Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: July 31, 1942

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: July 31, 1942 Page: <<   < prev  10 11 [12] 13 14   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: July 31, 1942 - 11/15/2021 6:43:32 PM   
Nomad


Posts: 5905
Joined: 9/5/2001
From: West Yellowstone, Montana
Status: offline 		July 31, 1942

Not much, a quick FT to Vaitupu in the Ellice Islands and it is mine.
Ground combat at Vaitupu (138,145)

Allied Shock attack

Attacking force 401 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 17

Defending force 0 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 0

Allied adjusted assault: 17

Japanese adjusted defense: 1

Allied assault odds: 17 to 1 (fort level 0)

Allied forces CAPTURE Vaitupu !!!

Combat modifiers
Attacker: shock(+), leaders(+), leaders(-)

Assaulting units:
3rd USMC Parachute Battalion

** corrected date

< Message edited by Nomad -- 11/16/2021 2:11:58 AM >

(in reply to Nomad)
Post #: 331
August 1, 1942 - 11/16/2021 2:13:45 AM   
Nomad


Posts: 5905
Joined: 9/5/2001
From: West Yellowstone, Montana
Status: offline 		August 1, 1942

Not much

A Japanese sub SW of Milne Bay
ASW attack near Milne Bay at 101,134

Japanese Ships
SS RO-61

Allied Ships
APD Stringham
APD McKean

SS RO-61 is sighted by escort
APD Stringham fails to find sub, continues to search...
APD McKean fails to find sub and abandons search
APD Stringham fails to find sub, continues to search...
APD Stringham fails to find sub, continues to search...
APD Stringham fails to find sub, continues to search...
APD Stringham fails to find sub, continues to search...
Escort abandons search for sub
================================================

(in reply to Nomad)
Post #: 332
RE: August 2, 1942 - 11/16/2021 2:06:11 PM   
Nomad


Posts: 5905
Joined: 9/5/2001
From: West Yellowstone, Montana
Status: offline 		August 2, 1942

Interesting developments today

Mines at Port Moresby

TF 205 encounters mine field at Port Moresby (98,130)

Allied Ships
CL Honolulu, Mine hits 1

CL Honolulu is in no real danger.
=====================================

Not sure why he would do this, I will have to think on it

Amphibious Assault at Horn Island (91,128)

TF 211 troops unloading over beach at Horn Island, 91,128

Japanese ground losses:
146 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 15 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 5 (0 destroyed, 5 disabled)
------------
Ground combat at Horn Island (91,128)

Japanese Shock attack

Attacking force 239 troops, 12 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 8

Defending force 0 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 0

Japanese adjusted assault: 2

Allied adjusted defense: 1

Japanese assault odds: 2 to 1 (fort level 2)

Japanese forces CAPTURE Horn Island !!!

Combat modifiers
Attacker: shock(+), leaders(-), disruption(-)

Assaulting units:
15th Nav Gd /6

It is not like he can hold it .
=====================================

(in reply to Nomad)
Post #: 333
RE: August 3, 1942 - 11/16/2021 11:32:16 PM   
Nomad


Posts: 5905
Joined: 9/5/2001
From: West Yellowstone, Montana
Status: offline 		August 3, 1942

Some pay back

TF 201 encounters mine field at Noumea (115,160)

Japanese Ships
SS RO-66, Mine hits 1, heavy damage
SS RO-68, Mine hits 1, on fire
========================================
Next turn I hit and land at Horn Island

(in reply to Nomad)
Post #: 334
RE: August 4, 1942 - 11/17/2021 1:32:59 PM   
Nomad


Posts: 5905
Joined: 9/5/2001
From: West Yellowstone, Montana
Status: offline 		August 4, 1942

Nothing happening

(in reply to Nomad)
Post #: 335
RE: August 5, 1942 - 11/17/2021 1:34:12 PM   
Nomad


Posts: 5905
Joined: 9/5/2001
From: West Yellowstone, Montana
Status: offline 		August 5, 1942

Retook an empty Horn Island


Ground combat at Horn Island (91,128)

Allied Shock attack

Attacking force 496 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 13

Defending force 0 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 0

Allied adjusted assault: 12

Japanese adjusted defense: 1

Allied assault odds: 12 to 1 (fort level 0)

Allied forces CAPTURE Horn Island !!!

