Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Is this game good anymore?

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East 2 >> RE: Is this game good anymore? Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Is this game good anymore? - 2/13/2022 10:37:56 AM   
actrade

 

Posts: 283
Joined: 11/3/2006
Status: offline
From the initial post I has my suspicions this was a troll post and this one pretty much sums it up for me. This guy doesn't want help, he's just here to troll the game. Goodbye!

(in reply to Gazzas)
Post #: 31
RE: Is this game good anymore? - 2/13/2022 10:47:41 AM   
Zovs


Posts: 6668
Joined: 2/23/2009
From: United States
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Gazzas
3-4 hours? Hell, I still have a full-time job and a wife. I don't have 3-4 hours every day.


To learn the game you are going to need to invest several hundreds of hours into both playing the and reading the manual. It’s not a beer & pretzel game.

_____________________________


Beta Tester for:
Flashpoint Campaigns: Sudden Storm
War in the East 1 & 2
WarPlan & WarPlan Pacific
Valor & Victory
DG CWIE 2
SPWW2 & SPMBT scenario creator

(in reply to Gazzas)
Post #: 32
RE: Is this game good anymore? - 2/13/2022 11:36:28 AM   
marion61

 

Posts: 1688
Joined: 9/8/2011
Status: offline
You can change your game settings during the course of a scenario on the Admin Panel. I use it frequently when I'm testing something.

< Message edited by marion61 -- 2/13/2022 11:39:08 AM >

(in reply to RedJohn)
Post #: 33
RE: Is this game good anymore? - 2/13/2022 11:37:39 AM   
Stamb

 

Posts: 1030
Joined: 10/26/2021
Status: offline
Is it still possible in multiplayer?

(in reply to marion61)
Post #: 34
RE: Is this game good anymore? - 2/13/2022 11:45:06 AM   
marion61

 

Posts: 1688
Joined: 9/8/2011
Status: offline
That I'm not sure of, but I'd say no for multiplayer (I haven't played a multiplayer game in awhile). I'm not sure how that would work if one player changed all his opponents options without them knowing it or how it might skew the match.

(in reply to Stamb)
Post #: 35
RE: Is this game good anymore? - 2/13/2022 1:00:57 PM   
carlkay58

 

Posts: 8650
Joined: 7/25/2010
Status: offline
Game options are set in stone on the initial start of the game in HvH games. AI games allow changes at any time.

There is an outstanding question in another thread as to whether the Editor could be used to change those settings in an HvH game after the start.

(in reply to marion61)
Post #: 36
RE: Is this game good anymore? - 2/13/2022 5:08:17 PM   
Sammy5IsAlive

 

Posts: 514
Joined: 8/4/2014
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Zovs


quote:

ORIGINAL: Gazzas
3-4 hours? Hell, I still have a full-time job and a wife. I don't have 3-4 hours every day.


To learn the game you are going to need to invest several hundreds of hours into both playing the and reading the manual. It’s not a beer & pretzel game.


I'd actually disagree with this to a certain extent. For me whilst the full campaign requires a large time investment in terms of both learning and playing the smaller scenarios are much more accessible for a more casual player. I think I'd feel fairly comfortable saying to a potential buyer that if they were to play all the smaller scenarios but never move onto the full campaign they'd still be getting acceptable value for money.

(in reply to Zovs)
Post #: 37
RE: Is this game good anymore? - 2/13/2022 5:28:58 PM   
malyhin1517


Posts: 1426
Joined: 9/20/2015
From: Ukraine Dnepropetrovsk
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Gazzas
3-4 hours? Hell, I still have a full-time job and a wife. I don't have 3-4 hours every day.

You can make your move in a few days. I usually rarely manage to make a move faster than once every 3 days!

