Shannon V. OKeets -> RE: Weather (4/13/2008 9:11:20 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Froonp quote:
ORIGINAL: Shannon V. OKeets A couple more new pages. [image]local://upfiles/16701/8140A888F34B4B43915E440AB333614C.jpg[/image] In this one you say "All the units are in supply because the cities in their home countries are primary supply sources." This is true for all the Polish units, but not for all the Germans ones. The German VI INF Corps for example near the Polish coridor is only in supply from Von Bock, as there are no German cities near enough to provide supply in northeast Germany. The VI INF Corps is 4 hexes from Stettin and Breslau. Also, the German stack in SW East Prussia, under the Bf 109E-3 next to Rundstedt, is only in supply from Rundstedt too, as the absence of German land units in the hex SE of Konigsberg (the Ju 87B here is alone) forbids them to trace through it, so they happen to be 4 hexes from Konigsberg. This is said to stress the fact that units are not always in supply inside their home country, especially in bad weather, and this idea of easy supply at home should not be given to players. It is easier, but you should be carefull too. I'll stay with the text as written. I did not say that each unit could trace a basic path to a primary supply source (a city in its home country). Yes, that is an easy assumption to make, given what I have written. But it is an assumption by the reader, not by the author. The German 7-3 could also trace supply through the nearby port, but then we would have to get into which optional rules are in effect and which units are in the Allied sea boxes in the Baltic. All of this is appropriate for a tutorial on tracing supply lines, and it is covered in exquisite detail there (tutorial #10). Here I am thinking of the comment about supply be more or less a tease about the supply rules. I do this often in the tutorials, where reference is made to something that has not been discussed in detail yet - but will be in a following tutorial. This is intentional on my part. And it is pretty much unavoidable given how heavily the different rules interact with each other. To discuss A you have to understand B, which requires understanding C, which requires understanding A.
|
|
|
|