RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (Full Version)

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> After Action Report



Message

rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/3/2016 11:05:06 AM)

Take the 3-2 ARTY as the loss.



ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/3/2016 4:06:19 PM)

Here is the MJ40 impulse 7 ending position - note the turn did not end. European front is not going to plan, though it was nice to break the Maginot and the Italian Alps positions open. In China, I have had more success than I am use to, if I can string a long enough turn together, I should be in great position. I do need to reinforce the Manchurian front. The Russians are looking quite bellicose (see next post).


[image]local://upfiles/47448/78F1F67FEE7C4E909F8592362B8E4C4A.jpg[/image]



ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/3/2016 4:11:39 PM)

And Manchuria

[image]local://upfiles/47448/33D854134BEB4EA89CCAD50DD4EF3512.jpg[/image]



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/6/2016 2:41:20 AM)

MJ40. Allied #8. Actions.

[image]local://upfiles/31901/F7EE7E3018C1426FBC4934890274A4A3.jpg[/image]



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/6/2016 2:43:38 AM)

MJ40. Allied #8. RN Port Strike. La Speiza.

Italian port defense gets the jump on the RN Baffin bombers. You have surprise points.

Do you wish to use your surprise points to increase your AA (x3) or avoid combat?

[image]local://upfiles/31901/CC452434B9D547159DB767E27295C658.jpg[/image]



ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/6/2016 3:47:51 AM)

Avoid



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/6/2016 3:48:16 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ashkpa

Avoid
As you wish, combat avoided.



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/6/2016 3:51:25 AM)

MJ40. Allied #8. Western Med. RN.

The RN elects not to try to initiate combat in the Western Med. The axis aren't given the chance because they have no organized units in the sea area.


[image]local://upfiles/31901/77676B5337E54FD1BE1B9E12E4E9965D.jpg[/image]



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/6/2016 3:52:24 AM)

MJ40. Allied #8. RAF Strategic Bombing.

RAF strategic bombing reduces German production by 1 PP.


[image]local://upfiles/31901/37A6C74D04E1403C9439E05149409644.jpg[/image]



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/6/2016 3:53:25 AM)

MJ40. Allied #8. China.

Post movement, no air or land combat.

[image]local://upfiles/31901/CB12C67C8FD1416F8A84CDBDEFC26B5A.jpg[/image]



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/6/2016 3:54:01 AM)

MJ40. Allied #8. Egypt. Eastern Libya.

Post movement, no air or land combat.

[image]local://upfiles/31901/D6D6194AD863412D82C612C0071C5D57.jpg[/image]



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/6/2016 3:54:34 AM)

MJ40. Allied #8. France.

Post movement, no air or land combat.

[image]local://upfiles/31901/F95CAF017170456FA307407C3F1CDB4D.jpg[/image]



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/6/2016 3:55:49 AM)

MJ40. Allied #8. CW. Nav Reorg.

This ends allied impulse #8.

[image]local://upfiles/31901/34FE796D319D4E1CB31B17CC37690FFF.jpg[/image]



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/6/2016 4:00:26 AM)

MJ40. Allied #8. End of Turn Check.

Our turn continues.

[image]local://upfiles/31901/34B5C987465B4E1F8302DCF1F496BFB8.jpg[/image]



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/6/2016 4:01:09 AM)

MJ40. Axis #9. Weather.

Here's the weather for the next impulse, or impulse pair.

It's back to Pat for his impulse.

[image]local://upfiles/31901/3FD69C694B8D488DBEFC1361C92EAD58.jpg[/image]



ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/6/2016 5:19:56 AM)

The weather probably saves Kunming.



ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/6/2016 6:45:52 AM)

Italy and German took lands. Japan took a combine.

Only one attack and that is in Europe at low odds. Result is ok, but not great.
You get a choice on the loss. I can seen reasons for selecting either, so I'll leave it up to you.

[image]local://upfiles/47448/95B6DDDB5ABA456183EF36CE4E8C9C9D.jpg[/image]



Mayhemizer_slith -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/6/2016 10:57:01 AM)

Can I ask why this attack was an assault? With result 14 it would have costed 3 units for Germany.



Orm -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/6/2016 11:01:55 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Mayhemizer

Can I ask why this attack was an assault? With result 14 it would have costed 3 units for Germany.

Germany had three loss units and didn't just want the French units to appear again as free reinforcements?



cfinch -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/6/2016 2:17:35 PM)

based on screen color looks like france chose -is assault not better for france?



Orm -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/6/2016 2:31:54 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: cfinch

based on screen color looks like france chose -is assault not better for france?

The screen shot is taken when France allocate their loss, hence the blue colour.

Back when the combat type was decided the form would have been grey since it was Germanys call. (More German armour and a clear hex)

And in this case, apparently, the German player thought assault was better for Germany than blitz. Hence the question from Mayhemizer.



ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/6/2016 4:46:55 PM)

quote:

Can I ask why this attack was an assault? With result 14 it would have costed 3 units for Germany.

Thinking back, I believe I thought it was a FR choice. So, it was definitely a mistake on my part if it was GE choice.



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/6/2016 5:16:28 PM)

The French will take the 4-3 infantry corps as the loss.



ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/7/2016 12:24:38 AM)

JP moved a few CPs and a few troops in the south of China and Italy moved a bit in the Italian Alps. Turn does not end.

[image]local://upfiles/47448/CC140C1977744369B3C2C97167B9E8F0.jpg[/image]



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/7/2016 2:27:27 AM)

MJ40. Allied #11. Actions.

[image]local://upfiles/31901/0EAD73B73D6A487FB91BC6B2D2FC7026.jpg[/image]



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/7/2016 2:29:05 AM)

MJ40. Allied #11. France. Baltic.

The French sub still operating in the Baltic without the chance of a safe return looks to get lucky and sink some German CP. However, the search rolls are 3 for the allies and a 10 for the axis. No contact by either side.

[image]local://upfiles/31901/7D30B07DB27C409F9887467ADF743407.jpg[/image]



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/7/2016 2:32:12 AM)

MJ40. Allied #11. RN. West Med.

No combat. No attempt by the allies and no chance to attempt by the axis.

[image]local://upfiles/31901/71544915020944A9A5584113B57006DF.jpg[/image]



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/7/2016 2:36:05 AM)

MJ40. Allied #11. RAF Strategic Bombing.

I got excited when the RAF rolled an unmodified 9, which since the raid was unopposed is modified to a 10. Good deal, I thought. The Germans have lost another PP due to strategic bombing, but they didn't! A roll of 9 wasn't good enough. I have some much to learn.

[image]local://upfiles/31901/2699F02CC51A4A7DB1044C4225413A0E.jpg[/image]



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/7/2016 2:37:46 AM)

MJ40. Allied #11. China.

If things keep going on in China like they are this may be a game where I should surrender China. Before this game I wasn't sure why I would ever do that but Pat is kicking my butt in China.

[image]local://upfiles/31901/761A3997321A418D9B3A2549CE35D3AA.jpg[/image]



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/7/2016 2:38:34 AM)

MJ40. Allied #11. Egypt, Libya. East Med.

Benghazi falls to the CW.

[image]local://upfiles/31901/530C324187944F01B864F14E67C70D38.jpg[/image]



Page: <<   < prev  17 18 [19] 20 21   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI
5.265625