (not a good idea as its going to be chaotic but the capacity is there)

Also a small remark - Soviet AF's should not have 37mm AA guns and DShK's at beginning of the war in their TOE.

I just tried adding an 11th AD to Luftflotte 1 and it would not let me. This seems to confirm that 10 AD per air command is the max.

(in reply to Dreamslayer)

Post #: 40

RE: Not bad turn 1 air - 3/29/2021 8:46:42 AM

loki100

Posts: 10920
Joined: 10/20/2012
From: Utlima Thule
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: TheFerret

Continuing thinking about pilot vs. airframe losses - I tested the theory that letting the VVS fly and beating them in the air will eliminate more pilots than destroying the VVS on the ground. I launched very limited airfield strikes, targeting a few of the largest fighter bases near the border plus most of the bases in the Bessarabia/Odessa region since there's no ground combat there T1, turned on ground support, set a couple of AS directives over Bialystok and Lvov, and let the air battle work itself out during my ground phase.

The result: compared to HardLuck's example, I lost 350 more Axis pilots - but eliminated 600 more Soviet pilots. I'm sure this approach can be optimized (this time around I tried adding drop tanks to all the fighters, which I assume contributed to the very high ops losses) but I'd still expect to lose 300+ Axis pilots - the question is, what is a favorable loss ratio for pilots, and how many losses can the Axis realistically afford at that loss ratio? And note that my airframe losses are shifted away from bombers and toward fighters - I'm not sure what to think of that; while I like the idea of having more bombers around, they won't be worth much if they're sitting around twiddling their thumbs for lack of fighter escorts.

few really big bits as a response.

For most of the war with the axis, airframes are not a constraint but your pilots are. Especially as ideally you don't want to stop using trained pilots till fairly late in the game (that experience/skill boost is what gives you the real edge over the VVS). In contrast the Soviets need to rely on untrained pilots (& get them to some acceptable standard by training up to the NM values in their reserve), it won't be till late in the war does a group of Soviet pilots live long enough to really push up unit experience levels.

So, I think, you are playing 2 different games. As the Axis I regard my pilot stock as critical and will try to keep losses at or under the trained replacements. For the Soviets, the best I can do is to avoid catastrophic losses but I know that a new unit (or one that has just taken heavy losses) will need to sit in the national reserve for some time just to have any value.

So in the main aircraft losses should be readily replaced (you might have to shift plane types in the early game but that is marginal).

In a way that leads to a discussion as to what you are trying to do on T1 vs the VVS. Left unchecked its going to cause you problems in 1941, not least where you can't concentrate or have lagged behind due to supply problems. Even bi-planes and the I-series stuff can generate enough interdiction to deny you admin moves, SB-2s can hit depots and they can generate quite a lot of GS. So the T1 cull is to get you a clear window till the LW is better aligned to the front lines (say from T5 onwards). You'll win every air exchange till late 1942 but you have to be present to achieve that.

To some extent taking out modern Soviet fighters, the Pe-2s and their recon assets is good as those are all hard to replace, but in truth inexperienced pilots in Yak-1s are not that much of a threat. What I wouldn't do is to risk too many Luftwaffe pilots on T1 - set yourself a budget and try to work to that?

_____________________________

(in reply to TheFerret)

Post #: 41

RE: Not bad turn 1 air - 3/29/2021 8:53:50 AM

loki100

Posts: 10920
Joined: 10/20/2012
From: Utlima Thule
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: CapAndGown

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dreamslayer

quote:

ORIGINAL: loki100
edit - you also have more than 10 ADs so not sure where you have taken that from. Each Air command can have 30 on their own (not a good idea as its going to be chaotic but the capacity is there)

Also a small remark - Soviet AF's should not have 37mm AA guns and DShK's at beginning of the war in their TOE.

I just tried adding an 11th AD to Luftflotte 1 and it would not let me. This seems to confirm that 10 AD per air command is the max.

been reported as a bug, we'll see what the response is. Have you tried this in the 1941 campaign or is just a RTL issue?

