RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (Full Version)

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> After Action Report



Message

rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (9/16/2017 6:50:13 PM)

Turn 22. Mar/Apr 1943. Allied #1. Arabian Sea. Potential Naval Combat.

The RN will not attempt to initiate, but the IJN can. If they do try, one Japanese fighter unit is in position to react.

Instructions?

[image]local://upfiles/31901/442B5728198C4BBF85D18B93836C6362.jpg[/image]



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (9/16/2017 6:51:20 PM)

Turn 22. Mar/Apr 1943. Allied #1. West Med. Potential Sub Combat.

The RN will attempt to initiate a sub combat in the Western Med. Shown are the planes that can react.

Instructions?

[image]local://upfiles/31901/972821A203BC403CA4C6F6599D88D62C.jpg[/image]



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (9/16/2017 6:52:24 PM)

Turn 22. Mar/Apr 1943. Allied #1. East Med. No Combat.

The RN will not attempt to initiate combat in the Eastern Med. The axis can't.

[image]local://upfiles/31901/33F6A22E13D24DBBB89277309451524E.jpg[/image]



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (9/16/2017 6:53:58 PM)

Turn 22. Mar/Apr 1943. Allied #1. The Solomons. Potential Naval Combat.

The USN/RN will not attempt to initiate combat in the Solomons; however the Japanese can if they wish. Shown are the planes that can react if an attempt is made.

Instructions?

[image]local://upfiles/31901/FDE30B7FBAE64AE193FD0FEF2D77D3FF.jpg[/image]



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (9/16/2017 6:55:10 PM)

Turn 22. Mar/Apr 1943. Allied #1. Coral Sea. Potential Naval Combat.

The USN/RN will not attempt to initiate combat the Coral Sea; however the Japanese can if they wish. No planes are in position to react if an attempt is made.

Instructions?

[image]local://upfiles/31901/D2C35591C85B4794ADD3E764160FC9AE.jpg[/image]



ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (9/16/2017 10:10:23 PM)

quote:

A USN Carrier Task force originating from Peal and headed to the Coral Sea passes though the Solomons Sea, which contains an IJN I-boat flotilla on the prowl for allied convoys and supply ships. Without consulting his higher naval command the local commander of the Japanese flotilla decides not to order his I-boats to search from this task force. This local commander hopes that his actions do not bring shame to himself; otherwise he'll be obliged to open his sub hatch and do the honorable thing.

In other words, I made the decision for the Japanese sub not to attempt to intercept. I do hope that was ok.
The commander gets to keep is head. I would have done the same.



ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (9/16/2017 10:12:28 PM)

quote:

Turn 22. Mar/Apr 1943. Allied #1. South China Sea. Potential Sub Combat.

The RN sub group will attempt to initiate a sub combat in the South China Sea. One IJN NAV unit is in position to react.

Instructions?
React NAV to the 0-box.



ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (9/16/2017 10:14:50 PM)

quote:

Turn 22. Mar/Apr 1943. Allied #1. Arabian Sea. Potential Naval Combat.

The RN will not attempt to initiate, but the IJN can. If they do try, one Japanese fighter unit is in position to react.

Instructions?
React the Zero to the highest box it can reach. Then sink the CP, please.



ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (9/16/2017 10:20:00 PM)

quote:

Turn 22. Mar/Apr 1943. Allied #1. West Med. Potential Sub Combat.

The RN will attempt to initiate a sub combat in the Western Med. Shown are the planes that can react.

Instructions?
The Sparviero will react to the 2-box (or as high as it can reach).
The 6pt Macchi (in Libya) will react to the 0-box. Hurt the subs if there is enough surprise to get them out of the area, otherwise avoid combat.



ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (9/16/2017 10:21:12 PM)

quote:

Turn 22. Mar/Apr 1943. Allied #1. The Solomons. Potential Naval Combat.

The USN/RN will not attempt to initiate combat in the Solomons; however the Japanese can if they wish. Shown are the planes that can react if an attempt is made.

Instructions?
I will hold back for now.



ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (9/16/2017 10:22:01 PM)

quote:

Turn 22. Mar/Apr 1943. Allied #1. Coral Sea. Potential Naval Combat.

The USN/RN will not attempt to initiate combat the Coral Sea; however the Japanese can if they wish. No planes are in position to react if an attempt is made.

Instructions?
I will not search at this time.



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (9/17/2017 4:12:50 PM)

Turn 22. Mar/Apr 1940. Allied #1. RN, South China Sea. Round 1.

The RN sub group rolls well, however, the IJN roll just as well.

[image]local://upfiles/31901/6062AD02C8B84ADA966D2050A8D59BE1.jpg[/image]



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (9/17/2017 4:14:34 PM)

Turn 22. Mar/Apr 1940. Allied #1. RN, West Med. Round 1.

Another very good roll by the RN, but again one that is matched by their opponent, which is the Italians in this case.

Round 2.

Both sides stay for a second round. However, with search rolls of 10 (allies) and 3 (axis), combat ends.

[image]local://upfiles/31901/74ECE702ABB04DBF9E19E9A18AA9634A.jpg[/image]



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (9/17/2017 4:15:24 PM)

Turn 22. Mar/Apr 1940. Allied #1. IJN, The Arabian Sea. Round 1.