Combat modifiers
Attacker: shock(+), fatigue(-)

Assaulting units:
Kanga Force Battalion
===================================

(in reply to Nomad)
Post #: 336
RE: August 5, 1942 - 11/17/2021 2:32:01 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Nomad

August 5, 1942

Retook an empty Horn Island


Ground combat at Horn Island (91,128)

Allied Shock attack

Attacking force 496 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 13

Defending force 0 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 0

Allied adjusted assault: 12

Japanese adjusted defense: 1

Allied assault odds: 12 to 1 (fort level 0)

Allied forces CAPTURE Horn Island !!!

Combat modifiers
Attacker: shock(+), fatigue(-)

Assaulting units:
Kanga Force Battalion
===================================


I hope you got some supply into Horn Island too. IIRC Kanga force is a good para-capable unit that should not remain on garrison duty for long. Cats can pull them out and replace them with a restricted Aussie company or two.


_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Nomad)
Post #: 337
RE: August 6, 1942 - 11/17/2021 5:57:50 PM   
Nomad


Posts: 5905
Joined: 9/5/2001
From: West Yellowstone, Montana
Status: offline 		August 6, 1942

Actually, Kanga Force is both garrisoning Horn Island for now and at the same time preping for its next target.

I have 1st Australian/A division brigade moving to Horn Island to further garrison it, plus a construction engineer
and a BF.

Nothing much happened today.

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 338
RE: August 7, 1942 - 11/17/2021 7:48:10 PM   
Nomad


Posts: 5905
Joined: 9/5/2001
From: West Yellowstone, Montana
Status: offline 		August 7, 1942

Got a sub:

ASW attack near Colombo at 26,47

Japanese Ships
SS I-157, hits 7, heavy damage

Allied Ships
DD Express
=====================================
ASW attack near Colombo at 27,46

Japanese Ships
SS I-157, hits 8, and is sunk

Allied Ships
DD Express
DD Electra
DE Sutlej
========================================
He landed FT TFs at
Trinkat, Moa, Great Nicobar, Car Nicobar.
=======================================
On the 19th of July I reported that I did something
stupid, I ran a sub, S KVXII into a mine at Singapore.
I am happy to report that the sub is in Colombo being repaired





Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Nomad -- 11/17/2021 10:30:17 PM >

(in reply to Nomad)
Post #: 339
RE: August 8, 1942 - 11/18/2021 12:23:51 AM   
Nomad


Posts: 5905
Joined: 9/5/2001
From: West Yellowstone, Montana
Status: offline 		August 8, 1942

nothing

(in reply to Nomad)
Post #: 340
RE: August 9, 1942 - 11/18/2021 2:19:31 PM   
Nomad


Posts: 5905
Joined: 9/5/2001
From: West Yellowstone, Montana
Status: offline 		August 9, 1942

Not much, all of the bases in the Andaman Islands are now Japanese controlled.

(in reply to Nomad)
Post #: 341
RE: August 10, 1942 - 11/19/2021 1:41:37 AM   
Nomad


Posts: 5905
Joined: 9/5/2001
From: West Yellowstone, Montana
Status: offline 		August 10, 1942

Nothing

(in reply to Nomad)
Post #: 342
RE: August 11, 1942 - 11/19/2021 2:10:41 AM   
Nomad


Posts: 5905
Joined: 9/5/2001
From: West Yellowstone, Montana
Status: offline 		August 11, 1942

nothing

(in reply to Nomad)
Post #: 343
RE: August 12, 1942 - 11/19/2021 3:01:50 PM   
Nomad


Posts: 5905
Joined: 9/5/2001
From: West Yellowstone, Montana
Status: offline 		August 12, 1942

Nothing

(in reply to Nomad)
Post #: 344
RE: August 12, 1942 - 11/19/2021 5:36:52 PM   
Cheesesteak


Posts: 301
Joined: 11/8/2010
From: Richmond, VA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Nomad

August 12, 1942

Nothing


Not having read your opponents AAR, I am confused by his play style. Did you have any idea he would be this slow or timid? Perhaps I'm just used to aggressive IJ players.