_____________________________

Sorry, i use an online translator :(

(in reply to Gazzas)
Post #: 38
RE: Is this game good anymore? - 2/13/2022 8:12:31 PM   
ToxicThug11


Posts: 67
Joined: 9/2/2021
From: United Kingdom
Status: offline
This game is awesome

(in reply to Gazzas)
Post #: 39
RE: Is this game good anymore? - 2/13/2022 8:19:19 PM   
Zebtucker12


Posts: 117
Joined: 1/8/2017
Status: offline
I love this game its my favorit currently and i play many games.

_____________________________

Axis Bias mod developer. Xhoel Fanboy. Red army choir enthusiast.
https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=5144537&mpage=1&key=

(in reply to ToxicThug11)
Post #: 40
RE: Is this game good anymore? - 2/14/2022 5:52:59 AM   
Gazzas

 

Posts: 14
Joined: 2/11/2022
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: actrade

From the initial post I has my suspicions this was a troll post and this one pretty much sums it up for me. This guy doesn't want help, he's just here to troll the game. Goodbye!



Sorry. You've failed to read into the spirit of my post. Not a Troll post. If I am going to drop $100 on a game that I will want to play against another human being, eventually, I don't want to be beaten simply because the other guy can trick his way through any situation.

I hate gimmicky play. And reading some of the AAR's and other posts,I see that many people are able to use gimmicks to prevent the opponent from advancing.

And furthermore, seeing that supply and reinforcements/replacements aren't making it to the front, I have to ask questions.

So thanks for your opinion.

< Message edited by Gazzas -- 2/14/2022 5:53:46 AM >

(in reply to actrade)
Post #: 41
RE: Is this game good anymore? - 2/14/2022 5:58:06 AM   
Gazzas

 

Posts: 14
Joined: 2/11/2022
Status: offline
Thank you all for your helpful answers. I appreciate the effort you put into this thread.

(in reply to Gazzas)
Post #: 42
RE: Is this game good anymore? - 2/14/2022 10:14:24 AM   
RedJohn

 

Posts: 517
Joined: 9/20/2019
Status: offline
There are a lot of gimmicks, to be sure, but you can houserule many of them away.

Supply and replacements work fine. The Soviets have it arguably too generous, and refitting panzers can be troublesome sometimes, but they're not insurmountable issues. The debate regarding reinforcements that xhoel brought up is a different kettle of fish but that's not relevant for Germany until their manpower depletes.

And these games have a very long dev cycle with fairly active development for a good few years, so it's not like things are static.

< Message edited by RedJohn -- 2/14/2022 10:19:05 AM >

(in reply to Gazzas)
Post #: 43
RE: Is this game good anymore? - 2/14/2022 1:54:40 PM   
Erik Rutins

 

Posts: 37503
Joined: 3/28/2000
From: Vermont, USA
Status: offline
I think a lot of folks are still trying to play WITE2 like WITE1 and looking for the same results. This is understandable initially, but to play WITE2 well and get the most out of your army, whether playing as the Axis or the Soviets, you need to learn the new systems and there are quite a few. Most importantly, the CPP/Delay system for ground combat, the improved Air system and the improved Logistics system. If you expect to do well by just pushing counters forward and using 1941 Panzer Divisions as tools to grind down enemy units, you're not going to do as well as a player who learns how to do a historical blitzkrieg within the game system.

For example, Panzer Divisions in 1941 still have plenty of teeth and they can absolutely wreck Soviet divisions, but they are also easier to misuse and break than in WITE1. If you look at the various AARs, you'll see a pretty huge difference in what the most experiences Axis players can achieve vs. those that are not. They give the Axis a huge early advantage in maneuver, encirclement and breakthrough, but they are not invincible and will lose strength and capability if you treat them as a blunt instrument.

The new victory system with the campaign that includes the sudden death victory checks does a good job of addressing retreat strategies overall, though some players asked for an alternate campaign without those sudden death check and prefer to play that way. However, playing without those checks will also encourage more retreat strategies. That's considered an alternate/optional campaign.

Finally, I'd ask the original poster to come in with an open mind rather than a negative assumption.

