|
kevinkins -> RE: Joint Command: PBEM Style Command Multiplayer (9/10/2016 2:35:51 AM)
|
I do not have an opinion one way or the other on MP. Too new to even try playing another human. But here are my two cents based on years working with consumer research testing.
If you combine the two responses for MP it comes in a 4% which puts MP in 7th place out of over > 60 possible responses.
Not too bad if you were 7th in the Masters out of 60 pros (i.e. top 10). The survey is heavily weighted toward the strike planner which does provided concrete direction for the developers. And there are others that are > than 4% that deserve attention ahead of MP for sure. But there are too many possible answers to get a good read on how to prioritize the top 10 responses. For that, you can run a "play off" poll which would drill down better at what players want. It may sound crazy, but by not randomizing the order of the list of sixty possible responses, which is probably too many to begin with, there is a built in bias. Note the higher numbers are at the top of the list. (I am assuming the list order was not presented randomized to each respondent.) Net-Net: MP is a warm topic, not "hot". But running a playoff poll, which is easy to do, would provide a more precise read on player preferences within the top ~10 features this poll identified.
|
|
|
|