_____________________________

"Knowledge is Good" - Emil Faber

(in reply to Nomad)
Post #: 345
RE: August 12, 1942 - 11/19/2021 5:49:17 PM   
Nomad


Posts: 5905
Joined: 9/5/2001
From: West Yellowstone, Montana
Status: offline 		I had no idea what his style of play would be.

(in reply to Cheesesteak)
Post #: 346
RE: August 13, 1942 - 11/19/2021 6:03:19 PM   
Nomad


Posts: 5905
Joined: 9/5/2001
From: West Yellowstone, Montana
Status: offline 		August 13, 1942

Funny how thing work out, he had not been very aggressive of late and then this:

Morning Air attack on TF, near Milne Bay at 101,133

Weather in hex: Heavy cloud

Raid detected at 39 NM, estimated altitude 19,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 15 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 9
G3M2 Nell x 28

Allied aircraft
P-39D Airacobra x 50

Japanese aircraft losses
A6M2 Zero: 3 destroyed
G3M2 Nell: 18 destroyed, 1 damaged

Allied aircraft losses
P-39D Airacobra: 1 destroyed

Allied Ships
DD Ellet
DD Reid

Aircraft Attacking:
13 x G3M2 Nell launching torpedoes at 200 feet
Naval Attack: 1 x 18in Type 91 Torpedo

CAP engaged:
8th FG/35th FS with P-39D Airacobra (8 airborne, 17 on standby, 0 scrambling)
8 plane(s) intercepting now.
Group patrol altitude is 15000 , scrambling fighters between 15000 and 20000.
Time for all group planes to reach interception is 28 minutes
17 planes vectored on to bombers
8th FG/80th FS with P-39D Airacobra (8 airborne, 17 on standby, 0 scrambling)
8 plane(s) intercepting now.
Group patrol altitude is 16000 , scrambling fighters between 16000 and 18000.
Time for all group planes to reach interception is 29 minutes
12 planes vectored on to bombers



---------------------------------------------

Afternoon Air attack on TF, near Milne Bay at 101,133

Weather in hex: Light cloud

Raid detected at 38 NM, estimated altitude 22,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 14 minutes

Japanese aircraft
G3M2 Nell x 6

Allied aircraft
P-39D Airacobra x 40

Japanese aircraft losses
G3M2 Nell: 1 destroyed

No Allied losses

CAP engaged:
8th FG/35th FS with P-39D Airacobra (8 airborne, 16 on standby, 0 scrambling)
8 plane(s) intercepting now.
Group patrol altitude is 15000 , scrambling fighters between 13000 and 23000.
Time for all group planes to reach interception is 27 minutes
8th FG/80th FS with P-39D Airacobra (5 airborne, 11 on standby, 0 scrambling)
5 plane(s) intercepting now.
Group patrol altitude is 16000 , scrambling fighters between 11000 and 16000.
Time for all group planes to reach interception is 16 minutes

That will deplete his bomber pilots a bit.
I lost 1 P-39 and in game is shows he lost 24 G3M2 Nells and 9 A6M2( 6 A2A and 3 ops )
========================================
And my earlier successes in sinking a freighter or two by Sakhalin has made him provide more
escorts, that will use up more fuel

ASW attack near Shikuka at 126,45

Japanese Ships
PB Tatsumi Maru
xAK Rasin Maru
xAK Hamburg Maru
PB Ichiyo Maru
PB Odatsuki Maru

Allied Ships
SS Whale
====================================


< Message edited by Nomad -- 11/19/2021 6:05:35 PM >

(in reply to Nomad)
Post #: 347
RE: August 14, 1942 - 11/19/2021 11:19:39 PM   
Nomad


Posts: 5905
Joined: 9/5/2001
From: West Yellowstone, Montana
Status: offline 		August 14, 1942

Since we depleted his fighters a bit last turn, I sent some P-38E sweepers over Rabaul
Not a great return, but useful. Next turn I am sending the B-17s to Rabaul and sweepers.

