LOG! (Full Version)

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> The War Room



Message


Nikademus -> LOG! (11/29/2011 10:29:08 PM)

ha ha......you iSuck part DU!

[img]http://bestsmileys.com/dancing/10.gif[/img] [img]http://bestsmileys.com/dancing/10.gif[/img]




Chickenboy -> RE: THE THREAD!!! (11/29/2011 10:29:14 PM)

But...

ETA: Weiner.




Mynok -> RE: THE THREAD!!! (11/29/2011 10:33:48 PM)

quote:

If I had a beef with what they do, then I wouldn't buy 'em. I also wouldn't claim the intellectual or moral high ground because I-by default or by design-chose not to do my homework and didn't know that my advisor bought some of 'em for Beta reduction in my portfolio.

For those that decry the curtain between mutual fund / money managers and their money, there's a simple solution: invest in non-public corporations or sit in cash. Anything else requires your acceptance of personal fault by either comission or omission.


Nah, I'm not taking any moral high ground. I got no problem with those who think differently about it. I don't do it personally...at least not in funds and stuff, but heck, my wife does. That's her call and her money.




Mynok -> RE: THE THREAD!!! (11/29/2011 10:36:46 PM)

I didn't see T on today. Unusual for that massive spambot cluster. After his moaning yesterday, makes me a bit concerned.

Did see him pop up on Facebook earlier today though. Maybe just taking a break. [8D]




Alfred -> RE: THE THREAD!!! (11/29/2011 10:40:39 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: JWE


quote:

ORIGINAL: jeffk3510
So ALL corporations are evil huh?

No, of course not. But that's what we are supposed to think. It's easier to just tuck in to the usual horse manure than try and teach people that Keynesian economics is a colonoscopy prep pill waiting to happen. [:D]


Sorry JWE, don't fully agree with your position re Keynesian economics. Problem with Keynesian economics is not with the theory but with the application of it by mediocre decision makers.

1. Most economic students don't actually study Keynes writings at source. Instead they study interpretations of what Keynes wrote written by other economists. At best students may read very selective extracts which distort the overall message of Keynes.

2. Keynes himself in his General Theory well identified that his approach was inflationary and that over the long term some quite undersirable consequences would ensue. However in the short to medium term, in a world still gripped by the Great Depression, inflation was by far the lesser of two evils.

3. There is nothing in Keynesian economic theory which mandates that aggregate demand must be continually ramped up by government. Indeed the growth of consumer product innovation supported by modern marketing, an area of economic activity which really only took off after Keynes death and thus was largely absent in Keynes writings, would allow for the role of the state in stimulating aggregate demand to be greatly reduced.

It comes down to Keynesian theory being a valuable tool in manageing the economy. A good manager employs it as appropriate together with other tools provided by other economic schools of thought, such as the Chicago School with its emphasis on monetary policy.

The problem however lies in having mediocre managers, not the theory per se.

Alfred




JWE -> RE: THE THREAD!!! (11/29/2011 10:43:59 PM)

Maida Gillespie: "Careers and higher education are leading to the masculinization of women, with enormously dangerous consequences to the home, the children, and our country. When our boys come home from war, what kind of girls will they be coming home to? And now the most disgusting example of this sexual confusion: Mr. Walter Harvey of Harvey Candy Bars is presenting us with women's baseball. Right here in Chicago, young girls plucked from their families are gathered at Harvey Field, to see which one of them can be the most masculine. Mr. Harvey, like your candy bars, your company is ... evil!"

Doris: Hey Mae, Mae, your date's here.
Mae: How do I look?
Doris: Where'd you get that dress?
Mae: Borrowed it.
Doris: It don't fit you, Mae, it's too tight.
Mae: I don't plan on wearing it that long.
Doris: Ohh! I don't know why you bother to get dressed at all.





Apollo11 -> RE: THE THREAD!!! (11/29/2011 10:45:08 PM)

Hi all,

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mynok

I didn't see T on today. Unusual for that massive spambot cluster. After his moaning yesterday, makes me a bit concerned.

Did see him pop up on Facebook earlier today though. Maybe just taking a break. [8D]


Kristian is using Facebook? [X(]


Leo "Apolllo11"




Nikademus -> RE: THE THREAD!!! (11/29/2011 10:47:32 PM)

yep. This way he can be grumpy globally. [:)]




Kwik E Mart -> RE: THE THREAD!!! (11/29/2011 10:49:28 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Apollo11

Hi all,

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mynok

I didn't see T on today. Unusual for that massive spambot cluster. After his moaning yesterday, makes me a bit concerned.

Did see him pop up on Facebook earlier today though. Maybe just taking a break. [8D]


Kristian is using Facebook? [X(]


Leo "Apolllo11"


now THAT's evil...[;)]




Grollub -> RE: THE THREAD!!! (11/29/2011 10:50:38 PM)

Good night friends [>:]




jeffk3510 -> RE: THE THREAD!!! (11/29/2011 10:52:08 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Mynok

Not worth any hard feelings. [:D]

I've been fortunate to only have to work for private companies. Much prefer that environment. Don't know what I would do if had to do otherwise. I'll deal with that pit if it ever shows up. [:D]

quote:

The line of corporations existing to make money for their shareholders might have been true in the past.

