AW1Steve -> RE: THE THREAD!!! (4/2/2012 11:02:41 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Chickenboy quote:
ORIGINAL: Terminus Wow, I thought that program had been cancelled. I hadn't heard anything about it for some time myself. Here's Boeing's main page. Good stuff. What say you, ASW-ubermench Steve? http://www.boeing.com/defense-space/military/p8a/index.html It has good features and bad features. A good speed so it's fast to get out on station.The cabin appears to be comfortable. Only 2 engines so it has little redundacy and not much ability to absorb battle damage. Plus it has the disadvantages of a jet at low altitude , and a SERIOUS disadvantage by having it's engines under the wing (as in close to the water). I would NOT want to fly this plane low to the water, EVER. The 737 airframe has been proposed before, rejected in favor of the P-3g, the P-3g was cancelled and the P-7 propsed and cancelled. I'm also dubious of the fact that Boeing hasn't even tried to build a MPA since the 30's, and has never one a contract for one. So I'm a little dubious. As I've been for just about every Navy airplane contract for the last 20 years or so. And I'm even more dubious of replacing P-3's with drones, another plan. [8|]
|
|
|
|