witpqs -> RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent (5/31/2017 4:07:57 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Canoerebel quote:
ORIGINAL: Lowpe That is how you do it...Japan's initial strength in the air gone, and the planes are destroyed on the ground. I wonder if he evacuated the pilots or if you are killing some pilots with each airfield strike? I suspect you might be better served either cutting China in half and hooking up with the Chinese or picking targets closer to Honshu....but since I don't know troop strengths in that area I am simply speculating. With no KB around, I might want to look at how could I activate the Soviets. Activating the Soviets is one of three major possibilities I'm considering now. It's probably third on that list, only because it's something I know the least about. I think I'd have to put enough Western Allied troops in Manchuria to negatively tilt John's garrison requirements. I don't have any idea how much cushion he has at the moment, so I don't know if the task is easy, feasible or long shot. Before pulling the trigger on any operation that will follow Formosa, I definitely have to bring in supply. I'm down to a theater reserve of 60k aboard ships (the rest is already unloaded at various bases and therefore "committed.") Supply is really an issue now. I think I have enough with that 60k to pull off a quick move against an isolated and battered Formosa....if KB stays away. As long as KB is away, my bombardment TFs and bombers can pulverize John's positions. And now my troops are highly prepped for three targets: Takao, Taichu and Taihoku. Most units are in the upper 80s or low 90s. I'm only reading this side to enable me to comment freely. Obviously John knows Formosa is at risk, but I wonder what is his assessment of its status as an Allied target: does he think an invasion is pending or that it will be bypassed for now while the Allied invasions move northward? As far as moving farther north in China, it's just difficult and resource intensive. I don't mean to suggest that it's a bad idea, but it will reduce what you have available elsewhere so it is very much a strategic level decision.
|
|
|
|