Today many a corporation is run by management which only cares in enriching itself. Many modern features of modern corporate life allows management to disregard the interests of their shareholders.


Which brings up another 'evil' of the whole public thing: most shareholders aren't people. They are other corporations, i.e. mutual fund and investment companies. Huge opportunity for a lot of evil and we had a recent perfect storm of it in the financial sector.

In a world run by messed up humanity, anything that reduces accountability is a bad thing and should be avoided.


People are comforted by being able to 'hand off' some of the inconvenient viscitudes of modern life to another set of hands so that they can do things that may be distasteful for the general public. Most people don't know how to invest or want to take the time and effort to do so, so they hand it over to a mutual fund investment company or buy an ETF that will do the same thing for 'em. They don't want to see the wizard behind the curtain, dude. Witness how few people want to know the gritty details about how food is produced for them as an example. They don't want to think about how, they only care about the bottom line mostly. Transparency isn't the same as accountability.

I'm OK with that duality / hypocracy.

I want the corporations in which I invest to be transparent in their financials, their annual statements, their quarterlys and their other dealings with shareholders. Everything else, including value judgements, is my domain. I don't care if Philip Morris produces and sells cigarettes and smokeless tobacco, so long as they're straightforward that that's exactly what they intend to do. And continue to give me a yummy 6.5% dividend yield return.

If I had a beef with what they do, then I wouldn't buy 'em. I also wouldn't claim the intellectual or moral high ground because I-by default or by design-chose not to do my homework and didn't know that my advisor bought some of 'em for Beta reduction in my portfolio.

For those that decry the curtain between mutual fund / money managers and their money, there's a simple solution: invest in non-public corporations or sit in cash. Anything else requires your acceptance of personal fault by either comission or omission.

And don't even get me started on 'living wage' or 'fair trade', please.



Agreed. 100%. Now it is time to go play trains at my parents house after supper.




Chickenboy -> RE: THE THREAD!!! (11/29/2011 10:56:37 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: jeffk3510
Now it is time to go play trains at my parents house after supper.

You lucky, lucky bastard....[:D]




Mike Solli -> RE: THE THREAD!!! (11/29/2011 11:05:56 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Mynok


That's very strange. What type of Mac do you have?


I have a Mac Mini. Not bad for the price. I got windows installed and then boot camp did it's thing. Still missing some drivers:

PCI Simple Communications Controller
SM Bus Controller
Ethernet Controller
Network Controller
Bluetooth USB Host Controller

I still can't get on the internet. When I try, it says it's missing the network adaptor driver.

I did get the driver installed for my monitor. It still wouldn't give me any option other than 800x600. I had to head out for an appointment. Going to reboot it now to see if that makes a difference.




Mike Solli -> RE: THE THREAD!!! (11/29/2011 11:07:38 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Apollo11

Hi all,

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mike Solli

I just found out from Apple that I have to use the 32 bit Windows 7. Ok, I can do that. [:D]


Why is that Mike?

No drivers for 64 bit Windows 7 version in Mac BootCamp?

BTW, you will have 3.2+ GB of RAM when suing Windows 7 32 bit (i.e. you will loose 700+ MBs - that that is not big deal since no programs actually use that much RAM anyway apart from specialized ones or the virtualization that I, for example, use regularly)...

Also, I always suggest Windows 7 32 bit to anyone with <= 4 GB RAM - less problems with 32 bit drivers compared to 64 bit Windows 7 drivers! [:)]


Leo "Apollo11"


They said it wasn't supported. I have no clue why. Anyway, I'm only going to use the windows side for AE and the other odd game that I may play. I've got 4 GB ram on this machine but 3.2 will be fine.




Mike Solli -> RE: THE THREAD!!! (11/29/2011 11:11:52 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Mynok


quote:

Hadn't heard about the 64 bit issue vs. 32 bit issue but then again the version of Win7 on my Core2 Duo "era" Mac uses the 32 bit version of 7 so it passed under my radar.


I have no troubles running 64-bit Windows 7 on my Macbook Pro with 4GB of memory. That's why I was curious what kind of Mac Mike had and what kind of RAM. RAM size could very well be an issue.


I wonder if it has anything to do with the HD being a flash drive. I have no clue if that means anything. Just different, that's all.




jeffk3510 -> RE: THE THREAD!!! (11/29/2011 11:14:35 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy


quote:

ORIGINAL: jeffk3510
Now it is time to go play trains at my parents house after supper.

You lucky, lucky bastard....[:D]

So, do you have the model railroad disease we have?[8D]




Mike Solli -> RE: THE THREAD!!! (11/29/2011 11:20:21 PM)

Holy cow. All I did was blab about what a moron I am with my computer and look what it turned into. [:D]

Off to see what windows will do now.....




Mynok -> RE: THE THREAD!!! (11/29/2011 11:23:07 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Mike Solli


quote:

ORIGINAL: Mynok


That's very strange. What type of Mac do you have?


