rkr1958 -> RE: Global War AAR in Pictures (3/13/2016 9:43:15 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Courtenay Out of curiosity, why didn't the Japanese destroy the Tokyo MIL instead of either the 6-3 INF or the AT gun, both of which will cost more and take longer to replace? Look wise I valued a 6-2 white print MIL more that a 6-3 regular infantry corps. I guess I was lured by 6 combat value and the white print. It probably was the wrong decision on my part, but my thinking was that I needed the combat value in the near term. quote:
ORIGINAL: Courtenay Who owns Taiyuan? If the Japanese still control it, why didn't the Communist CAV XX capture Taiyuan? This would have cut of one resource from the Japanese, might have given a US entry chit when the Japanese recaptured it, and the CAV would have threatened to charge into Hebei, forcing the Japanese to come up with at least one unit to block it. (If the Chinese have already captured it, then ignore this comment.) Japan does. I missed that one didn't I. I was focused on Mao and what was happening to the south and not to the north. [:(]
|
|
|
|