RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR (Full Version)

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> After Action Report



Message


Orm -> RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR (4/28/2016 7:04:45 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1


quote:

ORIGINAL: Orm


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1

I don't seem to have the throw for Yenan?

I got it and it says that you got a copy.
warspite1

Strange - I got Antwerp at 18:24 then Nanyang at 18:45


I got (adjusted 1 hour for time difference):
Antwerp at 18:26
Nanyang at 18:45
Yenan at 18:48




warspite1 -> RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR (4/28/2016 7:06:04 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Orm


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1


quote:

ORIGINAL: Orm


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1

I don't seem to have the throw for Yenan?

I got it and it says that you got a copy.
warspite1

Strange - I got Antwerp at 18:24 then Nanyang at 18:45


I got (adjusted 1 hour for time difference):
Antwerp at 18:26
Nanyang at 18:45
Yenan at 18:48
warspite1

Just come through. Timed, like yours 3 minutes before Nanyang but arrived 15 mins later.....




AllenK -> RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR (4/28/2016 7:08:45 PM)

Guess it takes longer to relay by semaphore to the bridge of HMS Warspite.




Orm -> RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR (4/28/2016 7:11:48 PM)

Semaphore?!

I want you to know that we use signal flags!

[image]local://upfiles/29130/76063F97DF4246FDB1DF08120FC7313F.jpg[/image]




AllenK -> RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR (4/28/2016 7:14:51 PM)

Well I suppose single flags will also take quite a time.




warspite1 -> RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR (4/28/2016 7:17:45 PM)

Flags! How very topical as I am reading about Jutland at the moment....




AllenK -> RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR (4/28/2016 7:43:37 PM)

Okay, I hope I've interpreted the instructions from Herr Chancellor correctly.

A German LXXI Inf moves adjacent to Lodz. In the West, XII Inf, LXXXVI Garr and supporting PzJg1's occupy Strasbourg. The Alpine Corps occupies the positions east of Antwerp vacated by XII Inf.

The Germans declare 3 land combats and the Japanese 1. Me-109's, flying as fighter-bombers contribute ground-support to an attack on the French XVII Inf.

Final odds

Which tables would the Allies care to select?

Edit: Scratch that. Combat doesn't look right.




AllenK -> RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR (4/28/2016 7:49:18 PM)

Final odds. Which table do the Allies wish to select?

[image]local://upfiles/47730/D46055B6CA0A4CE6B83085D628C60CFF.jpg[/image]




warspite1 -> RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR (4/28/2016 7:52:29 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: AllenK

Final odds. Which table do the Allies wish to select?

[image]local://upfiles/47730/D46055B6CA0A4CE6B83085D628C60CFF.jpg[/image]
warspite1

I assume the Germans have the choice for the 3:1 in France?




Mayhemizer_slith -> RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR (4/28/2016 7:54:42 PM)

I think not, there is only INF and AT gun attacking.




Orm -> RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR (4/28/2016 7:56:38 PM)

Warspite1 - what do you think about all attacks assault except blitz on the art?




AllenK -> RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR (4/28/2016 7:57:59 PM)

I don't think so. The self-propelled artillery doesn't count as Arm/Mech for combat table choice. The rest of the units are Inf and Garrs.




warspite1 -> RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR (4/28/2016 7:59:18 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Orm

Warspite1 - what do you think about all attacks assault except blitz on the art?
warspite1

I agree except the 3:1 - I am tempted for Blitz on that one.......




Orm -> RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR (4/28/2016 8:04:06 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1


quote:

ORIGINAL: Orm

Warspite1 - what do you think about all attacks assault except blitz on the art?
warspite1

I agree except the 3:1 - I am tempted for Blitz on that one.......


I like that to but not when I consider the possibility that Germany get one more clear weather impulse. Then I want assault. [:D]

Edit: It is your call. [:)]




AllenK -> RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR (4/28/2016 8:05:06 PM)

While the world holds its breath .....




warspite1 -> RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR (4/28/2016 8:06:54 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Orm


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1


quote:

ORIGINAL: Orm

Warspite1 - what do you think about all attacks assault except blitz on the art?
warspite1

I agree except the 3:1 - I am tempted for Blitz on that one.......


I like that to but not when I consider the possibility that Germany get one more clear weather impulse. Then I want assault. [:D]
warspite1

If a) the Germans get another impulse we can moan our arses off and b) if they do and the weather is clear we can..... moan our arses off even more!

BLITZ




AllenK -> RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR (4/28/2016 8:09:29 PM)

Just to confirm ...

Assaults in China and Poland, Blitz in the two French combats?




Orm -> RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR (4/28/2016 8:09:50 PM)

So assault in Poland and China. Blitz for the 2 attacks in France. Right?




warspite1 -> RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR (4/28/2016 8:10:28 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: AllenK

Just to confirm ...

Assaults in China and Poland, Blitz in the two French combats?
warspite1

[Peers out from behind his sofa - everything crossed and whimpers] Yes...




AllenK -> RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR (4/28/2016 8:13:49 PM)

The Japanese assault in China goes well.

[image]local://upfiles/47730/55FA401B6D7A40719A999CE8079B7F8C.jpg[/image]




AllenK -> RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR (4/28/2016 8:17:38 PM)

German woe in Poland continues.

[image]local://upfiles/47730/657CAB0E4BA44BE4BD6BC0D7E794BFD1.jpg[/image]




AllenK -> RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR (4/28/2016 8:22:32 PM)

The 3:1 Blitz gets the job done but at a cost and won't be going any further.

[image]local://upfiles/47730/2396F0F67EC94013AF61DF07F1E8DEAC.jpg[/image]




AllenK -> RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR (4/28/2016 8:26:57 PM)

Well, that loss was kind of anticipated.

[image]local://upfiles/47730/6D415B9C56244221B631FD537B12699F.jpg[/image]




warspite1 -> RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR (4/28/2016 8:28:50 PM)

Ormster I am inclined to put the 3-2 with the 3-1 do you agree?




Orm -> RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR (4/28/2016 8:30:01 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1

Ormster I am inclined to put the 3-2 with the 3-1 do you agree?

Now you lost me. [&:][:(]




warspite1 -> RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR (4/28/2016 8:33:28 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Orm


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1

Ormster I am inclined to put the 3-2 with the 3-1 do you agree?

Now you lost me. [&:][:(]
warspite1

Don't worry - scrub that.




AllenK -> RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR (4/28/2016 8:34:45 PM)

Italian fighter rebases from Libya to Sicily.

No reorgs.

Turn continues on a 7.

Back to the Allies.




Orm -> RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR (4/28/2016 8:34:49 PM)

quote:

Don't worry

Do you know me at all? [;)][:D]




warspite1 -> RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR (4/28/2016 8:37:44 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Orm

quote:

Don't worry

Do you know me at all? [;)][:D]
warspite1

I told you we should have done Assault in France. Why don't you listen?




Centuur -> RE: 4 player E-mail: AAR (4/28/2016 8:39:35 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1


quote:

ORIGINAL: Orm

quote:

Don't worry

Do you know me at all? [;)][:D]
warspite1

I told you we should have done Assault in France. Why don't you listen?



This is typical for the Anglo-French relations....




Page: <<   < prev  14 15 [16] 17 18   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI
5.625