_____________________________

(in reply to CapAndGown)

Post #: 42

RE: Not bad turn 1 air - 3/29/2021 9:13:17 AM

Dreamslayer

Posts: 452
Joined: 10/31/2015
From: St.Petersburg
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: loki100
been reported as a bug, we'll see what the response is. Have you tried this in the 1941 campaign or is just a RTL issue?

Seems like its in both.

_____________________________

(in reply to loki100)

Post #: 43

RE: Not bad turn 1 air - 3/29/2021 9:29:05 AM

loki100

Posts: 10920
Joined: 10/20/2012
From: Utlima Thule
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dreamslayer

quote:

ORIGINAL: loki100
been reported as a bug, we'll see what the response is. Have you tried this in the 1941 campaign or is just a RTL issue?

Seems like its in both.

thanks, added to the report

_____________________________

(in reply to Dreamslayer)

Post #: 44

RE: Not bad turn 1 air - 3/29/2021 1:41:58 PM

Speedysteve

Posts: 15998
Joined: 9/11/2001
From: Reading, England
Status: offline

Just as an experiment I decided to prosecute all AF attacks on D1 at night....here's the results (note c.100 of the Axis and a similar Soviet are from a few daytime Interdiction missions)

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

WitE 2 Tester
WitE Tester
BTR/BoB Tester

(in reply to loki100)

Post #: 45

RE: Not bad turn 1 air - 3/29/2021 6:33:49 PM

Jajusha

Posts: 249
Joined: 12/21/2010
Status: offline

Can now reach 3k soviet planes down at the end of the air phase, with 120ish axis casualties (more then half are always operational, but it can't be avoided if you want to hit some of those undefended big airfields)

12 ADs on AGN (Don't hit north of Riga, nor East of Vilnius)
12 ADs on AGC (Don't try to go near Minsk, hit everything in fighter range)
26 Ads on AGS (Very important, hammer the fighter air bases first, then you can reach out a little to hit the bomber bases that are undefended, but don't go more then 12 hexes in. Use the romanians to hit the airfields near north Moldovia for the last 200 kills)

Day 1 bombing only
1 strike per airfield, except airfields with more then 100 planes, where they get 2 strikes
7000 altitude

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Jajusha -- 3/29/2021 6:35:53 PM >

(in reply to Speedysteve)

Post #: 46

RE: Not bad turn 1 air - 3/30/2021 1:00:29 AM

CapAndGown

Posts: 3206
Joined: 3/6/2001
From: Virginia, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: loki100

quote:

ORIGINAL: CapAndGown

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dreamslayer

quote:

ORIGINAL: loki100
edit - you also have more than 10 ADs so not sure where you have taken that from. Each Air command can have 30 on their own (not a good idea as its going to be chaotic but the capacity is there)

Also a small remark - Soviet AF's should not have 37mm AA guns and DShK's at beginning of the war in their TOE.

I just tried adding an 11th AD to Luftflotte 1 and it would not let me. This seems to confirm that 10 AD per air command is the max.

been reported as a bug, we'll see what the response is. Have you tried this in the 1941 campaign or is just a RTL issue?

Just the RtL.

(in reply to loki100)

Post #: 47

RE: Not bad turn 1 air - 3/30/2021 9:14:21 AM

Nix77

Posts: 561
Joined: 10/2/2016
From: Finland
Status: offline

Well this is definitely an intriguing exercise, I have absolutely no idea how I will have the resources to wade through the whole Grand Campaign...

I stayed up until 2:30am last night (mostly because it was hard to find a picture of Kesselring smiling), but I finally got the whole opening turn Air Directive set sorted, with about the same guidelines as Jajusha. I kept the directives per HQ limited to 9-13 to keep it manageable, but I think it was more of a time sink in the end :D

I didn't do any recon or naval patrols, they just seemed to accumulate more losses for no gain. I can imagine that in the final (after the last "just one more try"-feeling) directives I would fly recon over key ground targets to raise their detection level. I also didn't play around with ground support, probably would need to limit escort numbers during air planning to be able to give effective GS/air cover in ground phase.

I ran several tests to try things out, and just happened that the final execution was also the luckiest, none of the Minsk and Kiev region fighters responded to my long range strikes in those areas. In a real game I'd probably skip those long distance Dornier and Heinkel sorties to prevent any risks and excessive supply usage.