Morning Air attack on Rabaul , at 106,125

Weather in hex: Clear sky

Raid spotted at 43 NM, estimated altitude 36,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 9 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 18

Allied aircraft
P-38E Lightning x 22

Japanese aircraft losses
A6M2 Zero: 4 destroyed

Allied aircraft losses
P-38E Lightning: 1 destroyed

Aircraft Attacking:
10 x P-38E Lightning sweeping at 34000 feet

CAP engaged:
13th Ku S-1 /A with A6M2 Zero (0 airborne, 4 on standby, 4 scrambling)
1 plane(s) not yet engaged, 0 being recalled, 0 out of immediate contact.
Group patrol altitude is 10000
Time for all group planes to reach interception is 18 minutes
13th Ku S-1 /C with A6M2 Zero (0 airborne, 4 on standby, 4 scrambling)
1 plane(s) not yet engaged, 0 being recalled, 0 out of immediate contact.
Group patrol altitude is 10000
Time for all group planes to reach interception is 18 minutes



---------------------------------------------

Morning Air attack on Rabaul , at 106,125

Weather in hex: Clear sky

Raid spotted at 15 NM, estimated altitude 39,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 3 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 3

Allied aircraft
P-38E Lightning x 3

Japanese aircraft losses
A6M2 Zero: 1 destroyed

Allied aircraft losses
P-38E Lightning: 1 destroyed

Aircraft Attacking:
2 x P-38E Lightning sweeping at 34000 feet

CAP engaged:
13th Ku S-1 /C with A6M2 Zero (0 airborne, 0 on standby, 2 scrambling)
Group patrol altitude is 10000 , scrambling fighters between 9000 and 11000.
Time for all group planes to reach interception is 6 minutes
13th Ku S-1 /A with A6M2 Zero (0 airborne, 0 on standby, 1 scrambling)
Group patrol altitude is 10000 , scrambling fighters to 8000.
Time for all group planes to reach interception is 3 minutes

I lost 4 P-38Es but only 2 pilots. I am out of P-38Es for replacements, I have almost
enough P-38Fs to replace them. Actually, I downgraded one of my P-38E units in India for now,
I will wait for P-38Gs or Hs.

< Message edited by Nomad -- 11/19/2021 11:25:33 PM >

(in reply to Nomad)
Post #: 348
RE: August 14, 1942 - 11/20/2021 9:49:29 AM   
castor troy


Posts: 14330
Joined: 8/23/2004
From: Austria
Status: offline 		How are those pilots flying the P-38s? The P-38 is so scarce in replacements I usually downgrade any restricted units in the US even if that means I have to trade 2-3 other fighters for 1 P-38 but then I create one flying circus with the best available fighter pilots in the USAAF. Means there will be 80 air skill pilots on top with the rest being in the mid 75 usually, all having 70+ def skill ranging from 70-80 and an average exp of 70+.

That usually means trashing Zeroes with a strato sweep like the one above if you don't run into crazy numbers. You had a kill rate of 4 or 5:1 but I would only be happy to trade a P-38 at 10:1 at this date as the enemy can pump out Zeroes at will and I'm sitting there with literally no replacement rates for the P-38 at all.

_____________________________


(in reply to Nomad)
Post #: 349
RE: August 14, 1942 - 11/20/2021 12:20:06 PM   
Nomad


Posts: 5905
Joined: 9/5/2001
From: West Yellowstone, Montana
Status: offline 		Well, let me see. A2A is 70-75. Exp is 54-81. Def is 58-74. Good, not spectacular. I did glean all the P-38Es I could from departing air groups. I had 3 P-38E units before this turn, I now have 2 and there are 29 I can use for replacements. I will have to see about rotating some pilots to get better stats. I have been training mostly for large quantities of 70 A2A pilots. I have about 800 in the reserve pool now.