I have a Mac Mini. Not bad for the price. I got windows installed and then boot camp did it's thing. Still missing some drivers:

PCI Simple Communications Controller
SM Bus Controller
Ethernet Controller
Network Controller
Bluetooth USB Host Controller

I still can't get on the internet. When I try, it says it's missing the network adaptor driver.

I did get the driver installed for my monitor. It still wouldn't give me any option other than 800x600. I had to head out for an appointment. Going to reboot it now to see if that makes a difference.


Are you running Lion or Snow Leopard?




Nikademus -> RE: THE THREAD!!! (11/29/2011 11:32:36 PM)

Mac Mini.

ahhhhhh.....

This explains alot. Thats a whole different beast of Apple product.

Flash drives are no issue for Windows.........as long as you have the proper drivers for it. All our new Dell laptops ordered now come with SSD (flash) drives. Really speeds those puppies up.

Do you know from the specs what brand of SSD drive it is? The manufacturer website probably has a windows driver. course if your successfully booting to Windows, then obviously Windows is at the very least using a generic SSD driver.




Nikademus -> RE: THE THREAD!!! (11/29/2011 11:39:19 PM)

This is a great example of what i'm talking about re: Apple's approach. They want it to be simple as possible, but by being simple, they tell you next to nothing.

The only specifics for the Mac Mini in "configuring" (i.e. customizing) it are:

Video -

Intel HD Graphics 3000 processor with 288MB of DDR3 SDRAM shared with main memory3

or

AMD Radeon HD 6630M graphics processor with 256MB of GDDR5 memory


The PCI controller is probably their new "Thunderbolt" port. I think that might be propriatary.

Ethernet and wireless 'specs' say nothing other than speed. (no manufacturer) However i believe Broadcomm makes these. You can get drivers for it from Broadcomm directly but it's a hit or miss process. I did enable my MacBook Pro's wireless by this method without the Snow Leopard disk.





Mynok -> RE: THE THREAD!!! (11/29/2011 11:42:40 PM)


For those who aren't on Facebook.....my girl critter surveys her domain.

[image]http://a1.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc7/390506_2515796866762_1608446322_32369543_624762371_n.jpg[/image]




Mike Solli -> RE: THE THREAD!!! (11/29/2011 11:47:44 PM)

I'm using Lion.

Does this mean anything: Windows is using "Standard VGA Graphics Adapter". The resolution is greyed out at 800x600. Makes AE pretty worthless. I can't do anything because I see only about a third of the screen. [:@]




Dixie -> RE: THE THREAD!!! (11/30/2011 12:00:41 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Apollo11

Hi all,

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mynok

I didn't see T on today. Unusual for that massive spambot cluster. After his moaning yesterday, makes me a bit concerned.

Did see him pop up on Facebook earlier today though. Maybe just taking a break. [8D]


Kristian is using Facebook? [X(]


Leo "Apolllo11"


He sure is, so I get the occasional angry message in Danish [:D] Makes a change from the ramblings of drunken servicemen that I usually get.




Nikademus -> RE: THE THREAD!!! (11/30/2011 12:19:58 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Mike Solli

I'm using Lion.

Does this mean anything: Windows is using "Standard VGA Graphics Adapter". The resolution is greyed out at 800x600. Makes AE pretty worthless. I can't do anything because I see only about a third of the screen. [:@]


Yes....it means windows is using a generic driver to power your display. You need to get the dedicated driver for your graphics card. According to Apple's website you either have:

Intel HD Graphics 3000 processor with 288MB of DDR3 SDRAM shared with main memory3

or

AMD Radeon HD 6630M graphics processor with 256MB of GDDR5 memory


If your documentation doesn't specify which you can try booting up in OS-X and looking at "About this Mac Mini" in the upper left of your main OS screen. Or you can bull through it by downloading drivers for both types of graphics cards and see which one Windows likes. The smarter written install packages will usually tell you if they can't detect a compatible product for the driver.




Nikademus -> RE: THE THREAD!!! (11/30/2011 12:28:16 AM)

well just confirmed what Mynok said...

I show 64bit drivers on my Snow Leopard disk. You know Mike.....I could probably try email to you one of these and see if it installs. I think Apple uses broadcomm for all their Macs.



[image]local://upfiles/452/C6EB4F14365148DF8619B5C2FC8E614A.jpg[/image]




Nikademus -> RE: THE THREAD!!! (11/30/2011 12:30:06 AM)

Whoops....forgot to expand it. There are Win7 32 and 64 bit drivers in my file list




Nikademus -> RE: THE THREAD!!! (11/30/2011 12:30:21 AM)

and just for you




Nikademus -> RE: THE THREAD!!! (11/30/2011 12:30:32 AM)

Chicky




Nikademus -> RE: THE THREAD!!! (11/30/2011 12:30:44 AM)

boy




Nikademus -> LOG! (11/30/2011 12:30:58 AM)

U




Page: <<   < prev  16 17 [18] 19 20   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI
0.734375