EDIT: seems like fighter air miles aren't that bad after all! included in the pic. I also didn't use the Bf-110, following HLYA's example and also after considering the general LW fighter situation. They went directly to 8-turn fighter training right from the start.

Anyway here are my results after the air phase, complete with a Happy Alfred-badge.

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Nix77 -- 3/30/2021 9:21:57 AM >

(in reply to CapAndGown)

Post #: 48

RE: Not bad turn 1 air - 3/30/2021 1:12:44 PM

carlkay58

Posts: 8650
Joined: 7/25/2010
Status: offline

Turn 1 Axis Air Phase is the most intensive air phase of the entire war. After this turn, you will probably just be doing Ground Support and Recon on a regular basis with only the occasional other directives. If you master the Axis Turn 1, the other air phases will be a breeze.

(in reply to Nix77)

Post #: 49

RE: Not bad turn 1 air - 3/30/2021 3:44:19 PM

Jajusha

Posts: 249
Joined: 12/21/2010
Status: offline

So very much true, doing it full manual, and the orders aren't more then 2 minutes after then first turn.
And i just love how easy it is to ctrl drag to move all the air groups at once.

(in reply to carlkay58)

Post #: 50

RE: Not bad turn 1 air - 3/30/2021 4:45:34 PM

821Bobo

Posts: 2311
Joined: 2/8/2011
From: Slovakia
Status: offline

Can confirm. After T1 I just set groups to GS, leave some fighters for interception and shuffle recon directives. Other than that, I only setting naval interdiction when it is needed(siege of Odessa, Sevastopol, Leningrad).
But setting T1 directives can take few hours if you go nuts and set for every group separate directive targeting just one airfield.

(in reply to Jajusha)

Post #: 51

RE: Not bad turn 1 air - 3/30/2021 5:25:26 PM

Tyrfinn

Posts: 4
Joined: 3/4/2018
Status: offline

Greetings,

so this is what I have achieved after a complete finished Turn 1.
Special about it is: I only used 6 Ground Attack AD (2x per Luftflotte), all 10x10, Auto-Strike-Number, Auto-Loadout, High Intensity. So it looks pretty good to me for a "fast solution" without much micro.

I thus guess that Micro-Managing isn't mostly about getting those kill-numbers on the Soviets but to keep ones own losses down but I'm currently asking myself: How? Okay, not flying over AA I is simple... but how are some of you guys getting below 100 planes killed is above my head.

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Tyrfinn -- 3/30/2021 5:26:27 PM >

(in reply to 821Bobo)

Post #: 52

RE: Not bad turn 1 air - 3/30/2021 9:58:30 PM

Nix77

Posts: 561
Joined: 10/2/2016
From: Finland
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tyrfinn
I thus guess that Micro-Managing isn't mostly about getting those kill-numbers on the Soviets but to keep ones own losses down but I'm currently asking myself: How? Okay, not flying over AA I is simple... but how are some of you guys getting below 100 planes killed is above my head.

Kill the enemy fighters by prioritizing the closest fighter airfields first on Very High with enough escorts. Then High prio on medium range fighter bases. After that Normal prio for fighter airfields that need escorts with drop tanks. And finally with clear skies you can use Low priority for unescorted bombing runs. On turn 1, bomb only on day 1.

(in reply to Tyrfinn)

Post #: 53

RE: Not bad turn 1 air - 3/31/2021 8:42:04 AM

loki100

Posts: 10920
Joined: 10/20/2012
From: Utlima Thule
Status: offline

I just did a really simple test. I took the set ADs, made sure each was one day at 9000' and ran them - got about 1000 on the ground kills. I lost about 120 pilots mainly up around Riga.

Ran 5-6 ground attacks at selected points across the border and got > 1000 kills - and mostly stuff I would want to kill.

Now I clearly could have done better with the GA element and that is only a small sub-set of the likely ground battles (though clearly the Soviet response will drop off) and before any over-runs.

Also the trade rate in all this A2A stuff is much more in my favour.

Point is whereas in WiTE1 your T1 cull of the VVS was almost all triggered off a willingness to endlessly micro-manage the airbase bombing in WITE2 its merely the first stage.