Regards,

- Erik


_____________________________

Erik Rutins
CEO, Matrix Games LLC




For official support, please use our Help Desk: http://www.matrixgames.com/helpdesk/

Freedom is not Free.

(in reply to RedJohn)
Post #: 44
RE: Is this game good anymore? - 2/15/2022 4:05:22 AM   
Gazzas

 

Posts: 14
Joined: 2/11/2022
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Erik Rutins

I think a lot of folks are still trying to play WITE2 like WITE1 and looking for the same results. This is understandable initially, but to play WITE2 well and get the most out of your army, whether playing as the Axis or the Soviets, you need to learn the new systems and there are quite a few. Most importantly, the CPP/Delay system for ground combat, the improved Air system and the improved Logistics system. If you expect to do well by just pushing counters forward and using 1941 Panzer Divisions as tools to grind down enemy units, you're not going to do as well as a player who learns how to do a historical blitzkrieg within the game system.

For example, Panzer Divisions in 1941 still have plenty of teeth and they can absolutely wreck Soviet divisions, but they are also easier to misuse and break than in WITE1. If you look at the various AARs, you'll see a pretty huge difference in what the most experiences Axis players can achieve vs. those that are not. They give the Axis a huge early advantage in maneuver, encirclement and breakthrough, but they are not invincible and will lose strength and capability if you treat them as a blunt instrument.

The new victory system with the campaign that includes the sudden death victory checks does a good job of addressing retreat strategies overall, though some players asked for an alternate campaign without those sudden death check and prefer to play that way. However, playing without those checks will also encourage more retreat strategies. That's considered an alternate/optional campaign.

Finally, I'd ask the original poster to come in with an open mind rather than a negative assumption.

Regards,

- Erik




There are some interesting things that you write here, Erik. I will try to look into it further. But I still am not sure if it's for me, as I was expecting something more like the original.

(in reply to Erik Rutins)
Post #: 45
RE: Is this game good anymore? - 2/15/2022 4:07:24 AM   
Gazzas

 

Posts: 14
Joined: 2/11/2022
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: RedJohn

There are a lot of gimmicks, to be sure, but you can houserule many of them away.

Supply and replacements work fine. The Soviets have it arguably too generous, and refitting panzers can be troublesome sometimes, but they're not insurmountable issues. The debate regarding reinforcements that xhoel brought up is a different kettle of fish but that's not relevant for Germany until their manpower depletes.

And these games have a very long dev cycle with fairly active development for a good few years, so it's not like things are static.


Thanks for the thoughts. I've had a lot of prospective opponents for other games shy away because of house rules. Some people just don't like them.

(in reply to RedJohn)
Post #: 46
RE: Is this game good anymore? - 2/15/2022 5:10:52 AM   
MButtsworth

 

Posts: 433
Joined: 7/4/2014
Status: offline
I have played both Wite and Wite 2 extensively including play testing it during development and playing numerous games since and can say conclusively that Wite 2 is infinitely superior to Wite 1 reflecting the mammoth amount of game development and historical research that has gone into it.
As a war game and a historical simulation it is a marvel.

(in reply to Gazzas)
Post #: 47
RE: Is this game good anymore? - 2/16/2022 12:36:10 PM   
FriedrichII

 

Posts: 90
Joined: 3/16/2021
From: Germany
Status: offline
I have had already hundreds of hours great enjoyment playing and learning this game since the release. I think learning the game makes for me as much fun as playing it. The game is incredible deep and there is still a lot to discover and learn for me. I am sure that I will have hundreds of hours great joy before me playing WitE2. If I look at the price in money per hour this is maybe the cheapest game I have ever bought.
Sometimes I am just looking and optimizing one little thing in my ongoing campaign for hours with great passion, curiosity and joy for hours without doing actual much. Never had this before in a game.

< Message edited by FriedrichII -- 2/16/2022 12:40:34 PM >

(in reply to MButtsworth)
Post #: 48
RE: Is this game good anymore? - 2/16/2022 1:20:14 PM   
Zovs


Posts: 6668
Joined: 2/23/2009
From: United States
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Gazzas

But I still am not sure if it's for me, as I was expecting something more like the original.