(in reply to castor troy)
Post #: 350
RE: August 14, 1942 - 11/20/2021 1:14:58 PM   
castor troy


Posts: 14330
Joined: 8/23/2004
From: Austria
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Nomad

Well, let me see. A2A is 70-75. Exp is 54-81. Def is 58-74. Good, not spectacular. I did glean all the P-38Es I could from departing air groups. I had 3 P-38E units before this turn, I now have 2 and there are 29 I can use for replacements. I will have to see about rotating some pilots to get better stats. I have been training mostly for large quantities of 70 A2A pilots. I have about 800 in the reserve pool now.


I do the same about training, 70 air then 70 def. There are several pilots around by default that have god like stats which I usually mass in a flying circus. And squadrons that are flying CAP non stop also get their air skills up into the mid 70s which then supplement my hero pilots. Pilots shouldn't be an issue for the Allied, airframes are. For the Japanese it's the other way around (at least for the IJNAF with the lower replacement rate), which is crazy but that's just how it is.

< Message edited by castor troy -- 11/20/2021 1:16:15 PM >

_____________________________


(in reply to Nomad)
Post #: 351
RE: August 14, 1942 - 11/20/2021 4:01:42 PM   
Nomad


Posts: 5905
Joined: 9/5/2001
From: West Yellowstone, Montana
Status: offline 		It is probably a good idea to create one and then more elite units. I have been spreading the wealth and putting some excellent pilots in
units among good pilots. Note that the P-39D pilots did good work a turn ago, and they are about the same mixture as the P-38E pilots.

(in reply to castor troy)
Post #: 352
RE: August 15, 1942 - 11/20/2021 5:33:35 PM   
Nomad


Posts: 5905
Joined: 9/5/2001
From: West Yellowstone, Montana
Status: offline 		August 15, 1942

Nothing happened. I guess weather grounded all my aircraft flying from Port Moresby.

(in reply to Nomad)
Post #: 353
RE: August 14, 1942 - 11/20/2021 6:47:51 PM   
castor troy


Posts: 14330
Joined: 8/23/2004
From: Austria
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Nomad

It is probably a good idea to create one and then more elite units. I have been spreading the wealth and putting some excellent pilots in
units among good pilots. Note that the P-39D pilots did good work a turn ago, and they are about the same mixture as the P-38E pilots.


Yeah but your P-39 jumped on the Zeroes being on escort which is always a big malus for them. I guess your P-39 wouldn't do as good on a sweep as the P-38 given both units have the same pilot stats.

_____________________________


(in reply to Nomad)
Post #: 354
RE: August 14, 1942 - 11/20/2021 7:50:41 PM   
Nomad


Posts: 5905
Joined: 9/5/2001
From: West Yellowstone, Montana
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: castor troy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nomad

It is probably a good idea to create one and then more elite units. I have been spreading the wealth and putting some excellent pilots in
units among good pilots. Note that the P-39D pilots did good work a turn ago, and they are about the same mixture as the P-38E pilots.


Yeah but your P-39 jumped on the Zeroes being on escort which is always a big malus for them. I guess your P-39 wouldn't do as good on a sweep as the P-38 given both units have the same pilot stats.


That is true, but that is what they are there for. I do not normally sweep with P-39Ds. I use them for defense and on rare occasions escort, but their short range limits them.

(in reply to castor troy)
Post #: 355
RE: August 16, 1942 - 11/20/2021 8:42:29 PM   
Nomad


Posts: 5905
Joined: 9/5/2001
From: West Yellowstone, Montana
Status: offline 		August 16, 1942

No fighters up over Rabaul

Morning Air attack on Rabaul , at 106,125

Weather in hex: Clear sky

Raid spotted at 17 NM, estimated altitude 12,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 5 minutes

Japanese aircraft
no flights

Allied aircraft
B-17E Fortress x 36

Japanese aircraft losses
A6M2 Zero: 1 destroyed on ground

No Allied losses

Japanese ground losses:
12 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Airbase hits 17
Airbase supply hits 5
Runway hits 36
====================================

This was interesting

AM Echuca hits reef at 102 , 134

That ship was in a mine sweeping TF in Milne Bay
and the hex it hit the reef is the hex SE of Milne Bay.
I guess it was out looking for mines.