Another bit worth bearing in mind, in both air and ground, keeping axis losses down is as important as what you inflict. By late August, you will have gaps in the ranks and worse, its hard to bring up replacements.

_____________________________

(in reply to Nix77)

Post #: 54

RE: Not bad turn 1 air - 3/31/2021 1:56:44 PM

Zovs

Posts: 6668
Joined: 2/23/2009
From: United States
Status: offline

You don't have to be 'too creative'.

I am just starting a PBEM game with a fellow by the nick of Keith from Discord (not sure if he is here or not).

I am only setting up 10 AD total (3 for GS and 7 for GA), I used auto for all and set the area and altitude as below, the only thing I did different was to set the intensity to High, this results I think in higher losses for both sides. In this case killing 10-1 is okay by me and good enough.

Here is how many AD I set up:

Here are the turn 1 air losses from that AD:

Killing 3,325 from airbase attacks is pretty good. I'll kill more in the movement phase (I think it's between 1k an 1.5k you can overrun if memory serves from testing).

_____________________________

Beta Tester for:
Flashpoint Campaigns: Sudden Storm
War in the East 1 & 2
WarPlan & WarPlan Pacific
Valor & Victory
DG CWIE 2
SPWW2 & SPMBT scenario creator

(in reply to loki100)

Post #: 55

RE: Not bad turn 1 air - 3/31/2021 2:39:15 PM

CapAndGown

Posts: 3206
Joined: 3/6/2001
From: Virginia, USA
Status: offline

Well, since everyone is posting their first turn air results, this is a link to my first turn air execution in a PBEM game.

< Message edited by CapAndGown -- 3/31/2021 2:40:06 PM >

(in reply to Zovs)

Post #: 56

RE: Not bad turn 1 air - 3/31/2021 8:43:33 PM

Nix77

Posts: 561
Joined: 10/2/2016
From: Finland
Status: offline

Problems with high air losses for Germany won't be apparent in the first turns.

Germany produces 46 Bf-109 airframes per week for quite a long time. I don't think the factories expand gradually so you're stuck with that for quite a while. They seem to expand to produce 58 airframes / week in summer '42, and more then double the production in 1943. But anyway the production is quite low in 1941-42.

Not sure how the pilot training changes during the war, but at the start Germany trains around 130 trained pilots per week, out of which maybe only 1/3 are fighter pilots if you compare the bomber/fighter/utility ratio of Luftwaffe. Not sure if trained pilots are created only for fighters and bombers which would make the fighter pilot number around 60/week.

I haven't checked the bomber situation but I'm sure the airframe and pilot supply for those isn't endless either.

So you might want to set your limit of fighter losses to a steady 50 or less per week during the early war unless you want to start slowly diminishing your air power. Preferably keep it even lower since the Luftwaffe starts a bit undermanned, missing maybe around 50 fighter pilots.

High intensity basically just increases the number of strikes per day for the missions. Especially for airfield bombings on the opening turn, this could mean a lot of useless airmiles and casualties since most of the fields get completely devastated with a single bombing run.

EDIT: ok the airframe factories don't set the aircraft production limit... seems like it's 42 Bf-109 until May'42 it rises to 57, and after that to well over 100 when the new models arrive in 1943-45. You'll start getting some FW-190 in 1942 too.

< Message edited by Nix77 -- 3/31/2021 9:03:57 PM >

(in reply to CapAndGown)

Post #: 57

RE: Not bad turn 1 air - 3/31/2021 9:02:34 PM

HardLuckYetAgain

Posts: 6987
Joined: 2/5/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nix77

Well this is definitely an intriguing exercise, I have absolutely no idea how I will have the resources to wade through the whole Grand Campaign...

I stayed up until 2:30am last night (mostly because it was hard to find a picture of Kesselring smiling), but I finally got the whole opening turn Air Directive set sorted, with about the same guidelines as Jajusha. I kept the directives per HQ limited to 9-13 to keep it manageable, but I think it was more of a time sink in the end :D

I didn't do any recon or naval patrols, they just seemed to accumulate more losses for no gain. I can imagine that in the final (after the last "just one more try"-feeling) directives I would fly recon over key ground targets to raise their detection level. I also didn't play around with ground support, probably would need to limit escort numbers during air planning to be able to give effective GS/air cover in ground phase.