It is far better than the original, hands down.

_____________________________


Beta Tester for:
Flashpoint Campaigns: Sudden Storm
War in the East 1 & 2
WarPlan & WarPlan Pacific
Valor & Victory
DG CWIE 2
SPWW2 & SPMBT scenario creator

(in reply to Gazzas)
Post #: 49
RE: Is this game good anymore? - 2/16/2022 1:44:52 PM   
Stephan61

 

Posts: 60
Joined: 3/3/2021
Status: offline
Agree with Zovs above ^^^

Having played Computer, Board and Tabletop war Games for some 50 years now I didn't think you could get a better game than some of the later SSG Battlefront Titles or John Tillers later Campaign Series titles or WiTE1, but WiTE2 beats them all in my book.

Yes it has faults, but the game is continually being developed from the feedback received.

v the AI you will find a very challenging game as the Axis Player, more so than in H2H mode, as the Russian Player is armed with all the historical information on where the Axis need to strike to enable the collection of points and can mount a very stern defence at those locations.

Finally (from many hours now on WiTE2) I will repeat what has been said many times on this forum, that you need to forget what you learnt in WiTE1 and start afresh and understand the new system.

(in reply to Zovs)
Post #: 50
RE: Is this game good anymore? - 2/16/2022 2:15:38 PM   
malyhin1517


Posts: 1426
Joined: 9/20/2015
From: Ukraine Dnepropetrovsk
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Gazzas

There are some interesting things that you write here, Erik. I will try to look into it further. But I still am not sure if it's for me, as I was expecting something more like the original.


I played WITE1 for a very long time and I really enjoyed playing it. I am also not always happy with the changes in the second part of the game. But I stopped playing the original game completely! The second game after training is much more interesting than the first. But you need to change your game strategy and most importantly learn how to manually manage your aircraft, supplies and theaters. Only in this case you will get the maximum pleasure and result from the game!

_____________________________

Sorry, i use an online translator :(

(in reply to Gazzas)
Post #: 51
RE: Is this game good anymore? - 2/16/2022 8:04:00 PM   
Gazzas

 

Posts: 14
Joined: 2/11/2022
Status: offline
It's good to see more positive posts. I find it difficult to try to be uninterested in this game. I've started watching some tutorials on Youtube.

(in reply to malyhin1517)
Post #: 52
RE: Is this game good anymore? - 2/17/2022 12:46:25 AM   
DarkHorse2

 

Posts: 77
Joined: 2/4/2022
Status: offline
It still has potential and could turn around in 6 months.

But despite all of the gaslighting to the contrary, no.

(in reply to Gazzas)
Post #: 53
RE: Is this game good anymore? - 2/17/2022 12:58:24 AM   
AlbertN

 

Posts: 3693
Joined: 10/5/2010
From: Italy
Status: offline
I think the game is good and can get better in terms of balance, and quality of life.

There are things I'd like - but that won't be here if not via DLC (like Production Control and things that may turn it into a grander strategy game).

It can improve in quality of life stuff (ie. Depot Switches / Cycles; or more Commander Report functions like -move to OKH/Stavka- a mass of SU from HQs and divisions) etc.
For instance it is a chore to filter all the SUs that are under 30% TOE (for example) ... and then the only option is to transfer them to the reserve. Why not a mass move them to -This Target HQ-. It would cut a lot of time and effort, pretty much mindless, repeated clicking. That may murder the 'fun component' of a player.

It can improve in balance (and that's where many forum discussion get on!).

Some mechanics can be reviewed? Maybe in the eyes of some.

But I do not know a single strategy game that once it came out for retail sale, it was flawless. Each game took years to get refined via patches - and very often many games had continued 'balance mods' made by PvP Players (that due to their competitive nature of gaming have a better grip on the game vs people that play exclusively against the AI).