< Message edited by Nomad -- 11/20/2021 8:47:11 PM >

(in reply to Nomad)
Post #: 356
RE: August 17, 1942 - 11/21/2021 3:40:37 PM   
Nomad


Posts: 5905
Joined: 9/5/2001
From: West Yellowstone, Montana
Status: offline 		August 17, 1942

B-17Es did about as good as the P-38Es.
Afternoon Air attack on Rabaul , at 106,125

Weather in hex: Severe storms

Raid spotted at 19 NM, estimated altitude 11,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 5 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 10

Allied aircraft
B-17E Fortress x 18

Japanese aircraft losses
A6M2 Zero: 2 destroyed

Allied aircraft losses
B-17E Fortress: 1 destroyed, 5 damaged

Runway hits 1

Aircraft Attacking:
9 x B-17E Fortress bombing from 10000 feet
Airfield Attack: 8 x 500 lb GP Bomb
8 x B-17E Fortress bombing from 10000 feet
Airfield Attack: 8 x 500 lb GP Bomb

CAP engaged:
13th Ku S-1 with A6M2 Zero (3 airborne, 7 on standby, 0 scrambling)
3 plane(s) intercepting now.
Group patrol altitude is 15000
Time for all group planes to reach interception is 10 minutes



---------------------------------------------

Afternoon Air attack on Rabaul , at 106,125

Weather in hex: Severe storms

Raid spotted at 19 NM, estimated altitude 14,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 5 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 4

Allied aircraft
B-17E Fortress x 9

No Japanese losses

Allied aircraft losses
B-17E Fortress: 4 damaged

Airbase supply hits 1

Aircraft Attacking:
9 x B-17E Fortress bombing from 10000 feet
Airfield Attack: 8 x 500 lb GP Bomb

CAP engaged:
13th Ku S-1 with A6M2 Zero (0 airborne, 0 on standby, 0 scrambling)
4 plane(s) not yet engaged, 0 being recalled, 0 out of immediate contact.
Group patrol altitude is 15000 , scrambling fighters to 10000.
Time for all group planes to reach interception is 106 minutes
========================================================================================

(in reply to Nomad)
Post #: 357
RE: August 18, 1942 - 11/21/2021 7:17:17 PM   
Nomad


Posts: 5905
Joined: 9/5/2001
From: West Yellowstone, Montana
Status: offline 		August 18, 1942

Nothing

(in reply to Nomad)
Post #: 358
RE: August 19, 1942 - 11/21/2021 8:35:49 PM   
Nomad


Posts: 5905
Joined: 9/5/2001
From: West Yellowstone, Montana
Status: offline 		August 19, 1942

Duds:
Sub attack near Tandjoengpinang at 51,85

Japanese Ships
xAK Hukuyo Maru
PB Fuji Maru #3

Allied Ships
SS Snapper
==========================
Submarine attack near Tandjoengpinang at 51,86

Japanese Ships
xAK Eihuku Maru

Allied Ships
SS Seal
===============================

(in reply to Nomad)
Post #: 359
RE: August 20, 1942 - 11/21/2021 11:02:30 PM   
Nomad


Posts: 5905
Joined: 9/5/2001
From: West Yellowstone, Montana
Status: offline 		August 20, 1942

Another one found a minefield:



TF 219 encounters mine field at Milne Bay (101,133)

Japanese Ships
SS I-159, Mine hits 1, on fire, heavy damage



---------------------------------------------

TF 219 encounters mine field at Milne Bay (101,133)

Japanese Ships
SS I-159, Mine hits 1, on fire, heavy damage
========================================================

(in reply to Nomad)
Post #: 360
Page:   <<   < prev  10 11 [12] 13 14   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: July 31, 1942 Page: <<   < prev  10 11 [12] 13 14   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.813