RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (Full Version)

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> After Action Report



Message

ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (7/31/2016 4:12:58 PM)

Ok, combat ends in N. Atlantic

Any reaction flights to the CSV and W. Med combats? (see post above for what is in both zones).

Below is an image of the two CW planes that can react to the W. Med. The Hampden could also react to CSV. The FR also have a NAV that can react to the W. Med.

[image]local://upfiles/47448/907C8B82F3A5439EB211F413BC66DED4.jpg[/image]



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (7/31/2016 4:39:59 PM)

(1) Hampden to CSV, 0-box.

(2) The Blenheim will stay grounded for now.

(3) Keep French NAV ground too.



ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (7/31/2016 7:52:41 PM)

Ok,
West Med went the axis way with a 3,10 split.
Below are the results through the first X, you choose the first D, and I'll end with the last D.
Staying for round 2?

[image]local://upfiles/47448/937BB59E296843DAA498B2E015FEAD5F.jpg[/image]



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (7/31/2016 8:16:46 PM)

Put next damage on the Strasbourg. Allies stay.



ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (7/31/2016 9:55:53 PM)

Rnd final results shown below. Rnd 2, both search rolls were 6's. No further contact.

[image]local://upfiles/47448/78ED4D67C55148149A2D9CB37ECBABF4.jpg[/image]



ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (7/31/2016 10:03:07 PM)

CSV, axis roll 2, allies roll 1. CW ends with 2 surprise points.
You can reduce the result against your CA (in the 3-box) from A to ne OR increase the result against the IT from ne to 2A.

[image]local://upfiles/47448/FF7B101E4DB54C68ABD71350D9FB0A14.jpg[/image]



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (7/31/2016 10:10:04 PM)

Increase result to 2A against the Italian subs. Regardless of result, the allies will stay.



ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (7/31/2016 10:21:08 PM)

Kent was aborted as well as both subs.

[image]local://upfiles/47448/4C6ABAF1DA2042E29FCB6069A7AD3DBF.jpg[/image]



ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (7/31/2016 10:22:41 PM)

I aborted the Kent to Gibraltar, if that does not work, let me know.



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (7/31/2016 10:28:52 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ashkpa

I aborted the Kent to Gibraltar, if that does not work, let me know.
Perfect! [:)]



ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (7/31/2016 10:38:18 PM)

The GS results below.
No image for the Paris GS (by the Italians), the disorganized the X INF corp (missed the primary targets).

[image]local://upfiles/47448/D0AD5194DD0949DAB85FF74BA529AE56.jpg[/image]



ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (7/31/2016 11:01:10 PM)

You may support against the one land attack I am making this turn.

[image]local://upfiles/47448/B084D0978EFD47DFA37C28BCACB4A140.jpg[/image]



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (7/31/2016 11:34:54 PM)

The 105 provides support.



ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/1/2016 12:12:37 AM)

Assumed Assault, Net result an 18, you need to lose one unit, which?

[image]local://upfiles/47448/BDF5713951B6437AB5E04C68BCE5536E.jpg[/image]



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/1/2016 12:30:41 AM)

changed mind. 5-4 inf.



ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/1/2016 12:42:22 AM)

Guderian, Von Bock, and Von Leeb used to reorganize most of the front line troops disorganized in that ill thought out attack.
Onto the Allies.



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/1/2016 12:47:28 AM)

I'll need which units initiated combat in the North Atlantic and West Med.



ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/1/2016 12:53:38 AM)

The GE sub 4830 and the GE NAV. Note, I also used the air transport for reorg as well as the 3 HQ's. Note a new game file with the 5-4 as the loss was just sent.



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/1/2016 1:13:48 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ashkpa

The GE sub 4830 and the GE NAV. Note, I also used the air transport for reorg as well as the 3 HQ's. Note a new game file with the 5-4 as the loss was just sent.
Thanks!



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/1/2016 1:39:12 AM)

MJ40. Allied #3. Actions.

[image]local://upfiles/31901/C9749C41124742DD8FB3E57D5C44553F.jpg[/image]



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/1/2016 2:09:22 AM)

MJ40. Allied #3. West Med. North Atlantic.

The allies elect NOT to try to initiate combat in these two sea areas.

Does the axis wish to try to initiate combat in either or both area? If so, which area(s) and which unit(s). Also, do yo wish to commit any additional axis air units?

Background: The French NAV was flown to the Italian Coast, 2-box. No other allied air units are in position to support combat in the West Med with the exception of the French air unit in Paris. I'm not sure if it can react to the 0-box or not in the West Med.

[image]local://upfiles/31901/B93D0933D4F64124B2EF41262DC5FBDB.jpg[/image]



ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/1/2016 2:40:14 AM)

I will pass in the N Atl. In the W. Med I will initiate. React the IT fighter to the 1-box.



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/1/2016 3:21:31 AM)

MJ40. Allied #3. (Non-Phasing Initiated) West Med.

The attempted naval combat in the West Med is anti-climatic. The search rolls (axis-allies) is 8 - 6. No contact by either side.

I'm also showing the RN disposition off the Italian Coast.



[image]local://upfiles/31901/817A809F56D041518E8169C0DA1DC4A6.jpg[/image]



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/1/2016 3:25:28 AM)

MJ40. Allied #3. West Med. Egypt.

Note the Libyan territorial "racing" across central Egypt. That's definitely an irritant!

[image]local://upfiles/31901/E2A2858F996844E786FBFF73A42B05D3.jpg[/image]



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/1/2016 3:47:09 AM)

MJ40. Allied #3. France.

Post movement. No air or land combat.

This ends the allied impulse 3. Back to Pat for our next weather roll and axis impulse 5.

[image]local://upfiles/31901/A7FD0227727342638940AEF9147EC09C.jpg[/image]



ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/1/2016 4:19:25 AM)

Fine weather around the world.

[image]local://upfiles/47448/276F660B21414B84987EDD82B43914B4.jpg[/image]



ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/1/2016 4:26:52 AM)

Axis actions below. Germany plays an offensive chit on Rundstedt.

[image]local://upfiles/47448/2BF1A531C692465AB8DFC78CD84C700B.jpg[/image]



ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/1/2016 5:35:23 AM)

Movements, there are 4 attacks in Europe and none in Asia. Image below shows the 4, the partisan is automatic,
The attack in Belgium is 60:18 at the moment
The attack on Metz is 18.33:4
The attck in the Italian Alps is 20:8

The French may fly the bomber. Do you wish to and to where?

[image]local://upfiles/47448/1DC0F05BF84E42D688386F73A540F291.jpg[/image]



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/1/2016 1:20:10 PM)

1. Boston flies support to the French attacked in Belgium (60:18).

2. For all attacks that the French can select a table, select assault.

3. For losses, take the "least" valuable units (ok to use your best judgement).

4. Vive La France. [:(]




ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/1/2016 9:32:10 PM)

Here are the results of the attacks. With the Reorganizations, I should be good for follow up.

[image]local://upfiles/47448/A6E154EC94E2425089642109668BB982.jpg[/image]



Page: <<   < prev  15 16 [17] 18 19   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI
1.0625