I ran several tests to try things out, and just happened that the final execution was also the luckiest, none of the Minsk and Kiev region fighters responded to my long range strikes in those areas. In a real game I'd probably skip those long distance Dornier and Heinkel sorties to prevent any risks and excessive supply usage.

EDIT: seems like fighter air miles aren't that bad after all! included in the pic. I also didn't use the Bf-110, following HLYA's example and also after considering the general LW fighter situation. They went directly to 8-turn fighter training right from the start.

Anyway here are my results after the air phase, complete with a Happy Alfred-badge.

Dang nice!!! This is just the the Air Execution phase, correct? What was the end of turn total if you went that far?

Also did you use the Hungarians?

< Message edited by HardLuckYetAgain -- 3/31/2021 9:03:15 PM >

(in reply to Nix77)

Post #: 58

RE: Not bad turn 1 air - 3/31/2021 9:18:06 PM

Nix77

Posts: 561
Joined: 10/2/2016
From: Finland
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: HardLuckYetAgain

Dang nice!!! This is just the the Air Execution phase, correct? What was the end of turn total if you went that far?

Also did you use the Hungarians?

Yes that's air execution only. I think I did use the Hungarians for some of the southern sorties?

End of turn total was close to 4000 with 40 more GE fighters lost, but I actually started practicing other parts of the game rather than carrying on the VVS destruction exercise :D I blundered my opening in the south really bad, so there were many fields that I could've overrun with better planning, and I really didn't pay attention to Ground Support at all, I just set the directive for AGN to have only fighters fly GS, and it seemed to work almost too effectively. Lost a fair bit of fighters in GS though, probably pushed them too far and hard when not paying attention. Maybe moving the fighters to forward fields on the ground phase might yield more results even on turn 1 if you manage to lure in some distant VVS fighter aces :)

Not yet sure how the forward moving trick works for fighters since the airfields at front are probably quite empty. Have to experiment more with the supply system! Fun times!

EDIT: just noticed that the GS doctrine for Luftflotte 1 is red, so it probably didn't get executed at all, the fighters were just auto-intercepting?

EDIT2: Bobo's tactic of closing Ventspils with naval interdiction seems like a good plan, with VVS destroyed from that area the interdiction runs should probably work nicely. Also I tested out Guctony's tip of motorizing an infantry division to grab Riga, works nice! The 4PzG panzers can just rush toward Pskov and leave the Latvian cleanup to the infantry.

< Message edited by Nix77 -- 3/31/2021 9:23:58 PM >

(in reply to HardLuckYetAgain)

Post #: 59

RE: Not bad turn 1 air - 3/31/2021 9:26:58 PM

HardLuckYetAgain

Posts: 6987
Joined: 2/5/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nix77

quote:

ORIGINAL: HardLuckYetAgain

Dang nice!!! This is just the the Air Execution phase, correct? What was the end of turn total if you went that far?

Also did you use the Hungarians?

Yes that's air execution only. I think I did use the Hungarians for some of the southern sorties?

End of turn total was close to 4000 with 40 more GE fighters lost, but I actually started practicing other parts of the game rather than carrying on the VVS destruction exercise :D I blundered my opening in the south really bad, so there were many fields that I could've overrun with better planning, and I really didn't pay attention to Ground Support at all, I just set the directive for AGN to have only fighters fly GS, and it seemed to work almost too effectively. Lost a fair bit of fighters in GS though, probably pushed them too far and hard when not paying attention. Maybe moving the fighters to forward fields on the ground phase might yield more results even on turn 1 if you manage to lure in some distant VVS fighter aces :)

Not yet sure how the forward moving trick works for fighters since the airfields at front are probably quite empty. Have to experiment more with the supply system! Fun times!

Ya, ~3,600 - 4,200 seems to be the sweet spot as long as you can keep losses down. I started experimenting again myself ;-)

Ya, You really don't need GS on the first turn. But yes you can move the fighters forward and bag more. Really liking the Air part of the game now & will never use the Air AI personally.

I have found moving a few bomber squadrons forward isn't too bad on supply... so far

(in reply to Nix77)

Post #: 60