RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (Full Version)

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> After Action Report



Message

rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/7/2016 2:39:23 AM)

MJ40. Allied #11. West Med. The Italian Coast.

[image]local://upfiles/31901/24389B38F4F94234A8DAEE40E4D8CB11.jpg[/image]



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/7/2016 2:39:49 AM)

MJ40. Allied #11. France.

[image]local://upfiles/31901/3DC63BABFCC344508527C5BC0F0C9F70.jpg[/image]



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/7/2016 2:40:23 AM)

MJ40. Allied #11. End of Turn Check.

Our turn continues. Now for the weather ...

[image]local://upfiles/31901/6846DA4ECB4142608BE15C2A4820D813.jpg[/image]



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/7/2016 2:41:06 AM)

MJ40. Axis #13. Weather.

Not a good roll for the Chinese. [:(]

[image]local://upfiles/31901/7FB8DB2CBE6E415E8AF15F6810759C2C.jpg[/image]



ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/7/2016 4:28:19 AM)

quote:

I got excited when the RAF rolled an unmodified 9, which since the raid was unopposed is modified to a 10. Good deal, I thought. The Germans have lost another PP due to strategic bombing, but they didn't! A roll of 9 wasn't good enough. I have some much to learn.


I assumed, Brussels had been hit earlier in the turn. Certainly a 9 would hit if there was a valid target. Might be nice if the game would not let you select a factory hex that had been hit earlier and no longer has a valid SB target.



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/7/2016 4:37:10 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ashkpa

quote:

I got excited when the RAF rolled an unmodified 9, which since the raid was unopposed is modified to a 10. Good deal, I thought. The Germans have lost another PP due to strategic bombing, but they didn't! A roll of 9 wasn't good enough. I have some much to learn.


I assumed, Brussels had been hit earlier in the turn. Certainly a 9 would hit if there was a valid target. Might be nice if the game would not let you select a factory hex that had been hit earlier and no longer has a valid SB target.

It was hit earlier, so I guess that was it?



ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/7/2016 4:44:22 AM)

The JP and GE take lands, Italy a combined. Italy sails 7 ships to the 4-box of the W. Med. Both sides find with a pair of 4's. I'm assuming you will make it a naval air.

[image]local://upfiles/47448/7015B9119D224CC1AEFD3356AA6B9B64.jpg[/image]



ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/7/2016 4:49:35 AM)

AA reduce bombs by two. Net result is a single abort. Who do you wish to apply it to. I assume you will stay for round 2.

[image]local://upfiles/47448/D74D026027EA43EEA3536EA34830B676.jpg[/image]



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/7/2016 5:00:09 AM)

Apply abort to the BB Contre Di Cavour. Yes, I will stay for a second round.



ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/7/2016 5:03:43 AM)

May the axis are finally learning good damage control techniques.

[image]local://upfiles/47448/95A2CD63602544F8A58F8F481CD30FC5.jpg[/image]



ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/7/2016 5:05:07 AM)

Round 2, 6 and 9's don't find and there is no contact.



ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/7/2016 5:43:49 AM)

Two land attacks. One in China, up North-Central, with HQ support. Result shown below. Which two units do you want destroyed. The other will be retreated.

The second attack is on Nice, I did have the FR CA in the 4-box provide defensive SB and the Italian Fleet also provided SB.

I debated a 3rd attack on Antwerp, but there was just too much defensive SB available.

[image]local://upfiles/47448/47DE8A11FB124611827C2F5C69716D1A.jpg[/image]



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/7/2016 6:00:55 AM)

Destroy the two garrisons and retreat the mot div.



ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/7/2016 6:07:16 AM)

Occupy city with the 3-1 Garrison. No US entry.

[image]local://upfiles/47448/1A5F6BC845674BEFA1B8ABE98447B1AC.jpg[/image]



ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/7/2016 6:09:43 AM)

The Nice defenders were just too strong.

[image]local://upfiles/47448/021E705048024B559BA05B9DB441226A.jpg[/image]



ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/7/2016 6:13:00 AM)

The turn did end.

[image]local://upfiles/47448/E069A9D1145F4E6C8C3F35B4DF1274B0.jpg[/image]



ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/7/2016 6:15:47 AM)

No Partisans showed up. Where would you like the RU entry chit to go? off or def?



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/7/2016 7:18:42 AM)

Defensive pool please.



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/7/2016 8:24:30 PM)

MJ40. End of Turn. Destroyed and Repair Pools.

[image]local://upfiles/31901/3A38319BE4BA424BA12C63AA65DC45F4.jpg[/image]



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/7/2016 8:24:56 PM)

MJ40. End of Turn. Victory Totals.

[image]local://upfiles/31901/8F19F3702DF94A18A1761CACF0B201D2.jpg[/image]



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/7/2016 8:28:27 PM)

MJ40. End of Turn. USSR, Preliminary Production.

An interesting feature, see: http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tt.asp?forumid=1319

Basically, I had to "unsave" where Pat was saving one of the USSR traded oil points and "Recompute" in order for that point to go to a Germany factory in order to change where the Soviets were saving one oil point. This was critical as Sverdlovsk already contained 4 saved oil points and couldn't store more.

[image]local://upfiles/31901/7C55B2BB7DDA41719C8B5AF93703DA5E.jpg[/image]



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/7/2016 8:29:17 PM)

MJ40. End of Turn. USSR, Use.

It's back to Pat for axis oil usage.

[image]local://upfiles/31901/0EEBCC0D52B345679F14433A396B7FA6.jpg[/image]



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/7/2016 9:04:36 PM)

MJ40. End of Turn. US Entry Options.

The USA added another chit to the Japanese entry pool. They did not select any option this turn. They had their heart set on option 16, "Gift of destroyers to Commonwealth", but didn't have the numbers to make that happen.

[image]local://upfiles/31901/717904A7A3FC457F9CDA884BAE85671C.jpg[/image]



ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/7/2016 10:22:16 PM)

Axis had to leave the following disorganized, Germany: 2 ships and a fighter; Italy: 3 CAs; Japan: one transport.
(I would have liked to have left one JP CP disorganized, but it was in a 2 CP counter and could not be split from that screen).



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/7/2016 11:00:59 PM)

MJ40. End of Turn. Use Oil, USSR.

[image]local://upfiles/31901/FDC9EC828570418281A5E4A6E8AF2B73.jpg[/image]



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/7/2016 11:01:25 PM)

MJ40. End of Turn. Use Oil, USA.

[image]local://upfiles/31901/30A34AFF60DF4B608A5D2A336C3CFDF2.jpg[/image]



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/7/2016 11:12:04 PM)

MJ40. End of Turn. Use Oil, Active Allies.

[image]local://upfiles/31901/78C24B22D18D40B0AEA9131E1B2C18C6.jpg[/image]



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/7/2016 11:12:45 PM)

MJ40. End of Turn. Production Planning Final, Neutral Allies.

[image]local://upfiles/31901/3D75DCA8548141F09604EF14462D91D2.jpg[/image]



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/7/2016 11:13:09 PM)

MJ40. End of Turn. Production Planning Final, Active Allies.

[image]local://upfiles/31901/E75C3213743E4B3C89195B2CCD1FF38F.jpg[/image]



ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/7/2016 11:45:48 PM)

Here is the axis final production. Axis did not scrap any units.

[image]local://upfiles/47448/99ED1949566B45519169F835E5C6A15C.jpg[/image]



Page: <<   < prev  18 19 [20] 21 22   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI
0.8886719