Both search rolls fail ... no contact.

[image]local://upfiles/31901/AC0172050A5145A8A4DD4CAED0EB30DC.jpg[/image]



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (9/17/2017 4:30:37 PM)

Turn 22. Mar/Apr 1943. Allied #1. US Air Reorg.

[image]local://upfiles/31901/1E9C569911954A2B897D2294D302B76B.jpg[/image]



ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (9/19/2017 4:22:48 AM)

MA43 i3 Axis Actions

[image]local://upfiles/47448/CF80C519C3D3428395C7A4109C92A3FF.jpg[/image]



ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (9/19/2017 4:28:02 AM)

MA43 i3 Possible Axis Naval Search Options shown.
Polynesia rolls 5/1 -> nc
Tasman Sea rolls 9/9 -> nc
The Solomons, no search initiated
SE Indian Ocean rolls 8/8 -> nc
Cape Naturliste (see following post)
Bay of Bengal, no searches initiated
Arabian Sea (see following post)
North Atlantic (see following post)
East Coast rolls of 7/6 -> nc
W. Med, no searches initiated
E. Med rolls of 9/10 -> nc
BoB (see following post)

[image]local://upfiles/47448/0CF4A1D1A6584F70B449AC08E36229A4.jpg[/image]



ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (9/19/2017 4:29:02 AM)

Cape Naturaliste rolls of 1/4 resulted in Axis finding and sinking the CP.

[image]local://upfiles/47448/661AB53B865A4625813D99AB11753374.jpg[/image]



ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (9/19/2017 4:30:19 AM)

Arabian Sea rolls of 4/3 resulted in both sides finding. I made it a Naval air. CA was damaged.
Second round rolls (assumed you would stay) of 9/7 resulted in no further contact.



[image]local://upfiles/47448/DB150C5C950746689631B6C5D95694DF.jpg[/image]



ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (9/19/2017 4:35:25 AM)

In the North Atlantic rolls of 9/3 resulted in you finding with 6 surprise points. I made the surprise use decision for you. You could guarantee the sub was out of the zone and only take 1 aborted. Potentially sinking the sub (which you did). It worked out well for you with the aborted ship making it's saving throw and staying in the sub free area.

[image]local://upfiles/47448/ACC9B06771BF4AE4888F194857B7DAAB.jpg[/image]



ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (9/19/2017 4:36:33 AM)

Last BoB where rolls of 7/1 results in you finding me with 6 surprise points. Options here are a little closer, so I'll let you decide.
Note, storms means it cannot be a naval air combat.

[image]local://upfiles/47448/D909E0F44DD84756A7582EA8B6F495D2.jpg[/image]



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (9/19/2017 12:32:27 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ashkpa

Last BoB where rolls of 7/1 results in you finding me with 6 surprise points. Options here are a little closer, so I'll let you decide.
Note, storms means it cannot be a naval air combat.
With no allied battleships present and unable to use my carrier air I think the better part of valor is to avoid combat. So, use 4 of the 6 SP's to avoid combat please.



ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (9/19/2017 9:07:02 PM)

Avoided.
Only 1 ground strike, ART on Lisbon. Very successful.

[image]local://upfiles/47448/E97BBA24CC274F6EBCC21FFDEF59F0A5.jpg[/image]



ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (9/19/2017 9:08:33 PM)

Only 1 land attack, on the Partisan in China. It was automatic (for those interested the combat roll was 15)

[image]local://upfiles/47448/C109EC739506458692F76DF27F26F37F.jpg[/image]



ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (9/19/2017 9:09:16 PM)

MA43 i5 weather roll of 3.

[image]local://upfiles/47448/6BC161CDDC454F669A1E6F6A54CA9F24.jpg[/image]



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (9/21/2017 11:15:46 PM)

Turn 22. Mar/Apr 1943. Allied #5. Actions. Weather Map.

[image]local://upfiles/31901/86D8E9A209754F17A03EC923469569EE.jpg[/image]



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (9/21/2017 11:47:25 PM)

Turn 22. Mar/Apr 1943. Allied #5. RN Naval Moves (Combine Action).

(1) 2 CP's from Cape Town, South Africa to Southeastern Indian Ocean.

(2) 1 CP from Adelaide, Australia to Cape Naturaliste.



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (9/21/2017 11:48:37 PM)

Turn 22. Mar/Apr 1943. Allied #5. RN. US East Cast. No Combat.

RN chooses not to attempt to initiate and the axis cannot try.

[image]local://upfiles/31901/7AC6EF0B0C1E44B689983590BB88E808.jpg[/image]



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (9/21/2017 11:49:07 PM)

Turn 22. Mar/Apr 1943. Allied #5. RN. Coral Sea. No Combat.

RN chooses not to attempt to initiate and the axis cannot try.

[image]local://upfiles/31901/3BF4ED8C94D946AD981BAD977CCF32B6.jpg[/image]



rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (9/21/2017 11:51:15 PM)

Turn 22. Mar/Apr 1943. Allied #5. RN. Bay of Bengal. No Combat.

RN chooses not to attempt to initiate and the axis cannot try.

[image]local://upfiles/31901/6ABCA8CC0D7642DC8285FB9CA6FAEAFF.jpg[/image]



Page: <<   < prev  90 91 [92] 93 94   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI
1.84375