Canoerebel -> RE: One Weird Battle (10/17/2010 8:16:26 PM)
|
BigRed: Thanks for yet another helpful reader tip. I am getting some very helpful input and rule citings from you guys. Vettim: I don't plan to engage in a sustained, massive campaign to reconquer India. I prefer to cut to the chase and start my first major campaign somewhere much closer to the Japanese heartland. Of course, that doesn't mean I won't fight in India. I'll use troops and aircraft as best I can, but my main effort will be to use India as a diversion (this isn't anything new - I've outlined this from the beginning of the game). Of course, this is subject to change to adapt the the actual circumstances as the game further develops. I think there is a reasonable chance that Brad has already decided whether or not he's coming full bore in India. I am scouring SigInt and known troop dispositions for clues or signs of withdrawals. If he is withdrawing, he would keep up some forward pressure while at the same time organizing a pull out. I'm going to stop and mount a credible fight at Cawnpore (major urban hex in north India) and see if Brad really wants it. My gut feeling is that Brad isn't coming full bore, but I am not acting on that until I have enough evidence to draw an informed conclusion. Thus far the Allies have played the game just as outlined in the opening days of the war. Here's a summary of what that plan has been and how it's worked out. Interestingly, even though I feel justified in giving myself some high marks to this point, all of these things are secondary to whether or not I made the right call in not using my carriers or other offensive capabilities to counter Brad's India offensive. If I've failed in that regard, then all of my successes will be meaningless. 1. At the outset, I felt that Brad would come hard for one of these three places - India, Austrailia, or Hawaii. All early war deployements were made with that in mind. 2. Brad orchestrated a massive diversion against Australia. While impressed by his efforts there, I remained worried about India. Consequently, the Allies diverted one of the two Aussie divisions that arrive at Aden to India. That was an astute move and I bet it made Brad scractch his head when he first bumped into those Aussies. 3. If Brad invaded either Oz or India, I wanted him to penetrate deeply, but not deeply enough to threat the main urban area (Melbourne/Sydney and Karachi/Delhi). I thought (and think) that I can eventually use penetration against the Japanese. 4. The rigid invocation of the "force in being" use of the Allied carriers has clearly made Brad reluctant to venture forth anywhere away from the KB or outside his LBA umbrella. Thus, while he has made great strides in India, he has been totally, completely absent from the Pacific. This has allowed the Allies to develop good defenses of the Aluetians, Midway, Canton Island, and Fiji. Of these, Midway and the Aleutians are of paramount importance given my future plans. 5. I think that the big Allied build up in the Aleutians has Brad's full attention, as it is meant to. I don't have any way of knowing this for certain, but I suspect that Brad's decision making in India is now influenced by the growing (appearance of an) Allied threat in NoPac. If that's the case, the the Aleutians operation has been a crictical operation even though no battle has occurred there (yet). 6. Throughout the game, the Allies have worked hard to position troops, supplies, fuel, ships, and aircraft in harmony with my long-range strategic plan. Despite the havoc in India, this has continued. So, everything that has happened in the game to this point has been in accordance with Allied plans. But the jury is still out as to whether the plan was fatally flawed due to Japanese success in India. I think I'm going to prevail in India (by prevail I mean holding Karachi/Delhi), but I didn't mean to cut things so finely.
|
|
|
|