Thus - I believe anyone buying the game should do so with the idea of a product that reaches maturity in time.

(in reply to DarkHorse2)
Post #: 54
RE: Is this game good anymore? - 2/17/2022 1:37:18 AM   
Erik Rutins

 

Posts: 37503
Joined: 3/28/2000
From: Vermont, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DarkHorse2
But despite all of the gaslighting to the contrary, no.


Personal attacks are against the forum rules. Who exactly are you accusing of gaslighting (lying)?

Regards,

- Erik



_____________________________

Erik Rutins
CEO, Matrix Games LLC




For official support, please use our Help Desk: http://www.matrixgames.com/helpdesk/

Freedom is not Free.

(in reply to DarkHorse2)
Post #: 55
RE: Is this game good anymore? - 2/17/2022 2:12:25 AM   
MechFO

 

Posts: 669
Joined: 6/1/2007
Status: offline
In some areas it is very good, notably that it makes the Eastern front over several years actualy a playable experience in a level of detail that's probably as good as it gets. It's Logistics design is topnotch and the C&C model as well as the level of integration of the airwar is very good.

In certain areas it's quite bad. It's unit size/hex size relation does not mesh well with it's stacking rules, excaberated by having corps sized counters and compounded by having no density factor in combat resolution or movement cost. It also lacks time synchronisation. The combat delay feature is a step in the right direction but it's a band aid and probably used too sparingly. This should be the prime factor that's stopping ridiculous penetrations by units in a timewarp (combat delay should arguably be the number of movement points invested in the previous combats if certain CV relation is not reached). It's unfortunate that TOAW's inovations in these areas did not make a bigger impact.

In many cases it seems to overburden itself with unneeded complexity, given the limited developer resources it realistically has.

(in reply to AlbertN)
Post #: 56
RE: Is this game good anymore? - 2/17/2022 3:02:11 AM   
Gazzas

 

Posts: 14
Joined: 2/11/2022
Status: offline
After watching a few hours of Youtube tutorials, I'm very disappointed to learn that production is completely out of the player's control. I can see limiting certain heavy types... i.e., the Tiger I. But being stuck with PzII chassis in production for a long time seems counter-intuitive to trying to win a war in a grand campaign game.

It seems to me, that interesting and useful things like managing production has been replaced with the tedium of managing logistics.

So much looks good in this game. Yet so many things look bad.

The whole point of playing a big, historical game is to win. And part any winning strategy is to avoid the mistakes made by the people in history.




(in reply to MechFO)
Post #: 57
RE: Is this game good anymore? - 2/17/2022 6:45:41 AM   
Zebtucker12


Posts: 117
Joined: 1/8/2017
Status: offline
You can enjoy without winning i really enjoyed my vistula to berlin campign
You can also learn from this things like those pzr3 chassis become stugs :)

_____________________________

Axis Bias mod developer. Xhoel Fanboy. Red army choir enthusiast.
https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=5144537&mpage=1&key=

(in reply to Gazzas)
Post #: 58
RE: Is this game good anymore? - 2/17/2022 8:34:47 AM   
Stamb

 

Posts: 1030
Joined: 10/26/2021
Status: offline
This is what I also feel. When I saw wite 1 on youtube - Soviet player was afraid of losing armament and heavy industry factories in Ukraine. I was amazed by such a details.

And then I bought wite 2 and...

Nobody pays attention to a resource/armament/heavy industry factories. At all. No mentions in AAR. Why? Because even if you lose it - you will not feel any consequences.

That is why I also say that production is more important than logistics. I hope one day we will have proper production in wite 2.

_____________________________


(in reply to Gazzas)
Post #: 59
RE: Is this game good anymore? - 2/17/2022 8:36:28 AM   
Stamb

 

Posts: 1030
Joined: 10/26/2021
Status: offline
Also recon during air phase and inability to use it as you progress during ground phase is a step back, from my perspective.

_____________________________


(in reply to Stamb)
Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East 2 >> RE: Is this game good anymore? Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.672